This new law bans Red No. 40 from sale, distribution in Delaware schools. What to know
Delaware is the latest state to ban Red No. 40 in schools.
Here's how the new law came about.
Senate Bill 69 was introduced on March 11 by Sen. Eric Buckson, R-South Dover, and aims to protect students in the First State from the potential health risks associated with Food, Drug and Cosmetic Red No. 40, a synthetic food dye made from petroleum. It contains benzene, a cancer-causing substance.
SB 69 prohibits the sale or distribution of foods and beverages containing Red No. 40 during the school day in Delaware school districts and charter schools. This includes items sold in vending machines on campus or served a la carte.
Recent concerns over the impact of synthetic food dyes on children's health, including potential links to behavioral issues and hyperactivity, were cited as reasons for the proposed ban.
SB 69 was signed into law by Gov. Matt Meyer on May 22, with the restrictions on Red No. 40 to take effect by July 1, 2026, allowing schools and education officials time to prepare for the transition. This makes Delaware only the second state, behind California, to ban Red No. 40 in schools. At least six other states have introduced similar legislation.
Senate Bill 41 is a similar bill in Delaware that aims to ban Red No. 3 statewide, another synthetic food dye. This bill has yet to be decided on.
More on proposed Red No. 3 ban: Along with the FDA ban, Delaware legislators seek to ban use of Red No. 3 in the state
Red No. 40 is widely used and found in a variety of foods, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, according to Healthline, including:
Flavored milk
Yogurt
Pudding
Ice cream
Popsicles
Cakes and other pastries
Candy
Gum
Breakfast cereals and bars
Fruit snacks
Gelatin
Chips
Powdered drink mixes, including some protein powders
Soda
Sports drinks
Energy drinks
More legislation news: Medical aid in dying becomes law, Inspector General bill passes Senate: The Press Room
If Red No. 40 is in a product, it will be listed on the label as:
Red 40
Red 40 Lake
FD&C Red No. 40
FD&C Red No. 40 Aluminum Lake
Allura Red AC
CI Food Red 17
INS No. 129
E129
Sidewalk parking violations: Wilmington officials address complaints about vehicles parked on sidewalk
Got a tip or a story idea? Contact Krys'tal Griffin atkgriffin@delawareonline.com.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Red No. 40 banned in Delaware schools, second US state to do so
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Some popular foods may soon require warning labels in Texas
The Brief Texas could be among the first states to require warning labels on foods containing artificial dyes and some chemicals. Senate Bill 25 is waiting for Gov. Abbott's signature. The bill includes an increased physical activity requirement for middle school students and nutrition education for undergraduate students at colleges and universities. AUSTIN, Texas - The next time a Texan buys a Mountain Dew or a bag of Nacho Cheese Doritos, they might find a warning that it contains ingredients that other countries say shouldn't be eaten. Senate Bill 25 currently sits on Gov. Greg Abbott's desk awaiting his signature. The bill would require products that contain certain food additives to have a warning label that says those additives are "not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom." The warning label must be placed in a "prominent and reasonably visible" location on the packaging and must be easily readable on the background of the packaging. The bill would only apply to packages produced after Jan. 1, 2027. More than 40 ingredients that could trigger the warning label under the Make Texas Healthy Again bill. READ MORE: FDA aims to eliminate petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food by end of 2026 The ingredients that would trigger the warning label include: Acetylayed esters of mono- and diglycerides (acetic acid ester) Anisole Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) Bleached flour Blue 1 (CAS 3844-45-9) Blue 2 (CAS 860-22-0) Bromated flour Calcium bromate Canthaxanthin Certified food colors by the United States Food and Drug Administration Citrus red 2 (CAS 6358-53-8) Diacetyl Diacetyl tartaric and fatty acid esters of mono- and diglycerides (DATEM) Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) Ficin Green 3 (CAS 2353-45-9) Interesterified palm oil Interesterified soybean oil Lactylated fatty acid esters of glycerol and propylene glycol Lye Morpholine Olestra Partially hydrogenated oil (PHO) Potassium aluminum sulfate Potassium bromate Potassium iodate Propylene oxide Propylparaben Red 3 (CAS 16423-68-0) Red 4 (CAS 4548-53-2) Red 40 (CAS 25956-17-6) Sodium aluminum sulfate Sodium lauryl sulfate Sodium stearyl fumarate Stearyl tartrate Synthetic trans fatty acid Thiodipropionic acid Titanium dioxide Toluene Yellow 5 (CAS 1934-21-0) Yellow 6 (CAS 2783-94-0) Beyond the food warning labels, SB25 mandates more time for health and exercise in public schools. Currently, students in grades six, seven and eight are required to participate in four semesters of at least 30 minutes of physical activity daily. That number would increase to six semesters under SB 25. In higher education, students in an undergraduate degree program would be required to take a class in nutrition education as developed by the Texas Nutrition Advisory Committee. The committee would be appointed by the governor by Dec. 31, 2025. The seven-member committee would at least include: One expert in metabolic health, culinary medicine, lifestyle medicine, or integrative medicine One licensed physician certified in functional medicine One member representing the Texas Department of Agriculture One member representing a rural community One member representing an urban community One pediatrician specializing in metabolic health Doctors and nurses would be required to complete continuing education on nutrition and metabolic health in order to remain licensed in Texas. The Source Information on Senate Bill 25 comes from the Texas Legislature. Information on products containing artificial dyes comes from those individual ingredient labels.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ascletis Announces Phase III Trial of Denifanstat (ASC40), a First-in-Class, Once-Daily Oral FASN Inhibitor for Acne, Meets All Endpoints
Denifanstat (ASC40), a once-daily oral fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitor, demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement compared to placebo in all primary, key secondary, and secondary endpoints Denifanstat demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile Denifanstat was 98% and 178% more effective than U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved sarecycline and doxycycline with regard to placebo-adjusted percent treatment success, respectively, 18.6% for denifanstat versus 9.4% for sarecycline, 18.6% versus 6.7% for doxycycline Denifanstat was 60% more effective than FDA-approved clascoterone cream with regard to placebo-adjusted percent treatment success, 18.6% for denifanstat versus 11.6% for clascoterone cream, respectively The exceptional efficacy of denifanstat coupled with its favorable safety profile in the Phase III trial provides a potential major break-through for the treatment of acne HONG KONG, June 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ascletis Pharma Inc. (HKEX: 1672, "Ascletis") announces today that denifanstat (ASC40), a first-in-class, once-daily oral small molecule fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitor, meets all primary, key secondary, and secondary endpoints in the Phase III clinical trial for the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris (NCT06192264). The Phase III clinical trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial in China to evaluate the safety and efficacy of denifanstat once-daily oral tablet in 480 patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Patients were enrolled and randomized into one active treatment arm and one placebo control arm at the ratio of 1:1 to receive 50 mg denifanstat oral tablet once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between denifanstat and placebo arms. Table 1 summarizes some of baseline characteristics. Primary, key secondary, and secondary endpoints can be found in Table 2. Primary endpoints included the percent treatment success (defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-point decrease in IGA from baseline at week 12), the percent reduction from baseline in total lesion count, and the percent reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesion count. At week 12, percent treatment success was 33.2% compared to 14.6% for placebo, p<0.0001, percent reduction from baseline in total lesion count was 57.4% compared to 35.4% for placebo, p<0.0001, and percent reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesion count was 63.5% compared to 43.2% for placebo, p<0.0001. The key secondary endpoint, percent reduction from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count at week 12, was 51.9% compared to 28.9% for placebo, p<0.0001. Denifanstat demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile following 12 weeks of once-daily oral administration at 50 mg. The incidence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between denifanstat and placebo. No incidence rates of TEAEs related to study drug in any category exceeded 10%. Only two categories of TEAEs had an incidence rate of more than 5% (6.3% dry skin in denifanstat-treated patients versus 2.9% in the placebo group; 5.9% dry eye in denifanstat-treated patients versus 3.8% in the placebo group). All denifanstat-related adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. There were no denifanstat-related grade 3 or 4 AEs and no denifanstat-related serious AEs (SAEs). No deaths were reported. The mechanisms of action of denifanstat for the treatment of acne are (1) direct inhibition of facial sebum production, through inhibition of de novo lipogenesis (DNL) in human sebocytes; and (2) inhibition of inflammation, through decreasing cytokine secretion and Th17 differentiation. Denifanstat's unique mechanism of action directly reduces one of the main underlying causes of acne which is the overproduction of sebum. This makes denifanstat unique as most other acne treatments do not treat the underlying cause of the condition. "We are extremely pleased with the topline results of our Phase III trial. Denifanstat tablets demonstrated impressive efficacy beyond treatment success, showing significant reductions in total lesion count, inflammatory lesion count, and non-inflammatory lesion count. We are excited to be submitting this innovative treatment with the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) soon." said Jinzi Jason Wu, Ph.D., Founder, Chairman and CEO of Ascletis. Table 3 highlights the excellent efficacy of denifanstat in a non-head-to-head comparison to other commonly used oral and topical acne treatments. Denifanstat demonstrated its exceptional efficacy across multiple key metrics compared to sarecycline, doxycycline and clascoterone cream. With regard to the placebo-adjusted percent treatment success and the placebo-adjusted percent reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesion count, denifanstat was 98% and 30% more effective than sarecycline, respectively, 178% and 178% more effective than doxycycline, respectively, and 60% and 59% more effective than clascoterone cream, respectively. With regard to the placebo-adjusted percent reduction from baseline in total lesion count, denifanstat was 189% and 85% more effective than doxycycline and clascoterone cream, respectively. With regard to the placebo-adjusted percent reduction from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count, denifanstat was 411% and 102% more effective than sarecycline and clascoterone cream, respectively. Denifanstat has the potential to be a first-in-class, once-daily, oral acne therapeutic, potentially offering both exceptional efficacy and patient compliance with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Compared to other oral acne treatments, denifanstat provides outstanding efficacy with excellent safety. There is no potential for antibiotic resistance or off target effects which can occur with tetracycline derivatives and no reported denifanstat-related severe AEs such as hepatotoxicity, hearing impairment and depression which are seen with isotretinoin. Denifanstat should also provide better adherence to treatment compared to topical therapies: an estimated 30% to 40% of patients do not adhere to their topical treatments[1]. Denifanstat is licensed from Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (Nasdaq: SGMT) for exclusive rights in Greater China. "The Phase III clinical trial results for denifanstat are highly encouraging. The data demonstrate statistically significant improvements in treatment outcomes for moderate-to-severe acne patients, with percent treatment success of 33.2%, total lesion count reduction of 57.4% from baseline, inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts decreasing by 63.5% and 51.9%, respectively, while maintaining a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Denifanstat's first-in-class mechanism targeting FASN directly addresses a key cause for acne, establishing it as a groundbreaking therapeutic approach in acne treatment." said Prof. Leihong Xiang, Chief Physician of Dermatological Department, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Executive Deputy Director of Institute of Dermatology, Fudan University, Deputy Director of Dermatology Division of Chinese Medical Doctor Association and principal investigator of denifanstat Phase III trial for moderate to severe acne. [1] Purvis CG, Balogh EA, Feldman SR. Clascoterone: How the Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitor Fits Into the Acne Treatment Paradigm. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(10):1297-1299. doi:10.1177/1060028021992055. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of Phase III trial of denifanstat Baseline characteristics 50 mg denifanstat, oral, oncedaily (n=240) Placebo, oral, once daily (n=240) Total lesion count 102.2 102.1 Inflammatory lesion count 42.1 43.1 IGA=3 (moderate), % 85.8 85.8 IGA=4 (severe), % 14.2 14.2 Table 2. Efficacy endpoints of 50 mg denifanstat oral, once daily at week 12 versus placebo (intent-to-treat, ITT, analysis) Efficacy endpoints (1) 50 mg denifanstat, oral, once daily (n=240) Placebo, oral,once daily (n=240) Placebo adjusted p value Percent treatment success (2) (primary endpoint) 33.2 14.6 18.6 <0.0001 Percent reduction from baseline in total lesion count (primary endpoint) 57.4 35.4 22.0 <0.0001 Percent reduction from baseline ininflammatory lesion count (primary endpoint) 63.5 43.2 20.3 <0.0001 Percent reduction from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count (key secondary endpoint) 51.9 28.9 23.0 <0.0001 Absolute reduction from baseline intotal lesion count (secondary endpoint) 58.3 36.2 22.1 <0.0001 Absolute reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesion count (secondaryendpoint) 26.6 18.4 8.2 <0.0001 Notes: (1) All efficacy endpoints are least square means.(2) Treatment success is defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-point decrease in IGA from baseline at week 12. Table 3. Denifanstat compared to other commonly used acne treatments (not head-to-head comparison) Category Denifanstat (n=240) Sarecycline(1) (n=1002) Doxycycline(2) (n=216) Clascoterone cream(3) (n=722) Baseline characteristics Total lesion count 102.2 72.4 71.7 103.6 Inflammatory lesion count 42.1 30.0 33.6 42.7 IGA=3 (moderate), % 85.8 85.2 93.5 82.7 IGA=4 (severe), % 14.2 14.9 6.5 17.3 Efficacy endpoints at week 12 Placebo-adjusted percenttreatment success 18.6 9.4 6.7 11.6 Placebo-adjusted percent reductionfrom baseline in total lesion count 22.0 NA 7.6 11.9 Placebo-adjusted percent reductionfrom baseline in inflammatorylesion count 20.3 15.6 7.3 12.8 Placebo-adjusted percent reduction from baseline in non-inflammatorylesion count 23.0 4.5 NA 11.4 Notes: (1) The sarecycline data represent an analysis of its two Phase III clinical trials, with values expressed as means. The data are from Moore, A., et al., J Drugs Dermatol 2018 Vol. 17 Issue 9 Pages 987-996. The non- inflammatory lesion count data are from FDA ( The doxycycline data at week 16 are from Moore, A., et al., J Drugs Dermatol 2015 Vol. 14 Issue 6 Pages 581-6.(3) The clascoterone cream (1%) data represent an analysis of its two Phase III clinical trials, with values expressed as means. The data are from Hebert. A, et al., JAMA Dermatology 2020 Vol. 156 Issue 6, DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0465. About Ascletis Pharma Inc. Ascletis is an innovative R&D driven biotech listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange ( covering the entire value chain from discovery and development to GMP manufacturing. Led by a management team with deep expertise and a proven track record, Ascletis is focused on metabolic diseases by addressing unmet medical needs from a global perspective. Ascletis has multiple clinical stage drug candidates in its metabolic disease pipeline. For more information, please visit Contact: Peter VozzoICR Healthcare443-231-0505 (U.S.) Ascletis Pharma Inc. PR and IR teams+86-181-0650-9129 (China)pr@ ir@ View original content: SOURCE Ascletis Pharma Inc. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trevi Therapeutics Announces Pricing of $100 Million Underwritten Offering of Common Stock
NEW HAVEN, Conn., June 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Trevi Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: TRVI), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing the investigational therapy Haduvio™ (oral nalbuphine ER) for the treatment of chronic cough in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC), today announced the pricing of its previously announced underwritten public offering of 17,400,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $5.75 per share, for total proceeds of $100 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses payable by Trevi. All of the shares in the offering are being sold by Trevi. In addition, Trevi has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 2,610,000 additional shares of its common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The offering is expected to close on or about June 5, 2025, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions. Morgan Stanley, Leerink Partners, Stifel and Cantor are acting as joint book-running managers for the offering. The shares are being offered by Trevi pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-273030), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29, 2023, amended on August 11, 2023 and declared effective by the SEC on August 15, 2023. This offering is being made only by means of a prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus that form a part of the registration statement. A preliminary prospectus supplement relating to and describing the terms of the offering has been filed with the SEC and is available on the SEC's website located at The final terms of the offering will be disclosed in a final prospectus supplement to be filed with the SEC. When available, copies of the preliminary prospectus supplement, final prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus may also be obtained from Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10014, or by email at prospectus@ Leerink Partners LLC, Attention: Syndicate Department, 53 State Street, 40th Floor, Boston, MA 02109, or by telephone at (800) 808-7525, ext. 6105, or by email at syndicate@ Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Attention: Syndicate, One Montgomery Street, Suite 3700, San Francisco, CA 94104, by telephone at (415) 364-2720 or by email at syndprospectus@ or Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Attention: Capital Markets, 110 East 59th Street, New York 10022, or by email at prospectus@ This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. About Trevi Therapeutics, Inc. Trevi Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing the investigational therapy Haduvio™ (oral nalbuphine extended-release) for the treatment of chronic cough in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC). Haduvio acts on the cough reflex arc both centrally and peripherally as a kappa agonist and a mu antagonist (KAMA), targeting opioid receptors that play a key role in controlling chronic cough. Nalbuphine is not currently scheduled by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the anticipated closing of the public offering and the expected gross proceeds of the offering, among other things, and other statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "may," and similar expressions. Risks that contribute to the uncertain nature of the forward-looking statements include: uncertainties related to market conditions and whether the conditions for the closing of the public offering will be satisfied, as well as other risks and uncertainties, as well as other risks and uncertainties set forth in the "Risk Factors" section of the preliminary prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on June 2, 2025, in Trevi's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 filed with the SEC, and in any subsequent filings with the SEC. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made. Trevi undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made except as required by law. Investor Contact Jonathan CarlsonTrevi Therapeutics, Inc.(203) 654 3286carlsonj@ Media Contact Rosalia Scampoli914-815-1465 rscampoli@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Trevi Therapeutics, Inc.
