Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule.
Advertisement
The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Advertisement
On Wednesday, Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.'
She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.'
Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.'
Most Republicans have staunchly defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action.
'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters.
But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict.
'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.'
Advertisement
Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record.
'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said.
While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell.
The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear program.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows How Much Each NATO Member Contributes as Trump Touts Increase
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump on Wednesday touted a plan for NATO member states to raise defense spending to 5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) as a "monumental win" for the United States. The agreement addresses Trump's long-standing concern about NATO members not carrying their weight. Newsweek reached out to the alliance for comment via email. Why It Matters NATO leaders committed increasing their defense spending on Wednesday following pressure from Trump, who for years has raised concerns that the U.S. was paying more than its fair share of spending. Under the plan, nearly every country in the military alliance will increase investments to the 5 percent by 2035. Leaders wrote in a declaration that the agreement is reaffirmation to their "ironclad commitment to collective [defense] as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty," which states that an attack on one NATO member shall be treated as an attack against all. The agreement was signed with a backdrop of a world dealing with crises. The yearslong war between Russia and Ukraine continues. World leaders have been trying, but struggling, for years to broker a deal to end the armed conflict. Meanwhile, tensions have flared up in the Middle East amid the battle between Iran and Israel, with Trump striking several Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. Iran has since retaliated against U.S. military bases, and Trump has pushed for a ceasefire. What To Know The agreement means many NATO countries will be dramatically increasing their defense investments over the coming years, as many are far from the 5 percent mark. The declaration states that the spending must be on "core defense requirements" as well as "defense-and security-related spending." "Our investments will ensure we have the forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, warfighting readiness, and resilience needed to deter and defend in line with our three core tasks of deterrence and defense, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security," the declaration reads. At the moment, Poland is the NATO member state spending the most per GDP on defense investments, according to the latest data from the alliance, at 4.12 percent. Estonia follows with 3.43 percent and the U.S. places third with 3.38 percent. Conversely, Belgium, Canada, Italy and Spain each spend less than 1.5 percent. Trump celebrated the declaration in remarks to reporters on Wednesday. President Donald Trump speaks at a news conference in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25. President Donald Trump speaks at a news conference in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25."In a very historic milestone this week, the NATO allies committed to dramatically increase their defense spending to that 5 percent of GDP, something that no one really thought was possible, and they said, 'You did it sir, you did it.' I don't know if I did it, but I think I did," Trump said. The president said it will add more than $1 trillion per year to common defense. "This is a monument, really, to victory. But it's a monumental win for the United States because we were carrying much more than our fair share." Spain Says It's Unable to Meet Spending Requirement, Sparks Trump's Ire Some NATO member states have expressed concerns about whether it is realistic to increase defense spending so much over the next decade. Spain has already said it will not be able to do so, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez describing the requirement as "unreasonable," the Associated Press (AP) reported. He announced a deal earlier this week that would allow Spain to remain part of NATO without having to increase defense spending to 5 percent of its GDP. "We must protect Europe. But we must also protect what makes it unique in the world: its welfare state and its commitment to diplomacy, development aid, and peace," he wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter. However, Trump expressed frustration. "I think Spain is terrible, what they've done. They're the only country that won't pay the full—they want to stay at 2 percent. I think it's terrible. And you know, they're doing very well. Their economy is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water with something bad happening," he said. He added that he could make Spain "pay twice as much" as he negotiates a trade deal with Madrid. What People Are Saying NATO leaders wrote in their declaration: "We reaffirm our shared commitment to rapidly expand transatlantic defense industrial cooperation and to harness emerging technology and the spirit of innovation to advance our collective security. We will work to eliminate defense trade barriers among Allies and will leverage our partnerships to promote defense industrial cooperation." United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer said, per the AP: "This is the moment to unite, for Europe to make a fundamental shift in its posture and for NATO to meet this challenge head-on." What Happens Next NATO members have until 2035 to increase their spending to comply with the declaration. How Trump's negotiations play out with Spain has yet to be seen.
Hamilton Spectator
42 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Donald Trump likens U.S. strike on Iran to WWII atomic strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
An American intervention likened to the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in World War II has set back Iran's nuclear program by 'decades,' U.S. President Donald Trump claims. Speaking at a gathering of NATO leaders in The Hague, Trump disputed reports that the bunker buster bombs dropped by American war planes during the Israel-Iran war had failed to completely destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities. CNN, which first reported on the confidential Pentagon assessment, said that the attacks had delayed Iran's nuclear production efforts by just a few months. The report contradicts statements from U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's The report contradicts statements from U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's Describing as 'scum' those journalists who reported on the assessment that there had been only limited damage to Iran's nuclear program, Trump said that the intelligence was 'very inconclusive' and concluded that the damage 'could have been very severe.' Saying that there had since been additional intelligence reports as well as physical visits, he insisted Wednesday that Iran's nuclear ambitions had instead been set back by 'basically decades.' 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich,' he said, adding that the American bomb strike 'ended the war.' 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war. This ended the (Israeli-Iran) war. If we didn't take that out, they'd be fighting right now.' Iran has enriched uranium to 60 per cent purity, just short of the 90 per cent required to make a nuclear weapon. About 400 kilograms of that highly enriched uranium is currently unaccounted for, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Trump said that American officials would be meeting with the Iranians next week, but brushed off the notion that Iran would try to restart its nuclear program or that he wanted a new formal deal to limit the country's atomic ambitions. Asked if he would order more strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities if nuclear enrichment activities continued or resumed, Trump said: 'Sure, but I'm not going to have to worry about that.' 'It's gone for years, years. It's very tough to rebuild because the whole thing has collapsed. In other words, inside it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it because it's collapsed. You can't go in to see a room that's got 10 million tonnes of rock in it.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that his country's military efforts had sent Iran's nuclear program 'down the drain.' There were more modest impact assessments from the IAEA, which monitors nuclear facilities programs around the world. On Tuesday, Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a statement that there has been 'extensive damage at several nuclear sites in Iran' as well as 'some localized radioactive as well as chemical release inside the affected facilities that contained nuclear material.' But he said there has been no reports of increased radiation levels outside of the nuclear facilities. Grossi said the Fordow nuclear site, which was build deep underground, beneath a mountain, has likely suffered damage to access roads close to the facility and at one of its entrances. The strikes to the Natanz nuclear facility, used to enrichment activities and storage of enriched uranium, 'may have caused localized contamination and chemical hazards.' Iran's Parliament voted Wednesday to suspend nuclear safety co-operation with the IAEA, though a formal decision to cut ties has not yet been taken. In a June 22 statement in response to the U.S. attacks, the head of the Atomic Energy Agency of Iran, Mohammad Reza Kardan, said that officials had anticipated attacks on its nuclear facilities and taken defensive measures. 'Due to the previously planned measures and the measures taken, no radiation contamination or nuclear radiation has been observed outside these sites and facilities.' Trump provided no details on negotiations between Israel and Iran that might result in a longer-term peace deal between the bitter enemies, but he suggested that the American strikes on Iran had resulted in 'great progress being made on Gaza.' 'Because of this attack that we made, I think we're going to have some very good news.' Israel is still seeking the return of hostages taken by Hamas in the attack of Oct. 7, 2023. United Nations officials are managing a humanitarian catastrophe affecting Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Earlier this week, in a briefing for journalists, the head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Jonathan Whitall, said that more than 400 Palestinians have been killed, most of them 'shot or shelled trying to reach U.S.-Israeli distribution sites purposefully set up in militarized zones.' 'Just a few days ago more than 60 people were killed and hundreds injured when a tank opened fire on a crowd of people waiting for food trucks to arrive,' he said. 'It shouldn't be this way. There shouldn't be a death-toll associated with accessing the essentials for life.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump renews attacks on fed chair Powell, hints at replacement
-- U.S. President Donald Trump reignited his criticism of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell on Wednesday, speaking at the NATO summit. Trump said he plans to announce a replacement for Powell, whose term ends in May 2026, though it remains unclear whether he will attempt to remove him before then. 'I know, within three or four people, who I'm going to pick,' Trump said. 'He goes out pretty soon fortunately, because I think he's terrible.' Trump again questioned Powell's mental capacity, calling him a 'very average person mentally.' The president has repeatedly teased the idea of firing Powell in the past, dubbing him 'Too Late' for his perceived slowness in cutting interest rates. Each time, however, Trump has backed off following negative market reactions. On Tuesday, Powell tempered expectations for a potential rate cut in July, signaling a continued cautious approach. 'Policy changes continue to evolve, and their effects on the economy remain uncertain,' Powell said. 'For the time being, we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.' Powell's remarks contrast with recent statements from at least two Fed governors who said they would support a July cut if inflation remains subdued. Trump has publicly urged the Fed to slash rates by a full percentage point or more, arguing such a move could save the federal government billions - or even up to a trillion dollars - in interest costs. Related articles Trump renews attacks on fed chair Powell, hints at replacement Forget the 'Mar-a-Lago Accord', Deutsche Bank outlines 'Pennsylvania Plan' for US NY Fed's Williams says modestly restrictive policy stance 'appropriate' Sign in to access your portfolio
