Water industry may be added to list of sensitive business sectors, says minister
Communications, energy and data infrastructure are among the 17 sectors that must notify the investment security unit of certain business deals since the list was created in 2021.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said the Government was taking action to 'hone the type of transactions facing greatest scrutiny' (James Manning/PA)
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has asked for businesses' views on extending this requirement to the water sector.
It is not expected to affect large numbers of deals but reflects 'increasing risks to the sector's resilience in a growing threat landscape', the Cabinet Office said.
'Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there's more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy,' Mr McFadden said.
'We're taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation.'
Thames Water is battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government.
Southern Water sought an extra £2.1 billion from its Australian owner earlier this month (Chris Ison/PA)
Southern Water asked its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion earlier this month to help boost its struggling finances.
Making semiconductors and critical minerals into their own standalone categories and moving computing hardware to fall under semiconductors is also being proposed.
Mr McFadden also said he planned to remove some requirements that are 'very unlikely to present risk'.
Businesses will no longer need to notify the unit of certain internal reorganisations or when appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers.
Secondary legislation would be brought to Parliament to put these changes in place.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
State pension gender gap narrows - but difference in size of private pots is still huge
The state pension gender gap has shrunk to 1 per cent, less than a decade after a major overhaul aimed at gradually equalising payments. Women received £208.15 per week on average on reaching 66 and men got £209.95 in the year to November 2024, new Government figures reveal. But this stands in stark contrast with private pension pots, where there is a 48 per cent gender divide in the run-up to retirement, according to recent official data. The state pension is the bedrock of most people's retirement income and is currently worth £230.25 a week if you qualify for the full amount, or nearly £12,000 a year. But although couples can get by on two full state pensions, financial experts warn individuals face a struggle on only one and recommend building a private fund too to achieve a decent standard of living. Former Pensions Minister Steve Webb, who was the architect of the new state pension introduced in 2016, says one of its goals was to gradually eliminate the gender gap in state pensions. Webb, who is now a partner at LCP and This is Money's pensions columnist, says: 'The new system had to be phased in gradually, not least to protect the rights people had already built up under the old system. 'But those transitional protections are gradually working their way out of the system, with the result that the gap between men and women is reducing with every passing year.' Webb, who obtained the state pension data under a Freedom of Information request, notes the average state pensions paid to men and women who retired under the pre-2016 state pension system differ greatly. Men get an average of £217.30 compared with £186.44 for women - and the latter includes many widows who were on much lower state pensions when younger, he points out. But Webb says he is delighted that the battle against the state pension gender gap is nearly won for those retiring today. 'When there is so much negative news about gaps between men and women when it comes to pensions, these figures show that things can be changed provided that there is the political will to do so. 'There are however, far too many women who have already retired who are living on reduced pensions and I will continue to campaign for them to be treated fairly, including by rooting out all of the errors which have led to so many being underpaid for so long.' Private pension gender gap Separate private pension gap data was published by the Government last month which was based on the median pension wealth (the middle figure in the range) of people aged 55-59 in 2020-2022. The gap overall was 48 per cent, but it was 39 per cent for people with only defined benefit pensions, also known as final salary pensions. These are guaranteed until you die but almost phased out unless you work in the public sector. However, the gap is a massive 75 per cent among people only saving into defined contribution schemes, which are prevalent in the private sector and depend on building and investing a pension fund for old age. For those with both types of pension the gender gap is 52 per cent, but younger generations who work for private companies are likely to have just defined contribution funds. Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, says the 48 per cent figure is 'truly appalling' and 'quite frankly unacceptable'. She blamed it on women earning less, and then working fewer hours after they have children, despite saving around the same percentage of salary as men into a pension under auto enrolment. 'The wheels come off women's retirement saving when they start a family,' Vahey says. 'The gap is much smaller at younger ages, at 22 per cent for those aged between 25 and 29, but rises dramatically for older women. 'Those women who work in the public sector fare better. The gender pensions gap for those that only hold defined benefit pensions – now mostly only available to public sector workers – is much lower. 'This throws into stark relief the chasm between private sector workers and their public sector counterparts.' Vahey suggests changing pension risk warnings to be more appropriate for a female audience, and reducing the auto enrolment earnings trigger of £10,000 because some women have several part-time jobs that all fall below it. 'Change must also come from the labour market, such as through pay, affordable childcare and more shared parental leave,' she adds. Hannah English, head of DC corporate consulting at Hymans Robertson, says the gaps in gender private pensions remain 'stubbornly high', and she called on the Government to make auto enrolment changes like lowering the earnings limit and reviewing the auto enrolment entry age of 22 as soon as possible. 'Reducing the age limit would not only support all savers to save more into pensions and retirement, it could also help reduce the gender pensions gap further. 'It would allow female employees the chance to save more over a larger proportion of their working career. 'In effect, this would avoid the dramatic fall often as a result of taking time out for child care or other caring responsibilities, which often fall to women later in life. All of which sees their pay and savings levels drag behind male peers.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Europe's bond market losing Dutch pension fund buyers as retirement payouts shift
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - As if Europe's cash-hungry finance ministers didn't have enough to worry about. An overhaul of the Dutch pension system is depriving the euro zone's $10 trillion government bond market of a key buyer of its long-term debt, just as state funding needs surge. The Dutch private pension sector, the bloc's largest which oversees more than 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) of assets, will move to a defined contribution system - as opposed to defined benefit - from next year. For governments looking to issue debt to fund their spending needs, it's a big change. Long-term debt has many advantages for governments because they are able to plan out their interest liabilities for longer. But under the new Dutch system, pension funds will have less need to buy bonds - and longer-dated bonds in particular - as they will no longer promise specific long-term benefits and will be able to take on more risk overall. Dutch pension funds are already stepping back from buying longer-dated bonds, according to a senior trader at BofA, just as Germany prepares to triple its borrowing. It's unclear how quickly funds will unwind their bond holdings and their hedges against risk, and how they will invest in future, adding to the uncertainty. "You're in a paradigm shift where you've had the largest-duration buyer in Europe disappear," said BofA's EMEA head of linear rates trading Kal El-Wahab. "They haven't been buying all year." "In a world where there's already a supply-demand imbalance going on, as sovereigns need to raise more cash than they ever have, losing one of the largest buyers of duration in Europe is very, very material." Longer-dated government bonds have been under pressure globally this year, prompting Japan and Britain to shorten the maturities of their issuance, as other key buyers have stepped back there too. But in the euro zone, pension fund reform "comes when Germany has to do more than it has ever done on the issuance front," said Barclays' head of euro rates strategy Rohan Khanna. The additional premium that benchmark borrower Germany pays for 30-year debt over shorter maturities has already risen this year. Traders say anticipation of the reform has been one driver. So far, the long end of the German yield curve has steepened roughly in line with other regions , , but the trend may have further to run. "The market's consensus is still for steepeners," said Credit Agricole CIB's head of European government bond trading Bruno Benchimol. BofA's El-Wahab expects the German 10/30-year yield curve, currently at around 50 basis points, could steepen another 20-25 basis points and lead other markets from here. Declining demand from Dutch pension funds is "something (governments) have to take into account when coming up with (funding) plans," said ABN AMRO rates strategist Jaap Teerhuis, who previously headed the Dutch Treasury's dealing room. Dutch banks estimate pension funds will eventually sell around 100 billion euros of government bond holdings. But their holdings aren't as long-dated and many of the long-dated bonds they bought have rolled down the curve over the years, BofA's El-Wahab noted. "It's not clear they're going to be selling long-dated bonds in order to do this transition ... The very seismic shift is just the absence of them on a forward-looking basis." The biggest source of uncertainty is how quickly funds will reduce those holdings and what role bonds will play in funds' post-transition portfolios, ABN's Teerhuis said. A plan from ABP, the country's largest pension fund, which manages 520 billion euros in assets, points to a gradual shift. It suggests ABP will shed around 25 billion euros of government bonds by 2030, but its exposure will remain unchanged in 2027 compared with 2023. Analysts said they expect even greater curve steepening in the swaps market. Pension funds have hedged their interest-rate risk by putting on long-dated swap trades to receive fixed-rate payments, but will now raise cash to close those trades, most likely by selling bonds. The next hurdle for markets is January 2026, when three of the five biggest funds plan to start switching to the new system, according to Barclays. But analysts aren't ruling out delays, which could stoke volatility at year-end. One of the three, PMT, has said it will assess in December and once again in January whether it's ready to transition. "We will know about the final 'go, no-go' very perilously close to the transition date," Khanna said.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel
Scottish Greens co-leader Ross Greer has written to the First Minister demanding that he adopt the principles of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which aims to put pressure on the Israeli economy in the mould of the anti-apartheid boycott of South Africa. A Scottish Government spokesperson said ministers would 'consider' the proposal, which would see official guidance issued to businesses urging them to end trade with Israel, as was done with Russia in 2022. Greer's letter to John Swinney welcomed the First Minister's acknowledgement that 'there is a genocide in Palestine', but the MSP said he disagreed with the assertion that he was 'trying to do everything I possibly can do to make sure that we apply the pressure' on Israel. Before setting out a raft of measures to implement the BDS campaigns' demands, Greer (below) said: 'As we both know and have previously discussed, there is much more which the Scottish Government can be doing to put pressure on Israel to end its genocide in Palestine.' (Image: Gordon Terris) He called for the Scottish Government to scrap part of the Local Government Act 1988 to allow councils to bar companies from winning contracts if they participated in the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory. Greer suggested this could be achieved through an amendment to the Community Wealth Building Bill. As well as issuing guidance to businesses recommending that they halt trade with Israel, Greer suggested that the Scottish Government should stop funding arms companies which have supplied Israel during the genocide and 'all other companies directly complicit in the occupation'. READ MORE: David Lammy contradicted as UK 'shares Gaza spy plane data with Israel' Pension funds should also be encouraged to divest from companies 'complicit in Israel's apartheid regime', Greer added. Finally, he suggested imposing financial penalties on 'complicit companies' through the Scottish Government's powers to impose surcharges on non-domestic rates. Speaking to The National, Greer said: 'Unfortunately the First Minister's claim that he is doing everything possible for Palestine just isn't true. Most foreign policy powers lie with Westminster, but there are still meaningful actions the Scottish Government could take, yet hasn't. (Image: AP) 'John Swinney now rightly recognises what is happening as a genocide. Those words must be matched with action, but we've seen very little of that from his government. Taxpayers' money is still being handed to companies who the United Nations has identified as being directly complicit in Israel's campaign of ethnic cleansing. 'The worst crime against humanity of our time is being inflicted on the Palestinian people right in front of our eyes. 'Scotland has a moral responsibility to act. The same approach helped end apartheid in South Africa. Now we must show that solidarity with the people of Palestine.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has repeatedly called for an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages and an urgent increase in humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Scottish Government will continue to press the UK Government to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution to secure lasting peace in the region. 'Ministers will consider and reply to Mr Greer's letter.'
