Former RUC chief sorry for impact of ombudsman spat on Omagh bomb victims
During an opening statement to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry on Monday on behalf of Sir Ronnie, Ian Skelt KC detailed some of the lengths he had gone to, including contacting Nasa to ask if they had any footage of the area.
Sir Ronnie was chief constable of Northern Ireland's then police force the Royal Ulster Constabulary at the time of the bomb and had weekly meetings with then secretary of state Mo Mowlam to discuss security.
Mr Skelt said Sir Ronnie has 'consistently pledged his commitment to engaging positively with this inquiry to ensure it provides answers to those most affected, namely the survivors and the next of kin of those who lost their lives'.
He said he followed the commemorative statements around those killed and impacted by the bomb in the last phase of the inquiry earlier this year.
'He welcomes the inquiry and recognises that some nearly 27 years from the bomb attack this may represent the last opportunity to identify the truth in respect to the preventability of the bombing,' he said.
'He pledges to engage fully and transparently.'
He went on to describe how Sir Ronnie is sorry for the impact of his row with then Police Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan in 2001 after she produced a critical report around the police investigation into the Omagh bomb.
At the time, Sir Ronnie responded by saying he would resign and 'commit suicide in public' if the multiple failures highlighted in the ombudsman's report were true.
Mr Skelt told the Omagh Bombing Inquiry that Sir Ronnie regrets his 'ill-judged emotive statement'.
'Sir Ronnie has heard the evidence during the personal statement hearings that the public dispute between him and the then Police Ombudsman was unwelcome and distracted from the focus being on the victims and their loss, this was not his intention. He is sorry for causing upset,' he said.
'All he can say now is back then when the ombudsman's report was released, he felt very strongly about its content and considered it important to ensure the public had accurate information about the police investigation of the Omagh bombing.
'Following the release of what he considered to be an inaccurate Police Ombudsman report, Sir Ronnie acknowledges the making of an ill-judged emotive statement in response to a journalist's question asking him if he would resign if the report was accurate. Having very quickly recognised that it was a crass response, Sir Ronnie immediately issued an apology.'
Mr Skelt added: 'At the relevant time, Sir Ronnie considered he took the appropriate position in light of the information and advice available to him, but as outlined above and previously, he is sorry for causing upset to those impacted by the bombing, he will continue to reflect upon this and other decisions through this inquiry.
'It is submitted that Sir Ronnie acted in good faith and at all times motivated by an intention to bring all of those responsible for this crime to justice, that this has not been possible is a matter of great personal and professional regret.'
Mr Skelt also outlined some of the measures taken in the police investigation into the bomb which included contacting the then director of the FBI to ask whether there was any possibility of library footage from Nasa, the FBI, CIA or any other US agency of the Omagh area at the time of the bombing.
'This is an example of the lengths he went to to ensure even the most remote avenues of investigation were explored,' he said.
'That said, Sir Ronnie is not in any way closed to the suggestion that other avenues could have been explored, indeed this inquiry may identify possibilities as the work on documentation and evidence progresses.'
Sir Ronnie, a core participant in the inquiry, is expected to give a full statement of evidence at a later stage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
John Caldwell: Two men in court on charges linked to shooting
Two men have appeared in court charged in relation to the attempted murder of Det Ch Insp John Caldwell in February senior detective was off duty when he was shot several times at a sports complex after coaching a youth football team in Omagh, County New IRA has claimed responsibility for the Robinson, 45, of Ardstewart in Stewartstown, and Caoimhin Murphy, 25, of Altowen Park in Coalisland, appeared before Dungannon Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, via videolink, charged with the preparation of terrorist acts and perverting the course of justice. The two men were arrested and detained under the Terrorism Act on the charges were put to Mr Robinson and Mr Murphy, neither responded.A Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) detective sergeant told the court that police could connect both men to the said police believed the accused were involved in preparations and the moving of vehicles for both a prior attempt to carry out an attack on Mr Caldwell on 1 February 2023, and the shooting that took place three weeks later on 22 February officer said the initial plan to attack Mr Caldwell at the same sports complex did not go ahead as the senior officer was not detective sergeant said Mr Robinson and Mr Murphy were believed to be involved in the destruction of one of the cars involved in the shooting, which was found burnt out in Ardboe, County Tyrone. 'Significant CCTV trawl' The detective sergeant told the court the cases against Mr Robinson and Mr Murphy were "complex" and circumstantial, based on CCTV footage, police observations, communications, the inactivity of mobile phones and vehicle said there had been "a significant CCTV trawl across the country" since the investigation officer told the court that in the days and weeks leading to the shooting, both of the accused had either been communicating with those believed to be the gunmen or had met up with them face to face for a "walk and talk" on court heard Mr Robinson's car had also been seen on CCTV in Belfast, days before the shooting, where police believe he transported Mr Murphy to collect one of the cars involved in the shooting; and in Ardboe the night one of the cars, a Ford Fiesta, was found burnt out.A solicitor representing Mr Murphy argued that despite "thousands of hours of CCTV" being analysed in the investigation, there was not "one iota of surveillance" linking his client to either the scene of the shooting or getting into or out of any of the vehicles solicitor also said there had been no DNA or clothing fibres belonging to Mr Murphy linked to the scene or the cars Mr Robinson's solicitor made a similar argument, adding that there was no CCTV or evidence placing the accused at the scene of the shooting or in the industrial estate where one of the cars was burnt. 'Remains to this day' A prosecution barrister said the case was "most circumstantial in its truest form" and that there were many strands to it. But she said that when the court layers all of the actions together, there was "sufficient evidence to connect both of the accused to the charges".The judge told the court he was "satisfied both defendants can be connected" to the respect of Mr Robinson, an application for bail was made with his solicitor telling the court that 16 other co-defendants charged in relation to the shooting were on bail, including those charged with more serious offences like attempted murder.A prosecution barrister told the court that Mr Robinson is currently being investigated in connection with a previous illegal republican parade in Creggan, Londonderry, which was linked to the New said Mr Robinson also had a record of "indicating violence" that includes threats to kill a police officer in 2022 and that he has a mindset that is "sympathetic to violent republican activity".The senior police officer said both of the accused were linked to Saoradh, which police have previously described as the political voice of the New judge rejected Mr Robinson's bail application and said the "risk of reoffending was real".The judge added that the risk to Mr Caldwell's life "remains to this day, with his name appearing on a bonfire in the Creggan estate as we speak".Both men were remanded into Murphy will appear in court again on 20 August to make a bail application, while Mr Robinson will appear at court on 2 September.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
New IRA had planned earlier attack on detective John Caldwell, court told
Police have uncovered what they believe was a failed attempt to murder detective John Caldwell in the weeks before he was seriously wounded in a gun attack by dissident republicans, a court has heard. The details were revealed as two men appeared at Dungannon Magistrates' Court on charges linked to the attempted murder of the senior Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officer in Omagh, Co Tyrone, on February 22 2023. Mr Caldwell was shot several times while he was off duty and with his young son, packing up after coaching a youth football team. The attack was claimed by the New IRA. Mr Caldwell has since retired from the PSNI on medical grounds. A number of people have previously appeared in court charged with offences linked to the shooting attack. Caoimhin Murphy, 25, from Altowen Park, Coalisland, and Liam Robinson, 45, of Ardstewart, Stewartstown, are both charged with preparation of terrorist attacks and perverting the course of justice. Both men appeared in court on Wednesday via videolink from Musgrave Street police station in Belfast. Neither responded when asked if they understood the charges. A detective sergeant told the court he could connect both men to the offences. After the court was told there was a challenge to the connections, a prosecution barrister said the investigation into the shooting of Mr Caldwell had been a 'complex, circumstantial case,' pointing out that several people had already been charged. She said: 'When the original individuals were charged that was subsequent to the attempt on DCI Caldwell on the 22nd February of 2023. 'Investigations obviously continued and through those investigations it was ascertained the case is there was a prior attempt on the 1st February 2023.' She said of the first attempt on the detective's life an Audi and a Volkswagen vehicle had been used and when he was later shot, two Ford Fiestas had been used. She told the court the case against Murphy is that it is alleged he had moved a vehicle involved in the first failed attack, moved a vehicle involved in the later attack and had been involved in burning a car after the detective was shot. The case against Robinson is that it is alleged he assisted in the recovery of a vehicle used in the first attempt, moved a vehicle in the second attempt and assisted in burning a car. The detective sergeant told the court: 'The investigation has identified what is believed to have been a failed attempt to attack DCI Caldwell on the 1st February. 'On this occasion DCI Caldwell wasn't at Youth Sport, which would have been his usual routine. 'At that time a Volkswagen Tiguan on false registration plates was observed on CCTV entering the youth sports site in similar fashion to the movements of the Fiesta number one on the 22nd, the evening of the attempt.' The officer laid out elements of the police investigation which stretched over events on a number of dates in February 2023 and included phone and CCTV evidence and what police believe are suspects taking place in 'walk and talk' conversations. He said the shooting of the detective is believed to have been 'a joint venture between a number of active service units', including Belfast and Tyrone New IRA. The officer told the court that on the night Mr Caldwell was shot, he had arrived at football training earlier than usual. He said police believe the attack had been planned to take place when he arrived at the sports complex, but was delayed because of his early arrival. He added: 'He was not shot until 8 o'clock that night, an hour and a half after what we would suggest was the planned attack.' Murphy's defence solicitor Peter Corrigan told the court there was 'not one iota' of surveillance evidence linking his client to any of the vehicles used in the shooting. Robinson's solicitor Gavin Booth said it was not part of the prosecution case that his client had taken part in the shooting of Mr Caldwell and had been in Coalisland at the time of the attack. The prosecuting barrister said it was a 'circumstantial case in its truest form'. She said: 'One strand may be weaker than the other, that is what a circumstantial case is. 'But when they are all layered on top of the other the consequences of those meetings, the prosecution says that there is sufficient material before the court to connect both accused to the charges.' Mr Corrigan: 'It is a circumstantial case, but it is a circumstantial case which fails at connection because there are alternative explanations. 'It is all based on speculation and conjecture and does not close alternative explanations.' District Judge Rafferty said he was satisfied both could be connected to the offences. Police objected to a bail application for Robinson, with the detective sergeant stating it is believed he has a 'trusted role' in the IRA. He added: 'The New IRA have made a claim of responsibility for this terrorist attack. 'In addition to trying to justify the shooting of DCI Caldwell as a senior Crown forces member, the group further claimed that Irish Republican Army intelligence are now in possession of security information regarding the out of bounds movement of Crown force personnel.' He added: 'The threat to the life of John Caldwell continues to this day with his name appearing on a bonfire in the Creggan estate as we speak along with cross-hairs indicating he continues to be a target.' He said the threat posed by the group was 'real and imminent'. The judge denied bail to Robinson. Both defendants were remanded in custody. Robinson will appear in court again on September 2 and Murphy will appear on August 20 to make a bail application.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
NASA's nuclear gamble on the moon faces growing skepticism
Fast-tracking a NASA plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon may sound dubious. Experts say that's because it is. 'The whole proposal is cock-eyed and runs against the sound management of a space program that is now being starved of money,' national security analyst, nuclear expert and author Joseph Cirincione told The Independent. Nuclear has been used in space since the 1960s. That's nothing new. The U.S. launched its first test reactor into orbit in 1965, and the former Soviet Union has sent up dozens more. NASA says that a new 100-kilowatt reactor could be used to power a future base at the lunar South Pole, and fuel prospective missions to Mars and beyond. Nuclear would help to fill gaps in solar energy that occur when that side of the moon is in darkness for two weeks. The majority of space experts have said that placing a reactor on the moon is possible, so, why is NASA's current plan 'cock-eyed?' The problem is the proposed timeline. Interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, who also serves as President Donald Trump's Secretary of Transportation, pushed to expedite the project, detailed in a memo this week. Duffy said the administration wanted to have a nuclear reactor ready to launch by 2030. Earlier this year, China and Russia announced a plan to build a nuclear reactor for a lunar base by 2035. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a 'keep-out' zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Duffy said. NASA first announced in 2021 that it would put a reactor on the moon 'within a decade.' In 2024, NASA then said that their target date for delivery a reactor to the Earth-based launchpad was the early 2030s. But, Cirincione says essentially no progress has been made. 'It was in the last Trump administration that NASA had put out a press release, they had a YouTube video, they had these announcements about how they're going to develop these small, modular nuclear reactors for use on the moon, and it was going to be ready by 2026,' said Cirincione, who is vice-chair of the Center for International Policy, a non-profit that advocates for a peaceful approach to foreign policy. 'Oh, really? So, where is it?' Ultimately, the expert believes a nuclear reactor on the moon could take up to 20 years to become a reality. NASA would need a working launch vehicle, a small and adaptable reactor, and the ability to land on the moon. Right now, the SpaceX Starship is the only vehicle option – but it has exploded during several of its test flights. NASA has been working with Boeing on a Space Launch System - the main competitor to Space X's Starship - but that program would be canceled under the Trump administration's proposed cuts which slash 24 percent from NASA's overall budget. Landing on the moon is no picnic, and attempts by Japanese space companies in 2023 and 2025 ended in crashes. There are also the scientific and technological advances needed for the nuclear reactors. The reactors must be able to withstand harsh conditions on the moon, including temperatures swings from 250 degrees Fahrenheit during the day to minus 400 degrees at night. 'Small modular nuclear reactors, it turns out, are always just around the corner – a corner you never get to turn,' Cirincione said. Many scientists and nuclear energy experts have shared in Cirincione's skepticism. Dr. Kathryn Huff, a former nuclear energy official at the U.S. Department of Energy, and professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote in a Bluesky social media post that she's not 'bullish' on 'unrealistic timelines.' 'The 2030 target does not align well with recent budgetary trends…' she explained in a statement, shared by the university. 'Accelerating the FSP program could come at the expense of other critical priorities, including earth science, climate observation and space-based weather forecasting – all core elements of NASA's public-serving mission.' Dr. Alfredo Carpineti, an Italian astrophysicist, wrote in IFLScience this week that the proposal is 'unfeasible.' 'Even if we allow landing the nuclear reactor on December 31, 2030, the timing is really too short for something that must not have any faults if you want to operate it safely,' Carpineti wrote. Others were more optimistic about NASA's accelerated timeline. Sebastian Corbisiero, a senior program manager at Idaho National Laboratory who leads the Energy Department's space reactor program, told The Independent that a nuclear reactor on the moon is 'doable' by 2030. 'Nuclear reactor technology has been around for decades, so its well known,' he said. 'Some key differences with a space reactor is that it needs to fit on a rocket, so there are mass and volume requirements; and that the system needs to operate in vacuum – so components will need to be built to survive that environment.' Dr. Bhavya Lal, a former associate administrator for technology, policy, and strategy at NASA, and former aerospace executive Roger Myers, recently argued that it would be possible to have nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030, and it would take $3 billion to do so. 'It's possible, but it will require serious commitment,' Lal told The Independent. But even if plans are speeded up, Lal says there's no need to worry about the prospect of the moon blowing up. It's 'simply not grounded in science,' she said.
