Assisted dying: Why this momentous vote – with such far-reaching consequences
The stakes are so high that entrepreneur Declan Ganley has offered a private ambulance to MP Sorcha Eastwood, who is ill with Covid, to get her to the Commons to vote against the Bill.
No wonder. It has been almost six decades since MPs have considered a Bill that would cause such a profound and fundamental change in the state's relationship with individuals and society's attitude to life and death.
An historic vote
In December Ms Leadbeater won a 55 majority on the second reading vote of her Bill, dealing with the principle rather than details, and is expected to carry a reduced majority today, although that is less certain than it was before.
If she is successful then the state, for the first time, will be licensed to end people's lives if they wish it and if the circumstances allow. Doctors will be allowed to offer it as an alternative to people who have been given six months left to live.
What factors will MPs be considering?
The lack of certainty on the vote is partly fueled by the fact that a number of MPs who voted for the principle made it clear that they were allowing the debate to be had and would reserve judgment on the final vote.
The debate in fact has moved on from one of principle - which only a minority oppose - to one of practicalities. The questions faced by MPs include:
Can such a law be introduced to allow those with genuine terminal illnesses who wish to end their lives to do so without exposing the weak, poor and vulnerable to coercion to end their lives?
Can the so-called tight restrictions be prevented from expanding beyond that through medical practice, judicial intervention or further legislation?
Will this end up being a means for saving costs on the care centre and the NHS?
Are the safeguards strong enough to ensure that the new law will not be abused?
MPs changing their minds
The reason that the vote has become tighter is because a growing number of MPs are concerned about the potential answers to those questions. The only issue will be whether that is enough to block the Bill.
Based on votes on the amendments as well as known supporters and opponents, the predictive voting model used by opponents of assisted dying gives Ms Leadbeater a majority of up to 15, ranging to a defeat of the Bill by a majority of five. Very close.
Key to the debate will not be the heartbreaking stories of people suffering in their final months, or celebrity voices like Esther Rantzen. They have already had their effect.
More important will be the big change to the Bill brought by Ms Leadbeater which means a judge in court will not have to sign off, as originally laid out in the second reading vote. Instead, there will be an expert panel led by a judge or KC but not with the same legal authority.
It is worth noting that the judicial safeguard was cited by more than 100 MPs in the first debate.
The 'slippery slope' argument
The other issue at play will be whether this Bill is a full stop to the issue or is something that will unleash a loosening up of the law over time.
The lesson from the then Liberal MP David Steel's abortion legislation in 1967 will play a part in the decision-making of a number of MPs, who will be considering the so-called 'slippery slope' issue of an apparently tightly worded piece of legislation expanding its reach over time.
Just this week we have seen MPs vote by a large majority to decriminalise abortion – effectively allowing it up to birth without criminal consequences from the 24 weeks (six months) already legislated for.
But more important will be the experience of other countries where assisted dying has been legalised.
Ms Leadbeater has been at pains that this is a specifically British Bill. However, in Canada, Oregon in the US, the Netherlands, and New South Wales in Australia the legislation has expanded beyond terminal illness to include mental health and other issues.
Ms Leadbeater in fact highlighted a case of a couple who decided to end their own lives in Australia after 70 years of marriage even though terminal illness was not a factor.
How the debate will unfold
She will argue on Friday though that her Bill has been strengthened since November.
Opponents will point out that she has rejected safeguards on eating disorders, mental health, the requirement of people actually suffering pain and many other apparently reasonable checks to the process.
She had also opposed an amendment preventing doctors recommending assisted dying to children, the one defeat she has suffered so far.
Many have consistently argued that a private members bill is not sufficient to debate something that will have such a profound effect on the country. Indeed, 52 Labour MPs asked Keir Starmer, a supporter of assisted dying, to give more time for further scrutiny, an appeal he rejected.
The issue today will be whether all these questions and issues will mean there are enough MPs to have second thoughts from their vote in November to overturn a 55-majority.
If the Bill is defeated then it will not come back before the next election, if Ms Leadbeater wins then it will have cleared its most important hurdle and a battle in the Lords awaits where many of the issues will be debated again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK backs joint call for Israel to allow foreign media in Gaza
The UK is among 27 countries backing a statement calling for Israel to allow immediate independent foreign media access to Germany, Australia, and Japan have also signed the text released by the Media Freedom Coalition - an intergovernmental group which advocates for the rights and protection of journalists statement also condemned attacks on journalists, saying those working in Gaza must be journalists have been banned by Israel from entering the Gaza Strip independently since the start of the war nearly two years ago. Some journalists have been taken into Gaza by the IDF under controlled access. At least 192 journalists and media workers, the vast majority of them Palestinian, have been killed since then in the deadliest conflict for journalists ever documented, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).Thursday's statement, the first of its kind to be made jointly by countries, says their call is in light of "the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe", adding they "oppose all attempts to restrict press freedom and block entry to journalists".It says that "deliberate targeting of journalists" is unacceptable, calling for all attacks to be investigated and followed up by latest such attack occurred earlier this month when four Al Jazeera journalists, including prominent reporter Anas al-Sharif, were killed in a targeted Israeli strike near Gaza City's al-Shifa and another correspondent, Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with cameramen Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, were in a tent for journalists at the hospital's main gate when it was struck, the broadcaster said at the other freelance journalists were killed - Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed it had targeted Sharif, alleging he had "served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas".However, the CPJ said Israel had failed to provide evidence to back up its allegations. Al Jazeera has also denied Israeli claims. With no international journalists allowed into Gaza, local reporters have continued throughout the war to provide coverage directly on social media and working for Palestinian or international media High Court of Justice last year ruled that restrictions on entry were justified on security grounds. The Foreign Press Association, which represents journalists operating in Israel, has been petitioning the court to lift the ban, arguing that "unprecedented restrictions" had "hindered independent reporting". For the journalists still in Gaza, the situation is dire. As well as Israeli air strikes, many have faced the threat of month, the BBC and three news agencies - Reuters, AP and AFP - issued a joint statement expressing "desperate concern" for journalists in the territory, who they say are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have warned of mass starvation in which controls the entry of aid supplies into Gaza, has accused the charities of "serving the propaganda of Hamas". But its own government figures show the amount of food it allowed into the territory between March and July was significantly below what the World Food Programme (WFP) says is needed for even basic assistance needs. There are more fears about Palestinians after the Israeli military began the first stages of a planned ground offensive in Gaza government announced its intention to conquer the entire Gaza Strip after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal broke down last Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 62,122 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry. The ministry's figures are quoted by the UN and others as the most reliable source of statistics available on casualties.
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mum finds daughter, 21, ‘not moving in chair' after watching TV and eating hash browns before she slipped into a coma
OLIVIA Pitfield was relaxing at home watching TV and eating hash browns when her whole world changed suddenly. Moments later the 21-year-old was found lifeless on the chair she was sitting on and ended up being in a coma for three weeks. 5 5 It was at the family home in Cobham, Surrey in 2021 when mum, Karen Pitfield, found Olivia had suddenly gone into cardiac arrest. Her dad, Gary, jumped into action, having done a CPR refresher course just days before. After checking her pulse, he pulled Olivia onto the floor, and while Karen rang 999, he began chest compressions that he'd been taught by St John Ambulance. Recalling the ordeal, Gary said: 'Olivia was sitting in a chair in the living room not moving. 'It was just a few days after my first aid refresher course, so all my training was at the forefront of my mind. 'Olivia had aspirated, which meant she'd breathed food into her lungs. I carried on with the CPR until the paramedic got the defibrillator and applied the pads. 'It felt like ages until the ambulance came but it was around eight minutes. My adrenalin kept me going.' Olivia, who had no previous health conditions, began breathing again, but this was followed by a traumatic period in which she stopped and started breathing, even after paramedics used a defibrillator. She also had a severe lung injury caused by aspirating on a hash brown during the cardiac arrest. Olivia was in a coma for three weeks but, after having an internal defibrillator fitted, has made a full recovery. Looking back at her experience, the 25-year-old doesn't remember much of what happened, but counts her blessings that her parents were around for the traumatic event and knew what to do. 'When I woke up in hospital, I saw my mum and dad and they told me everything that had happened,' Olivia explains. 'I felt sad and happy: sad they'd had to go through it all but happy that I was okay. 'After I was in hospital, I suffered a lot mentally when it came to coming back into reality. 'I had to go to therapy to realise that I couldn't just jump straight back into what I was doing before because I was quite an active person. 'Watching all my friends go and carry on riding and doing stuff without me took quite a toll.' 5 5 5 Olivia, who now works as a stable groom at a livery yard, had to slowly build her strength back up, but feels much better today. The family want to encourage everyone to do a first aid course, as they say you never know when you may be needed to save a life. 'My dad's always been on top of his first aid because of his job,' Olivia said. 'It's so important to know first aid as it can be used anywhere at any time. It's taught me to be thankful for who's around you.' Gary says that learning CPR is essential, as you never know when you may need those vital skills. 'Everyone should know basic CPR. It saves lives,' said Gary. 'I just did what I had to do but I'll remember every minute of it.'
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Asylum figures a mixed bag for UK government
Newly released Home Office data paints a mixed picture of how the government's asylum seeker strategy is working the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels - a current political flashpoint - the new data shows that the number has risen slightly compared to when it came to power. However the figures are far below the 2023 peak, when the Conservatives were in number of asylum applications in the UK during the year to June also reached a new record of 111,000 - though the government has reduced the backlog of claims by processing them addition, in the year to June, about 38% more small boats landed on UK shores than the previous correspondents Jack Fenwick and Dominic Casciani assess what the figures tell us about the effectiveness of the government's asylum strategy. How many people cross the Channel in small boats?Why do Channel migrants want to come to the UK? Strategy could be working but long way still to go By political correspondent Jack Fenwick Headlines about record numbers of asylum applications and an increase in hotel use since Labour came to power clearly don't make comfortable reading for the overall view in the Home Office on Thursday morning, according to one source, was "not disappointed".And behind those headlines there is evidence that elements of the government's strategy could be is the first data that takes into account the huge rise in small boat crossings since March.A few months ago, some people inside the Home Office had been worried that hotel use could spike as a that hasn't happened. The number of asylum seekers in hotels actually went slightly down between March and have been trying to find alternative sources of accommodation, like regular houses and flats within communities - but those numbers haven't gone up processing claims more quickly, the Home Office has been able to ensure that the big rise in small boat crossings hasn't had much of an effect on asylum the use of hotels was a Labour manifesto pledge and ministers have a long, long way to go before they get close to achieving they'll be hoping they've now broken the link between small boats crossings and hotel parties give that claim short say the government's record on illegal immigration will ultimately be judged on the small boat crossing numbers, which remain at stubborn, record-breaking Home Secretary Chris Philp claims the numbers would be at zero if his party's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda had been Office accounts released last month show the Conservatives had around 1,000 civil servants working on the Rwanda scrapped the idea and a senior Home Office source says they've been able to speed up initial asylum applications by moving many of those staff over to that same source also tried to shift some of the political onus going forward onto the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).While initial asylum claims are being processed more quickly, there's increasing concern over what's happening in the appeals from March 2025 shows a record level of appeals being made against failed asylum Home Office source said "courts are definitely a pinch point and we do need the MoJ to step up and help us with that".A former justice secretary told us these types of appeals backlogs are often caused by "poor casework management" from the Home Office during the initial application clear potential for tension between two parts of government there in the coming months. Ending hotel use still a huge challenge By home and legal correspondent Dominic Casciani The government's aim, ultimately, is to convince the public that it has better and greater control of the immigration and asylum system than its predecessors - and thanks to the rise of Reform it knows it has to send a signal that even if it does not achieve all its aims, that it is going in the right is why these stats are complicated for both them and their opponents - and why both sides will highlight different good news for the government is that officials are taking decisions on asylum applications quicker than of June there were 91,000 cases in the asylum backlog. That's down a fifth on a year - and is almost half the peak of two years smaller the backlog, the less the government needs to spend. The total asylum support bill has fallen to £4.8bn in 2024-25, down from £5.4bn the year now for the bad news. More people who have been told they have no case are appealing against that decision. There are some 51,000 appeals before asylum and immigration judges. Those people are stuck in the system until they either win their appeal or are given a final decision to be that's part of the reason why the Home Office is making only modest progress on the use of hotels - establishments which were brought in by the last government after it ran out of alternative accommodation around the government can show it has increased removals from the UK of people at the end of the process. But more than half of removals are not failed asylum applicants but foreign national offenders leaving of small boat migrants are modest and many of these are legally low-hanging fruit, such as the brief phenomenon of a rush of Albanian though - and this is a win for government - the number of people voluntarily leaving has gone up by 13% to 26,761. They are generally paid up to £3,000 to go - but that's far cheaper than battling through the other critical factors will play a huge role in this government's plan to strengthen counter-smuggling gang powers is still in Parliament. TBC on whether that works. Ministers are waiting for the French to stop dinghies leaving the shore and a separate German commitment to change its law so it can seize boats being warehoused final factor relies on global events. People will keep leaving their homes around the world to come to Europe if they feel of these things needs to come together - and keep going in the right direction - for the government to meet its commitment to end hotel use by the end of the Parliament.
