California state workers critical of Gov. Newsom's return-to-office mandate
Gayle Jamerson is a decades-long state worker who said that returning to her office four days per week will cost her hundreds of dollars a month. The existing hybrid work model for state workers, implemented by the governor last June, requires at least two in-office days per week.
"I would say at least $400 to $500," Jamerson said. "So yesterday, I canceled my retirement contribution anticipating these changes."
Amber Grace has worked for the state for two years.
"I'm concerned with the increased carbon emissions, traffic," Grace said. "It's unnecessary. Why? The work is being completed."
California's largest state workers' union, SEIU 1000, called the executive order out of touch and unnecessary and wants it reversed.
"State employees should not be used as a political pawn and really, that seems like the only reason we would be sent back," SEIU 1000 President Anica Walls said.
Democratic political strategist Steve Maviglio, often a critic of Newsom, said this executive order is likely aimed at a national audience.
President Trump issued an executive order for federal workers to return to the office five days a week. San Francisco's new mayor, Daniel Lurie, announced a four-day-return-to-office order for city workers last month.
"First of all, you have to put everything Governor Newsom does in the prism of future presidential politics. He's seeing mayors, governors, and even the President of the United States require workers to go back to work in an office," Maviglio said. "And this fits into the box of having the state government be more efficient, which is certainly a topic of the day."
"If I could retire now, I would," Jamerson said. "I would totally be out the door as soon as we had to come back."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jon Husted sitting on $2.6 million for 2026 U.S. Senate race, as Sherrod Brown mulls run
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — While Democrat Sherrod Brown is mulling a return to the U.S. Senate, Republican Sen. Jon Husted has $2.6 million on hand to retain his seat in 2026. Husted raised more than $3 million from the start of 2025 to the end of June, including $1.7 million from contributions and $1.4 million from affiliated committees, according to the Federal Election Commission. During that period, about $406,000 was spent on operating expenditures, leaving the campaign with $2.6 million. Central Ohio Republican lawmaker vows to push back on DeWine effort to ban prop bets Of that sum, $1.1 million was raised during the first quarter this year, between January and March, and $2 million was raised in the second quarter from April through June, FEC records show. The campaign said in a release that Husted, who was appointed to the U.S. Senate in January, has 'quickly demonstrated that he intends to continue his winning streak that began with his first election in 2000.' 'We continue to see growing momentum in every corner of Ohio for Senator Husted,' said Tyson Shepard, Husted's campaign spokesperson, in a release boasting the quarter two haul. 'This quarter's strong showing demonstrates that Jon is building the operation required to achieve a decisive victory in 2026.' Watch a previous NBC4 report on Husted's appointment in the video player above. Husted has been collecting cash without yet having to face a Republican or Democratic challenger. That may soon change as Brown, who was defeated last November by Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno, is said to be entering the race against Husted, according to multiple media outlets. Brown, who has yet to set up a campaign fund, will be starting fresh. The former senator finished last year's race with $394,000 on hand, which he then funneled into a political action committee called 'Dignity of Work.' The effort coincided with Brown's creation in March of the Dignity of Work Institute, a nonprofit group to address working-class issues like low wages and home ownership. The PAC then raised $112,000 but spent $493,000, most of which was on operating expenditures, according to FEC records. Now, the PAC has about $12,000 on hand. Marijuana generates nearly $1 billion in taxes in Ohio. Now figuring out how to spend it. Brown's race against Moreno was the most expensive in the nation last fall, with a record-breaking $483 million spent, the highest for any nonpresidential election on record, according to AdImpact. Republicans cashed in $251 million for Moreno, while Democrats spent $232 million to boost Brown. The winner of the 2026 race for Ohio's U.S. Senate seat will be completing current Vice President JD Vance's original term, which runs through 2028. If that senator wants to serve a full six-year term, they will need to run again in 2028. Husted's campaign touted his endorsements from the Ohio Republican Party, Ohio Values Voters and 100% of the county Republican parties that have endorsed so far. At the start of quarter two, Husted received the backing of President Donald Trump, who offered his 'complete and total endorsement' of the senator. 'This is a true team effort,' Husted said in a release. 'Ohioans are rallying behind our efforts exceptionally early because of our proven track record of delivering wins for Ohio. I will never take their support or trust for granted.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
DC Mayor Muriel Bowser walks delicate line with President Donald Trump, reflecting the city's precarious position
NEW YORK — As National Guard troops deploy across her city as part of President Donald Trump's efforts to clamp down on crime, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser is responding with relative restraint. She's called Trump's takeover of the city's police department and his decision to activate 800 members of the guard ' unsettling and unprecedented ' and gone as far as to cast his efforts as part of an 'authoritarian push.' But Bowser has so far avoided the kind of biting rhetoric and personal attacks typical of other high-profile Democratic leaders, despite the unprecedented incursion into her city. 'While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented, I can't say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past, that we're totally surprised,' Bowser told reporters at a press conference responding to the efforts. She even suggested the surge in resources might benefit the city and noted that limited home rule allows the federal government 'to intrude on our autonomy in many ways.' 'My tenor will be appropriate for what I think is important for the District,' said Bowser, who is in her third term as mayor. 'And what's important for the District is that we can take care of our citizens.' The approach underscores the reality of Washington's precarious position under the thumb of the federal government. Trump has repeatedly threatened an outright takeover of the overwhelmingly Democratic city, which is granted autonomy through a limited home rule agreement passed in 1973 that could be repealed by Congress. Republicans, who control both chambers, have already frozen more than a $1 billion in local spending, slashing the city's budget. That puts her in a very different position from figures such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom or Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Democrats whose states depend on the federal government for disaster relief and other funding, but who have nonetheless relentlessly attacked the current administration as they lay the groundwork for potential 2028 presidential runs. Those efforts come amid deep frustrations from Democratic voters that their party has not been nearly aggressive enough in its efforts to counter Trump's actions. 'Unfortunately she is in a very vulnerable position,' said Democratic strategist Nina Smith. 'This is the sort of thing that can happen when you don't have the powers that come with being a state. So that's what we're seeing right now, the mayor trying to navigate a very tough administration. Because this administration has shown no restraint when it comes to any kind of constitutional barriers or norms.' Bowser's approach marks a departure from Trump's first term, when she was far more antagonistic toward the president. Then she routinely clashed with the administration, including having city workers paint giant yellow letters spelling out 'Black Lives Matter' on a street near the White House during the George Floyd protests in 2020. This time around, Bowser took a different tact from the start. She flew to Florida to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago after he won the election and has worked to avoid conflict and downplay points of contention, including tearing up the 'Black Lives Matter' letters after he returned to Washington in response to pressure from Republicans in Congress. The change reflects the new political dynamics at play, with Republicans in control of Congress and an emboldened Trump who has made clear he is willing to exert maximum power and push boundaries in unprecedented ways. D.C. Councilmember Christina Henderson said she understands Bowser's position, and largely agrees with her conclusion that a legal challenge to Trump's moves would be a long shot. Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in his executive order, declaring a 'crime emergency' so his administration could take over the city's police force. The statue limits that control to 30 days unless he gets approval from Congress. 'The challenge would be on the question of 'Is this actually an emergency?'' said Henderson, a former congressional staffer. 'That's really the only part you could challenge.' Henderson believes the city would face dim prospects in a court fight, but thinks the D.C. government should challenge anyway, 'just on the basis of precedent.' Trump told reporters Wednesday that he believes he can extend the 30-day deadline by declaring a national emergency, but said 'we expect to be before Congress very quickly.' 'We're gonna be asking for extensions on that, long-term extensions, because you can't have 30 days,' he said. 'We're gonna do this very quickly. But we're gonna want extensions. I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will.' Bowser's response is a reflection of the reality of the situation, according to a person familiar with her thinking. As mayor of the District of Columbia, Bowser has a very different relationship with the president and federal government than other mayors or governors. The city is home to thousands of federal workers, and the mass layoffs under DOGE have already had a major impact on the city's economy. Her strategy has been to focus on finding areas where she and the new administration can work together on shared priorities. For now, Bowser appears set to stick with her approach, saying Wednesday that she is focused on 'making sure the federal surge is useful to us.' During a morning interview with Fox 5, she and the city's police chief argued an influx of federal agents linked to Trump's takeover would improve public safety, with more officers on patrol. Police chief Pamela Smith said the city's police department is short almost 800 officers, so the extra police presence 'is clearly going to impact us in a positive way.' But Nina Smith, the Democratic strategist, said she believes Bowser needs a course correction. 'How many times is it going to take before she realizes this is not someone who has got the best interests of the city at heart?' she asked. 'I think there may need to be time for her to get tough and push back.' Despite Trump's rhetoric, statistics published by Washington's Metropolitan Police show violent crime has dropped in Washington since a post-pandemic peak in 2023. A recent Department of Justice report shows that violent crime is down 35% since 2023, reaching its lowest rate in 30 years.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
California voters widely prefer keeping independent redistricting panel: Poll
California voters widely prefer keeping the state's independent redistricting commission, new polling shows, as Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) threatens to bypass it to counter GOP gerrymandering in other states. A Politico-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab survey found that just 36 percent of California voters support returning congressional redistricting authority to the state Legislature, compared to 64 percent who back the independent redistricting commission. Newsom has pledged to move forward with plans for redistricting in the Golden State as a direct response to Republican-led redrawing efforts elsewhere. President Trump and others in the GOP have been urging several red states to do mid-decade redistricting and expand the party's midterm pickup opportunities. In Texas, state Democrats fled to break quorum this month over a proposal that would net five GOP House seats. To counter would-be Republican gains, Newsom has proposed putting forward a ballot measure that would bypass the independent redistricting commission for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 election cycles, before reverting to the existing system. His aim is to get the matter before California voters during a special election this fall, stressing that the redistricting would only be triggered if other red states move forward. The campaign is launching in earnest with a 'Liberation Day' event on Thursday, 'We're gonna fight fire with fire,' Newsom said, pledging to 'neutralize' whatever happens in Texas. Some experts have suggested that, despite Democrats' advantage in the blue stronghold, Newsom may have to heavily campaign to make sure such a measure gets the support it needs, due to the popularity of the independent redistricting commission that voters approved in both 2008 and 2010. The Politico poll question notably didn't specify whether a return to Legislature-drawn lines would be temporary, as Newsom has stressed. But the wide support for the commission underscores why Democrats would want to make sure any plans to bypass it would have an expiration date. The poll was taken July 28-Aug 12 among 1,445 California registered voters. The modeled error estimate is plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.
