
Singapore to stop entry to high-risk travellers from 2026
Also, 43 per cent more foreigners were refused entry in the first six months of 2025 compared to the same time last year after the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) enhanced border security to identify more high-risk travellers before their arrival.
The ICA plans to roll out the no-boarding directives (NBDs) to prevent arrivals at air checkpoints from 2026 and at sea checkpoints from 2028, The Straits Times reported.
Transport operators who fail to comply with an NBD can be fined up to SGD 10,000.
The move comes in the wake of the Immigration (Amendment) Act that came into force on December 31, 2024.
Singapore, with over six million people of multiple ethnicities, remains sensitive to issues related to ISIS and or even other racial, religious and political-bias elements, according to diplomatic observers here.
On Thursday, the ICA said that while collecting passenger and crew information in advance has been the norm for airline and ship operators, such information is generally not readily available at land checkpoints, involving bus-car-passengers.
The authorities, therefore, are looking into ways to implement similar measures at land checkpoints, according to the daily report.
Meanwhile, enhancements to Singapore's border security, including through new profiling and detection capabilities, have allowed ICA to identify more high-risk travellers before their arrival to Singapore.
'This has translated into a 43 per cent increase in the number of foreigners refused entry into the prosperous island state in the first half of 2025, compared with the same period in 2024," the daily said.
People who can be denied entry include those who had been previously barred from entering Singapore after being convicted of certain crimes.
On Thursday, Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam said ICA's transformation comes at a time of increasing volumes of travellers coming into the country.
Shanmugam, who is also Coordinating Minister for National Security, pointed out that traveller volumes through Singapore's checkpoints increased to 230 million passengers in 2024, compared with the 197 million who passed through the country's borders in 2015.
The diplomatic observers noted that it is also common for travellers to fly into Malaysia and then take a bus, taxi or car ride to Singapore.
Shanmugam said traveller volume is expected to increase further with the completion of three major infrastructure projects in near future.
Peninsular Malaysia's southernmost state capital of Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System is expected to be operational in December 2026; the Changi Airport Terminal 5 is slated to open by the mid-2030s, and the expansion of Woodlands Checkpoint, a land-border checkpoint, is expected over the next 10 to 15 years, according to the broadsheet report.
'But the limitation is that ICA's manpower cannot grow indefinitely, so we have been drawing more on technology to cope with this demand and to really navigate the more complex security environment," the minister said.
To that end, ICA said it has achieved its vision to transform checkpoint clearance operations by becoming among the first border agencies in the world to implement passport-less immigration clearance.
This was part of ICA's New Clearance Concept that was first announced in 2019, to provide faster and more secure immigration clearance.
All travellers to and from Singapore can now clear immigration in an automated, passport-less process. This involves a facial or iris biometric scan at air and sea checkpoints, or clearance using a QR-code for those travelling through land checkpoints.
As of June 30, ICA said some 93 million travellers have cleared immigration without needing to present their passports. PTI GS NPK NPK
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
July 31, 2025, 16:30 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Exclusion of Aadhaar from Bihar SIR: Supreme Court observes 11 documents better than 7; calls it 'voter friendly'
Supreme Court NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the 11 documents required for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the poll-bound Bihar show the electoral roll revision is "voter-friendly" compared to the seven documents needed for a summary revision. "The number of documents in summary revision conducted earlier in the state was seven and in SIR it is 11, which shows it is voter friendly. We understand your arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar is exclusionary but a high number of documents is actually inclusionary," the bench said according to news agency PTI. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, which resumed hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the June 24 decision of the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct SIR in poll bound Bihar, said despite petitioners' arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar was exclusionary, it appeared the large number of documents was "actually inclusionary". The top court noted electors were required to submit any one of the 11 documents on the list. Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, disagreed and submitted the number of documents may be high but they had the least coverage. Giving an example of passport availability with the electors, Singhvi said it was only one to two per cent in Bihar and they have no provision for permanent resident certificates given in the state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo "If we see the availability of documents with the population in Bihar it can be seen the coverage is very low," he said. The bench said the coverage of 36 lakh of passport holders in the state appears to be good. "The list of documents is prepared normally after taking feedback from various government departments to ensure maximum coverage," Justice Bagchi pointed out. On August 12, the Supreme Court said that including or excluding citizens and non-citizens from electoral rolls was within the Election Commission's remit. It backed the poll panel's decision to not treat Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's voters' list. Amid the escalating row over the ongoing SIR in and outside Parliament, the court noted the dispute was 'largely a trust deficit issue.' The EC has maintained that about 6.5 crore of Bihar's 7.9 crore voters did not need to submit any documents for themselves or their parents if their names were in the 2003 electoral rolls.


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Congress MP responds to objection of Bihar's Minta Devi: ‘Why do we need her permission?'
Congress Lok Sabha MP Imran Masood defended the Opposition's use of Minta Devi's photo in Bihar's SIR row, saying her permission was not required since the information came from Election Commission records. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and other INDIA bloc members seen wearing T-shirts featuring the name Minta Devi, a voter allegedly listed as 124 years old in the Election Commission's voter list, during their protest over the issues of 'poll fraud' and Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.(PTI ) He added that the woman is being 'oppressed' and that the Congress party stands against it. 'Why do we need her permission? We took her name from the records of the Election Commission. According to the Election Commission records, her age is listed as 124 years, and I have the record. Where does the need for her permission come in?,' Masood told news agency PTI. 'If she goes to vote tomorrow, people will ask her how she has become 124 years old. This has nothing to do with her personally. She is being oppressed, and we are standing against that oppression,' the Congress leader added. Masood responded after Minta Devi expressed her anger at the Congress leaders, asking who 'gave them the right' to wear t-shirts bearing her picture. Senior Congress leaders, including Priyanka Gandhi and Gaurav Gogoi, were seen wearing t-shirts featuring Minta Devi's picture and name on the front, with '124 Not Out' written on the back, inside the Parliament premises on Tuesday. The leaders alleged that the woman had been registered as a 124-year-old voter, making her nine years older than the oldest person in the world. 'Who are they (Opposition MPs) to me? Who is Priyanka Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi to me? Who gave them the right to wear t-shirts featuring me?' Minta Devi told the news agency ANI. However, she also acknowledged discrepancies in her voter details and demanded corrections. According to her Aadhar card, her date of birth is July 15, 1990, and she criticised her registration as a 124-year-old. Minta Devi, a resident of Bihar's Siwan district, was one of the voters highlighted in Rahul Gandhi's presentation on alleged voter fraud. He had claimed that she was listed as 124 years old in the Election Commission's draft voter list recently released.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Uttar Pradesh court orders FIR against Union MoS for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, four others in land dispute case
A court in Uttar Pradesh's Gonda district has directed the police to register an FIR against Union Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, his representative Rajesh Singh and three others in connection with an alleged land dispute case. According to officials, the order was issued on Monday (August 11, 2025) by Special Judge of the MP-MLA Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division) Apeksha Singh, who instructed Mankapur police station to lodge an FIR against Kirti Vardhan Singh, Rajesh Singh, Pinku Singh, Sahdev Yadav and Kanti Singh. The complainant, Ajay Singh, a resident of Bhitoura in the Mankapur area, had moved the court under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking registration of a case against the accused. Ajay Singh has alleged that land registered in the name of his wife Manisha Singh was fraudulently transferred again by influencing and luring the original seller, Bittan Devi, to execute a backdated sale deed in favour of Mithlesh Rastogi and Kanti Singh using a three-year-old stamp paper. He claimed that when he complained, the Superintendent of Police ordered an inquiry, which confirmed the allegations. Based on the SP's directions, police registered a case in 2024 against the seller and the buyers under relevant sections, but later filed a final report closing the matter. Ajay Singh said he objected to the closure, and in March 2025, the court set aside the final report and ordered further investigation, which is still underway. In the meantime, Rajesh Singh allegedly lodged a false case against Ajay Singh and his wife at the local police station in 2024. After the court's order for further investigation, Rajesh Singh allegedly used his political influence to harass the couple, they said. Through his driver Rinku Singh, he purportedly got another case registered against the couple under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the aim of pressuring them to settle the dispute. Ajay Singh alleged that since then, the accused have been threatening him to stop pursuing cases related to the disputed land and agree to a settlement, warning that his family would be killed if he refused. He said that despite repeated complaints to the police, no action was taken, prompting him to approach the court. Reacting to the development, Rajesh Singh, the Union Minister's representative, said he had come to know about the matter through the media and would comment only after receiving a copy of the court order.