Zelensky knows he risks another White House ambush
The Independent
The free world's most celebrated president is showing some mettle in agreeing to a meeting with the leader of the free world. When Volodymyr Zelensky walks into the Oval Office on Monday, he knows he's risking another ambush. The Ukrainian president is prepared to gamble that he'll get another White House schoolyard bullying session, because there's a slim chance that Donald Trump may finally have tired of being played by the Kremlin. It is now conceivable, just, that Trump is prepared to consider security guarantees for Ukraine that reflect Nato's Article 5, which could mean that if Ukraine signed up to a peace deal then its long-term future sovereignty and security would be protected, by force of arms, by allies including the US.
Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, spoke with Trump and went public with the idea (that had been hers in the first place) suggesting that the US president had bought into the concept. "The crucial point remains security guarantees to prevent new Russian invasions, and this is the aspect where the most interesting developments were recorded in Anchorage," Meloni said.
Meloni said Trump had highlighted an earlier Italian proposal for security guarantees for Ukraine "inspired by Nato's Article 5".
"The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," said Meloni. After his Friday summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Trump said that the two presidents were close to an agreement. He didn't mention "peace" or a "ceasefire" and admitted that there's no deal until there is a full deal.
Sources have since confirmed to The Independent that Putin demanded that Ukraine give Luhansk and Donetsk provinces to Russia in return for a "freeze" on the front lines elsewhere.
Zelensky, they said, would seek "clarity" on the proposal — which could only be agreed after a referendum in Ukraine.
"We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to. There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there," Trump said.
That "one" significant sticking point with Russia might well be that Ukraine and Europe have persuaded Trump that there can be no enduring peace for Ukraine if a ceasefire, or peace deal, is just a pause in fighting while the Kremlin prepares for a renewed conflict.
Putin's demand that Ukraine cede two provinces in return for a pause in the killing are certain to be rejected by Europe and Ukraine as they make no commitment to ending Putin's long-term desire to take the rest of the counrty.
So far this year Trump has echoed and accepted almost all of Russia's conditions for peace. He has endorsed Putin's demand that Ukraine can never join Nato. He has accepted that Moscow should keep the Ukrainian lands it has already captured. He has blamed the west for provoking the war with Russia in the first place and has even questioned the legitimacy of the Zelensky presidency itself.
Diplomatic sources very close to the European and Ukrainian talks, which followed the Trump-Putin meeting, said that while there was relief that Trump now understood the need for Ukrainian security guarantees.
But details of how it would work — and what concessions Ukraine would be asked to make, are critical. "The question is — how can, or will, this work?" one senior source said.
If, on arrival in the Oval Office, Trump tells him to accept that he must give away Ukraine's east, including Crimea, forever abandon fantasies of joining the EU and Nato and hold elections while his country is occupied (all Russian demands) — then any "security guarantees" will be meaningless. They will have been part of a Russian effort to see Zelensky enfiladed in the White House, as he was in February.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ARN News Center
44 minutes ago
- ARN News Center
Russian drone attack kills 7 in Kharkiv, Ukraine says
A Russian drone attack on a residential area in Kharkiv killed seven people including a toddler and a 16-year-old boy overnight, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday, as the US presses Kyiv to accept a quick deal to end the war that Moscow started. Six children aged 6 to 17 were among 20 other people injured in the attack on Ukraine's second largest city, Oleh Synehubov, governor of the wider Kharkiv region, wrote on Telegram. The attack came as Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy was preparing for talks with Donald Trump in Washington later on Monday amid European fears the US president could try to pressure Kyiv into accepting a peace settlement favourable to Moscow. The air force said Russia launched 140 drones against Ukraine overnight, the largest total recorded in a single night since August 4. Kharkiv, which lies near northeastern Ukraine's border with Russia, has been the target of Russian drone and missile attacks throughout the war. A ballistic missile attack shattered around 1,000 windows in various buildings in the city on Sunday, Synehubov said. Some residents had to be evacuated from their homes, officials said. Reuters witnesses saw medics attending to residents on a street and rescuers inspecting damage to residential buildings. "Russia is a murderous war machine that Ukraine is holding back. And it must be stopped through transatlantic unity and pressure," Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on X after the attack. He said Russia was continuing to kill civilians despite peace efforts. Russia says it does not deliberately target civilians. Thousands have been killed since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. Russia fired four missiles overnight as well as the drones, the air force said. It said 88 drones were downed and reported impacts at 25 locations in six different regions. Seventeen people were injured in a morning missile attack that struck unspecified critical infrastructure in the southeastern city of Zaporizhzhia, officials said. In the Black Sea region of Odesa, an attack caused a large fire at a fuel and energy infrastructure facility, requiring a major firefighting effort, the governor said. Two people were also injured in strikes in the northern region of Sumy, where at least a dozen homes and an educational institution were damaged, authorities said. Reuters could not independently verify the weapons used by Russia. There was no immediate comment from Moscow.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US halts visas for Palestinian medical evacuees from Gaza
The US State Department announced on Saturday it was halting all visitor visas for Palestinians from Gaza while it conducts a "full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days". The move follows unverified claims posted on X by far-right commentator Laura Loomer, who alleged that Palestinians granted medical-humanitarian visas were 'pro-Hamas' and tied to the Muslim Brotherhood. Her posts drew support from some Republicans, including Congressman Randy Fine, who called the visas a 'national security risk'. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) condemned the restrictions, calling them 'the latest example of the Trump administration's complicity with Israel's genocide' and 'intentionally cruel'. 'It is deeply ironic that the Trump administration would ban Palestinian children seeking treatment while rolling out the red carpet for racists and indicted war criminals from the Israeli government,' Cair added in a statement on X. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters According to Reuters, the US has issued more than 3,800 B1 and B2 visitor visas in 2025 to holders of Palestinian Authority travel documents, which allow foreigners to seek medical care in the United States. That total includes 640 visas issued in May alone. Heal Palestine, an NGO that coordinates evacuations for injured children and their families, said it has assisted 148 people so far this year, including 63 children in urgent need of care. On 4 August, the group announced its 'largest single medical evacuation' to date, bringing 11 critically injured children, along with caregivers, to the US for long-term treatment and rehabilitation. Basic right The Palestine Children's Relief Fund, which has facilitated free medical care for sick and injured children for more than 30 years, warned the visa halt would strip children of their 'most basic right to access medical care'. Reacting to the new policy, Loomer wrote on X that she hoped "GAZANS are added to the Trump travel ban", which targets a number of Middle East countries, "and hopefully every single Gazan who came in under [former US President] Biden and Trump is immediately deported'. 'They are not that sick if they can sit on a plane for 22 hours,' she added. Israel's bombardment has devastated Gaza's healthcare system, leaving the besieged enclave without a single fully functioning hospital. The World Health Organisation estimates that as many as 12,500 patients in Gaza require evacuation for medical treatment.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
The Trump-Putin summit shows why Europe needs to continue re-arming itself
Much store has been placed over the past eight months in how foreign leaders prepare to interact with US President Donald Trump. From a European point of view, there has been a carousel of winners and losers. Take, for example, a write-up in The Wall Street Journal of the golfing prowess of Finnish President Alexander Stubb and how that was key to the relationship between the two men. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer would have enjoyed the headline on Monday that said he was hoping to 'exploit his curious relationship' with the US leader to the benefit of Ukraine. Mr Trump appears to enjoy it all. Going back to his first term and the notorious handshaking with French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Trump sees meeting European leaders as a kind of vaudeville performance. At the start of this week, he was boasting that Monday's White House gathering on Ukraine was a big day in history. 'Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honour to host them!!!' Step back from all the stage management, and the reality is that Mr Trump and the new American political establishment see the Europeans as all one, not the individual performers that the news reports highlight. The war in Ukraine appears to have reached the moment of truth. By abandoning demands for a ceasefire as a gateway to peace talks during his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Trump has established how the conflict can now end. For the Europeans, this means the transactional basis of US foreign policy going forward is a fundamental reality that cannot be wished away anymore. Nor even blunted by the kind of summit theatrics we have seen over recent months. The Europeans must now follow through on the generational change the continent's leaders have promised on its collective defence. This means all nations need to match the kind of uplift that Germany has promised. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrived at the White House on Monday having promised to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of national gross domestic product by 2029. It also means that leaders must be more ruthless in the dollars versus euros choices that the Europeans are making when buying defence equipment. Put simply, to defend itself Europe must now more aggressively buy European as a long-term strategic play. The third aspect of this is that the Europeans must show they are prepared to join in delivering what it takes to be robust in their own self-defence. That is why I describe this as a generational choice. It is surely true that the defence spending must go back to levels last seen during the Cold War. But it is also true that the population must be mobilised in civil defence and formal security roles in new and wider ways. The war in Ukraine has already changed the trajectory of the European story. A decade that started with the Covid-19 pandemic has seen its growth and prosperity derailed by the subsequent decoupling from Russia. This isn't just in terms of the cost of living, which was severely hit by the resources shock following the war. The wider outlook for the continent is also one of beleaguered choices between welfare and warfare with no real prospect of an economic revival. It is not just Ukraine that is a frontline state. The Baltics and Scandinavians have that mentality, too. Alliances have been formed such as the 10-nation Joint Expeditionary Force, which stretches from Iceland through the UK to those northern frontline states. Most European countries are on a trajectory to higher government spending, but the reforms in the security mentality are not yet as real as the scale of the challenge that the continent is facing. The retired British general Richard Barrons observed last week that no one was talking about a Russian invasion of the UK as a credible prospect, but he queried the readiness for a more wholistic threat landscape. This includes strengthening the digital sphere in the information age. A society mobilised to take on these challenges is clearly just as vital as strong defences in Finland or elsewhere. For now, the Europeans will seek to eke out as much of a security blanket from the US as they can feasibly obtain. That is why the cast at the White House on Monday was not just Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy but also included Mr Starmer, Mr Macron, Mr Merz, Mr Stubb, plus Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It would be a fool's paradise, however, to not see the writing on the wall. When the Signal chat involving American leaders was leaked during Washington's confrontation with Yemen's Houthis, Vice President JD Vance was shown asking why the US was bailing out European security. The intervention across the Red Sea was quickly curtailed. France has long argued that at least two thirds of the coming European military build-up should be manufactured at home. Vulnerabilities of ordering from the US include long lead times and a de-prioritisation of the European inventory rebuild in areas such as ammunition. Other European countries openly push for the high-capability requirements on offer from the US. This pushes the longer-term restructuring of the continent's defence industries into the long grass. So while orders are flowing from a top-line increase in defence budgets, it is hard to shake the questions around adequacy. Not only is the spending rising as fast as pledged but also can Europe become strong enough, faster? The answer to that question won't be found in this week's trip to Washington.
