Instagram Rolls Out New 3:4 Aspect Ratio For Photos For iOS And Android; How To Use It
Instagram New Aspect Ratio: Meta-owned platform is expanding its focus beyond Reels and Stories with a much-needed update for photographers. A photo and video uploading platform has officially introduced support for 3:4 aspect ratio photographs on its platform, allowing users to upload images without needing to crop them to fit Instagram's previously supported dimensions. The change aligns with the default setting found on most smartphone for the users.
This new compatibility is available for both single-image uploads and carousel posts on Android and iOS. For years, users were limited to the app's signature 1:1 square format or the more recent 4:5 rectangle for photo posts. Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri has shared a new announcement via Threads that photos taken in the 3:4 format will now appear on the platform exactly as captured. The meta-owned platform is a win for casual users and professional photographers alike.
How To Use New 3:4 Feature On Instagram
Step 1: Open Instagram on your iPhone or Android device and tap the plus (+) icon to create a new post.
Step 2: Select the photo you want to upload—make sure it's taken in the 3:4 format (portrait mode on most phones).
Step 3: Instagram detects the aspect ratio automatically; no need to crop or resize the image.
Step 4: Tap Next, apply filters or edit if needed, then hit Share—your 3:4 photo will display correctly in the feed.
Adding further, Instagram keeps adding new tools to help users create better content. Recently, it launched a separate app called Edits that lets people easily work on their videos. Another new feature, Blend, creates a custom Reels feed inside your chats. It shows videos based on what you and a friend both enjoy. This feature is invite-only and aims to make content discovery more personal. After a year of testing, Blend is now available on both Android and iOS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
This is the first ever picture clicked on a cell-phone!
Taking a photo today is second nature—you pull out your phone, tap the screen, and capture the moment in an instant. It's casual, seamless, and deeply woven into the fabric of everyday life. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now We don't think twice before sending a selfie, sharing a sunset, or preserving memories with a single click. But what we now take for granted is the result of years of innovation, experimentation, and a dash of tech magic. B efore smartphones and cloud storage, before Instagram and camera rolls, there was one moment—one photograph—that started it all. And it happened on June 11, 1997, in a hospital room in California. How did the first ever picture come to be? On June 11, 1997, engineer and tech entrepreneur Philippe Kahn sat in the maternity ward of Sutter Maternity Center in Santa Cruz, California. His wife was in labor, and as he waited for their daughter to arrive, Kahn decided he didn't just want to take a photo—he wanted to share it instantly. But there were no smartphones then. No Instagram. No instant sharing. So Kahn improvised. Using a Motorola StarTAC flip phone, a Casio QV digital camera that shot low-res 320x240 pixel images, and a Toshiba 430CDT laptop, he built a system from scratch right there in the hospital. The setup was wired so that when he took a photo, it would automatically upload the image to his web server, then send out email alerts to friends and family with a link to view it online. This wasn't just a photo—it was the first time an image was captured and sent directly from a mobile phone. Kahn had already been working on a concept called 'Picture Mail', a vision for sending photos instantly via a server-based system. As he told IEEE Spectrum, he wanted to be the 'Polaroid of the 21st century,' bringing to life a digital version of the instant camera. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Still, he hadn't developed consumer-ready hardware to make the system easy to use. But time—and necessity—sparked invention. 'I had always wanted to have this all working in time to share my daughter's birth photo,' Kahn said. 'But I wasn't sure I was going to make it.' Luckily for Kahn (and not so luckily for his wife), she was in labor for 18 hours—long enough for him to put his Frankenstein rig together. He had most of the tech on hand, and what he didn't have, an assistant quickly grabbed from a local Radio Shack. As Kahn put it, 'It's always the case that if it weren't for the last minute, nothing would ever get done.' A single photo that sparked a revolution That day, the first photo ever sent from a mobile phone was shared with the world—and though it was a humble 320x240-pixel image of a newborn, it marked the beginning of a technological revolution. We've come a long way since then. Today, more than 1.8 trillion photos are taken each year, mostly from phones that are thinner than a paperback but smarter than computers from the '90s. And it all began with a father, a hospital room, and a dream to share a moment instantly. We've never looked back since.
Hans India
7 hours ago
- Hans India
Google launches AI Edge Gallery App to run hugging face models offline on phones
Keywords: Google AI Edge Gallery, offline AI models, Hugging Face, Android AI apps, iOS AI app, AI on-device, edge computing, local AI models, AI Prompt Lab, Google Gemma, Apache 2.0 license, experimental alpha release, AI development, Google open source AI, mobile AI Google has quietly unveiled a new app called AI Edge Gallery, enabling users to download and run AI models from Hugging Face directly on their smartphones — entirely offline. Currently available for Android (with iOS support coming soon), this experimental Alpha release allows local execution of image generation, Q&A, code writing, and more using compatible models like Google's Gemma 3n. Users can browse models by task, such as 'AI Chat' or 'Ask Image,' and launch them via an intuitive interface. A built-in Prompt Lab supports quick, single-turn tasks like summarizing and rewriting content, offering customizable templates and settings for developers to explore. While cloud-based models remain more powerful, the local alternative prioritizes data privacy, speed (on modern devices), and offline accessibility, especially useful where internet is unreliable. Performance will vary based on device specs and model size. Licensed under Apache 2.0, the app is open for commercial and personal use, and Google is inviting developer feedback to improve its capabilities. Developers can download Google AI Edge Gallery from GitHub by following provided instructions.
Hans India
7 hours ago
- Hans India
The challenges behind producing iPhones in the U.S. – and why it's unlikely
In 2011, President Barack Obama asked Apple cofounder Steve Jobs what it would take to shift iPhone assembly back to the United States. Fast-forward 14 years: former President Donald Trump is resurrecting that same question with Apple's current CEO, Tim Cook. Trump has threatened a 25 percent tariff on Apple—and other smartphone makers—unless they build every iPhone sold in the U.S. domestically. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25 percent must be paid by Apple to the U.S.' Earlier this month, Cook confirmed that most iPhones bound for American customers will ship from India. That response underscores a tough reality: reassembling the iPhone's global supply chain on U.S. soil would dramatically upend how Apple produces its most profitable device. A Well-Oiled Overseas Manufacturing Ecosystem Currently, Apple relies heavily on factories in China and—more recently—India, where a specialized workforce has been honed to assemble millions of iPhones every year. Foxconn, Apple's long-standing manufacturing partner, employs up to 900,000 people at peak production. Their vast campuses, complete with dormitories and on-site support services, allow Foxconn to rapidly adjust output to match Apple's exacting timelines. 'China already has sprawling facilities designed specifically for electronics assembly,' notes Dipanjan Chatterjee, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester. In these plants, teams of workers focus on narrow, highly skilled tasks—often programming industrial robots or performing precision component installation. That level of specialization and scale cannot simply be duplicated overnight in the U.S. David Marcotte, senior vice president at Kantar, adds: 'Each step of the iPhone's assembly requires expertise developed over many years. Replicating that on American soil would be an immense challenge.' Labor and Skills Gap Manufacturing in the United States today looks very different than it did in the latter half of the 20th century. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 8 percent of American workers were employed in manufacturing as of early 2025—down from roughly 26 percent in 1970. Moreover, modern factories increasingly rely on a blend of robotics, data analytics, and coding skills—areas where China and India currently hold an edge when it comes to electronics production. Carolyn Lee, executive director of the Manufacturing Institute, explains that 'the job has very much changed. Workers today need training in programming, data analysis, and advanced machine operations.' Apple CEO Tim Cook has echoed that point: at a 2017 Fortune event, he said that China offered a rare combination of 'craftsmanship, sophisticated robotics, and software talent.' He warned that meeting Apple's exacting standards without that unique mix would be nearly impossible. President Trump's Onshoring Push One of Trump's central economic objectives has been to bring manufacturing back to the United States. Within the first months of his second term, he levied tariffs on broad categories of imported goods, hoping to incentivize companies to build products domestically. Trump's threat of a 25 percent tariff on smartphones sold in the U.S. would, if enforced, make iPhones significantly more expensive for American consumers—or cut deeply into Apple's profit margins. Cook reportedly met with Trump last week to discuss these proposals. Trump, for his part, hailed Apple's February commitment to invest $500 billion in U.S. operations over the next four years—money earmarked for R&D, data-center facilities, and a Detroit 'Academy' to teach small and mid-sized businesses about advanced manufacturing and AI tools. Taiwan's TSMC has similarly pledged $100 billion to build or expand American chip-making plants, which Trump called a 'political win' onshoring U.S. tech production. Yet Apple's February announcement does not include training a workforce capable of iPhone-scale assembly. Instead, the Detroit academy will focus on helping other businesses adopt 'smart manufacturing' practices—not on building the trained, highly specialized labor pool that Foxconn has cultivated over decades in Asia. What It Would Take to Build in America Several analysts believe that Apple could shift at least part of its iPhone assembly to the U.S. within five years—but only by fundamentally changing the way each device is put together. Patrick Moorhead, founder and CEO of Moor Insights & Strategy, says Apple would need to introduce far more automation to offset the higher labor costs and skill gaps. That could mean redesigning certain elements—glue application, component placement, or precision machining—to be driven by robotic arms rather than hand-assembly. Ultrahuman, a smart health ring startup, offers a real-world example. CEO Mohit Kumar told CNN that when Ultrahuman moved production of its wearable from India to Texas last November, it leaned heavily on automation and cross-training workers to perform multiple tasks like casting and polishing. Even so, Ultrahuman accepts that mass-producing millions of units at the level Apple requires is a far bigger undertaking. Many core iPhone components—chips, camera modules, displays—still originate with suppliers based in China, Taiwan, South Korea, and elsewhere in Asia. Shifting assembly alone would break the synergy of having suppliers clustered near one another, intensifying logistical hurdles and rising freight costs. Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities, estimates that 90 percent of iPhone production currently takes place in China; as recently as last year, that figure dipped to about 40 percent only after Apple began ramping up in India. Ives warns that assembling the iPhone in the U.S. might triple the device's price. Even if Apple were willing to redesign the iPhone for greater automation, recruit and retrain thousands of American factory workers, and reorganize its supplier network, the company would face significant political pressure from both sides. Trump's tariffs risk imposing punishing costs on Apple, but CEOs and shareholders alike may balk at the price increases or margin squeeze such a move would entail. A Tightrope Walk Forrester's Chatterjee sums up Apple's quandary: 'You cannot realistically, from an economic standpoint, bring iPhone production to the U.S., and you also can't simply refuse to do it.' Apple must carefully navigate between appeasing political demands to onshore manufacturing and preserving the cost efficiencies that keep iPhone prices competitive. At this point, the consensus among analysts is clear: Apple will continue to expand production in India and maintain its China base. Until there's a seismic shift in labor availability, automation technology, or supply-chain structure, making iPhones in America remains more aspiration than reality.
