PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'
'Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians and recorded in Malaysia to share his views on our domestic political landscape', the party said in a statement.
In a video released on YouTube on Jun 24, the Workers' Party (WP) secretary-general spoke to Keluar Sekejap, a popular Malaysian political podcast hosted by former health minister Khairy Jamaluddin and Mr Shahril Hamdan, previously UMNO's information chief.
It was Mr Singh's most in-depth interview since the May 3 General Election, in which the PAP retained power with 65.57 per cent of the vote.
The PAP said the issue was not "merely a matter of platform preference". "It touches on a fundamental principle - that Singapore's domestic affairs should be debated and decided by Singaporeans, within Singapore."
Quoting former opposition stalwart Chiam See Tong, the party added: "The opposition must be 'truthful … good patriotic Singaporeans…and not go around the world denouncing Singapore'.'
During the interview, which lasted more than one-and-a-half hours, Mr Singh addressed a wide range of topics, including the WP's electoral strategy, and the intersection of race, religion and politics.
Asked by Mr Khairy if he aspired to be prime minister, Mr Singh said no.
Mr Khairy also asked if there was a 'lack of ambition' from the WP and if it should have pivoted from the goal of winning one-third of the seats in parliament, to which Mr Singh said that Singaporean voters were not seeking a change in government.
"PATTERN OF MISREPRESENTATION"
The PAP also challenged Mr Singh's claim that his party does not 'score political points based on race or religion'.
It referenced the WP's interactions with Mr Noor Deros, a self-styled religious teacher in Malaysia known for 'views that are at odds with Singapore's commitment to multiracialism and religious harmony'.
In the lead up to the elections, the religious teacher, who is Singaporean, had published a list of demands for Singaporean politicians and claimed to have met the WP's Malay candidates. He also called on his followers to vote for WP candidates, such as Mr Faisal Manap, who contested in Tampines GRC.
'Despite public interest, the WP has not explained what transpired in that meeting, or why Mr Deros subsequently expressed public support for WP candidates during GE2025,' said the PAP.
In addition, it said WP's Punggol GRC candidate Harpreet Singh had made 'misleading statements about the PAP's stance on a minority prime minister'.
The claims were later disproven with public records of PAP leaders speaking on the issue, including Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Coordinating Minister for National Security K Shanmugam, it said.
'This pattern of misrepresentation is worrying,' PAP said.
It also cited endorsements of WP candidates by Malaysian politicians from Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) on social media during the election.
'Their messages contained racial and religious overtones, designed to encourage segments of Singaporean voters to vote along racial and religious lines,' it said.
"POLITICS SHOULD STOP AT THE WATER'S EDGE"
The PAP said that Mr Singh remained silent until the Singapore government 'called out these acts of blatant foreign interference'.
'Even then, his response left many critical questions unanswered,' said the party.
Mr Singh had told reporters during the election campaign that a member of the Muslim community at an Aljunied mosque had asked to speak to Mr Faisal and WP's Malay members. 'There was no indication that this individual would be joining the meeting,' Mr Singh said then.
He also said the WP did not agree to any demands made by Mr Noor.
But the PAP said in its statement that Singaporeans should question the WP chief's consistency: 'Does Mr Singh truly stand by the principles he has stated? Or are they only invoked when convenient? Does he believe foreign involvement is acceptable when it benefits his party?'
The party said that while Singapore and Malaysia share close ties, they have long refrained from commenting on each other's politics and from using each other's media to influence public opinion, especially after the racial unrest of the 1960s.
This understanding has served both countries well, and maintaining it requires 'political leaders of integrity who place national interest above partisan gain', said the PAP.
'As a sovereign nation, we must be clear: Politics should stop at the water's edge,' it said. 'Singapore's affairs are for Singaporeans to decide, based on what is best for our national interests.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Online Citizen
7 hours ago
- Online Citizen
Workers' Party hits back at PAP over podcast criticisms, accuses it of 'opposing for the sake of opposing'
The Workers' Party (WP) has delivered a forceful rebuttal to the People's Action Party's (PAP) recent criticisms of Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh, accusing the ruling party of 'opposing for the sake of opposing' in a statement released on 3 July 2025. The WP's sharp response came after a series of escalating attacks by the PAP and its publication, Petir. The debate began with Petir's article published on 30 June 2025, which criticised Singh's decision to appear on the Malaysian podcast Keluar Sekejap rather than on a local platform. During the Keluar Sekejap podcast on 24 June 2025, Singh firmly stated that he had no intention of becoming Prime Minister, describing his mission instead as 'normalising the idea of an opposition in Singapore.' He explained that his goal was to build a credible and prepared alternative force, which he described as essential 'insurance' for Singapore in case the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) ever faced a serious setback. Singh also rejected suggestions that the Workers' Party (WP) lacked ambition, emphasising that there were no 'safe seats' for the opposition and that contesting elections in Singapore requires long-term commitment and serious ground engagement. He cautioned against bold slogans or positioning oneself as a 'Prime Minister in waiting' without strong public demand, describing such moves as risky 'gambles' that do not work well in Singapore politics. Petir described Singh's choice as 'strange' and suggested it was a deliberate move to air domestic political issues on foreign soil. It questioned why Singh, who had declined invitations from local podcasts, would choose to speak extensively to a foreign audience, implying this undermined the principle that domestic affairs should be debated within Singapore. Citing former opposition leader Chiam See Tong, Petir argued that opposition politicians should be 'good patriotic Singaporeans' and avoid 'denouncing Singapore' abroad. It also highlighted previous controversies, including an alleged meeting between WP members led by Faisal Manap and Malaysian religious figure Noor Deros. Petir claimed the WP had never fully disclosed what transpired in that meeting and questioned why Deros subsequently endorsed WP candidates during the 2025 general election. It further criticised WP candidate Harpreet Singh for allegedly making false claims about the PAP's stance on a minority Prime Minister and accused the WP of staying silent on racially charged endorsements from Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) politicians during the campaign. Building on Petir's criticisms, the PAP issued an official statement on 3 July 2025 titled 'Politics should stop at the water's edge'. The statement argued that Singh's appearance raised 'serious questions' about his judgment and commitment to national interests, stating that Singapore's domestic politics should be debated and decided by Singaporeans within the country. The PAP noted that Singapore and Malaysia share close historical ties but emphasised the importance of respecting sovereignty and refraining from using each other's media to shape domestic opinion The statement recalled lessons from the racial unrest of the 1960s and warned against allowing foreign influence to shape Singapore's political landscape. In its rebuttal, the WP firmly rejected these accusations. It argued that public reception to Singh's podcast appearance had been 'positive', with many Singaporeans appreciating his candid and fair views. The party stressed that Singh did not denounce Singapore or its government, but instead engaged in a transparent exchange on issues of public interest. The WP underscored that Singh, as Leader of the Opposition, is not part of the executive branch and thus not subject to the same diplomatic conventions as government ministers. It stated that no legal or formal guidelines have ever been communicated to Singh restricting him from speaking on overseas platforms. Highlighting what it called a 'double standard', the WP pointed out that PAP leaders have frequently granted interviews to foreign media outlets and discussed domestic affairs without facing similar criticism. The party noted that these interviews have at times gone viral internationally, helping to enhance the PAP's global image rather than undermining national interests. The WP revealed that one PAP member had even remarked privately after watching the podcast that 'Pritam did well', suggesting a stark contrast between private sentiments and public attacks. Additionally, some PAP members were seen posing for photos with one of the Keluar Sekejap hosts during a recent visit to Singapore, further indicating no genuine concern over national security or sovereignty. 'These actions would lead any Singaporean to an irresistible conclusion: that the Leader of the Opposition's appearance on the podcast had no detrimental impact whatsoever on Singapore's national interests,' the WP declared. Addressing the controversy over Noor Deros, the WP reaffirmed that it had thoroughly addressed this issue during the general election and had issued a public statement clarifying that no promises were made to Deros. Furthermore, Deros himself had clarified on 26 April 2025 that his comments had been misinterpreted and that no agreements were made. On the criticism of Harpreet Singh, the WP maintained that his comments regarding a minority Prime Minister reflected public perceptions shaped by certain statements, rather than an attack on the PAP's official position. Harpreet had also encouraged the public to view his comments in full context, which the WP insisted was critical to understanding his intent. The WP refuted suggestions that it condoned foreign interference, reiterating its longstanding position against the use of race and religion in politics. It stressed that it had promptly clarified its stance when foreign endorsements surfaced during the election and firmly rejected any external influence on Singapore's democratic process. In closing, the WP called on the PAP to engage in 'reasoned and constructive debate' rather than reviving past controversies or making baseless allegations for political advantage. The party reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, openness, and responsible political engagement both within Singapore and abroad.
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Thailand's new Cabinet sworn in
Thailand's new Cabinet has been sworn in, completing a reshuffle of portfolios. It was originally aimed at stemming a political crisis, which has seen Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended from office, with two acting prime ministers stepping up just this week. CNA's Saksith Saiyasombut reports from Government House in Bangkok.
CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'
SINGAPORE: The decision by Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh to speak about Singapore's politics on a Malaysian podcast 'raises serious questions' as to why he chose to address the topic "on foreign soil to a foreign audience", the People's Action Party (PAP) said on Thursday (Jul 3). 'Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians and recorded in Malaysia to share his views on our domestic political landscape', the party said in a statement. In a video released on YouTube on Jun 24, the Workers' Party (WP) secretary-general spoke to Keluar Sekejap, a popular Malaysian political podcast hosted by former health minister Khairy Jamaluddin and Mr Shahril Hamdan, previously UMNO's information chief. It was Mr Singh's most in-depth interview since the May 3 General Election, in which the PAP retained power with 65.57 per cent of the vote. The PAP said the issue was not "merely a matter of platform preference". "It touches on a fundamental principle - that Singapore's domestic affairs should be debated and decided by Singaporeans, within Singapore." Quoting former opposition stalwart Chiam See Tong, the party added: "The opposition must be 'truthful … good patriotic Singaporeans…and not go around the world denouncing Singapore'.' During the interview, which lasted more than one-and-a-half hours, Mr Singh addressed a wide range of topics, including the WP's electoral strategy, and the intersection of race, religion and politics. Asked by Mr Khairy if he aspired to be prime minister, Mr Singh said no. Mr Khairy also asked if there was a 'lack of ambition' from the WP and if it should have pivoted from the goal of winning one-third of the seats in parliament, to which Mr Singh said that Singaporean voters were not seeking a change in government. "PATTERN OF MISREPRESENTATION" The PAP also challenged Mr Singh's claim that his party does not 'score political points based on race or religion'. It referenced the WP's interactions with Mr Noor Deros, a self-styled religious teacher in Malaysia known for 'views that are at odds with Singapore's commitment to multiracialism and religious harmony'. In the lead up to the elections, the religious teacher, who is Singaporean, had published a list of demands for Singaporean politicians and claimed to have met the WP's Malay candidates. He also called on his followers to vote for WP candidates, such as Mr Faisal Manap, who contested in Tampines GRC. 'Despite public interest, the WP has not explained what transpired in that meeting, or why Mr Deros subsequently expressed public support for WP candidates during GE2025,' said the PAP. In addition, it said WP's Punggol GRC candidate Harpreet Singh had made 'misleading statements about the PAP's stance on a minority prime minister'. The claims were later disproven with public records of PAP leaders speaking on the issue, including Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Coordinating Minister for National Security K Shanmugam, it said. 'This pattern of misrepresentation is worrying,' PAP said. It also cited endorsements of WP candidates by Malaysian politicians from Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) on social media during the election. 'Their messages contained racial and religious overtones, designed to encourage segments of Singaporean voters to vote along racial and religious lines,' it said. "POLITICS SHOULD STOP AT THE WATER'S EDGE" The PAP said that Mr Singh remained silent until the Singapore government 'called out these acts of blatant foreign interference'. 'Even then, his response left many critical questions unanswered,' said the party. Mr Singh had told reporters during the election campaign that a member of the Muslim community at an Aljunied mosque had asked to speak to Mr Faisal and WP's Malay members. 'There was no indication that this individual would be joining the meeting,' Mr Singh said then. He also said the WP did not agree to any demands made by Mr Noor. But the PAP said in its statement that Singaporeans should question the WP chief's consistency: 'Does Mr Singh truly stand by the principles he has stated? Or are they only invoked when convenient? Does he believe foreign involvement is acceptable when it benefits his party?' The party said that while Singapore and Malaysia share close ties, they have long refrained from commenting on each other's politics and from using each other's media to influence public opinion, especially after the racial unrest of the 1960s. This understanding has served both countries well, and maintaining it requires 'political leaders of integrity who place national interest above partisan gain', said the PAP. 'As a sovereign nation, we must be clear: Politics should stop at the water's edge,' it said. 'Singapore's affairs are for Singaporeans to decide, based on what is best for our national interests.'
