‘Do not buy' warning to parents over 3 major suncream brands that won't properly protect children this summer
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
PARENTS have been warned against three major suncream brands ahead of the summer holidays.
These products were found to not offer significant protection to children in the hot weather.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
A study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of popular suncream brands for protecting your children (stock image)
Credit: Getty
4
The Morrisons SPF 30 Sun Spray is currently available for £3.75
Credit: Morrisons
Which? carried out a series of tests to determine the effectiveness of popular suncream brands ahead of the peak summer season.
The independent lab exams tested sun creams that pass British Standard tests for UVA and UVB sun protection.
However, the tests uncovered three suncreams which failed either the UVA or UVB tests or both.
According to the outlet, this means they don't provide the protection they claim.
First on the list is the Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30, available for £3.75.
Which? claimed this suncream failed SPF tests, which verify if the product can provide the claimed levels of protection from UVB rays.
The outlet said it tested the suncream twice to confirm the result and it failed both times.
However, the product did pass the UVA test carried out independently by Which?.
"We work closely with our supplier and conduct extensive efficacy and safety testing during product development," said a Morrisons representative.
"As such all our sun care products are tested to the relevant industry test standards and are not approved for launch until they meet these standards.
Man reveals very unusual suncream hack and not everyone is convinced
"During development and production all tested variants consistently achieved an SPF of 30."
In direct response to the Which? report, the spokesperson told The Sun: "We have retested the SPF against the British and International Standard and can confirm the product has achieved an SPF value of 34.5 and can therefore be labelled as SPF 30."
The second suncream on the Which? no-go list is the Ultrasun Family SPF30, available for £22.40 from Boots.
The outlet said the product failed a UVA test by not meeting the minimum required level in a first and second test.
However, Which? reported that the suncream did pass SPF tests, but said it couldn't recommend it due to failing one of the required tests.
The importance of sun cream in your skincare routine
Dermatologist and skincare enthusiast Andrea Suarez - known as Dr Dray - revealed why you should wear suncream.
The one thing you can do that will make the biggest difference - and this matters for all ages - is protecting your skin from the sun, Andrea stressed.
"The vast majority of external aging is due to exposure to ultraviolet radiation," she continued, not because you're "not using some jazzy serum or layering 90 different things on your face everyday".
"If you're not doing in your 20s, get on that now."
But she said the use of sun cream alone doesn't go far enough. Andrea urged that you also wear sun-protective clothing like broad-brimmed hats and long sleeves, on top of not staying out too long in the sun.
Doing this over your lifetime - and all year, not just during the summer or on sunny days - "will reduce the visible signs of photoageing", Andrea said.
Those are wrinkles, muddled pigmentation and sagging skin.
Ultrasun disputed the findings, telling the publication: "Ultrasun is fully confident in our testing protocols.
"As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards.
"Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available, and our UVB and UVA filters are tested both in-vitro and in-vivo.
"We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1, which equates to a 92% UVA absorbance."
4
The Ultrasun Family 30SPF Sun Protection is available for £22.40 from Boots
Credit: Boots
Finally, Which? claimed the Asda Protect Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF30 High, £2.66, also failed to deliver when tested.
According to the outlet, tests did not confrim the product's claimed SPF30 in both an initial test or a retest.
When contacted by The Sun, a spokesperson for Asda offered an update.
"We recently had our Asda Protect Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF 30 High re-tested by a leading external provider using internationally recognised testing methods," they said.
"These test results confirmed that this product has a sun protection factor of 31.5, and therefore we do not recognise the test results Which? has published.
'When Which? reviewed this same product in 2022, they awarded it 'Great Value' at that time and it also passed their SPF test.
"The product formulation has not changed since then, so we would question the validity of their test.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
MP Eemeli Peltonen takes his life in parliament building sparking emergency response & suspending sessions in Finland
TRAGIC POLITICIAN MP Eemeli Peltonen takes his life in parliament building sparking emergency response & suspending sessions in Finland Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FINNISH MP has tragically died by suicide in the country's parliament building. Eemeli Peltonen, 30, died today inside the Helsinki Parliament House. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Eemeli Peltonen died today inside the Helsinki Parliament House Credit: AFP 3 Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo earlier confirmed that a body had been found on the premises Credit: AFP 3 He was first elected to the Finnish parliament in 2023 Credit: AFP Emergency services rushed immediately to the scene upon being alerted to the tragedy, Parliament's Director of Security Aaro Toivonen told the Finnish media. Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo earlier confirmed that a body had been found on the premises. He said: "Some time ago, we received truly shocking news from parliament, our common workplace. "One of our colleagues has passed away on parliament premises. This is truly sad news." He added that political business in parliament is being suspended in mourning of Peltonen. Orpo said: "At the same time, we wish strength to his family, loved ones and colleagues. "This deeply touches all of us, we send greetings and strength to everyone." Peltonen's body was found at about 11am local time, according to local media reports. Officials initially did not name him until it was confirmed that his next of kin had been notified. He had previously taken sick leave in June following a problem with his kidneys. In a social media post, he revealed his recovery had been complicated by an infection. "To control the bacteria, I was started on an intravenous antibiotic course... which will take time," he posted. "At the same time, treatment for my kidney problems will continue." Peltonen was first elected to the Finnish parliament in 2023 with 5,747 votes. He was a member of the centre-left Social Democratic Party. Before his election to parliament, he was chairman of the Järvenpää city council from 2017 to 2021. The national flag of Finland was lowered to half mast following the tragic news. If you or someone you know is affected by any of the issues raised in this story, call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, chat on or text Crisis Text Line at 741741.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Kill the single state pension age
When William Beveridge designed the welfare state in the 1940s, the state pension age was 65 for men and 60 for women. Life expectancy for a man was around 66, and around 71 for a woman. The pension was not designed to fund decades of leisure: it was a modest provision for the last couple of years of life, one that not everyone would receive. Today, life expectancy for a man aged 66 (the current state pension age) is around 85, and a woman aged 66 can expect to live until she is 88. The average person now spends close to a fifth of their life in retirement. What was once a short post-script has become a major chapter – and an increasingly expensive one. This is the backdrop for the latest statutory review of the state pension age (SPA), led this year by Dr Suzy Morrissey. Her terms of reference are technical: consider sustainability, intergenerational fairness, life expectancy, international practice. Behind the dry language sits a political question no one rushes to answer: when should people stop working, and who pays for the years they do not? You know the script here. Britain is ageing. The ratio of workers to pensioners is shrinking. Every review concludes that the SPA must rise. Every opposition grumbles about the cruelty of doing so. Every government, when in office, quietly nudges the age upwards. Nothing fundamental changes. What almost never gets challenged is the model itself: a single age at which everyone, regardless of class, health or occupation, is deemed equally ready for retirement. This is tidy for Whitehall. It is also daft. The Office for National Statistics reports that male life expectancy for a retirement age man in Surrey is 86 years; in Blackpool, it is 81. Healthy life expectancy – the years lived without major illness – shows still sharper divides. Yet we persist in pretending that the 66-year-old accountant in Guildford and the 66-year-old ex-dockworker in Hull should both cross the same finish line. That is unjust, and unsustainable. It loads the cost of longer-lived, healthier retirees onto taxpayers who may not live long enough to see much retirement at all. Here I can almost hear some readers reaching for outrage about contributions. Shouldn't a person's pension entitlement reflect their national insurance contributions? So a Surrey stockbroker who pays more NI than a Sunderland scaffolder has earned the right to draw the state pension for longer? This takes me to the biggest and most persistent misunderstanding in British politics: the state pension isn't really a pension. It's a benefit. And it's funded not from some pot of money patiently built up from each recipient's contributions, but from the taxes of today's workers. National Insurance is just a tax, and one that long ago lost any hypothecated link to the pension system. That means pension policy cannot be treated as a personal contract between citizen and state. It is a collective transfer between generations. Pretending otherwise, with talk of 'I've paid in, I deserve it back', hides the real choices – about fairness between regions, between classes, and between young and old. Other countries are at least edging away from the one-size-fits-all fiction. Denmark and the Netherlands now link their pension ages directly to life expectancy. Countries including Norway and Portugal offer some scope to offer earlier pensions to those who have done physically demanding work. None has yet built a fully 'variable' pension age, but the recognition is spreading: a uniform pension age does not match demographic reality. Britain should be bolder. One approach is to tie entitlement not to age but to years of contributions, recognising that someone who started work at 18 has done their share by 65, while the graduate entering at 25 has not. Another is to give more flexibility to those in arduous jobs: that Sunderland scaffolder is likely to be physically knackered in a way that his stockbroking compatriot is not. More radical still is to abandon the cliff-edge retirement model altogether. Instead of full-time one day and nothing the next, policy should support tapering – part-time, flexible work in the sixties and seventies, subsidised and encouraged so people can scale down, not drop out. This would help individuals, who gain income and purpose. It helps employers, who retain skills and experience. It helps the state, which saves on pensions and collects more tax. Above all, it acknowledges reality: ageing is a spectrum, not a binary switch from 'young' to 'old'. This is politically difficult, to put it mildly. I am recommending electoral hemlock, because it entails higher pension ages for some (who will be angry) and different treatment for some (ditto). No sane politician attempts major change to the state pension. The fury of the Waspi women still haunts ministers. Even tinkering with winter fuel allowances causes uproar. You'd be mad to do it, minister. But it must still be done. The fiscal maths is brutal. By 2075, pensioners will make up more than a quarter of the adult population. The cost of the state pension is projected to rise from around 5 per cent of GDP today to nearly 8 per cent. Absent reform, the money has to come from somewhere: higher taxes on a shrinking workforce, or cuts to other services. Intergenerational politics are already sour. Younger voters see themselves funding entitlements for older cohorts who enjoyed cheaper houses and more generous occupational pensions. A rigid single SPA deepens that resentment. That is the real political danger: not the fury of today's pensioners, but the alienation of tomorrow's workers who simply refuse to pay for the pensions of others. Dr Morrissey's review is framed as technical, but it is inescapably political. She has licence to say what ministers will not: that one pension age for all is outdated, unfair and unaffordable. A braver politics would seize that truth, and act on it. None of this is easy. None of it is popular. But it is necessary. The single state pension age should end.
Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
The 3 holiday hotspots with highest risk of deadly ‘suitcase viruses' that attack organs and cause ‘debilitating' pain
Plus, how to protect yourself against the viruses CASE EXPLOSION The 3 holiday hotspots with highest risk of deadly 'suitcase viruses' that attack organs and cause 'debilitating' pain Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WITH 'suitcase viruses' making a comeback in recent years, experts are urging Brits travelling abroad to take extra precautions. Holidaymakers travelling to three popular European destinations could be at risk of two deadly viruses. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Cases of mosquito-borne viruses like chikunyunga and dengue fever have been on the rise in recent years Credit: Getty Mosquitoes carrying viruses can travel in suitcases, often unnoticed, and pose a risk of introducing diseases to new areas. Two mosquito-borne viruses most prevalent at the moment, particularly for travellers returning to the UK, are dengue fever and chikungunya. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) recently warned of a "worrying increase in chikunyunga cases" among travellers returning to the UK. Chikungunya virus is primarily spread to humans through the bite of infected aedes mosquitoes. Described as a "nasty disease", it causes severe joint and muscle pain, headaches, sensitivity to light and skin rashes. While Chikungunya is generally not considered fatal, it can be in very rare cases, particularly among vulnerable populations like the very young, elderly, or those with pre-existing health conditions. Most recently, there's been an outbreak in China, with 7,000 cases reported, mostly across the city of Foshan, in the southern province of Guangdong, sparking global fears. In 2024, 904 dengue cases were recorded in returning travellers across England, Wales and Northern Ireland - up from 631 in 2023 - with all cases linked to travel abroad. Like chikungunya, dengue fever is spread through the bite of infected aedes mosquitoes. In its mild form, dengue fever causes fever and a rash and lasts about a week. What is Chikungunya Severe dengue can cause shock, internal bleeding, and death. About one out of 20 people with dengue will develop severe dengue within a few hours after symptoms start. To stop the number of cases of chikunyunga and dengue fever increasing, UK health officials recommend keeping up-to-date on health risks in different countries. And a new report by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has revealed the holiday hotspots in Europe with the highest number cases of chikunyunga and dengue fever currently. Chikunyunga Since the beginning of 2025, and as of August 13, two countries in Europe have reported cases of chikungunya - France and Italy. So far, France has reported 111 cases of locally-acquired chikungunya in 22 different clusters. And compared to the previous week, the number of cases has increased by 48 cases. Areas in France where cases have been reported include Charente (five cases in one cluster), Côte-d'Or (one case in one cluster), and Haute-Corse (two cases in one cluster). Two new cases were reported in two new clusters in Alpes-Maritime and a one new case in a new cluster in Isère. The largest clusters are located in Vitrolles, with an increase of 20 cases in the last week, Grosseto-Prugna, Salon-de-Provence, Grans, and Lambesc, Castries, Poulx and Caveirac. In the last week, Italy has reported five new cases in three new clusters - three cases in Modena and two cases in Verona province. Dengue fever Since the beginning of this year up until now, dengue fever has also been reported in France and Italy - 11 cases in France, and four in Italy. But Portugal has also reported two. The are currently six clusters reported in France, located in Aubagne, and Bouches-du-Rhône. In the last week, a new case has been reported in Vicenza province in Italy. And the cases in Portugal, reported in January, were in Madeira, and probably transmitted in 2024, says the ECDC. Is it safe to travel to these countries? 2 Preventing mosquito bites is one of the best ways to protect yourself from chikunyunga and dengue fever Credit: Getty It's considered safe to travel to Europe, including areas with reported chikungunya and dengue fever cases. Most reported cases of the viruses in Europe are imported, meaning they are contracted by travellers returning from affected areas outside of Europe. However, local transmission is increasing due to the spread of mosquitoes like the aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito). So when travelling abroad it's crucial to take precautions to prevent mosquito bites. Follow the tips below...
