Ukraine to withdraw from treaty banning anti-personnel mines
Ukraine ratified the convention in 2005. In a statement, the country's Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained that the decision was motivated by the "unequal and unjust situation that restricts (...) the right to self-defence" of Kyiv, in the face of Russian aggression.
Moscow has never ratified the convention, and has instead "extensively used anti-personnel mines as a method of warfare".
A senior Ukrainian lawmaker, Roman Kostenko, said that parliamentary approval is still needed to withdraw from the treaty.
"This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this Convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians," Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliament's committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said on his Facebook page.
"We cannot remain tied down in an environment where the enemy has no restrictions," he added, saying that the legislative decision must definitively restore Ukraine's right to effectively defend its territory.
Russia has intensified its offensive operations in Ukraine in recent months, using significant superiority in manpower. Kostenko did not say when the issue would be debated in parliament.
(adm)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
5 hours ago
- Euractiv
Ukrainian attacks halt Russian oil flows to Hungary and Slovakia
Deliveries of Russian crude through the Druzhba pipeline to Slovakia and Hungary were suspended after a Ukrainian drone strike damaged infrastructure on Russian territory, Ukrainian officials confirmed on Monday. The successful drone strike hit overnight the Nikolskoye oil pumping station in the Tambov region, approximately 400 km east of the Ukrainian border, according to the Kyiv Independent, temporarily halting oil deliveries. The interruption follows another short halt in deliveries last week after a Ukrainian drone attack on a pumping station in the Bryansk region. Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó bemoaned the attack on social media, saying "this is not our war... we want to stay out of it." In Slovakia, national operator Transpetrol confirmed flows into Slovakia had also stopped, stressing the problem lay outside its territory. Slovak Economy Minister Denisa Saková said the outage was the second in a week, caused by damage to a transformer station in Russia. She insisted Slovakia's fuel supply was not at risk and expected deliveries to resume in the coming days. Slovnaft, the Slovak refinery part of Hungary's MOL group, also said production had not been halted and that it was relying on reserves. 'The supply of fuel remains secure,' said spokesperson Lucia Čorbová. Slovakia's former Economy Minister Karel Hirman, now in opposition, said: 'Only a naïve person could believe that during wartime – especially when the supplier of raw materials is attacking the transit country – supplies would not be disrupted.' Hirman pointed out that almost all of Slovakia's neighbours – Austria, Czechia, and Poland – recognised these risks and have already replaced Russian energy supplies. Hungary and Slovakia are the only two EU countries still buying Russian oil. European Commission spokesperson Eva Hrnčířová said that the executive is in touch with Slovakian and Hungarian authorities and that the suspension 'does not affect the security of supply." UPDATE: The article now includes the Commission's comment. (mm)
Euractiv
5 hours ago
- Euractiv
Switzerland says would grant Putin ‘immunity' for peace talks
AFP Aug 19, 2025 14:03 2 min. read News Service Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards. Switzerland would grant Russian President Vladimir Putin immunity if he came to the country for talks on peace in Ukraine, despite the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant, it said Tuesday. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis told a press conference that, under certain circumstances, he would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland. Last year, the Swiss government defined "the rules for granting immunity to a person under an international arrest warrant. If this person comes for a peace conference – not if they come for private reasons," Cassis said. French President Emmanuel Macron raised the possibility of a peace summit between Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy being held in Europe, in "a neutral country, maybe Switzerland". "I'm pushing for Geneva," he said in an interview aired earlier Tuesday on French news channel LCI. Cassis said Switzerland was fully prepared to host such a meeting and highlighted the militarily neutral country's long expertise in the field. However, he pointed out that Russia had gone cold on Switzerland, which has decided to match the sanctions imposed by the neighbouring EU since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Cassis said he had "constantly reiterated this willingness" to organise such meetings during his contacts with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov over recent months. "I was told that since Switzerland adopted European sanctions, they have naturally lost some of the desire to do so in Switzerland," he added. Cassis mentioned the precedent of last month's Sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament, a three-day gathering convened by the Geneva-based Inter-Parliamentary Union. Switzerland permitted Russia's participation, with Valentina Matviyenko, president of the upper house of Russia's Federal Assembly, attending despite international sanctions. Switzerland said it acted in accordance with the law and international agreements. Swiss authorities may authorise exemptions from travel restrictions, "notably if the person is travelling to participate in an international conference," a Swiss foreign ministry spokesman told AFP at the time. Putin last visited Geneva for his June 2021 summit with then-President Joe Biden. The most recent bilateral talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Istanbul. Turkey is considered more friendly by Moscow, despite its membership of NATO. (mm)
Euractiv
5 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europeans edge towards Ukraine security guarantee proposal after White House summit
European countries are inching towards a framework of Western security guarantees for Kyiv after Donald Trump hinted at a US "presence" in Ukraine, even as the details remain unclear. Monday's White House summit between Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and six European leaders produced a clearer – if still tentative – US commitment to support Ukraine's security. A day later, EU27 leaders, and separately members of the 'Coalition of the Willing', were briefed via videoconference on the talks in Washington. "Now is the time to accelerate our practical work to put in place a guarantee similar to NATO's Article 5 with continued US engagement," European Council President António Costa told EU leaders in Tuesday's follow-up meeting. Drafting a framework European officials say that negotiators will now begin sketching a blueprint of security guarantees intended to pave the way for a possible meeting between Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin. National security advisers from participating countries hope to draft a skeleton framework over the next week, people familiar with the talks say, before a potential follow-up call with Trump. A British read-out of Tuesday's Coalition of the Willing meeting separately said that "planning teams would meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees." So far, a broad consensus on the security guarantees has emerged around three elements: a well-equipped and well-armed Ukrainian armed forces without size restrictions, a multinational 'reassurance force' after a ceasefire, and some form of Washington backing, although the scope of American involvement remains vague. EU leaders also voiced wide support for NATO-style commitments - "Article 5-like protections," as US officials increasingly describe them. While this is a reference to NATO's mutual defence clause, the level of protection remains largely unclear. They also acknowledged that hammering out the details will require painstaking negotiation. Overall, European officials privately note a subtle but telling shift in Trump's rhetoric: from mere 'coordination' of security arrangements to a ' presence of the US." Trump, speaking the morning after White House meetings on Tuesday, told Fox News that US forces could assist Ukraine's allies in deterring future Russian attacks. 'When it comes to security, [Europeans are] willing to put people on the ground,' Trump said, adding Europe would 'front load' them, including 'boots on the ground.' 'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably talk about by air, because there's nobody [has the] kind of stuff we have,' he added, indicating Washington could focus on air defence elements in such plans. EU foreign and defence ministers, meeting informally in Copenhagen next week, are expected to discuss security guarantees, the bloc's top diplomat Kaja Kallas said. 'The EU will contribute to these security guarantees, notably by the training of Ukrainian soldiers and strengthening Ukraine's armed forces and defence industry,' she said. Keeping Putin in check Timing remains the thorniest question. Officials hope to have the framework ready before a potential Zelenskyy-Putin meeting, which could take place within two to three weeks. In Monday's talks at the White House, several European leaders made the pitch to the US side that any Russian refusal to attend such a meeting – or any failure to make progress – should trigger the next round of sanctions. "Whether we call it a ceasefire or a truce is secondary; what matters is that we maintain pressure through sanctions if Russia does not comply," Costa told EU leaders. The European Commission says the next package of measures against Moscow – the nineteenth – could be ready by early September, if required. (mm)
