Europeans edge towards Ukraine security guarantee proposal after White House summit
Monday's White House summit between Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and six European leaders produced a clearer – if still tentative – US commitment to support Ukraine's security.
A day later, EU27 leaders, and separately members of the 'Coalition of the Willing', were briefed via videoconference on the talks in Washington. "Now is the time to accelerate our practical work to put in place a guarantee similar to NATO's Article 5 with continued US engagement," European Council President António Costa told EU leaders in Tuesday's follow-up meeting. Drafting a framework
European officials say that negotiators will now begin sketching a blueprint of security guarantees intended to pave the way for a possible meeting between Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin.
National security advisers from participating countries hope to draft a skeleton framework over the next week, people familiar with the talks say, before a potential follow-up call with Trump.
A British read-out of Tuesday's Coalition of the Willing meeting separately said that "planning teams would meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees."
So far, a broad consensus on the security guarantees has emerged around three elements: a well-equipped and well-armed Ukrainian armed forces without size restrictions, a multinational 'reassurance force' after a ceasefire, and some form of Washington backing, although the scope of American involvement remains vague.
EU leaders also voiced wide support for NATO-style commitments - "Article 5-like protections," as US officials increasingly describe them. While this is a reference to NATO's mutual defence clause, the level of protection remains largely unclear.
They also acknowledged that hammering out the details will require painstaking negotiation.
Overall, European officials privately note a subtle but telling shift in Trump's rhetoric: from mere 'coordination' of security arrangements to a ' presence of the US."
Trump, speaking the morning after White House meetings on Tuesday, told Fox News that US forces could assist Ukraine's allies in deterring future Russian attacks. 'When it comes to security, [Europeans are] willing to put people on the ground,' Trump said, adding Europe would 'front load' them, including 'boots on the ground.'
'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably talk about by air, because there's nobody [has the] kind of stuff we have,' he added, indicating Washington could focus on air defence elements in such plans. EU foreign and defence ministers, meeting informally in Copenhagen next week, are expected to discuss security guarantees, the bloc's top diplomat Kaja Kallas said.
'The EU will contribute to these security guarantees, notably by the training of Ukrainian soldiers and strengthening Ukraine's armed forces and defence industry,' she said. Keeping Putin in check
Timing remains the thorniest question. Officials hope to have the framework ready before a potential Zelenskyy-Putin meeting, which could take place within two to three weeks.
In Monday's talks at the White House, several European leaders made the pitch to the US side that any Russian refusal to attend such a meeting – or any failure to make progress – should trigger the next round of sanctions.
"Whether we call it a ceasefire or a truce is secondary; what matters is that we maintain pressure through sanctions if Russia does not comply," Costa told EU leaders. The European Commission says the next package of measures against Moscow – the nineteenth – could be ready by early September, if required.
(mm)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
France and Germany doomed to stay in unhappy fighter jet marriage
Defence firms have little choice but to accommodate political demands given Europe's next generation fighter jet has been a political project from the start Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Kjeld Neubert Euractiv Aug 20, 2025 06:30 5 min. read Analysis Based on factual reporting, although it Incorporates the expertise of the author/producer and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Squabbling over the next-generation FCAS fighter jet project has strained Franco-German relations in recent months, casting doubt on the programme's future. Yet despite disagreements, neither Paris nor Berlin would be happier if they pulled out of the multi-billion-euro Future Combat Air System (FCAS) programme, and doing so would mean no EU-only option for an advanced sixth-generation stealth fighter system, and dampen enthusiasm for cross-EU defence projects. "Germany and France are at a crossroads where if they decide to invest more they will make the project irreversible," Bertrand de Cordoue, a veteran aerospace industry expert now with the Jacques Delors Institute, told Euractiv. The project, envisioning a stealth fighter jet accompanied by autonomous drones, embedded in a sophisticated digital combat network, is approaching a major milestone later this year, as it moves from the planning phase towards building a prototype of the fighter jet, the programme's centrepiece. For the industry players involved, that next phase is one of only a few opportunities to renegotiate the project's terms. But the project has sparked various disagreements, notably over project leadership, but not only. The most public source of tension has been the unhappy relationship between the two lead aerospace contractors, Dassault Aviation and Airbus Defence, largely forced together by political deals cut in Paris and Berlin. Struggle over FCAS leadership Dassault CEO Éric Trappier has not been shy about pushing for a dominant role. In June, Trappier declared that his company could 'go at it alone' on FCAS. 'We are competitors that have to marry,' Jean-Brice Dumont, the head of air power at Airbus Defence, told journalists shortly afterwards at the Paris Air Show. Several industry observers and experts told Euractiv that Dassault and Airbus Defence will almost certainly have to work together, even if they would prefer to go their separate ways. From the very beginning, the effort to build an integrated air combat system has been politically driven. French President Emmanuel Macron and Germany's then-chancellor, Angela Merkel, launched the project in 2017, with Spain joining two years later. In July, Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated political support for the programme. Their defence ministers are tasked with a plan to reconcile differences and move the €100 billion project forward by the end of August. France has a history of difficulty with joint European military aircraft projects. The country previously pulled out of the consortiums that developed the Tornado and Eurofighter jets. But the difficult state of French finances and major budget constraints are now limiting the options for Paris. France "does not have much room to make threats about going it alone", De Cordoue said. Stuart Dee, a defence economist at RAND Europe, told Euractiv that the cost to restart and develop a sixth-generation fighter from scratch would severely strain the finances of almost any single country. 'Only a very small number of nations globally can fund a programme of this scale independently, hence the original rationale of co-development between partners,' Dee said. Political risks for Merz and Macron Macron, whose final term as president ends in two years, helped launch FCAS and has been perhaps the strongest supporter of European integration and sovereignty on military matters. After having invested political capital in FCAS, the programme's collapse could leave a black mark on his legacy. 'For Macron, the aim is to cement this project before he has to leave office,' de Cordoue stated. Merz, who took office in May, has also cast himself as a champion of greater European defence cooperation. Losing FCAS would damage Merz's ambitions for Germany to be the EU's top military power. The Chancellor also touted himself as the man to rebuild Franco-German relations, which had grown frosty under his predecessor, Olaf Scholz – although that courtship has faltered recently. FCAS alternatives? If FCAS does fall apart, the countries could seek to join Europe's other flagship sixth-generation fighter jet project, the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), with its Tempest jet. But that project – a joint effort between the United Kingdom, Italy and Japan – is already underway with a target delivery date of 2035. Any newcomer to the programme would have less influence over the project, and would likely struggle to secure major involvement for domestic defence contractors. Justin Bronk, air power expert at British defence think-tank RUSI, said the GCAP countries have largely finalised the division of contracts, work and other elements of the programme, making it very difficult to add big industrial players from Germany or elsewhere at this stage. Dee agreed, adding that such a move 'would need to consider the considerable investment and interests of non-European players such as Japan." Customer is always right Those factors give Germany, France and Spain major incentives to stick with the FCAS programme – and political leaders, not corporate executives, will make the final decisions on how to proceed. 'Whoever pays calls the shots. And in the end, it is the state that pays, not industry,' German MP Christoph Schmid, rapporteur for the German Air Force, told Euractiv. 'That is why I believe that there is still leverage to get industry to cooperate.' De Cordoue said a similar dynamic exists in Paris: 'The French government has the political power to convince Dassault to carry on with the project, as they did from the beginning.' Though defence firms may grumble, they depend on government contracts and gain more by accommodating political will than by opposing it. (bts, cp)
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Toxic green algae: The disease poisoning French Brittany's waterways and coast
Almost 10 years after a jogger died on the Breton coast due to toxic gases from algae blooms linked to farm pollution, the region's president says preventative measures have been taken. But environmental groups warn that the threat is far from over. Once again this summer, the Brittany region in western France is plagued by a perennial problem: green algae. As temperatures rise, parts of the coastline are regularly covered with tons of foul-smelling seaweed. As the organisms decompose, they release hydrogen sulphide – a highly toxic gas. On 24 June, a French court ruled that the death of a jogger in 2016 on a beach in northern Brittany was due to inhaling this gas. The court accused Paris of failing to comply with EU and national water protection rules. But the tragedy was not an isolated case: Since 1989, an estimated 40 animals and three people have died as a result of these algae. The cause of the green tides is no mystery – it is rooted in the region's livestock-intensive farming, the backbone of Brittany's economy. Brittany's pork obsession Brittany dominates France's pig industry. The region is home to nearly 60% of the nation's pigs and supports some 20,000 jobs. The landscape is dotted with large-scale industrial pig farms that produce nitrogen-rich manure, which is then spread over fields as fertiliser. But crops cannot absorb all the nitrates in the soil, leaving the surplus to wash into groundwater, rivers, and eventually the sea, where it fuels the growth of green algae. In a 2017 investigation, French journalist Inès Léraud revealed the 'silence factory', whereby agricultural lobbies and political leaders downplay the scandal to protect the lucrative pork sector. Loïg Chesnais-Girard, socialist president of the Brittany region, told Euractiv that the situation has since improved. 'Everyone has understood that there were excesses'. Nitrate levels in Breton waterways have actually fallen from 53 milligrams per litre in the 1990s to a steady 25 mg/l since the 2010s. Largely because there are fewer pigs, which leads to a corresponding reduction in nitrate pollution. 'Animal production peaked in the 2000s and has been declining on average ever since', Chesnais-Girard said. Brittany's pig population dropped from 8.4 to 6.8 million between 2001 and 2022. But despite some improvement, the region is running out of time to meet its goal of bringing nitrate pollution down to 15 mg/l by 2027. One solution, Chesnais-Girard explains, is to plant hedges – which slow down the flow of nitrates into waterways. Manure tanks are also checked for leaks. Downstream, trucks collect green algae from beaches and deposit it in drying sheds. Putting lipstick on a pig For critics, however, these efforts fail to address the fundamental issues. "The problem is not solved", warns Stéphane Galais, spokesperson for Confédération Paysanne, a left and green-leaning farmers' union. 'There are still closed water catchment areas, and some places still have 50 mg/l of nitrates in the water," he told Euractiv. Galais added that, while nitrate pollution has subsided in line with falling livestock numbers, due to animal health and economic crises, 'the same structural problem' remains. He slammed the government's nitrate plans as ineffective, excessively complex, and influenced by 'powerful agri-food lobbies'. The union believes that the issue of nitrate pollution can only be resolved by addressing the dominance of the pork industry in Brittany, which it calls a 'historic error'. 'Without a real plan to move beyond industrial livestock farming, it is impossible to solve the problem.' A soft spot for pigs But moving on from pig farming will not be easy. Whilst Chesnais-Girard agrees that in particularly polluted areas, a reduction in pigs might be beneficial, he is careful to avoid making farming into a culture war. "Weighing in too heavily on the issue of ecological change will push voters to extremes," he warned. Unsurprisingly, the pig industry rejects the finger-pointing. "We must stop blaming pig farmers, who all have manure tanks with specific management rules and comply with spreading regulations,' Anne Richard, director of the French pork industry association INAPORC told Euractiv. Despite the French court's ruling, the national government still has a soft spot for its pigs. On 12 August, President Emmanuel Macron rubberstamped a controversial law easing the expansion of livestock farms. It's a decision Galais deplores: 'In Brittany, we need to do the exact opposite,' he lamented.
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Don't expect Putin to make peace any time soon
Konstantin Eggert is a Russian-born journalist with DW, Germany's international broadcaster. He is based in Vilnius and was previously editor-in-chief of the BBC Russian Service Moscow bureau. There are three impressions that stuck in my mind having watched broadcasts from Washington on Monday. To start with, Volodymyr Zelenskyy looked almost at home there, as opposed to the disastrous February visit. The European leaders also looked (and spoke) as if they finally understood – their common interest in containing and pushing back against Russia does not depend on who sits in the White House. And thirdly, Donald Trump never once called the Europeans "allies", as any other US president before (and, hopefully, after him) would – especially in such circumstances. But in spite of this, the Transatlantic alliance seems to still hold, even if with difficulty. The first impression is actually closely linked to a second one: The Ukrainian president no doubt felt reassured by the presence of the Europeans. He also seems to have understood that in modern-day Washington 'money talks' like never before in living memory. His offer to buy $100 billion-worth of American arms (ostensibly with Europe's blessing and financing) is a smart step that chimes in well with Trump's policy of "no freeloading", even by America's friends. And the US president seems to have appreciated this. But even bearing in mind his unpredictability and quick temper, the idea that he can throw Zelenskyy and Ukraine under Putin's bus with impunity is a fantasy. Always was. In spite of its reliance on Western help, Ukraine remains sovereign. Come to think of it, today it is more of a traditional nation state than some of the EU countries. This author, who first travelled to Kyiv in 1991 and continues to do so, can attest to this. Ukrainian society, although tired, will not accept "peace at any price'. Simply because a much better surrender protocol could have been signed with Vladimir Putin in 2021 or 2022, without so much death and suffering. Zelenskyy knows it too. His historical legacy – and possible political future – depends on giving Russia a good political and diplomatic fight before accepting any deal. If he does not, he'd rather not return to Kyiv from Istanbul, Geneva, Malta or wherever the future peace talks may be held. And by the way, he may never have to go there in the first place. At least, in the immediate future. If one looks at Putin's behaviour, there is nothing in it that says he is ready for such talks. His insulting offer to meet Zelenskyy in Moscow, if true, belies his ultimate goal – to sabotage the peace effort and blame it all on the Ukrainian leadership. 24 hours before the Washington talks, the Kremlin started rolling out new conditions to Kyiv and the West: giving the Russian language in Ukraine an official status (which means changing the Ukrainian constitution); restoring full rights to the Russian Orthodox Church (which Ukraine sees as an instrument of Russia's not-so-soft power); reiterating territorial claims; and finally, that no troops from NATO counties are deployed to Ukraine in the framework of security guarantees (this one is old). No side that wants to move towards the real deal would engage in such behaviour. Putin's main goal did not change. It is not so much a full-scale occupation of Ukraine – although he wants to keep what he got already. The aim is to put Ukraine under Moscow's full political control and limit its sovereignty, most probably by gradually promoting and installing in Kyiv a pliant administration that will forsake the goals of EU and NATO membership. He sincerely thinks that his economy can withstand more sanctions (with the help of China), that he still has enough Russians prepared to kill Ukrainians for money, and that Russia's demographic edge over Ukraine will bring him victory – with a bit of luck and patience. Putin's other goal is old and well-verified: to undermine the West. He wants to sow discord among Ukraine's allies, buy himself time to increase military production and find new ways and partners to game the sanctions regime. All this plus proving to Russia's international allies on the right and left, plus the so-called "global South", that Ukraine and its supporters are in the wrong and "his" Russia is in the right. Putin does not want peace talks. But talks about talks suit him just fine.
