Rahul Gandhi cites life threat over ‘vote theft' slogan in Pune court defamation case
A criminal defamation case has been filed against the Congress leader in Pune's special court for his remarks against Veer Savarkar. The case was lodged by Satyaki Savarkar over Gandhi's speech in London in March 2023, in which he claimed that Savarkar had said an assault on a Muslim man was 'found or pleasurable'.
Satyaki Savarkar challenged this statement, asserting that Savarkar had not written any such thing, and called Gandhi's speech false, misleading, and defamatory. He has sought Gandhi's conviction under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and compensation under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Gandhi's lawyer, Milind Pawar, highlighted in court that the Congress leader's safety was under threat, especially after his allegations of electoral malpractice.
In his application, it was also stated that given the documented history of violent and anti-constitutional tendencies linked to the complainant's lineage, there was 'a clear, reasonable appreciation that Rahul Gandhi may face harm, wrongful implication, or other forms of targeting, so history should not repeat itself.' Gandhi also sought preventive protection from the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
What are the challenges confronting the EC?
The story so far: At a press conference on August 7, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused the Election Commission (EC) of massive electoral roll manipulations in Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka. Mr. Gandhi's presser capped a series of allegations of deliberate voter roll discrepancies by the EC beginning with the Maharashtra Assembly polls. This, coupled with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, which is under judicial scrutiny, has put the poll body in the eye of a storm. What is the mandate of the EC? The Election Commission of India is a permanent constitutional body. The Constitution has vested in the EC the superintendence, direction and control of the entire process for conduct of elections to Parliament and the legislature of every State, and to the offices of President and Vice-President of India. Originally, the commission only had a Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). It was expanded to include two Election Commissioners (ECs). Why has there been a controversy about the appointment process? Parliament passed a new law governing appointments to the EC, namely the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. In accordance with the new law, the ECs are selected by a three-member selection committee, comprising the Prime Minister, a Union Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. The Opposition had objected to this, saying the committee gave little room for dissent as the Prime Minister and the Union Minister are part of the government and could rule 2:1 in favour of their candidate. Why is the EC's role in the spotlight? Last year, the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance had alleged that lakhs of new voters had been added to Maharashtra's electoral rolls in the time period between the Lok Sabha polls in May and the Assembly elections in October. The Congress had made the same allegations about Haryana, and later the Aam Aadmi Party alleged that voter rolls were tweaked in Delhi before Assembly polls. Even as the EC was grappling with these claims, CEC Gyanesh Kumar announced the SIR in Bihar which aims at cleaning up electoral rolls. The EC said the SIR exercise will be carried out across the country. At his press conference, Mr. Gandhi alleged large-scale discrepancies in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment under the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency in Karnataka which he claimed helped the BJP win the seat. Mr. Gandhi said his party had carried out an investigation which spanned over six months before reaching this conclusion. He claimed that the voter list had manipulated entries, including duplicate voters, invalid addresses, and bulk registrations of votes at single locations. Following this, Mr. Gandhi reiterated his demand for machine readable voter rolls to be provided to all political parties for proper verification. The EC stated it has not been providing machine readable or 'text-searchable' voter lists for concerns over cyber-security. The Supreme Court (SC) had upheld it in a petition filed by former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Kamal Nath in 2018. When was a revision announced in Bihar? On June 24, the EC ordered a SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar, barely five months before the Assembly elections. As per the SIR orders, every voter in Bihar who had not been listed in the 2003 voter rolls would have to submit documents proving their date and place of birth to determine whether they were Indian citizens. Those born after 1987 would also have to submit proof of their parents' date and place of birth. However, after the completion of the first phase of the SIR exercise, the EC released a draft electoral roll on August 1, which saw a drop in the number of voters in Bihar by 65 lakh. There were 7.89 crore voters registered in the 2025 electoral list before the SIR exercise; after the recount, it slid to 7.24 crore electors. The EC said that most of these 65 lakh 'missing' voters have died; are registered in two locations; have migrated out of Bihar; or are untraceable. Civil society organisations, Opposition parties as well as NGOs approached the Supreme Court challenging the SIR process. What has the SC directed EC to do? In an interim order on August 14, the Supreme Court directed the EC to publish an enumerated, booth-wise list of the 65 lakh electors not included in the draft roll. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi instructed the EC to provide reasons for the deletion — death, migration, untraceability, duplicate registrations — against each name. The court also asked EC to accept Aadhaar as proof of identity for an elector to include his or her name in the rolls. 'That it has taken the Supreme Court to nudge the EC towards following basic norms of natural justice and fairness in the Bihar SIR exercise reflects poorly on an organisation which takes pride in collecting and counting every last vote. While errors can creep into voter lists over time, the answer to that is not mass disenfranchisement as the EC is attempting,' said Alok Kumar Prasanna, Advocate and Co-Founder of Vidhi Centre for Public Policy. What about migrant voters? Migrant voters still have to return to the place where they are on the rolls to vote. This is a huge cost and depresses turnout, notes Mr. Prasanna. 'There is no simple solution to this currently. The solution will have to be cheap, secure and transparent to work. Solutions which work in richer societies and for richer migrants will not work for poor migrants from States like Bihar,' he added. What has been the political fallout? After Mr. Gandhi's press conference, the Opposition upped the ante and tried to hold a march from Parliament to the Election Commission headquarters. They courted arrest when stopped. The ongoing monsoon session of Parliament has also been virtually paralysed over demands for a discussion on the Bihar SIR. The government has, however, not conceded to the Opposition's demand. The issue has brought Opposition parties together and protests are likely to continue when Parliament reconvenes on August 18. 'To protect the voters of this country and democracy whatever has to be done we will do,' Rashtriya Janata Dal Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha told The Hindu.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Student dies in mishap at time of I-Day function in Jodhpur
1 2 Jodhpur: A 12-year-old school student died here after being hit by a dumper truck early morning on Independence Day, while three other students accompanying him were seriously injured. All four were heading to their school on one motorcycle. Enraged family members and local residents staged a protest and blocked the road at Panchbatti Chowk. They were joined by Congress leaders to support their demands. They demanded strict action against the guilty dumper driver, along with compensation, an impartial investigation, and a job for one member of the family. After several hours of discussions, the protest was called off following an assurance of immediate financial aid of Rs 11 lakh from the CM Relief Fund, along with a promise to provide a contractual job to one dependent of the family and to extend benefits of govt schemes by the administration. This incident took place at a time when Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma was scheduled to attend an Independence Day programme at the Shaheed Memorial in Jodhpur, barely a few meters away from the accident spot. As soon as news of the accident spread, panic spread through the police administration. In view of the chief minister's visit, a large police force immediately reached the spot and tried to bring the situation under control. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo Police said the accident took place when Lokendra (12), a resident of Ratanada Nehru Colony, was riding a bike with three of his schoolmates to attend the Independence Day function at his school. SHO (Airport) Ramkrishna Tada said all four children were on the same bike, were minors, and not wearing any helmets. "In front of Hotel Radisson, their bike skidded and they fell down while overtaking a small truck loaded with stones. Wheels of the truck ran over Lokendra Singh, crushing him to death on the spot while injuring three others, and the driver fled from the spot," Tada said, adding that a distant camera recording has shown the victims going behind the truck. "We have seized the dumper and detained the driver," said Tada, adding that two injured are undergoing treatment at the hospital, while one was discharged after primary treatment. Swinging into action, police swiftly removed the dead body from the spot and arranged to clean the spot in view of the chief minister's convoy, which had to head to the airport. The family members also demanded that Chief Minister Sharma, who was in the city for the state-level Independence Day celebration, come to the spot and talk to them. But given the demonstration, the administrative officials changed the route of the chief minister to the airport, who was to board the flight back to Jaipur. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Court clears Bishop Emeritus of charges under POCSO Act
Pune: A sessions court in the city discharged Bishop Emeritus Thomas Dabre (79) of Poona Diocese of charges of allegedly violating provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act by failing to disclose information about a sexual assault incident involving a 14-year-old boy at a school in 2018. Additional sessions judge Anirudhha Gandhi, in his order of August 8, noted, "The Bishop in a meeting asked a police officer if he should report the sexual assault incident to the police. But the officer said a Bishop cannot be forced to make a complaint and advised him that only a victim could file a complaint. The Bishop thus discharged his duty of communicating the incident to the police. He still directed his subordinate to inform the incident to the Wanowrie police and a letter dated March 20, 2018, was sent giving details of the incident involving the school principal. " The Wanowrie police filed a chargesheet against a school principal and another individual for sexually assaulting and harassing the minor under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act . Subsequently, a supplementary chargesheet was filed against the Bishop after investigations allegedly revealed that he did not report the incident to the police. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune | Gold Rates Today in Pune | Silver Rates Today in Pune The court observed, "There was insufficient material on record to prima facie show that the Bishop committed an offence under Section 21 (failure to report or record a case of child abuse) of the POCSO Act. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She Mixed Pink Salt With This - Now She Can't Stop Losing Weight Your Health Undo On the contrary, there was sufficient material indicating that he informed the police about the incident. The police, the victim or the informant did not register an FIR until September 2018. The Bishop cannot be held responsible for the delay on the part of the police and the informant. " The judge said the maximum punishment prescribed under Section 21 of the POCSO Act was one year imprisonment. The FIR was registered on March 16, 2018. The court said the complainant had no complaint against the Bishop for not informing the incident to the police. The supplementary chargesheet was filed against the Bishop on July 26, 2024, six years after the incident. No cognizance can be taken of a chargesheet filed after a year of the incident under Section 468 (bar of taking cognizance after lapse of period of limitation) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Bishop's lawyer, Sandeep Bali, argued that the supplementary chargesheet was filed against his client without evidence and prayed to discharge him. Additional public prosecutor Vishwas Satupute told TOI, "I will submit a proposal to the state law and judiciary department to file a criminal miscellaneous appeal in the Bombay high court to set aside the discharge order." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
