
Maxwell: 7 things to know about recently arrested Sheriff Marcos Lopez
Still, anyone who paid even passing attention to Lopez's tenure probably wasn't shocked to learn he may have done something wrong. This is a man, after all, who was deemed untrustworthy by the region's last two prosecutors.
Lopez may have been a red flag in a green uniform, but he found an ally in Gov. Ron DeSantis in their joint crusade against State Attorney Monique Worrell. And the sheriff had a generally high-profile career that got even higher with his recent arrest and suspension from office.
If you haven't been following along before, here are seven things to know about Lopez:
1. Two different state attorneys declared Lopez untrustworthy.
Orange-Osceola State Attorney Monique Worrell, a Democrat, and Andrew Bain, the man our Republican governor chose to temporarily replace Worrell, may not have agreed on much. But both agreed Lopez couldn't be trusted.
Bain was the first to place Lopez on the office's official 'Brady List' of law enforcement witnesses the office considered unreliable after an incident where the sheriff's office improperly and indecently posted a photo of a dead 13-year-old girl on social media. Bain concluded that Lopez's office had conducted an inadequate, if not laughable, probe into the sheriff's role in the incident and that Lopez's conflicting statements made him untrustworthy.
After Bain left office, Lopez appealed his decision. But Worrell's office rejected his plea, deciding to keep Lopez on the scarlet-letter list of cops with veracity concerns. It doesn't get much more damning than that.
Osceola Sheriff Lopez placed on Brady list of law officers deemed untrustworthy
2. The Orlando Sentinel editorial board also urged voters to remove Lopez from office.
This might not normally be noteworthy — except that the Sentinel endorsed Lopez in 2020 back when Lopez promised to usher in a new era of transparency and accountability. Voters liked what they heard. So did the ed board. But it turned out to be a crock.
So last year, instead of defending its prior last decision, the ed board acknowledged reality and reversed course, urging voters to get the Democratic incumbent out of office, saying he had clearly lost the public trust.
3. Lopez was a key ally to Ron DeSantis in the governor's crusade against Worrell.
The DeSantis team said it also consulted with Orange County Sheriff John Mina but relied heavily upon accusations made by Lopez that purported to prove Worrell was soft on crime. Well, many of those accusations turned out to be bunk. A Sentinel investigation would later reveal that nearly half of the 74 drug-trafficking cases that Lopez claimed Worrell had dropped were still working their way through the system and that other cases weren't prosecuted because of evidentiary problems.
Interestingly, DeSantis teamed up with Lopez to go after Worrell in 2023 — the same year the state said it started investigating Lopez's crimes.
4. Attorney General James Uthmeier called the arrest 'solemn.'
Anyone who has watched Florida's newly appointed attorney general knows he gets downright giddy when he talks about Worrell's removal from office. (As evidence, watch the press conference Uthmeier did last month in Orlando where he taunted Worrell with Sheriff Mina at his side.)
But Uthmeier took a very different tone when Lopez was arrested, calling it 'a solemn day for Florida and our law enforcement community.'
Lopez's arrest was definitely darkly serious. But it was probably especially solemn for members of the DeSantis administration who'd essentially made Lopez their lead character witness in the case against Worrell.
5. Lopez didn't put body cameras on all his officers.
Three years ago, Osceola deputies shot and killed a 20-year-old man accused of shoplifting pizza and trading cards. Lopez said it was a fair shooting — but never had any body-camera footage to prove it. After that case raised questions and prompted a lawsuit, Lopez vowed to get to work on cameras. But that was the same thing he'd told the Sentinel more than two years earlier when he was first trying to get in office.
Cameras are so commonplace nowadays that any sheriff or chief who chooses not to make body cams standard equipment is making an intentional decision not to give prosecutors and the public the full story.
No body-cams rolled as Florida cops shot 20-year-old. That was a choice | Commentary
6. Lopez is innocent until proven guilty.
Lopez hasn't been convicted of a thing so far. Maybe he never will be. He deserves his day in court.
But the sheriff's office at large has a lot of questions to answer. Chief among them: How was this casino allowed to operate as long as it did? The Sentinel reported Wednesday that, prior to the sheriff's arrest, the sheriff's office had been dispatched to 'at least 50 incidents at The Eclipse casino.' Well, casinos aren't legal in Central Florida. So how many times should a law-enforcement agency have to show up at one before shutting it down?
Osceola deputies made multiple responses to casino allegedly controlled by sheriff
7. He still shouldn't be in office.
That is one of the main takeaways from all this: Even if you don't account for this recent arrest, Lopez has provided ample evidence that Osceola voters deserve better. Take it from the two different prosecutors who agreed on little else.
smaxwell@orlandosentinel.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
7 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center
MIAMI — A federal judge in Miami dismissed part of a lawsuit that claimed detainees were denied access to the legal system at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' and moved the remaining counts of the case to another court. Claims that the detainees were denied hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration last weekend designated the Krome North Processing Center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz said in a 47-page ruling Monday night dismissing a 5th Amendment count. The judge granted the state defendants a change of venue motion to the Middle District of Florida, where the remaining claims of 1st Amendment violations will be addressed. Those include allegations of delays in scheduling meetings between detainees and their attorneys and an inability for the detainees to talk privately with their attorneys by phone or videoconference at the facility whose official name is the South Detention Facility. ACLU lawyer Eunice Cho, the lead attorney for the detainees, said the federal government reversed course only last weekend and allowed the detainees to petition an immigration court because of the lawsuit. 'It should not take a lawsuit to force the government to abide by the law and the Constitution,' Cho said. 'We look forward to continuing the fight.' The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility had access to their lawyers and could get a hearing. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration raced to build the facility on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland two months ago in order to aid President Trump's efforts to deport people who are in the U.S. illegally. The governor has said the location in the rugged and remote Everglades was meant as a deterrent against escape, much like the island prison in California that Republicans named it after. The detention center has an estimated annual cost of $450 million. The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's Southern District was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's Middle District. Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate. Attorneys for the detainees had argued that Ruiz's court was appropriate since the detainees were under the oversight of federal officials in the Miami regional office. Any transfer to another venue would cause a delay in a court decision. Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed Saturday when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center. The judge wrote that the case has 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed July 16, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility. 'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action — their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief — have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote. The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it's in compliance with federal environmental laws. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on Aug. 7 ordered a 14-day halt to additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question. Detainees at the facility have said worms turn up in the food, toilets don't flush, flooding floors with fecal waste, and mosquitoes and other insects are everywhere. Civil rights attorneys also said officers were going cell to cell to pressure detainees into signing voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys, and some detainees had been deported even though they didn't have final removal orders. Along with the spread of a respiratory infection and rainwater flooding in tents, the circumstances had fueled a feeling of desperation among detainees, the attorneys wrote in a court filing. Fischer, Schneider and Frisaro write for the Associated Press. Frisaro reported from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Schneider reported from Orlando, Fla.

The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Department of Homeland Security's Tricia McLaughlin joins 'The Hill'
Just how big could the presence of National Guard troops become in our nation's capital? Perhaps it will double in size in the coming days, as some Republican Governors have pledge sending in personnel from their states. But another question has emerged as well: could the National Guard members patrol D.C. streets armed?
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘I'm all in': Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announces 2026 reelection campaign
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said he has heard of people speculating that he would not run for reelection. On Tuesday afternoon, he made it clear that he will run again, making an official announcement to launch his 2026 campaign. 'I'm all in. I've always been all in,' Patrick said. He made the announcement surrounded by several Republican state senators. In a news release sent shortly after the announcement, Patrick said, 'I'm ready to hit the ground running for my re-election. With the help of my Texas Senate, we've accomplished so much, but there is more work to be done.' 'This Session, we have virtually eliminated school property taxes for the average senior for the rest of their life and cut school property taxes nearly in half for those under 65. I'm committed to continuing to lower property taxes in the Sessions ahead. We must continue to build a stronger, safer, and more prosperous Texas for generations to come,' Patrick said. Before Tuesday, it was not immediately clear if Patrick would seek reelection, after he was tapped to chair President Donald Trump's new commission on religious liberty back in May, according to The Texas Tribune. This was part of the Trump administration's push to 'bring back religion,' to the U.S. It was also Patrick who 'approached Trump with the idea for the commission,' which President Trump noted during his speech in May. Patrick also touted 'a major media buy covering all 20 media markets across Texas through broadcast, cable, and streaming services' as part of his campaign kick-off, the release said. During the news conference, Patrick said his campaign bank account will have $40 to $45 million available. 'I've never seen a more ambitious campaign kickoff in Texas,' Allen Blakemore, Texans for Dan Patrick senior strategist, said in the release. 'Launching a statewide media buy in all 20 markets, with broadcast, cable, and streaming media, certainly is laying a marker down. Lt. Governor Patrick and the Senate candidates are running to continue to deliver a bold conservative vision for Texas. It's an exciting milestone that shows the strength and momentum behind our campaign.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



