Kate Spade's whimsical designs just dropped at Target for under $50 🌼
Kate Spade's whimsical designs just dropped at Target for under $50 🌼 The limited-time collaboration features hundreds of Kate Spade x Target products, including a colorblock tote bag, floral cardigan and polka dot pillow.
Some retail collaborations are so unmissable, you find yourself setting an extra alarm(s) just to make sure you can shop products the moment they drop. In my world, the Kate Spade x Target collection is one of many such collaborations, and after weeks of anticipation (and feverishly bookmarking my most-wanted buys), it's finally live.
For its latest designer collaboration, Target teamed up with Kate Spade New York for a timeless lifestyle collection that's designed to spark joy and give shoppers a more accessible way into Kate Spade's decadent world. The limited-edition capsule features more than 300 items across three core categories, including women's clothing and accessories, home decor and entertaining essentials.
From Kate Spade purses and wallets to floral dresses and cheeky polka dot pillows, the collection bottles up the colorful whimsy of the O.G. heritage brand and reimagines it into the most darling and affordable collab—with prices starting at $5. Ahead, shop the best Kate Spade x Target products from their newest collection and infuse some more color into your spring aesthetic.
Shop the Kate Spade x Target collection
📲 More: We found a Kate Spade Disney bag for $214 off! Plus 10 other purse deals to shop this week
More: What's the difference between Target Circle and Target Circle 360?
More: Sip in style this summer: Get exclusive new Stanley Quencher colors at Target
Shop the Kate Spade x Target collection
What is the Kate Spade x Target collection?
Every year, Target announces a series of designer collaborations that are exclusive to the retailer and available to shop in stores or online. For 2025, Target teamed up with Kate Spade New York for a limited-edition collection that marks the retailer's largest designer collaboration to date—with over 300 pieces—and features a wide product assortment, with everything from Kate Spade handbags and accessories to hosting essentials like plate sets and tapered candles. The Kate Spade x Target collection officially launched on Saturday, April 12, and is available only for a limited time—or before products sell out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
Toy Story 5: The Big New Rival Is a Tablet
Pixar is giving its old-school toys a decidedly modern antagonist: a tablet. During the studio's Friday showcase at Annecy's International Animation Film Festival in France, chief creative officer Pete Docter revealed that Toy Story 5's villain is Lily Pad, a "sneaky" and "prickly" tablet tablet that convinces eight-year-old Bonnie that friends and games on a device beat dusty ol' toys in the closet. The first concept art shows the frog-faced tablet looming over Buzz, Jessie and Bullseye like a touchscreen tyrant of the toy box. As you can probably foresee, this is a battle between analog animation and always-on tech. (You can stream Toy Story movies 1 through 4 on Disney Plus.) The Lily Pad reveal topped a jam-packed Walt Disney Animation and Pixar showcase where the company rolled out updated release dates, never-before-seen footage and a couple all-new original films. Toy Story 5: The enemy is tech The premise of Toy Story 5 is eight-year-old Bonnie Anderson getting a Lily Pad for school chat and online games. However, the tablet decides that her toys, including Woody, Buzz and Jessie, are holding her back. Tom Hanks, Tim Allen and Joan Cusack are all returning, while Ernie Hudson steps in as Combat Carl, honoring the late Carl Weathers. Doctor shared the opening scene of Toy Story 5, which shows a crate full of stranded Buzz Lightyears trying to escape a desert island. Toy Story 5 is being released on June 19, 2026. Toy Story 5 starts off with Buzz Lightyear action figures, stuck in toy mode, searching for Star Command. Pixar Pixar announced two new original films Daniel Chong's Hoppers, releasing March 6, 2026, turns an eco-heist into a critter-powered caper: 14-year-old Mabel uploads her mind into a robotic beaver to save her local pond from a highway project. Gatto, slated for summer 2027, centers on Nero, a black cat in Venice who's burned through most of his nine lives doing jobs for a feline mob boss. Now, questioning whether he's wasted those lives, Nero stumbles into an unexpected friendship that could finally give him purpose. The film will be shot in a "living storybook" style, which is new to Pixar. And we got to see new footage from Zootopia 2 and Elio Jared Bush, Walt Disney Animation Studios' chief creative officer and director/writer of the Zootopia 2, showed some new footage and images from the anticipated sequel, which will be released in November. The audience also got to watch a 27-minute sizzle reel from Elio, the cosmic coming-of-age adventure, which opens June 20.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Cowardice of Live-Action Remakes
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. There's a coincidental yet meaningful connection between two of this summer's buzziest movies. The new Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon are both remakes; beyond that, they're both live-action adaptations of animated films—each of which happened to have been co-directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders. Lilo & Stitch has made a fortune at the box office since its late-May debut; How to Train Your Dragon, which opens today, seems similarly poised for success. The two features are, if a little lacking in visual stimulation compared with their forebears, reliably entertaining. But taken together, they signal something rather alarming in Hollywood's ongoing crisis of imagination: The timeline for nostalgia is growing shorter. Since Tim Burton's big-budget take on Alice in Wonderland grossed more than $1 billion in 2010, the live-action remake has become an inevitable, pervasive cinematic trend. Fifteen years later, it seems that capturing similar financial success requires a studio to look at progressively more recent source material to work with. Disney's attempt to update the nearly 90-year-old Snow White failed at the box office earlier this year; the company shuffled efforts such as a new Pinocchio and Peter Pan off to streaming, despite the recognizable directors and casts involved. The muted response to these modern takes on decades-old classics perhaps explains the move toward reviving properties that resonate with much younger generations instead. The original Lilo & Stitch is 23 years old; How to Train Your Dragon, produced by DreamWorks Animation, is only 15. Next year, a remake of Moana will hit theaters less than a decade after the original film's release. Is that even enough time to start feeling wistful about it? Clearly, the answer is yes, given how audiences have flocked to similar adaptations. The sentimental fervor around franchises such as How to Train Your Dragon is particularly unsettling to me, because the first entry premiered when I was fully an adult; the DreamWorks canon (which also includes such films as Shrek and Kung Fu Panda) was established when I was past the ideal age to become invested. However, I've seen How to Train Your Dragon many times because my daughter is a fan; that intense familiarity helped me out as I watched the live-action version, looking for anything that might feel different about it—which would thus justify its creation. [Read: The lesson Snow White should teach Disney] Not so much. DeBlois, who also directed the two How to Train Your Dragon sequels, makes his live-action debut by adapting his own feature; as such, the end result is wildly similar to the earlier work. The new film is again set in a Viking village that is constantly besieged by different kinds of dragons. The plucky teen son of the chief, a boy named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames), befriends a sleek black dragon named Toothless and learns that fighting the beasts isn't the only answer. The actor who voiced Hiccup's father in the animated film, Gerard Butler, returns to perform the role on-screen; in all other cases, the film uses well-suited performers to replace the voice cast. To my own surprise, I liked the new version of How to Train Your Dragon about as much as I do its ancestor. Both, to me, are above-average bits of children's entertainment that struggle with the same problems: They start to sag near the end and suffer a little from their murky color palette. I got a little choked up at the exact same point that I do while watching the 2010 Dragon, when Hiccup and Toothless take to the sky together; the boy rides on a saddle he's made for his fire-breathing pal, and the composer John Powell's excellent score soars into inspirational mode, all strings and bagpipes. If there's a difference between these redone scenes and their inspirations, it's a remarkably minor one; only good theater decorum stopped me from pulling out my phone and running the two Dragons side by side. Hollywood is struggling to get people to buy movie tickets, so I understand the impulse to offer something that a broad swath of viewers already knows and likes. But there's simply no sense of risk in making something like How to Train Your Dragon—nothing that will convince said theatergoers that the medium has a future beyond recycling. Yes, visual-effects technology is up to the task of re-creating a cartoon on a larger scale and dotted with real actors, and yes, these redos tend to turn a profit for their makers. These shouldn't be the only reasons for art to exist. [Read: Why is Disney trying so hard to dilute its brand?] Lilo & Stitch, at least, diverges somewhat from its source material. Because most of the characters are human beings, its world seems easier to translate to one composed of flesh and blood. The film, like How to Train Your Dragon, is about a shiftless youngster (Lilo, a Hawaiian girl who has been acting out since the death of her parents) bonding with a fantasy creature (Stitch, a blue alien experiment designed as a weapon of destruction). The director Dean Fleischer Camp's tweaks for his rendition didn't particularly click for me, however. One amusing character (another alien who is searching for Stitch) is absent entirely, and the revised ending has prompted some pushback, though Fleischer Camp has tried to defend it. In theory, I should be pro-change, given that I found the carbon-copy nature of How to Train Your Dragon so irksome—except that Lilo & Stitch doesn't really commit to its big alterations. The animated versions of Lilo and her older sister, Nani, forge a closer connection after meeting Stitch and his extraterrestrial hunters; the live-action Lilo enters the care of family friends at the end of the film, so that Nani can go off to study in California. These adjustments to the girls' relationship are a bit bold, because the prior film is so emotionally focused on their frayed sisterhood, yet the remake quickly undercuts their separation with the revelation that Nani can just visit Lilo anytime she wants, thanks to some space technology that Nani has borrowed. Such a cop-out is the underlying, depressing reality with all of these remakes: No change can be too daring, no update too significant. It's heartening that Sanders, a co-director of the original Dragon and Stitch, is one of the few people working in animation who's still committed to innovation. Last year, he directed The Wild Robot; much like How to Train Your Dragon, it is an adaptation of a children's book upon which Sanders found an exciting visual spin. The movie was a critical success, a box-office hit, and an Academy Award nominee. Cinema needs more entries like The Wild Robot—novel works that take chances and trust the audience to follow along. If nothing else, they provide fodder for more live-action remakes in the near future. Hollywood can't have these nostalgic adaptations without something to redo in the first place. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Claire Tabouret's L.A. House in Photos
More from Robb Report French Artist Claire Tabouret's Hand-Painted Home in L.A. Lists for $3 Million A Perfectly Preserved 1960 Richard Neutra Masterpiece in L.A. Hits the Market for $8 Million John Huston's Former L.A. Ranch Has a Miniature Disney Railroad, and It Just Listed for $20 Million Best of Robb Report The 10 Priciest Neighborhoods in America (And How They Got to Be That Way) In Pictures: Most Expensive Properties Click here to read the full article. The double-height living room, with a lofted library above, has a hand-painted fireplace and ceiling. Arches open into a dining room donning a Farrow & Ball hue called Red Earth. The kitchen comes with a vintage-style Bertazzoni range. The yellow breakfast room. The dusty blue family room. The primary suite. A wall of arched French doors in the primary spill out to a private balcony. The balcony overlooks views of Downtown Los Angeles. The updated primary bath comes with a soaking tub and steam shower. A guest bedroom. The courtyard. A special area is dedicated to the French lawn bowling game of pétanque. An aerial view of the property, which rests on less than a quarter of an acre adjacent to Laughlin Park. The floor plan.
