&w=3840&q=100)
How 3 nights of poor sleep can harm your heart
A new study from Uppsala University in Sweden has found that just three nights of restricted sleep, about four hours per night, can trigger changes in the blood associated with a higher risk of heart disease. Notably, these changes were seen even in young, healthy adults after only a few nights of poor sleep read more
Sleep affects not only what's in your blood, but when those changes are most visible. Pixabay/Representational Image
We've long known that a lack of sleep is bad for the heart – but scientists are now starting to understand exactly how it causes harm.
In a new study from Uppsala University in Sweden, researchers found that just three nights of restricted sleep – around four hours a night – triggered changes in the blood linked to a higher risk of heart disease.
The researchers looked at inflammatory proteins in the blood. These are molecules the body produces when it is under stress or fighting off illness.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
When these proteins stay high for a long time, they can damage blood vessels and raise the risk of problems like heart failure, coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat).
The research: What happened?
The study involved 16 healthy young men who spent several days in a lab, where everything from their meals to their activity levels and light exposure was carefully controlled.
The participants followed two routines: three nights of normal sleep (8.5 hours) and three night of sleep restriction (4.25 hours). After each sleep phase, the men completed a short, high-intensity cycling workout, and their blood was tested before and after.
The researchers looked at inflammatory proteins in the blood. Pixabay/Representational Image
Researchers measured almost 90 different proteins in the blood samples. They found that sleep deprivation caused a clear rise in inflammatory markers linked to heart disease.
And while exercise usually boosts healthy proteins such as interleukin-6 and BDNF (which support brain and heart health), these responses were weaker after poor sleep.
What about young adults?
Strikingly, the changes happened even in young, healthy adults, and after only a few nights of bad sleep. That's worrying given how common it is for adults to experience poor sleep from time to time – and around one in four people work shifts that disrupt sleep patterns.
The researchers also discovered that the time of day blood was taken mattered: protein levels varied between morning and evening, and even more so when sleep was restricted.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Changes happened even in young, healthy adults, and after only a few nights of bad sleep. Pixabay/Representational Image
This suggests that sleep affects not only what's in your blood, but when those changes are most visible.
Although modern life often encourages us to trade sleep for productivity, socialising or screen time, studies like this remind us that the body keeps score – quietly, chemically and without compromise.
Annie Curtis, Professor (Assoc), School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences (PBS), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
First Post
3 days ago
- First Post
How 3 nights of poor sleep can harm your heart
A new study from Uppsala University in Sweden has found that just three nights of restricted sleep, about four hours per night, can trigger changes in the blood associated with a higher risk of heart disease. Notably, these changes were seen even in young, healthy adults after only a few nights of poor sleep read more Sleep affects not only what's in your blood, but when those changes are most visible. Pixabay/Representational Image We've long known that a lack of sleep is bad for the heart – but scientists are now starting to understand exactly how it causes harm. In a new study from Uppsala University in Sweden, researchers found that just three nights of restricted sleep – around four hours a night – triggered changes in the blood linked to a higher risk of heart disease. The researchers looked at inflammatory proteins in the blood. These are molecules the body produces when it is under stress or fighting off illness. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When these proteins stay high for a long time, they can damage blood vessels and raise the risk of problems like heart failure, coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). The research: What happened? The study involved 16 healthy young men who spent several days in a lab, where everything from their meals to their activity levels and light exposure was carefully controlled. The participants followed two routines: three nights of normal sleep (8.5 hours) and three night of sleep restriction (4.25 hours). After each sleep phase, the men completed a short, high-intensity cycling workout, and their blood was tested before and after. The researchers looked at inflammatory proteins in the blood. Pixabay/Representational Image Researchers measured almost 90 different proteins in the blood samples. They found that sleep deprivation caused a clear rise in inflammatory markers linked to heart disease. And while exercise usually boosts healthy proteins such as interleukin-6 and BDNF (which support brain and heart health), these responses were weaker after poor sleep. What about young adults? Strikingly, the changes happened even in young, healthy adults, and after only a few nights of bad sleep. That's worrying given how common it is for adults to experience poor sleep from time to time – and around one in four people work shifts that disrupt sleep patterns. The researchers also discovered that the time of day blood was taken mattered: protein levels varied between morning and evening, and even more so when sleep was restricted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Changes happened even in young, healthy adults, and after only a few nights of bad sleep. Pixabay/Representational Image This suggests that sleep affects not only what's in your blood, but when those changes are most visible. Although modern life often encourages us to trade sleep for productivity, socialising or screen time, studies like this remind us that the body keeps score – quietly, chemically and without compromise. Annie Curtis, Professor (Assoc), School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences (PBS), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 days ago
- First Post
Why do people shed happy tears? The science, explained
We often cry when we are happy. That's because happiness is not a simple emotion; it is often tangled with memory, relief, and awe. Scientists note that happy tears are the brain's way of processing this complexity, of marking a moment that matters, even when it's joyful read more An LGBTQ couple shed tears as they celebrate their union. Happy tears seem contradictory, but offer a fascinating window into how the human brain handles intense emotion. Representational image/AP Tears are usually seen as a sign of sadness or pain, but it's not uncommon for people to cry during life's most joyful moments: weddings, births, reunions, sporting triumphs, or even just an unexpected act of kindness. These 'happy tears' seem contradictory, but they offer a fascinating window into how the human brain handles intense emotion. Why do we cry? Crying is a complex biological response to emotional overload – and it doesn't discriminate between good and bad feelings. Whether triggered by grief or elation, tears are often the result of our brain attempting to process more than it can manage in the moment. Both positive and negative emotions activate the limbic system, the part of the brain involved in processing feelings and memory. Within this system, the amygdala – an almond-shaped cluster of neurons – acts as an emotional alarm bell, detecting arousal and signalling the body to respond. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When highly stimulated, the amygdala activates other brain areas including the hypothalamus, which controls involuntary physical functions like heartbeat, breathing and tear production. Whether triggered by grief or elation, tears are often the result of our brain attempting to process more than it can manage in the moment. Representational image/Pixabay Another key structure is the anterior cingulate cortex, which plays a role in emotion regulation, decision-making and empathy. It helps coordinate the brain's response to emotional conflict, such as experiencing joy and sadness at the same time. These overlapping pathways explain why a sudden surge of happiness can still produce a reaction typically associated with distress. Scientists believe happy crying is a form of emotional homeostasis: a way of bringing us back to equilibrium after an emotional high. Crying activates the parasympathetic nervous system, which slows the heart rate and relaxes the body after the adrenaline spike of intense feeling. In other words, tears help us calm down. This idea of 'resetting' isn't unique to happiness. Crying in response to stress or trauma serves a similar purpose. What's striking about happy crying is how it illustrates the body's effort to balance opposing forces: relief after fear, gratitude after hardship, pride after struggle. What are happy tears? So-called 'happy' tears are rarely just that. Often they emerge from a blend of emotions. For example, a parent watching their child graduate may be proud, nostalgic, and a little melancholic all at once. A long-awaited reunion might stir joy and the pain of absence. Psychologists refer to this as a dual-valence response – an emotional state that contains both positive and negative elements. These emotional blends engage memory systems as well, particularly the hippocampus, which processes and retrieves personal history. That's why a joyful moment can unexpectedly bring a lump to the throat – it activates memories of previous loss, struggle or longing. The emoticon that resembles happy tears. Happy tears emerge from a blend of emotions. Representational image/Pixabay Interestingly, humans are the only animals known to shed emotional tears. While many mammals produce reflex tears to lubricate the eye, only humans cry in response to emotion. This probably evolved as a form of non-verbal communication, especially in early social groups. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tears signal vulnerability, authenticity and emotional depth. Crying during joyful moments demonstrates to others that something profoundly meaningful has occurred. In this way, happy crying can strengthen social bonds, invite empathy and create shared moments of catharsis. Research has even shown that people are more likely to offer help to someone who is crying, regardless of whether the tears are sad or joyful. So why do we cry when we're happy? Because happiness is not a simple emotion. It is often tangled with memory, relief, awe and the sheer weight of meaning. Tears are the brain's way of processing this complexity, of marking a moment that matters, even when it's joyful. Far from being a contradiction, happy tears remind us that emotional life is rich, messy and above all deeply human. Michelle Spear, Professor of Anatomy, University of Bristol This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Hindu
5 days ago
- The Hindu
The Svedberg show
A path to pursue Born on August 30, 1884 at Flerang in the parish of Valbo near Gavle, Sweden, Theodor (The) Svedberg was the only child of Elias Svedberg and Augusta Alstermark. The fact that his father was a works manager at different ironworks in Sweden and Norway meant that the family lived at a number of places in Scandinavia during his childhood. His father made it a point to take him out for excursions often, allowing him to develop a love for nature and a keen interest in botany. Svedberg attended the Koping School, the Orebro High School and Gothenburg Modern School and had the privilege of being taught by some prominent teachers. These teachers were also understanding, allowing Svedberg to study on his own. This gained him access to laboratories after ordinary classes and Svedberg spent time in the afternoons at the physical and chemical labs of the school. Stoked by the advent of new discoveries and inventions in both physics and chemistry, Svedberg went about building stuff on his own. He created a Marconi-transmitter and a Tesla-transformer this way and even arranged public demonstrations that included wireless telegraphy between two blocks of his school. Even though he had a passionate interest in botany, he decided to study chemistry following his hands-on efforts in his school laboratories. This experience also put him in good stead when he went on to experiment with colloids later on. A lifelong association After matriculating from school, Svedberg began a lifelong association with Uppsala University in January 1904. It was here that he received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1905, his Master's degree in 1907 and Doctor of Philosophy in 1908. While still studying, Svedberg accepted a post as assistant in the Chemical Institute at Uppsala. This means that Svedberg's scientific career set off in 1905, while he was still in his early 20s. By 1907, he was given the added responsibility of serving as lecturer in chemistry in the university. It wasn't long before a special appointment as lecturer and demonstrator of physical chemistry came through in 1909. In 1912, he was elected Professor of Physical Chemistry, Uppsala University – a position he held onto until 1949, when he was made emeritus. It was in 1949 that Svedberg took on the role of director of the Gustaf Werner Institute for Nuclear Chemistry at the University. He remained at this post until 1967 and the institute was renamed The Svedberg Laboratory in 1986, about 15 years after his death in 1971. The facility was permanently shut down in 2016, following a decision a year earlier to implement decommissioning. It is worth mentioning that a Nature article in 1944 speaks of a volume 'compiled by colleagues, friends and pupils to celebrate the sixtieth birthday of The Svedberg.' Even though by title he was a Professor of Physical Chemistry, 31 of the 56 communications in that volume can be termed as biophysics – both a nod to Svedberg's passion towards biological systems, and the fact that he had wide-ranging interests and activities. British physical chemist Eric Keightley Rideal, to whom the Nature article is attributed, also makes it clear that if it hadn't been for the limitations imposed on this compilation by World War II, the 'contributions would certainly have come in from all parts of the world.' A lifetime with science Primarily interested in colloids, Svedberg's work mainly concerned with these particles with a size of between 1 and 100 nanometres. His 1908 doctoral thesis – Studien zur Lehre von den kolloiden Lösungen – is now considered a classic and he described a new method of producing colloidal particles. Svedberg also gave convincing evidence of the validity of the theory on Brownian movements founded by renowned theoretical physicist Albert Einstein and Polish physicist Marian Smoluchowski. In this way, Svedberg provided conclusive proof of the physical existence of molecules. One of Svedberg's early patents was filed on June 1, 1909. In this patent, titled 'Process of Producing Colloidal Sols or Gels.' Svedberg speaks of an invention relating to the process of producing colloidal sols or gels. The patent was accepted and granted in Great Britain on May 26, 1910. It is interesting to note that Svedberg applied for this patent in four countries. What's more, he made the applications in Denmark, Switzerland, and Austria also on June 1, 1909. Working with a number of collaborators, Svedberg continued to study the physical properties of colloids, be it diffusion, light absorption, or sedimentation. His studies enabled him to conclude that the gas laws could be applied to disperse systems. Svedberg invented the ultracentrifuge for the study of sedimentation. Using this, he could study large molecules in solution, such as proteins, carbohydrates, and high polymers. Svedberg employed centrifugal forces to better mimic the effects of gravity on particles and the first ultracentrifuge, which was constructed in 1924, could generate a centrifugal force up to 5,000 times the force of gravity. With an ultracentrifuge, Svedberg came up with findings relating to molecular size and shape, and also used it to prove that proteins were a kind of macromolecules, paving the way for molecular biology. For his discoveries regarding disperse systems, Svedberg was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1926. In his later years, Svedberg switched to nuclear chemistry and radiation biology. He made contributions to improve the cyclotron and helped his doctoral student – Swedish biochemist Arne Tiselius – as he went about researching electrophoresis to separate and analyse proteins. Tiselius himself went on to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1948 'for his research on electrophoresis and adsorption analysis, especially for his discoveries concerning the complex nature of the serum proteins.' An Indian connection Svedberg has a couple of Indian connections – one that can be refuted, and another based on solid fact. The picture shown here is from The Hindu's archives. This image's caption mention both Svedberg and Indian physicist C. V. Raman. While there's no doubt that Raman is the one seated second from left, the same cannot be said about Svedberg. Even though he could be the one standing behind Raman, it can't be proven beyond doubt. Image searches on the web and AI-based results throw into question the possibility of Raman and Svedberg being in the same frame. Barring the caption in the archives, there's no known recorded mention online where the two scientists have been in the same gathering. In such a situation, it is impossible to conclude that the two men might have ever met. What we do know, however, is that Svedberg was a fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences. He was elected into the honorary fellowship in 1935, a year after the society was founded in 1934. This is an irrefutable fact that finds mention both in Svedberg's biographical entry on the Nobel Prize website and in the Fellows' portal of the Indian Academy of Sciences. This does hint that there might be a working relationship between Svedberg and Raman as the Indian Academy of Sciences was the brainchild of the latter. Raman founded the society in Bengaluru 'with the main objective of promoting the progress and upholding the cause of science.' When the Academy began functioning with 65 Founding Fellows in 1934, it elected Raman as its president in its first general meeting. Considering that Svedberg was elected an honorary fellow the very next year, the two men might well have known each other.
