25% tariff threatens key export sectors
"The move to impose a 25% tariff on Indian textile imports to the US is a significant setback for the industry," said Ronak Chiripal, promoter of Chiripal Group. "Such a tariff would impact price competitiveness, particularly for mid- to high-value products. While recent trade agreements with the UK and Australia are creating new opportunities, uncertainty around the US-India trade deal creates a planning and margin challenge for Indian exporters.
"
The impact is expected to spill over into other key sectors as well, including chemicals and ceramics, both of which contribute significantly to Gujarat's export basket. Exporters across sectors are actively diversifying markets and product lines, emphasizing the need for a stable, predictable trade environment to sustain manufacturing growth and long-term customer relationships.
You Can Also Check:
Ahmedabad AQI
|
Weather in Ahmedabad
|
Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad
|
Public Holidays in Ahmedabad
Ankit Patel, regional chairman – north region, Chemexcil, said, "The US is the top export destination for Indian chemical products, so the 25% tariff will deal a significant blow to the industry.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You
Reportingly
Undo
Since chemicals are industrial inputs, businesses cannot easily pass on the cost to end users, making it harder to absorb the impact. We expect the real impact to start showing in the coming months."
Trade experts say the development could re-ignite pressure for an expedited bilateral trade pact with the US, especially as geopolitical dynamics are rapidly shifting. Nilesh Jetpariya, former president of the Morbi Ceramic Association, said, "The Morbi ceramics industry will be impacted, but we are closely analysing the tariff structure on other key ceramic-supplying countries.
Last year, there was a process to impose anti-dumping duties on Indian ceramic products, which led to the US share in our exports falling to 7.5% from 9.5% the year before.
"
He added, "The competitiveness of our exports now depends on how countries like Italy, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, and Turkey — all major ceramic exporters to the US — are treated under the new tariff regime. If they too face similar tariffs, the playing field remains level. Currently, our ceramic products attract around 8.5% basic duty and 3.5% anti-dumping duty, along with a 10% tariff. An additional 15% tariff hike will have a negative impact, but we've seen that Morbi continues to export to Mexico despite a 25% duty — which shows that we remain cost-competitive compared to many global players.
"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India refuses to play 'dead economy'. Will Trump back off?
The United States' imposition of 25% tariffs on Indian goods has drawn a measured but clear response from India. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's remarks, issued in the wake of President Donald Trump's tariff announcement and disparaging comment calling India a 'dead economy,' were more than defensive. They were strategic, confident and unmistakably defiant. India has drawn its red line, and the message is clear: it will not be pressured into an unfavourable trade question now is whether the US will back off or recalibrate its approach, recognizing that India will not negotiate on unequal terms or under coercion. Goyal's statement, a quiet strategic assertionUnlike the rough words Trump used against India while announcing the tariffs, Goyal's statement that India gives 'utmost priority' to protecting farmers, labourers, entrepreneurs, exporters, and other industrial stakeholders was a quiet declaration of India's trade posture to the world, in addition to domestic assurance. By emphasising that India will not sign deals under deadlines or pressure, he framed the country's response not as reactive, but as anchored in policy consistency and sovereign also responded directly to Trump's calling India a "dead eocnomy" by asserting that India is not only the world's fastest-growing major economy, but will soon become the third-largest. This was a clear signal that India rejects the idea of being treated as a subordinate in global trade relations. It will engage but on equal rhetorical stance has important strategic consequences. In the realm of global diplomacy, perception is power. Goyal's articulation projected India not as a defensive partner on the backfoot, but as an assertive, confident global economy that deamnds respect and parity in negotiations. A red line, but not an unreasonable one While agriculture and dairy access remains a contentious issue, particularly the US push to export GM crops and meat-fed dairy, India's opposition is grounded in economic, regulatory, health and political logic. With vast numbers of small-scale farmers and a fragile rural economy, opening the gates to heavily subsidised US agri-products could destabilise a politically sensitive has not rejected trade reforms outright. It has signaled willingness to negotiate, but not on terms that threaten domestic livelihoods or regulatory autonomy. This is not blanket protectionism, but an insistence on fair trade rooted in local Read | India's $68 billion question: How to trade with Russia without making America unhappy Has Trump boxed the US into a corner?By publicly deriding India and slapping tariffs on its exports, Trump may have overplayed his hand. Rather than pushing India toward compromise, his comments have likely made it politically impossible for New Delhi to be seen as yielding. India now finds itself in a position where public perception, domestic politics and economic strategy all align in favour of resistance. Yielding to US demands would not only be unpopular at home, it would be interpreted as strategic weakness abroad US, too, has much to gain from deeper trade ties with India particularly as it seeks to diversify supply chains away from China and tap into India's growing consumer market. With India making it clear that unilateral pressure tactics won't work, Washington may be forced to rethink its strategy. The US could either entrench further, risking a prolonged standoff, or shift to a more diplomatic, respect-based dialogue to find common ground. Also Read | Pivot to Pakistan: Is Trump ditching Delhi for its enemy? The world may come to see India's firmness not as obstructionism or intransigence, but as a sign of a maturing power that cannot be steamrolled. If the US wants a meaningful, long-term economic relationship with India, it may have to abandon the current posture of economic intimidation. India has made its stance abundantly clear. It seeks trade partnerships based on fairness, mutual benefit and strategic respect. Goyal's statements underscore that India is no longer a pliant participant in global trade talks. It is assertive, self-assured and unafraid to walk away from deals that compromise core interests. The US now faces a decision -- either continue to press India with tariff threats and harsh rhetoric, or shift toward a cooperative approach that respects India's sovereign choices. If it chooses the latter, there remains strong potential for a new trade agreement that strengthens both economies. But if it clings to hardline demands, it risks isolating one of the world's fastest-growing markets and a critical geopolitical partner. The ball is now in America's court. India's response to Trump's tariffs has demonstrated that it is unwilling to buckle under pressure. Goyal's firm words reflect a broader shift in India's global stance: measured yet assertive. What remains to be seen is whether the US, recognising this new reality, is willing to adjust its tactics and engage India with the respect it demands. In the high-stakes world of global trade, coercion rarely works in the long term.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian-origin Nikhil Ravishankar named new CEO of Air New Zealand
India-origin Nikhil Ravishankar is set to take over as the CEO of Air New Zealand from October this year after being associated with the carrier for nearly five years. Prior to joining the airline, Nikhil Ravishankar was Chief Digital Officer at Vector and Managing Director of Accenture.(Nikhil Ravishankar/LinkedIn) Incidentally, Air India CEO and MD Campbell Wilson is from New Zealand. "Currently the airline's Chief Digital Officer, Nikhil will officially take over as CEO on 20 October 2025. In the nearly five years that Nikhil has been at Air New Zealand he has gained a deep understanding of the aviation sector, and the airline. He has also led major advances in the airline's technology backbone, loyalty programme and customer proposition," Air New Zealand said in a statement on July 30. Also Read: Air India, Air New Zealand forge new partnership Ravishankar earlier held top roles at Vector and Accenture Prior to joining the airline, Ravishankar was Chief Digital Officer at Vector and Managing Director of Accenture. "I'm both thrilled and humbled to be given this opportunity to lead Air New Zealand... airlines are complex, and safety underpins every decision we make," he said in the statement. Air New Zealand offers more than 400 flights a day to 49 domestic and international destinations. It has a fleet of more than 100 planes, including Boeing 777s, 787s, Airbus 320s, ATRs and Q300s, as per its website. Meanwhile, Air New Zealand and Air India, in March this year, announced that they will explore the introduction of a direct service between the two countries by the end of 2028, subject to new aircraft deliveries and approvals from relevant government regulators. Air India, Air NZ sign MoU for 16-route codeshare deal Both airlines had also inked a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to boost air connectivity between India and New Zealand. Both airlines will have a new codeshare partnership on 16 routes between India, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand. "Customers will now be able to travel from the Indian cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru and Chennai on Air India, and connect at Sydney, Melbourne or Singapore onto Air New Zealand-operated flights to Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington and Queenstown," Air India said in March.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Coming up Trumps against tariff threat
India's garments exports — that have stagnated in the $16-18 billion range over the last 10 years — now face an additional threat. Effective August 1, the Trump administration has more than doubled the tariff on Indian exports to 25%, with a threat of an additional penalty. Major apparel supplier Vietnam, on the other hand, recently secured a last-minute deal to cap US tariffs at 20% on many of its exports — giving it further advantage against India — while Bangladesh, another major competitor, is looking to secure a similar deal as Vietnam in the next few days. The apparel sector can lift millions out of poverty, as seen in Bangladesh, where garment work has empowered women at scale. (REUTERS) The US imported almost $85 billion worth of garments in 2024, of which India accounted for about $10.5 billion. While the latest tariff announcement can be seen as a setback, India still has three aces up its sleeve to neutralise its impact and push firmly towards its $100 billion textile exports target. These aces are concluding the free trade agreement (FTA) with the EU, ensuring the supply of raw material at competitive prices, and an incentive and reforms package tailored for employment generation through apparel exports. The first ace India must play is to expedite the FTA with the EU. Currently, the EU is the largest garments importer with an import value close to $200 billion. India only captures $5 billion of this against Bangladesh's $25 billion. The primary reason is the 10% duty advantage enjoyed by Bangladesh due to its LDC status, which allows it to export to the EU duty-free. If India were to sign an FTA with the EU on the lines of the recently concluded UK FTA, this disparity will vanish — making Indian exporters highly competitive in the largest market in the world. The second ace India needs to deal is addressing the high cost of raw material for its textile and apparel industry. Cotton, the lifeblood of our textile industry, carries an import duty of around 10% imposed in 2021. Duties are even higher when it comes to synthetic-fibre-based products. For example, the basic customs duty on polyester fabric is 20%, which raises the cost of synthetic fabric in the market. While garment exporters are allowed to import fabrics duty-free under the advance authorisation scheme, it is currently extremely restrictive and rigid. A few simple but far-reaching reforms can enable Indian exporters to access fabric at globally competitive prices, on a par with their Bangladeshi counterparts. First, simplify the input-output norms and allow exporters to import fabrics on self-certification basis with post-export audit, on the lines of the EU. Second, allow exporters to import inputs against export orders or contracts without prior licence. Finally, allow exporters or third parties to pool inputs or maintain bonded warehouses for multi-party use and treat sales of fabric to exporters as deemed exports. In addition to these, rationalisation of import duties on both cotton and synthetic fibres, yarn, and fabrics would eliminate the substantial disability Indian garment exporters face on account of raw material. The third ace that India must play is a package of carefully crafted policy measures and reforms for the garment sector to enhance competitiveness to world-beating levels. Such measures would include a suitable incentive scheme for the garment sector — one that is easy to avail and is export- and job-centric. The scheme would essentially function as an employment-linked incentive (ELI) — rewarding companies not just for production volumes, but for the number of new jobs they create and sustain in the sector. For it to be truly effective, such a scheme should be skewed towards large manufacturing units that employ, say, 1,000+ workers, to drive economies of scale and higher productivity. The government must also extend the Rebate of State & Central Taxes and Levies (RoSCTL) — which refunds embedded taxes to exporters — beyond 2026 to keep Indian apparel prices competitive globally. In addition to incentives, the government must fast-track the completion and operationalisation of the new PM MITRA textile parks. These parks should become magnets for textile and garment manufacturers through world-class infrastructure, responsive governance, and easier regulation around land, labour, and environment. The goal must be to make India the supplier of choice in terms of cost and reliability. The apparel sector can lift millions out of poverty, as seen in Bangladesh, where garment work has empowered women at scale. India can replicate and surpass that model by consciously steering policy to favour labour-intensive growth. The encouraging news is that global brands are already showing interest. From Japan to West Asia, buyers are in talks to tap into India's expanding production capacity and favourable incentive structure. This confidence, combined with the right policy push, could help India achieve the government's ambitious target of $100 billion in textile and apparel exports by 2030, up from roughly $30-40 billion (including yarn and fabric) today. Achieving this would vault India into the upper ranks of global apparel exporters, close in on rivals and create an estimated 2.5 crore new jobs by 2030 — a transformation with profound social and economic benefits. Ashish Dhawan is founder-CEO and Piyush Doshi is operating partner, The Convergence Foundation. The views expressed are personal.
