French fighter jets aren't up to it, claim Chinese agents
China used its diplomatic network to cast doubt over France's Rafale jets after four days of fighting between the two South Asian neighbours, the sources said.
Pakistan claimed its Chinese fighter jets had shot down five of India's aircraft that were made in France, including three Rafales.
Pakistan used China's J10-C Vigorous Dragon and JF-17 Thunder planes, armed with air-to-air missiles. It is thought to be the first time the J10-C has been used in active combat.
Findings from a French intelligence service, which has been seen by The Associated Press (AP), said defence attaches in China's foreign embassies began a drive to undermine Rafale sales. They have also been persuading countries, notably Indonesia, to backtrack on orders of the French jets and buy theirs.
India acknowledged it had lost aircraft in the fighting but declined to say which or how many.
Gen Jérôme Bellanger, of the French air force, said he had seen evidence pointing to just three Indian losses – a Rafale, a Russian-made Sukhoi and a Mirage 2000, which is an earlier-generation French-made jet. It was the first known combat loss of a Rafale, which France has sold to eight countries.
'Of course, all those, the nations that bought Rafales, asked themselves questions,' Gen Bellanger told AP.
France's defence ministry said the Rafale was targeted by 'a vast campaign of disinformation' that 'sought to promote the superiority of alternative equipment, notably of Chinese design'.
'The Rafale was not randomly targeted. It is a highly capable fighter jet, exported abroad and deployed in a high-visibility theatre,' the ministry wrote on its website.
'By attacking the aircraft, certain actors sought to undermine the credibility of France and its defence industrial and technological base.
French officials said the campaign included viral posts on social media, manipulated imagery showing supposed Rafale debris, AI-generated content and video-game depictions to simulate supposed combat.
China's ministry of national defence dismissed claims it had launched a Rafale-bashing drive as 'pure groundless rumours and slander'.
'China has consistently maintained a prudent and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability,' it said.
Experts said it would make sense for China to attack French technological prowess and reliability as part of its wider campaign to counter Western countries' influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
World must be more wary than ever of China's growing economic power
China is pulling every lever at its disposal to counter Donald Trump's economic blockade, and it's working. Trade is recovering after the massive hit from Washington's wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing's exports. According to data provider Macrobond and Beijing-based consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, exports to the US were down by about $15bn (£11bn) in May, but up by half that figure to other countries that trade with the US. Exports to African countries have also risen sharply. Meanwhile, Chinese officials are poised to strike deals to deepen economic cooperation with countries ranging from Brazil and South Africa to Australia and the UK. The latest addition to China's growing list of conquests occurred last week when its premier, Li Qiang, and Brazil's beleaguered president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a slew of cooperation agreements, including ones covering artificial intelligence (AI) and aerospace, further consolidating Beijing's Belt and Road scheme of tied investments. It matters to everyone that China's power and influence are expanding because the aims of its autocratic regime undermine the economic and political resources of the rest of the world. China might, by some, be considered the great provider, but its pseudo-communist regime is a malign actor on the international stage, much as Russia has become, and its search for ways to thrive must be strictly circumscribed. Without tough action, its voracious appetite for resources, information and intellectual capital will eat all of us. There are spies in every major university syphoning information back to Beijing about new developments and business opportunities. When intellectual property and patents can be hacked, they are duly stolen. Digital information is harvested on a vast scale and put into huge databases, waiting for developments in AI to allow for a more systematic analysis by Chinese officials. It might seem like a paranoid interpretation of China's day-to-day workings when Britons cast their eye over their own government and believe it barely capable of boiling an egg. China, though, is a very different place. Talk to local officials and you will quickly notice how concerned they are about the basics as much as they are about reasserting China's preindustrial revolution status as the world's greatest economic power. How to feed 1.4 billion people is a daily task and a constant worry. Nothing must stop the effort to keep the wheels of today's economy turning and the mission to usurp rivals such as the US and turn neighbours into supplicants. Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, knows this ahead of a trip to three Chinese cities this weekend for talks about trade and investment and the UK energy secretary, Ed Miliband, understands how carefully he must tread when considering injections of Chinese cash and knowhow to build new offshore windfarms. What Beijing can offer is hugely attractive. It's not just the 10% depreciation in its currency against the dollar that makes its exports even cheaper than they were just a few months ago. It has cut-price digital infrastructure products that will transform an economy, an especially appealing offer to the industrialising nations also being punished by Trump's tariffs such as South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines. In the post-pandemic period of panic gripping much of the world, where the costs of making any kind of improvements are growing and government debts are escalating, China is one of the few big investors outside the Middle East with significant financial firepower. Cheap goods offset inflationary pressures while tantalising investments lure countries that Beijing knows are struggling to deliver on election promises. In this turbulent world, the UK, the EU and Australia can fend off China's demands for greater access in return for investment – primarily access to digital information. They can use polite language when they say no. Or they can cite China's alliance with Russia if they need a more forceful excuse. Beijing supplies Russia with much of what it needs in wartime in return for cheap oil. In this way it has embraced pariah status. Albanese says he will take back the port in Darwin from Chinese control. Likewise, Miliband should block Chinese investment in UK energy infrastructure. And David Lammy, the foreign secretary, should support planning objections to China's proposed new embassy in London, which the MoD has warned will be a huge spying station. Keeping China at bay when it has so much to offer won't be easy. It pays the wages of university lecturers by sending tens of thousands of students to the UK. It sends us cheap electric cars and much else from its vast warehouse of electrical and electronic products. That shouldn't be an excuse for adopting a breezy, laissez-faire attitude. We might not have wanted to take sides. There is no issue with the people of Russia and China, but their governments have forced us to be more independent, and take the financial hit that comes with that.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Labour MPs tell Keir Starmer to cut Net Zero levies on industry or risk killing off Brit manufacturing jobs
SIR Keir Starmer must cut Net Zero levies on industry or risk killing off manufacturing jobs for good, Labour MPs have warned. They say oil and gas producers in particular are at risk of shutting up shop and being moved abroad because of the barmy rules. 1 The report is a major challenge to the PM's hugely controversial Net Zero policies. British factories are slapped with massive charges for every tonne of carbon they produce. But other big countries - including China and the US - have far lower levies or none at all. In a new hard-hitting report, the Commission for Carbon Competitiveness calls for these levies to be urgently eased to save jobs. Labour MP Henry Tufnell, chairman of the commission, said: 'We cannot afford to sleepwalk into a future where the UK achieves its climate goals through deindustrialisation, putting vital jobs at risk. "Britain needs to be able to compete with the big industrial powers, like China and the United States. 'To do that we need a level playing field. That is what this report is calling for.' They want UK companies to get free credits to produce carbon under the UK's Emissions Trading Scheme, and ignore the threat of legal action by the World Trade Organisation. Red Wall Labour MP for Grimsby Melanie Onn also backed the report. It comes after the OBR warned that the government's policy of hitting Net Zero by 2050 will cost an eye-watering £803 billion over the next 25 years.
The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
World must be more wary than ever of China's growing economic power
China is pulling every lever at its disposal to counter Donald Trump's economic blockade, and it's working. Trade is recovering after the massive hit from Washington's wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing's exports. According to data provider Macrobond and Beijing-based consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, exports to the US were down by about $15bn (£11bn) in May, but up by half that figure to other countries that trade with the US. Exports to African countries have also risen sharply. Meanwhile, Chinese officials are poised to strike deals to deepen economic cooperation with countries ranging from Brazil and South Africa to Australia and the UK. The latest addition to China's growing list of conquests occurred last week when its premier, Li Qiang, and Brazil's beleaguered president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a slew of cooperation agreements, including ones covering artificial intelligence (AI) and aerospace, further consolidating Beijing's Belt and Road scheme of tied investments. It matters to everyone that China's power and influence are expanding because the aims of its autocratic regime undermine the economic and political resources of the rest of the world. China might, by some, be considered the great provider, but its pseudo-communist regime is a malign actor on the international stage, much as Russia has become, and its search for ways to thrive must be strictly circumscribed. Without tough action, its voracious appetite for resources, information and intellectual capital will eat all of us. There are spies in every major university syphoning information back to Beijing about new developments and business opportunities. When intellectual property and patents can be hacked, they are duly stolen. Digital information is harvested on a vast scale and put into huge databases, waiting for developments in AI to allow for a more systematic analysis by Chinese officials. It might seem like a paranoid interpretation of China's day-to-day workings when Britons cast their eye over their own government and believe it barely capable of boiling an egg. China, though, is a very different place. Talk to local officials and you will quickly notice how concerned they are about the basics as much as they are about reasserting China's preindustrial revolution status as the world's greatest economic power. How to feed 1.4 billion people is a daily task and a constant worry. Nothing must stop the effort to keep the wheels of today's economy turning and the mission to usurp rivals such as the US and turn neighbours into supplicants. Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, knows this ahead of a trip to three Chinese cities this weekend for talks about trade and investment and the UK energy secretary, Ed Miliband, understands how carefully he must tread when considering injections of Chinese cash and knowhow to build new offshore windfarms. What Beijing can offer is hugely attractive. It's not just the 10% depreciation in its currency against the dollar that makes its exports even cheaper than they were just a few months ago. It has cut-price digital infrastructure products that will transform an economy, an especially appealing offer to the industrialising nations also being punished by Trump's tariffs such as South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines. In the post-pandemic period of panic gripping much of the world, where the costs of making any kind of improvements are growing and government debts are escalating, China is one of the few big investors outside the Middle East with significant financial firepower. Cheap goods offset inflationary pressures while tantalising investments lure countries that Beijing knows are struggling to deliver on election promises. In this turbulent world, the UK, the EU and Australia can fend off China's demands for greater access in return for investment – primarily access to digital information. They can use polite language when they say no. Or they can cite China's alliance with Russia if they need a more forceful excuse. Beijing supplies Russia with much of what it needs in wartime in return for cheap oil. In this way it has embraced pariah status. Albanese says he will take back the port in Darwin from Chinese control. Likewise, Miliband should block Chinese investment in UK energy infrastructure. And David Lammy, the foreign secretary, should support planning objections to China's proposed new embassy in London, which the MoD has warned will be a huge spying station. Keeping China at bay when it has so much to offer won't be easy. It pays the wages of university lecturers by sending tens of thousands of students to the UK. It sends us cheap electric cars and much else from its vast warehouse of electrical and electronic products. That shouldn't be an excuse for adopting a breezy, laissez-faire attitude. We might not have wanted to take sides. There is no issue with the people of Russia and China, but their governments have forced us to be more independent, and take the financial hit that comes with that.
