
World must be more wary than ever of China's growing economic power
Trade is recovering after the massive hit from Washington's wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing's exports.
According to data provider Macrobond and Beijing-based consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, exports to the US were down by about $15bn (£11bn) in May, but up by half that figure to other countries that trade with the US. Exports to African countries have also risen sharply.
Meanwhile, Chinese officials are poised to strike deals to deepen economic cooperation with countries ranging from Brazil and South Africa to Australia and the UK.
The latest addition to China's growing list of conquests occurred last week when its premier, Li Qiang, and Brazil's beleaguered president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a slew of cooperation agreements, including ones covering artificial intelligence (AI) and aerospace, further consolidating Beijing's Belt and Road scheme of tied investments.
It matters to everyone that China's power and influence are expanding because the aims of its autocratic regime undermine the economic and political resources of the rest of the world.
China might, by some, be considered the great provider, but its pseudo-communist regime is a malign actor on the international stage, much as Russia has become, and its search for ways to thrive must be strictly circumscribed.
Without tough action, its voracious appetite for resources, information and intellectual capital will eat all of us.
There are spies in every major university syphoning information back to Beijing about new developments and business opportunities. When intellectual property and patents can be hacked, they are duly stolen. Digital information is harvested on a vast scale and put into huge databases, waiting for developments in AI to allow for a more systematic analysis by Chinese officials.
It might seem like a paranoid interpretation of China's day-to-day workings when Britons cast their eye over their own government and believe it barely capable of boiling an egg. China, though, is a very different place.
Talk to local officials and you will quickly notice how concerned they are about the basics as much as they are about reasserting China's preindustrial revolution status as the world's greatest economic power.
How to feed 1.4 billion people is a daily task and a constant worry. Nothing must stop the effort to keep the wheels of today's economy turning and the mission to usurp rivals such as the US and turn neighbours into supplicants.
Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, knows this ahead of a trip to three Chinese cities this weekend for talks about trade and investment and the UK energy secretary, Ed Miliband, understands how carefully he must tread when considering injections of Chinese cash and knowhow to build new offshore windfarms.
What Beijing can offer is hugely attractive. It's not just the 10% depreciation in its currency against the dollar that makes its exports even cheaper than they were just a few months ago.
It has cut-price digital infrastructure products that will transform an economy, an especially appealing offer to the industrialising nations also being punished by Trump's tariffs such as South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines.
In the post-pandemic period of panic gripping much of the world, where the costs of making any kind of improvements are growing and government debts are escalating, China is one of the few big investors outside the Middle East with significant financial firepower.
Cheap goods offset inflationary pressures while tantalising investments lure countries that Beijing knows are struggling to deliver on election promises.
In this turbulent world, the UK, the EU and Australia can fend off China's demands for greater access in return for investment – primarily access to digital information. They can use polite language when they say no. Or they can cite China's alliance with Russia if they need a more forceful excuse.
Beijing supplies Russia with much of what it needs in wartime in return for cheap oil. In this way it has embraced pariah status.
Albanese says he will take back the port in Darwin from Chinese control. Likewise, Miliband should block Chinese investment in UK energy infrastructure. And David Lammy, the foreign secretary, should support planning objections to China's proposed new embassy in London, which the MoD has warned will be a huge spying station.
Keeping China at bay when it has so much to offer won't be easy. It pays the wages of university lecturers by sending tens of thousands of students to the UK. It sends us cheap electric cars and much else from its vast warehouse of electrical and electronic products.
That shouldn't be an excuse for adopting a breezy, laissez-faire attitude. We might not have wanted to take sides. There is no issue with the people of Russia and China, but their governments have forced us to be more independent, and take the financial hit that comes with that.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China says Dalai Lama succession issue a 'thorn' in relations with India
NEW DELHI, July 13 (Reuters) - The succession of Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, is a thorn in China-India relations, the Chinese embassy in New Delhi said on Sunday, as India's foreign minister prepares to visit China for the first time since deadly border clashes in 2020. Ahead of celebrations this month for his 90th birthday that were attended by senior Indian ministers, the head of Tibetan Buddhists riled China again by saying it had no role in his succession. Tibetans believe the soul of any senior Buddhist monk is reincarnated after his death, but China says the Dalai Lama's succession will also have to be approved by its leaders. The Dalai Lama has been living in exile in India since 1959 following a failed uprising against Chinese rule in Tibet, and Indian foreign relations experts say his presence gives New Delhi leverage against China. India is also home to about 70,000 Tibetans and a Tibetan government-in-exile. Yu Jing, a Chinese embassy spokesperson, said on social media app X that some people from strategic and academic communities in India had made "improper remarks" on the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. Yu did not name anyone but in recent days, Indian strategic affairs analysts and a government minister backed the Dalai Lama's remarks on his succession. "As professionals in foreign affairs, they should be fully cognizant of the sensitivity of issues related to Xizang," Yu said, using the Chinese name for Tibet. "The reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama is inherently an internal affair of China," she said. "(The) Xizang-related issue is a thorn in China-India relations and has become a burden for India. Playing the 'Xizang card' will definitely end up shooting oneself in the foot." Indian Parliamentary and Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who sat next to the Dalai Lama during the birthday festivities a week ago, has said that as a practising Buddhist, he believes only the spiritual guru and his office have the authority to decide on his reincarnation. India's foreign ministry said on July 4, two days before the Dalai Lama's birthday, that New Delhi does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion. Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will be attending a regional security meeting under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in Tianjin in northern China on July 15 and hold bilateral meetings on the sidelines. This will be one of the highest-level visits between India and China since their relations nosedived after a deadly border clash in 2020 that killed at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers. Late last month, India's defence minister held talks with his Chinese counterpart in China on the sidelines of a defence ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rwanda and Russia look to lock in influence as CAR' president eyes another term
When Central African Republic (CAR) goes to the polls in December for its first election since a referendum paved the way for Faustin-Archange Touadéra to run for president an unlimited number of times, the likelihood of him winning another term will not be the only thing on the minds of opposition leaders. Concerns are also mounting that the Russian and Rwandan interests that have swelled under Touadéra's presidency will be further entrenched. Touadéra came to power in the chronically unstable country in 2016 against a backdrop of three years of unrest spearheaded by rebel groups that had left thousands dead. In 2018, the Russian mercenary outfit Wagner arrived and has since become so embedded that sources in CAR say it and its 36-year-old head of civilian operations, Dimitri Sytyi, operate independently of Africa Corps, Moscow's newly centralised apparatus for managing its military footprint across Africa. Since 2014, Rwandan troops have been stationed in CAR as part of the UN peacekeeping force Minusca. An additional 1,000 special forces were deployed following an attack on the capital in 2021. According to the International Crisis Group, their arrival 'kept alive a peace process [between CAR's government and insurgencies] that was deeply weakened'. Initially, tensions ran high between the Russians and Rwandans owing to unclear mandates and overlapping zones of operation in the economic and security sectors. 'It was not clear what was the job of each partner,' said Charles Bouëssel, the central Africa analyst at the International Crisis Group. 'And President Touadéra wasn't really making a decision to say, OK, Rwanda takes this area, and Russia takes that one.' Things are clearer these days, observers say: Wagner handles the president's personal security and is in charge of military operations in areas where rebels are active; Rwandan troops train special forces and operate in relatively calmer areas – the capital, Bangui, and along the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo – where Rwanda has economic interests. The Rwandan government was approached to clarify its activity in CAR. 'Rwanda has less direct influence over the president because they don't have the same proximity to him, nor the same methods and the same leverage as Wagner,' said Bouëssel. Nevertheless, sources say Wagner operatives who focus primarily on gold and diamond mines frequently complain to CAR officials that despite assuming greater combat risks and suffering more casualties, they receive similar economic privileges as the Rwandans. Rwandan entities are more discreet but present at all levels of the economy. Soft power is also in play: peacekeepers shovel rubbish in several arrondissements in Bangui, while events commemorating the 1994 Rwandan genocide are now held in the city – an initiative that experts say promotes the idea that Rwanda, having rebuilt itself after genocide, is uniquely capable of guiding CAR towards stability. In different corners of Bangui, dozens of Rwandans, including former UN peacekeepers, have set up construction businesses, restaurants and clothing stores. There are also bigger investors linked to Crystal Ventures, which is owned by the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front party and is involved in key sectors including mining and agro-industries. Although Touadéra is yet to publicly declare his candidacy for the December elections, many in Bangui consider his re-election a foregone conclusion. 'There is not a lot of suspense,' said Bouëssel. 'There is 99% chance that Touadéra will be re-elected.' Kigali and Moscow are expected to support the incumbent, motivated by a desire to protect their strategic interests. Many of the country's traditional western partners remain hesitant about helping finance the election and some fear a disruption of electoral activity in areas where armed groups are still active. Albert Mokpeme, a CAR government spokesperson, was approached for comment. On 4 April, the opposition coalition, the Republican Bloc for the Defense of the Constitution, protested in Bangui against the third term, and plan to keep demonstrating in the coming weeks. But they face significant constraints including judicial harassment and travel bans. In January, two brothers of the former prime minister Henri-Marie Dondra, who is running for president, were arrested on allegations of plotting to poison the president. The opposition is in disarray: some prefer to go ahead with a coalition while others want reforms first. For years, Rwanda has leveraged peacekeeping as a foreign policy tool in the tiny landlocked nation. The same formula is in play everywhere: deploy troops to keep rebels at bay or train local forces and then secure investment. 'There's an obvious economic quid pro quo,' Danièle Darlan, the president of the Central African constitutional court from 2017 to 2022, told Le Monde last year. The playbook has allowed the Rwandan president, Paul Kagame, to carve an axis of influence from Kigale upwards to CAR and downwards through the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo to Mozambique. While some in Touadéra's circle openly admire the strongman model of governance in Russia and Rwanda, others in CAR are increasingly sceptical and some view their president as beholden to the foreign powers he invited in. 'This fight is a fight for the republic,' Martin Ziguélé, a prominent opposition politician, said at the April protest. 'A fight for respect for the Central African.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Albanese avoids committing to military role as US presses Australia over potential Taiwan war
Australia has said it will not commit troops to any conflict in advance, responding to Pentagon queries asking the US ally to clarify what role it would play if China went to war over Taiwan. Prime minister Anthony Albanese said that his country did not support 'any unilateral action' on Taiwan and that its spending on both defence and aid was 'about advancing peace and security in our region'. 'We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that … We don't want any change in the status quo,' he said on Sunday, his first day of visit to China. His remarks come shortly after Australian acting defence minister Pat Conroy said that Australia prioritises its sovereignty and 'we don't discuss hypotheticals', speaking to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Sunday, highlighting that such military decisions cannot be made in advance. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance but by the government of the day,' he said. His remarks come in the wake of pressure from Elbridge Colby, the US undersecretary of defence for policy, on Australia and Japan to clarify their military commitments in the event of a conflict over Taiwan. In May, US secretary of defence Pete Hegseth reiterated the Pentagon 's timeline for a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan. He warned that China was 'credibly preparing' for military escalation to upend the balance of power in Asia, with an invasion expected by 2027. He also vowed that the US was 'here to stay' in the Indo-Pacific region. US intelligence reports say that Chinese president Xi Jinping has instructed his military to be ready for an invasion by 2027, should he give the order. Beijing claims Taiwan as a breakaway province, and Mr Jinping has threatened to ' reunite ' the island with the mainland, by force if necessary. The Taiwanese people largely favour the status quo, which gives them de facto independence. Mr Conroy said Australia was concerned about China's military buildup of nuclear and conventional forces and wanted a balanced Indo-Pacific where no single country holds dominance. 'China is seeking to secure a military base in the region and we are working very hard to be the primary security partner of choice for the region because we don't think that's a particularly optimal thing for Australia,' he said, referring to the Pacific Islands. Mr Colby's push is seen as the latest effort by the Trump administration to persuade its Indo-Pacific allies to prepare for a potential war over Taiwan. According to the Financial Times, he has been pressing the defence agenda in meetings with Japanese and Australian officials in recent months, citing five sources familiar with the discussions. The top US official also took to X and said the Pentagon was implementing US president Donald Trump's agenda of 'restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength'. 'As the Department has made abundantly and consistently clear, we at DOD are focused on implementing the President's America First, common sense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength,' Mr Colby wrote on X. 'That includes urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence. This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy - in Asia as in Europe, where it has already been tremendously successful,' he said. According to a US defence official, the 'animated theme' of the discussions between Mr Colby and Australia and Japan was 'to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence in a balanced, equitable way'. 'We do not seek war. Nor do we seek to dominate China itself. What we are doing is ensuring the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace,' the US official told FT. A close defence partner to the US, Australia is already set to open its largest war-fighting exercise with the US, involving 30,000 troops from 19 countries on Sunday on Sydney Harbour. The Talisman Sabre exercise will span 6,500 km (4,000 miles) from Australia's Indian Ocean territory of Christmas Island to the Coral Sea on Australia's east coast. Meanwhile, the Australian defence industry minister said it was possible China's navy would be watching the exercise to collect information, as it had done in the past.