
Workers with Métis, Michif child and family services agencies hit picket line
Social Sharing
Workers with two Métis and Michif child and family services agencies hit the picket line on Tuesday, saying they're fighting for wages in line with other agencies in Manitoba.
"We are fighting for wage parity and unfortunately, at the bargaining table, we have yet to see it. We know it's possible," Manitoba Government and General Employees' Union president Kyle Ross said at a picket line outside the Métis Child and Family Services building on Portage Avenue in Winnipeg.
"Talking to these people today, it's not where they want to be."
Ross said the gap in wages leads to high turnover rate at the agencies, affecting the ability to build relationships and trust with the children and families the agencies serve.
Workers are asking for a contract similar to the four-year, 14 per cent wage increase MGEU members in other civil services got last year, Ross previously told CBC.
Social services, family support, youth care and administrative workers at the two agencies — Métis Child, Family and Community Services, and Michif Child and Family Services — voted for a strike mandate in December and issued a two-week strike notice earlier this month.
The contracts for 220 employees of the Winnipeg-area Métis Child, Family and Community Services, and 110 employees of Michif Child and Family Services, serving the Dauphin, The Pas and Brandon areas, expired on Jan. 31, 2023.
Workers with a third agency — Southeast Child and Family Services — had also voted in favour of strike action but reached a tentative agreement on Monday, he said.
About 170 workers at Southeast Child and Family Services, which provides services to eight First Nations in southeastern Manitoba, have been without a contract since March 31, 2022. A ratification vote on the tentative offer is planned for later this week, MGEU said in a Monday update on its website.
Since the two-week strike notice was issued, some progress has been made for members at the Métis and Michif agencies, but there hasn't been enough action on wage parity with other government workers, Ross said.
"They do the same work, they have the same education. It's really important to us that they are treated as equal as the other people who are paid who work in government, who work for other agencies," he said.
When asked, Ross did not say how many children or families would be affected by the limited services offered under the essential services agreement in place during the strike action, but said he hopes to get back to the bargaining table as quickly as possible to prevent any further reduction in care.
The union's wage concerns are compounded by layoffs in the sector, said Ross.
Earlier this month, the Manitoba Métis Federation said budget constraints led to 60 people being laid off from the Métis Child and Family Services Authority — which includes both the Métis and Michif Child and Family Services — with a total of 100 to 150 staff at risk of eventually being let go.
Ross called that a "heavy-handed" bargaining tactic.
"We really feel it's the employer trying to push down on these workers and trying to scare them into taking a less than ideal agreement," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll
Public sentiment is divided on the Ford government's controversial new mining law, according to fresh polling, which indicates people are in favour of speeding up projects but not at the expense of First Nation rights or labour laws. New polling from Liason Strategies for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada gauged the mood of Ontarians as the government passed Bill 5 into law. The legislation makes a number of changes, among them is the power for the government to create so-called special economic zones, where municipal, environmental or labour laws could be bypassed. The government has indicated the Ring of Fire will be one such area, potentially along with Highway 401 and Ontario's fleet of nuclear power stations. The law's passage at Queen's Park last week sparked a storm of protests and backlash from First Nations leaders, who fear it will infringe on their rights and labour unions, who worry about workers' rights. Story continues below advertisement First Nations groups, in particular, have promised a summer of disruption in response to the legislation — potentially blocking railways, highways and mines in the north. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Liaison's polling shows public opinion on the legislation itself is evenly split. About half of those polled (49 per cent) said they were following the legislation somewhat or very closely as it passed through the legislature. Opinion of its value was also split. Forty-four per cent of those polled said they were in favour of it, while 41 per cent said they were opposed. Fifteen per cent of people said they were unsure. 'Given the poll's margin of error, this is a pretty close result,' David Valentin, principal at Liason Strategies, said in an interview on Focus Ontario. 'It's not probably where the premier wants to see it, which is somewhere closer to 60 or 65 per cent, but it's also not where the opposition would like to see it, with overwhelming opposition. So, we've got a sort of mixed result.' The poll also asked people to rank various issues against the importance of fast-tracking key construction projects. Sixty-three per cent of respondents said fast-tracking was more important than municipal bylaws, and 58 per cent favoured speeding up projects over following environmental regulations. Story continues below advertisement On the other hand, 64 per cent of people said respecting Indigenous rights was more important than speeding up projects, and 56 per cent of those polled said it was more important to follow labour laws than to speed up projects. The polling points to public opinion sitting behind two groups who have been most vocal in their opposition to Bill 5. 'It shows you that when it comes to Indigenous leaders and labour leaders, they've gotten their message out, their message has resonated, and Ontarians agree with them: Yeah, you can speed up the process, but you're not going to suspend labour laws,' Valentin said. Last week, Bill 5 received Royal Assent and became law, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he wants to designate the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone 'as quickly as possible.' At the same time, the government is promising to consult with First Nations leaders before any major changes are made using the new powers. Valentin said the lack of examples for what a special economic zone will be was potentially making it harder for people to form a strong opinion in favour or against the legislation. 'What does it actually mean? Which regulations, which laws are going to be suspended? Which groups are ultimately going to be impacted?' he said. 'They've written the law so they can do a lot of things — OK, what are the specifics of that going to be? I think that might be why people perhaps have a hard time understanding what the ultimate effects of the bill are.'


Toronto Sun
5 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire don't support new mining law
Bill 5 seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects Published Jun 09, 2025 • 1 minute read Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written _ though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada Sunshine Girls World Golf Editorial Cartoons


Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law
TORONTO – Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.