
Do solar panels increase your home's value?
The truth is a bit more complex, of course.
The short answer to this question is almost certainly yes. That's because it's very unlikely that adding something that would give your home's new owner some free electricity for a few decades would make that home less attractive.
But the question you are really asking is: by how much? And this is a much harder question to answer.
How much do solar panels cost in the first place?
The cost of solar panels depends on the size of the array. The table below will give you some indication, with array costs taken from a survey of installers conducted by The Independent and energy prices from the Energy Saving Trust.
Household size
System size in kw
Array cost
Electricity cost per year before solar
Savings (energy used and sold from panels)
Price after solar (negative means a surplus)
Pays for itself after
3-bed
3.6kw
£4,990
2,900 kWh @24.5 pence = £710
£540
£170
9 years
4-bed
5.4kw
£5,470
2,900 kWh @24.5 pence = £710
£780
-£70
7 years
5-bed+
9.9kw
£7,390
2,900 kWh @24.5 pence = £710
£1,370
-£660
5 years
When can I see a return on my investment?
The table above tells you that with a bigger array you can get a return on your investment in as little as five years, but more like nine for smaller installations.
To do the maths we are using an address in London, assuming a family of three and typical use — no heat pumps, high daytime usage or electric car charging.
Other assumptions include no shade on the panels and that someone is in, using power for about half the day and an export price of 15 pence per kilowatt hour (p/kWh). Other than a new inverter, no other maintenance costs are assumed, and no financing costs are assumed. The roof is roughly south-east facing.
Much will depend on what price you get for your exported electricity. Tariffs vary widely. If you keep on top of things, however, you should be able to secure the 15p/kWh rate used in our assumptions.
Much will depend on what price you get for your exported electricity. Smart Export Guarantee (SEG) tariffs vary widely between suppliers, from around 2p/kWh to over 15p/kWh. If you keep on top of things, you should be able to get a competitive rate.
How energy prices affect the ROI of solar panels
Energy prices have a huge impact on the return on investment you get from solar panels. In 2021, a solar array might have taken 12 to 15 years to pay for itself. But by 2023, thanks to soaring electricity prices, that payback window fell to as little as five to nine years.
Even with prices now stabilising, they remain well above pre-2020 levels. If you're able to use a large proportion of your electricity during the day — for example, by running appliances or charging a battery — you can dramatically increase your savings.
The Energy Saving Trust has a handy calculator you can use to ascertain your savings from having solar panels and the ROI on your investment.
Do solar panels increase home value in the UK?
A good way of tackling this question is thinking about home improvements in general. Ones that are critical, like fixing a leaky roof, are likely to generate good returns since the home will be very unattractive without the work being done.
Similarly, a loft conversion or extension which makes the useable size of the home bigger will increase a home's value in a fairly reliable way.
But optional improvements like solar panels are harder to quantify. This is for a number of reasons.
Firstly, the idea of owning a home with solar panels is still a fairly new one. It won't be like weighing up the value of an extra bathroom or a new kitchen for most buyers. Without research, most people won't know the value of a solar setup.
Secondly, as you can see from our guide here, owning solar panels and managing them well does take a little effort. You need to set them up correctly to get paid for the electricity you don't use, and you may need to switch tariffs each year. It's hardly a second job, but it does take some time. Not everyone will see that as a plus.
And although most homeowners spend very little time looking at their own roofs – or even roofs in general – they can divide opinion on aesthetics.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, making a firm estimate on any improvement is difficult, and those trying to do so are often trying to sell those improvements and don't come from a place of neutrality.
You can't sell the same property twice at the same time, once with panels and once without to show how much value they add. Other, bigger factors such as the state of the housing market or rising or falling interest rates will make a far bigger impact on house prices than a £7,000 solar installation.
In short, these estimates have very little to back them. Most people will see cheaper electricity bills as a plus, but they may struggle to put a price on that, especially when buying a home is partly about taste and emotion, rather than pure numbers.
Those expecting that an investment of one sum will boost the price of their house by more than that sum will probably be disappointed. That's because buyers who want a solar array can just get their own.
Fitting them does not cause the mess or inconvenience of a new kitchen or bathroom, and they don't improve the look or feel of the home either. So you aren't doing the next owner such a massive favour. For more on this, read our guide on Are solar panels worth it?
How location within the UK affects solar performance and property value
It's important to remember that solar panels are not equally effective across the UK, and this can affect your ROI on the investment. Factors like roof angle and sun exposure vary by region and, crucially, so does house price growth.
Southern England sees significantly higher solar yields than northern Scotland, thanks to better sun exposure.
Meanwhile, homes in higher-value regions may see more uplift in absolute terms, but percentage-wise, returns are still modest.
Local planning regulations or conservation area restrictions may also limit what kind of installation is allowed.
What else affects the value that solar panels add to a home?
While there's no guaranteed uplift in property value when getting solar panels, the following factors can make a difference:
Age and condition of the solar system: newer panels are more efficient and more attractive to buyers.
Presence of a battery system: homes with battery storage can reduce reliance on the grid even further, improving appeal.
SEG or legacy FIT tariff details: if the home still benefits from the now-closed (and more generous) Feed-in Tariff scheme, that may increase its value.
Aesthetic impact: panels integrated flush with the roofline are often more desirable than bolt-on systems.
Documentation and maintenance: a well-documented system with clear records helps reassure buyers.
Should I add solar panels solely to improve my home's value?
In other words, spending £5,000 or £7,000 on a solar installation may well add a similar amount in value — but whether solar panels increase home value depends on many factors, from energy prices to buyer demand in your area.
Even if there was a good estimate for the improvement in the value of your house that solar panels could make, you ought to think twice before using it for the same reason that movements in the UK's average house price might not apply to you. That is because your house's price might not behave like the average house's price.
You could easily spend £7,000 and see your house price drop, not because of your investment but because demand in your area has fallen or the cost of borrowing has risen.
Here's the most useful advice: don't buy solar panels for your home if all you want to do is improve its sale price. Do buy them if you want to cut your energy bills.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
Kemi Badenoch throws down gauntlet to Keir Starmer and demands no stealth taxes on Brits
KEMI Badenoch has thrown down the gauntlet to Keir Starmer on the economy demanding no stealth taxes on Brits. The Tory leader has written to the Prime Minister saying 'tax rises are a choice'. She has challenged him to repeat Chancellor Rachel Reeves' promise at the Budget last year not to extend the freeze on income tax and National Insurance thresholds. Failing to end the freeze as planned in 2028 would mean millions more Brits are forced into paying a higher rate of tax under fiscal drag. This is when people are pulled into higher income tax brackets as inflation pushes their wages up. It comes after a bombshell report said the Chancellor must find £50billion in her autumn Budget to keep the country's finances in check. She will have to raise taxes or cut spending to maintain her stated financial cushion of £9.9billion by the end of the decade, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. At the Budget, Ms Reeves said: 'Extending the threshold freeze would hurt working people. "It would take more money out of their payslips. 'I am keeping every single promise on tax that I made in our manifesto, so there will be no extension of the freeze in income tax and national insurance thresholds.' Ms Badenoch asked the PM: 'I am writing to you to ask: does this remain government policy?' Kemi Badenoch pleads for Tories to give her more time just like Margaret Thatcher was given A Labour spokesperson said: 'We'll take no lectures from this failed Tory Party. "They crashed the economy which sent bills and mortgages rocketing, and left a £22 billion blackhole. 'Kemi Badenoch's next letter should be an apology to hard-pressed households for the Conservatives' role in hammering their family finances. 'Labour is the only party focused on creating a fairer Britain.' 1


The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Championship star, 22, scrambling to complete second transfer in one summer with new club banned from registering him
HULL are ready to offer keeper Ivor Pandur a new deal to fight off interest. The Tigers stopper only signed a year ago. But he is looking for a raise as rivals take a shine. Pandur, 25, is on the shortlist at Middlesbrough. The Croat, though, is still happy to stay on Humberside. That is despite their financial issues with the EFL. Hull have a pay ceiling of around £1million a year. But midfielder Gustavo Puerta is looking for a move to a Spanish club, as Hull are not allowed to sign him permanently from Bayer Leverkusen. The Colombian star, 22, is in limbo because of the EFL ruling. He spent last season on loan at Hull, making 31 appearances for the Championship side. In April, the club confirmed Puerta had triggered a clause in his loan move to make the transfer permanent for just north of £3m. But now he could be on his way out already. Hull have brought in seven other players in this transfer window - six of them on frees. That includes Oli McBurnie from Las Palmas and Semi Ajayi from West Brom. On the pitch, Sergej Jakirovic's side began their 2025-26 Championship season with a 0-0 draw away at Coventry on Saturday - which included a major brawl. But Puerta was not part of the matchday squad against Frank Lampard's men.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Can Tony Bloom's Hearts really topple the Old Firm with data instead of money?
Maybe the first thing to recognise about Tony Bloom is that it shows the credibility he carries that there has been no chorus line of sceptics sniggering and guffawing about all of his grand claims for Hearts. When we have been in this sort of territory before — yeah, we remember the characters who arrived and started bloviating about how this or that club was going to tear it up — let's just say it tended to come from chancers who were easy to dismiss. Bloom is another matter entirely. This is a very serious guy with a track record that stacks up. Not only has his personal wealth been estimated at up to £1.3billion, it was accrued largely from professional sports betting. In other words he has made an absolute fortune from showing exceptional judgment, much of it on football, so why would that suddenly desert him about Hearts and the SPFL? He bought into Brighton & Hove Albion and improved them significantly. Of even greater relevance to Hearts, given size and budgets, he invested in Union Saint-Gilloise and transformed them into Belgian champions 90 years after their previous title. Now he's rocked up and talked of splitting the Old Firm and winning a title and being in the Champions League within a decade. Many who would usually machine-gun anyone for coming out with this sort of stuff have held their fire. What is so staggering about Bloom's unshakeable confidence is that he foresees this total reinvention of Hearts, this calculated act of 'disruption', as being achievable without throwing money at them. His introductory investment of just under £10million is all there will be from him in terms of hard cash. He is basing an intended revolution on his complete faith in his company Jamestown Analytics. Sure, he knows Derek McInnes — and, eventually, any head coaches who succeed him — and the wider club staff and the training and stadium facilities all have major parts to play, but it is Jamestown he regards as the cornerstone of making Hearts great. So here's the thing: those of us who long to see the Old Firm properly challenged can have the utmost respect for Bloom and still seriously doubt that the Hearts project will pan out as he intends. Real improvement? That seems guaranteed. Trophies? Cups are quite likely soon enough. But win the league? There is just so much piled up against a club of their size, with their budget, in going the distance with two giant rivals over the marathon of 38 games. For a start, Jamestown are only data experts, even if Bloom may be quite right to acclaim them as the best in the business. Jamestown could unearth exciting talents for Hearts only for the players themselves to turn their noses up about coming. Or their agents could find them better deals elsewhere. And even when they come, and really impress, Hearts will be as vulnerable as any mid-sized club to others swooping in with attempts to quickly cherry-pick their stars. Building a title-contending team will be enormously challenging given their wage structure would leave them at risk of losing any truly outstanding talent (albeit for high fees) after a year, and potentially even to Celtic or Rangers. And say they do start to win consistently, month after month: they will have to keep their heads as well as their players. The attention and pressure which will build on them will be absolutely relentless. It's now more than 14 years since Rangers had the players and the nerve to win a league when there were fans in the grounds, and that's at a club where everyone always bangs on about having to be 'winners' to handle being there. Rangers are usually portrayed as credible challengers, though. That will all be new for Hearts if and when it comes. They will have to deal with growing national and even international media attention, the narrative of it being 40 years since the last non-Old Firm champions, endless questioning of their ability to go the distance, even the traumatic baggage of being the club which blew it on the final day in 1986. Leicester City showed a new force can come from nowhere and handle all of that stuff but it will be incredibly difficult. Union Saint-Gilloise may have waited nine decades for their title but the spread of champions in Belgium (seven different clubs in the past 17 years) meant it was less of a big deal there than it would be in Scotland. Then there is the big difference between the Belgian and Scottish leagues. After 30 games in Belgium the division splits and the top six play each other across ten more matches, home and away. Like in Scotland, everyone meets four times a season. But in Belgium the points totals from before the split are halved. Last season leaders Genk had 68 points before the split and 34 after it. Union Saint-Gilloise went from 55 points to 28 (rounded up). Suddenly Bloom's club went from trailing by 13 points with ten games left, to trailing by six when they still had two matches to come against the leaders. All they needed was a storming finish and they delivered exactly that, winning nine and drawing one of their post-split games to leapfrog the rest. Halving a hard-earned points total might not be especially fair on the league leaders but it sure as hell opens up competition and potentially keeps a title race alive. Bloom will know Scottish football well enough, even by now, to realise there is not a cat-in-hell's chance of Celtic and Rangers ever voting to ventilate the system in the same way here. Last season was typically chaotic and turbulent for Rangers and they were miles off a serious challenge to Celtic, but their final points total, 75, was a figure surpassed only once by any non Old Firm team in the SPL/SPFL era. In the past seven seasons no team other than Celtic or Rangers has reached even 70 points. So it will take a serious leap in consistency even for Hearts to haul level with Glasgow's underperforming runners-up. Beyond that, the past five titles have been won with between 92 and 102 points. Interestingly Bloom doesn't seem to be on record as ever saying Brighton could win the Premier League, even with Jamestown behind them. The stated goals there have been long-term — becoming an established top ten club (they pretty much are), qualifying for Europe (they made it for the first time in their history last season and narrowly missed qualifying again) and winning trophies (they reached the FA Cup semi-finals in 2019 and 2023). Those seem reasonable, realistic objectives, more sober than he has declared for Hearts. Yet this serial winner has seen something about Hearts and the Scottish scene which lit him up. Already he has talked like few dare to talk in terms of challenging Celtic and Rangers. He is far too substantial a guy to dismiss and that makes his conviction about what Hearts can achieve both surprising and absolutely fascinating. Good on him for every word of it.