South Africa: Minister Nzimande applauds National Research Foundation's (NRF) contribution to transformation at NRF Awards ceremony
The Minister said that the pipeline for the next generation of researchers looked much healthier because the NRF had funded more women over the last 10 years.
"I also think it is highly commendable and visionary on your part as the NRF that you have awards that focus on next generation researchers and early career/emerging researchers. This is critical for our human resource development needs," said Minister Nzimande.
The Minister said that South Africa's public science system had not only produced excellent researchers, but also made the country a sought-after global platform for conducting astronomy, nuclear physics, palaeontology, medicine and social sciences research.
The NRF Awards are held annually as a celebration of South Africa's research excellence. The awards are also meant to provide an opportunity to inspire emerging and early career researchers to pursue research excellence.
The Minister further commended the NRF for their choice of theme for the event, "Innovating for a Sustainable Future". He said that the theme was thought-provoking and that the NRF rightfully elevated innovation and placed it at the centre of its efforts to build a responsive public science system and, most importantly, a sustainable future. "This is consistent with Department of Science, Technology and Innovation's newly adopted mantra, which is "Placing science, technology and innovation at the centre of government, education, industry and society."
The mantra was introduced as part of the Department's efforts to align its work with the National Development Plan 2030 and the Science, Technology and Innovation Decadal Plan. It reflects a strategic vision to prioritise and integrate science, technology, and innovation into all aspects of national development.
The Chairperson of the NRF Board, Prof. Mosa Moshabela, also expressed pride in the work of the NRF. "As the chairperson of the NRF board, I am deeply proud of the work that is done by the NRF to support and enable our vibrant and diverse research community. The mandate of the NRF is to promote and support research through funding, through human capital development and through the provision of research infrastructure. These remain critical in our collective pursuit of a knowledge-based economy and society," he said.
"May we view this evening as a testament to what is possible when excellence meets opportunity. The individuals we celebrate exemplify academic rigour, intellectual curiosity and an unwavering commitment to making a difference. Whether they are in the laboratory, in communities, or across global platforms, they are mentors, they are collaborators, they are trailblazers," Prof. Moshabela added.
The Chief Executive Officer of the NRF, Dr Fhulufhelo Nelwamondo, highlighted the NRF's commitment to placing science, technology and innovation at the centre of government. He said that the NRF took the call to action to heart given its mandate and the critical role it plays in the national system of innovation.
The awards were presented in two categories, namely, Special Awards and NRF ratings.
SPECIAL AWARDS
Lifetime Achievement Award
• Prof. Jill Farrant, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town
Research Excellence Award for Next Generation Researchers
• Mr Avela Sogoni, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
• Mr Mashite Tshidi, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand
• Dr Riona Indhur, Department of Biotechnology, Durban University of Technology
• Ms Caressa Munien, Department of Chemical Engineering, Durban University of Technology
• Mr Jonathan Oehley, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town
Research Excellence Award for Early Career/Emerging Researchers
• Dr Thulani Andrew Chauke, Department of Adult, Community and Continuing Education, University of South Africa
• Prof. Kgaugelo Edward Lekota, School of Biological Sciences, North-West University
• Dr Mbuzeleni Hlongwa, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal
• Prof. Lebo Gafane-Matemane, Hypertension in Africa Research Team, North-West University
• Dr Msizi Innocent Mhlongo, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg
• Dr Itumeleng Monageng, Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town
• Dr Busiswa Ndaba-Vatsha, Institute for Catalysis and Energy Solutions, University of South Africa
• Prof. Musawenkosi Saurombe, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg
• Dr Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg
• Dr Azile Nqombolo, Department of Chemical and Earth Sciences, University of Fort Hare
Focused Research Advancement Award
• University of Technology: Durban University of Technology
• Historically Disadvantaged University: University of the Western Cape
Public Engagement with Research Award
• Prof. Leila Patel, Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg
Champion of Research Capacity Development and Transformation Award
• Prof. Namrita Lall, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria
RATINGS-BASED AWARDS
P-rated researchers
• Dr Jesse Heyninck, Department of Computer Science, University of Cape Town
• Dr Simone Richardson, Antibody Immunity Research Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases
• Dr Mitchell Cox, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand
• Dr Mubeen Goolam, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town
• Dr Daniel Hart, Department of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria
• Prof. Laura Heathfield, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town
A-rated researchers
A-rated for the 6th time
• Prof. Michael Wingfield, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria
A-rated for the 5th time
• Distinguished Prof. Philippe-Joseph Salazar, Department of Private Law, University of Cape Town
• Prof. Igor Barashenkov, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town
• Prof. Douglas Butterworth, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town
A-rated for the 4th time
• Prof. Thaddeus Metz, Department of Philosophy, University of Pretoria
• Prof. David Richardson, Department of Zoology and Botany, Stellenbosch University
• Prof. Dan Stein, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town
A-Rated for the 3rd Time
• Prof. Don A Cowan, Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, University of Pretoria
• Prof. Lewis Ashwal, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand
• Prof. Don Ross, School of Economics, University of Cape Town
• Prof. Isabel Hofmeyr, Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of the Witwatersrand
• Prof. Harold Kincaid, School of Economics, University of Cape Town
A-rated for the 2nd time
• Prof. Kelly Chibale, Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town
• Prof. David McQuoid-Mason, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal
• Dr Curtis W Marean, Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University
• Prof. Josua Meyer, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University
• Prof. Philip Hallinger, Department of Education Leadership and Management, University of Johannesburg
• Prof. Gary Maartens, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town
• Prof. James Raftery, Department of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria
A-rated for the 1st time
• Prof. Andrew McKechnie, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria
• Prof. Ralf Henkel, Department of Medical Biosciences, University of the Western Cape
• Prof. Susan Harrison, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town
• Prof. Ernst Conradie, Department of Religion and Theology, University of the Western Cape
• Prof. Matthias Bickelhaupt, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg
• Prof. Bruce Biccard, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town
• Prof. Jacek Banasiak, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Pretoria
• Prof. Sally Archibald, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand
• Distinguished Prof. Umezuruike Linus Opara, Department of Horticultural Science, Stellenbosch University
• Prof. Alexander (Zander) Myburg, Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University
• Prof. Ivan Vladislavić, Department of Creative Writing, University of the Witwatersrand
• Distinguished Prof. Charlie Shackleton, Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University
• Prof. Harald Winkler, PRISM, School of Economics, University of Cape Town
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, Republic of South Africa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
10 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Rethinking innovation to cross the ‘valley of death' in the tech sector
Innovation doesn't fail for lack of good ideas. It fails because good ideas are often stranded - too real for research, too early for procurement. In technology circles, we call this stretch the 'valley of death.' That's why specialist 'technology transfer' organizations exist - to bridge that gap. Their role is to take promising solutions and carry them from concept to deployment. Globally, the commitment to innovation is undeniable. In 2023, the top 2,000 corporate R&D investors spent €1.26 trillion (Dh5.4 trillion) - 85 percent of all business-funded research. Yet despite this enormous spend, returns are flattening. Analysts now speak of a 'diminishing return on R&D' as more organizations struggle to turn prototypes into products. One reason is that many firms still treat innovation as a procurement issue. They wait for technology to appear on the shelf and hope it fits the problem. But technology isn't furniture. It doesn't arrive pre-assembled and ready to use. A procurement mind-set may feel safe, but it often delivers average outcomes. That's fine - until the problem you're trying to solve involves emissions, patient safety, or food supply. At that point, average won't cut it. Technology transfer works when you work with industry partners to flip the equation. Instead of asking what's available, you ask: what's possible? Research is shaped around real problems. And success is measured by traction, not by novelty. Done well, this approach should follow a four-part model: 1. Anchor-client value. What's the upside of solving this problem - faster inspections, lower emissions, safer operations? If the impact isn't meaningful, question whether the project is necessary. 2. Global relevance. Can the solution scale beyond one client or country? If yes, it becomes not just a fix, but a potential export. 3. Three-legged execution. Teams blend commercial strategy, technical depth and stakeholder engagement. Dealmakers, analysts and engineers work as one. 4. Performance tracking. Both tangible and intangible outcomes – whether its cost savings, increased revenues, sustainability improvements, trust gains, safety and security enhancements - are measured and reported. This model is being applied in the UAE today. Take quantum sensing. What began as an exploration of emerging technology evolved into a deeply practical solution for the energy sector. Working closely with ADNOC, researchers at TII developed systems that dramatically improve the predictability of the lifespan of energy storage systems. In the quest for decarbonisation, this presents a paradigm shift in the electrification of assets that are run today on fossil fuels . Keeping product-market fit in our minds, even through the early stages of R&D has massive benefits. How will the end user use the technology and extract value from it? Consider drone-based emergency response. What started as a safety-driven request to improve response times in hazardous zones, evolved into a full-scale programme combining autonomy, communication infrastructure, and integration with live operations. These drones can now reach and assess dangerous environments before people ever need to, reducing exposure and speeding up critical decisions. And the technology is already finding broader applications - in industrial inspection, urban logistics and environmental monitoring. Dedicated air corridors, integrated safety protocols, and regulatory co-creation are all being fast-tracked to ensure the UAE is not just participating in advanced air mobility but setting the global pace, proving that regulation and innovation can travel together. These are real outcomes grounded in structured roadmaps, commercial logic and shared accountability. Each began not with a product pitch, but with a strategic question: what are the challenges of tomorrow that we need to be solving for today? The so-called valley of death isn't inevitable. It is one that can be overcome with the right coordination and partnerships. That's why institutions like ASPIRE matter. With a mandate to help convert strategic problems into co-developed solutions, linking researchers with engineers, regulators with innovators, and pilots with commercial off-take commitments based on assumed success; they shorten the distance between potential and progress. So, here's a suggestion for industry leaders: before launching your next RFP for a 'band aid' solution, ask a sharper question. What are you really trying to solve? What would solving it unlock - for your company, and for the wider market? The future isn't short on ideas. The real question is whether we have the courage - and the coordination - to carry them through.
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
South Africa: Minister Nzimande applauds National Research Foundation's (NRF) contribution to transformation at NRF Awards ceremony
The Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Prof. Blade Nzimande, praised the National Research Foundation (NRF) for making commendable progress in the area of transformation and for producing high calibre and impactful work. The Minister was speaking at the NRF Awards in Johannesburg on 7 August 2025. The Minister said that the pipeline for the next generation of researchers looked much healthier because the NRF had funded more women over the last 10 years. "I also think it is highly commendable and visionary on your part as the NRF that you have awards that focus on next generation researchers and early career/emerging researchers. This is critical for our human resource development needs," said Minister Nzimande. The Minister said that South Africa's public science system had not only produced excellent researchers, but also made the country a sought-after global platform for conducting astronomy, nuclear physics, palaeontology, medicine and social sciences research. The NRF Awards are held annually as a celebration of South Africa's research excellence. The awards are also meant to provide an opportunity to inspire emerging and early career researchers to pursue research excellence. The Minister further commended the NRF for their choice of theme for the event, "Innovating for a Sustainable Future". He said that the theme was thought-provoking and that the NRF rightfully elevated innovation and placed it at the centre of its efforts to build a responsive public science system and, most importantly, a sustainable future. "This is consistent with Department of Science, Technology and Innovation's newly adopted mantra, which is "Placing science, technology and innovation at the centre of government, education, industry and society." The mantra was introduced as part of the Department's efforts to align its work with the National Development Plan 2030 and the Science, Technology and Innovation Decadal Plan. It reflects a strategic vision to prioritise and integrate science, technology, and innovation into all aspects of national development. The Chairperson of the NRF Board, Prof. Mosa Moshabela, also expressed pride in the work of the NRF. "As the chairperson of the NRF board, I am deeply proud of the work that is done by the NRF to support and enable our vibrant and diverse research community. The mandate of the NRF is to promote and support research through funding, through human capital development and through the provision of research infrastructure. These remain critical in our collective pursuit of a knowledge-based economy and society," he said. "May we view this evening as a testament to what is possible when excellence meets opportunity. The individuals we celebrate exemplify academic rigour, intellectual curiosity and an unwavering commitment to making a difference. Whether they are in the laboratory, in communities, or across global platforms, they are mentors, they are collaborators, they are trailblazers," Prof. Moshabela added. The Chief Executive Officer of the NRF, Dr Fhulufhelo Nelwamondo, highlighted the NRF's commitment to placing science, technology and innovation at the centre of government. He said that the NRF took the call to action to heart given its mandate and the critical role it plays in the national system of innovation. The awards were presented in two categories, namely, Special Awards and NRF ratings. SPECIAL AWARDS Lifetime Achievement Award • Prof. Jill Farrant, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town Research Excellence Award for Next Generation Researchers • Mr Avela Sogoni, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology • Mr Mashite Tshidi, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand • Dr Riona Indhur, Department of Biotechnology, Durban University of Technology • Ms Caressa Munien, Department of Chemical Engineering, Durban University of Technology • Mr Jonathan Oehley, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town Research Excellence Award for Early Career/Emerging Researchers • Dr Thulani Andrew Chauke, Department of Adult, Community and Continuing Education, University of South Africa • Prof. Kgaugelo Edward Lekota, School of Biological Sciences, North-West University • Dr Mbuzeleni Hlongwa, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal • Prof. Lebo Gafane-Matemane, Hypertension in Africa Research Team, North-West University • Dr Msizi Innocent Mhlongo, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg • Dr Itumeleng Monageng, Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town • Dr Busiswa Ndaba-Vatsha, Institute for Catalysis and Energy Solutions, University of South Africa • Prof. Musawenkosi Saurombe, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg • Dr Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg • Dr Azile Nqombolo, Department of Chemical and Earth Sciences, University of Fort Hare Focused Research Advancement Award • University of Technology: Durban University of Technology • Historically Disadvantaged University: University of the Western Cape Public Engagement with Research Award • Prof. Leila Patel, Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg Champion of Research Capacity Development and Transformation Award • Prof. Namrita Lall, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria RATINGS-BASED AWARDS P-rated researchers • Dr Jesse Heyninck, Department of Computer Science, University of Cape Town • Dr Simone Richardson, Antibody Immunity Research Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases • Dr Mitchell Cox, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand • Dr Mubeen Goolam, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town • Dr Daniel Hart, Department of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria • Prof. Laura Heathfield, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town A-rated researchers A-rated for the 6th time • Prof. Michael Wingfield, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria A-rated for the 5th time • Distinguished Prof. Philippe-Joseph Salazar, Department of Private Law, University of Cape Town • Prof. Igor Barashenkov, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town • Prof. Douglas Butterworth, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town A-rated for the 4th time • Prof. Thaddeus Metz, Department of Philosophy, University of Pretoria • Prof. David Richardson, Department of Zoology and Botany, Stellenbosch University • Prof. Dan Stein, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town A-Rated for the 3rd Time • Prof. Don A Cowan, Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, University of Pretoria • Prof. Lewis Ashwal, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand • Prof. Don Ross, School of Economics, University of Cape Town • Prof. Isabel Hofmeyr, Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of the Witwatersrand • Prof. Harold Kincaid, School of Economics, University of Cape Town A-rated for the 2nd time • Prof. Kelly Chibale, Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town • Prof. David McQuoid-Mason, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal • Dr Curtis W Marean, Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University • Prof. Josua Meyer, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University • Prof. Philip Hallinger, Department of Education Leadership and Management, University of Johannesburg • Prof. Gary Maartens, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town • Prof. James Raftery, Department of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria A-rated for the 1st time • Prof. Andrew McKechnie, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria • Prof. Ralf Henkel, Department of Medical Biosciences, University of the Western Cape • Prof. Susan Harrison, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town • Prof. Ernst Conradie, Department of Religion and Theology, University of the Western Cape • Prof. Matthias Bickelhaupt, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg • Prof. Bruce Biccard, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town • Prof. Jacek Banasiak, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Pretoria • Prof. Sally Archibald, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand • Distinguished Prof. Umezuruike Linus Opara, Department of Horticultural Science, Stellenbosch University • Prof. Alexander (Zander) Myburg, Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University • Prof. Ivan Vladislavić, Department of Creative Writing, University of the Witwatersrand • Distinguished Prof. Charlie Shackleton, Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University • Prof. Harald Winkler, PRISM, School of Economics, University of Cape Town Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, Republic of South Africa.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Too many scientific ‘discoveries' get discredited
It's not a good look for science when the most hyped, heavily marketed, and supposedly transformative discoveries are later discredited. Among the more spectacular cases were claims that a team of scientists had discovered fossilised Martian life in a meteorite, and that spores found in amber and salt crystals had been revived after lying dormant for millions of years. Last month, the research journal Science finally retracted a headline-grabbing study published in 2010, which claimed scientists had found arsenic-based life. NASA had promoted the discovery as bolstering the case for the existence of extraterrestrials and a new tree of earthly life known as the 'shadow biosphere.' The good news is that the wider scientific community didn't buy the hype. Soon after all these bombshells dropped, skeptical scientists took a look at the research and discovered the flaws. These kinds of volunteer scientific sleuths play an important role in policing their fields. The real problem is the bureaucracy that's grown around science — the peer-review process, the people who decide what gets published in elite journals, and those who market and promote the 'discoveries.' I encountered these allegedly textbook-changing claims as a science writer for The Philadelphia Inquirer, starting with the 1996 announcement of the Martian microbes that rode to Earth on a meteorite. NASA officials wanted to keep the findings a secret until a big press conference — a situation that makes it hard for reporters to do any truth-squadding in advance. And anyone who might have doubts tends to get drowned out by a torrent of early media coverage, which usually parrots the official announcement. In this case, reporters got a lucky break when the news leaked, and we were able to arm ourselves with information and points of view from independent sources before the big show. President Bill Clinton gave a speech about the historic moment, but the media coverage was not uniformly fawning. Most scientists with relevant expertise suspected the specimen had been contaminated with earthly life, which is the consensus today. Similar contamination was also the most likely explanation for the spectacular claim that spores had sprung back to life after slumbering inside a crystal for 250 million years, according to a study published in the journal Nature. There was no press conference that I knew of, so reporters had time to temper the excitement by talking to outside experts who had good reason to doubt this exciting find. By 2010, NASA and Science were more careful not to let the media get in the way of the story they wanted to sell. News outlets received a cryptic message about a big press event, where officials would unveil something of great significance related to astrobiology and extraterrestrials. At the event, a team of scientists explained that they'd taken a type of bacteria that can tolerate arsenic, a toxic chemical. They said they had managed to make the bacteria incorporate some arsenic into their molecular machinery. This was supposed to show that life might not need to follow the same basic chemistry we know, and could perhaps exist in ways we haven't seen. The evidence was very thin, but the presentation included music and slides of different life forms to hammer home the message that something profound was going on. The bacteria had come from arsenic-rich Mono Lake in California, but there was no apparent evidence that they had incorporated any arsenic in that environment. It was rooted in our normal tree of life. There were some big holes in the story told to the media. How much arsenic was incorporated into the bacteria? How did researchers confirm this? Why didn't the bacteria take up arsenic in the arsenic-rich environment of Mono Lake? What did this have to do with extraterrestrials? There was much innuendo and hand-waving for something that was supposed to change the textbooks. Purdue University biologist David Sanders said he heard the news on NPR. This was his area of expertise — he'd done work in the relevant area of biochemistry, so he was eager to look into it. He told me he found a fatal mistake in the scientific paper. The researchers had assumed that the bacteria were eating and incorporating arsenic because they were starving them of phosphorus, and so they must have been taking up arsenic instead. But Sanders could see that their technique would have left enough phosphorus contamination for the bacteria to pick out what it needed and fend off the toxic arsenic — all well-documented behaviour. 'It had nothing to do with the shadow biosphere. It had nothing to do with life on other planets, and it had nothing to do with reality,' he said. University of Connecticut biologist Peter Setlow felt a similar skepticism as soon as he heard the announcement. It reminded him of those claims of fossilised Martian life and spores that were supposedly born before the age of dinosaurs. The expert in bacterial spores said he was interviewed on NPR, where he explained why those trapped in 250-million-year-old material probably latched on relatively recently. It wasn't enough to deflate the hype. While all these claims were eventually discredited, Setlow said many other spurious findings have been published in respected scientific journals. Sometimes peer review doesn't work the way it's supposed to. Reviewers raise objections, he said — as he's done — and a journal will publish the findings anyway.
