logo
Navy will rename the USNS Harvey Milk, named for LGBTQ rights pioneer

Navy will rename the USNS Harvey Milk, named for LGBTQ rights pioneer

Yahoo2 days ago

A Navy vessel named after celebrated gay rights activist and Navy veteran Harvey Milk will no longer carry his name.
NBC News confirmed with the Navy that the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler, will be renamed. No reason was given.
The news comes during Pride Month, the dedicated time to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements and contributions of the LGBTQ community.
After years of devoted activism in San Francisco and across California, Milk became one of the country's first openly gay elected officials, winning a position on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977.
In 1978, he and Mayor George Moscone were fatally shot at City Hall. His killer, Dan White, a former city supervisor, was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to less than eight years in prison in 1979, sparking a mass protest that turned violent.
Milk was portrayed by Sean Penn in the 2008 film 'Milk,' for which Penn won an Academy Award.
The USNS Harvey Milk is a 2021 vessel designed to support other ships at sea. The USNS Harvey Milk was introduced in a class of several ships named after civil rights figures, including the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsberg, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Lucy Stone. The group, or class, of ships is collectively called the John Lewis class, honoring the Georgia congressman and civil rights icon who died in 2020.
Milk served in the Navy from 1951 to 1955, according to the National Archives. On the USS Chanticleer and the USS Kittiwake, he was an operations officer during the Korean War.
In January, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a directive instructing the Pentagon and U.S. military services to abandon any cultural or awareness months. It was titled 'Identity Months Dead at DoD,' citing Women's History Month, LGBTQ Pride Month and Black History Month.
Hegseth's Jan. 31 directive said: 'Our unity and purpose are instrumental to meeting the Department's warfighting mission. Efforts to divide the force — to put one group ahead of another — erode camaraderie and threaten mission execution.'
Earlier this year, Hegseth also issued an order to restore the name of the North Carolina military base back to Fort Bragg. Its namesake was a Confederate general who owned slaves, and in 2023, the base was renamed Fort Liberty. Hegseth said the new Fort Bragg would be named to honor Pfc. Roland L. Bragg, a World War II veteran who earned a Silver Star and a Purple Heart.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio

Chicago Tribune

time18 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio

WASHINGTON — A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court that federal civil rights law draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' — without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group — Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson wrote. The court ruled in an appeal from Marlean Ames, who has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 years. Though he joined Jackson's opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas noted in a separate opinion that some of the country's 'largest and most prestigious employers have overtly discriminated against those they deem members of so-called majority groups.' Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, cited a brief filed by America First Legal, a conservative group founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, to assert that 'American employers have long been 'obsessed' with 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' initiatives and affirmative action plans.' Two years ago, the court's conservative majority outlawed consideration of race in university admissions. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has ordered an end to DEI policies in the federal government and has sought to end government support for DEI programs elsewhere. Some of the new administration's anti-DEI initiatives have been temporarily blocked in federal court. Jackson's opinion makes no mention of DEI. Instead, she focused on Ames' contention that she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ames. The 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing 'background circumstances' that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group. The appeals court noted that Ames didn't provide any such circumstances. But Jackson wrote that 'this additional 'background circumstances' requirement is not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute.'

Pride flag creator and activists honored with new sculpture
Pride flag creator and activists honored with new sculpture

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Pride flag creator and activists honored with new sculpture

NAPA, Calif. (KRON) — The rainbow flag is recognized around the world as a symbol of LGBTQ+ social movements. The colorful banner is the creation of a San Francisco man. The artist behind the flag and two of his closest friends and fellow activists are now immortalized with a new sculpture. The iconic flag is a symbol of hope and a reminder of the ongoing battle for acceptance and equality. 'There was a need for something to put out to everyone to say, we are just like everybody else,' said Richard Gutierrez of San Francisco. Who was Harvey Milk? Late SF gay rights icon at center of ship renaming controversy The flag would debut at the San Francisco Gay Freedom Parade in June of 1978 at the request of gay rights icon Harvey Milk to show unity at a time of turbulence. 'We were still struggling. We were still being beaten up everywhere. That was horrible. The violence, the hatred,' said Steve Brownfield of San Francisco. 'The Pride parade was a way for us to feel good about ourselves finally.' The creative mind behind the eye-catching flag— artist Gilbert Baker. A new bronze sculpture now immortalizes Baker and his flag, years after his death, sharing a park bench with his departed friends Dr. Jerry Goldstein and Tom Taylor in a warm embrace. The artwork was crafted by Dina Angel Wing. More Pride Month stories 'A very important message for all of us, regardless of who you are, to have compassion to other people's lifestyles and celebrate love,' said Angel Wing, who felt her creation should depict a same-sex couple to live up to its name 'Freedom to Love.' It is now on display at the Napa Valley College Library. 'I want it to, to inspire some curiosity,' said Greg Miraglia, a Napa Valley College instructor of LGBT studies. 'There will be students that will come through that won't have any idea who these people on this bench are.' Tom and Jerry would make a name for themselves in San Francisco as gay activists, throwing extravagant parties to support charities. They are the namesakes of the Tom and Jerry house in Noe Valley, famous for its larger-than-life Christmas decorations. 'I just am so thankful that, that this is ended up here and that my uncles were out, that the idea that they didn't have to have this cover up story,' said Tom and Jerry's niece Angela Traeger. But with conservatives taking action to ban the Pride flag on government property in Utah, some are concerned progress is under threat. 'I feel like all of our gay rights are going to get stripped all over again and we just got to keep pushing on,' said Daniel Cherry, a friend of Tom and Jerry. The flag would evolve, making diversity more visible, and still advocates for a more inclusive society today. 'I certainly hope this generation feels safer.' A hope made possible by the contributions of those who've helped pave the way. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump suggests Elon Musk is suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome'
Trump suggests Elon Musk is suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump suggests Elon Musk is suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome'

Shortly after Elon Musk officially left his White House office, he apparently felt free to share some candid thoughts about the Republican Party's domestic policy megabill, the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Evidently, the billionaire wasn't impressed. Just one day after a joint appearance with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, during which the president rewarded his top campaign donor with praise and a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia, Musk condemned Trump's proposal in striking terms, writing on the social platform he owns, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk added soon after, apparently referring to lawmakers who voted for the GOP reconciliation package, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' On Wednesday, he went further, launching an online 'KILL the BILL' effort. Those expecting the president to return rhetorical fire with over-the-top online missives of his own were disappointed: Trump didn't say a word. On Thursday, however, just a few days after singing Musk's praises, the Republican had quite a bit to say. NBC News reported: 'I've always liked Elon,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office during a bilateral meeting with [German Chancellor Friedrich Merz], but he said he was 'very surprised' by Musk's comments denouncing the legislation. 'You saw the words he had for me. He hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill, because the bill is incredible,' the president said. Putting aside the obvious fact that the legislation is far from 'incredible' — see the latest findings from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, for example — the president didn't just offer a vague defense of the far-right reconciliation package. On the contrary, Trump actually focused most of his comments on Musk specifically. 'Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate — which was a lot of money for electric vehicles — and they're having a hard time,' the president said, referring to a 'mandate' that does not exist while implying that Musk only opposes the GOP legislation because it'll affect his car company's profits. Trump went on to suggest, in reference to former NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, whom Musk lobbied for, that 'I didn't think it was appropriate.' Of course, that raises the related question of why the president nominated him in the first place if this was inappropriate. That paved the way for the pièce de résistance: the president suggesting that his former DOGE chief is suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome.' 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' the Republican concluded. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' For his part, the GOP megadonor responded to Trump's claim that he 'knew the inner workings of the bill' as it came together, saying, 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He also discounted the idea that the electric vehicle provisions of the package have anything to do with his opposition. I don't imagine we've heard the last of this. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store