Not in favour of expelling any member: Punjab assembly speaker
He made it clear that if these applications are not resolved within the stipulated time, they will automatically be forwarded to the Election Commission.
Addressing a press conference at the Punjab Assembly Media Hall, S Malik Ahmad Khan said that he believes in the supremacy of the Constitution and has always strived to run the Assembly according to the rules and regulations. He emphasised that despite being one of the strongest critics of Articles 62 and 63, it is his constitutional duty to implement them in light of the Supreme Court's rulings.
The Speaker said that the opposition had been given every possible democratic space in the past— from chairing standing committees to leading the Public Accounts Committee— but unfortunately, it turned the Assembly into a forum for constant disruption.
He noted that the opposition is portraying disorder as a political right, but there is no such provision in the Constitution. Parliament is meant for legislation, not protest. If there is disruption during the Order of the Day, proceedings will move forward as per the law. He further said that the Leader of the Opposition, after consulting constitutional expert Salman Akram Raja, claimed that the Speaker does not have the authority to send a reference. However, the judgment by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa in the Panama Papers case clearly establishes that if members violate their oath, the Speaker must either make a decision or refer the matter to the Election Commission.
The speaker categorically stated that he does not believe in the politics of disqualifying anyone, as practiced by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. However, if anyone violates constitutional boundaries or undermines the discipline of the House against party decisions, he will not hesitate to take action.
He added that he holds no grudge against any party or leader but is committed to upholding the sanctity of the House. 'Any member who violates their constitutional oath will inevitably face action.'
The Speaker stated that such actions in the past have laid the foundation for undermining democracy in Pakistan. 'I do not politicise disqualification,' he said, 'but if a reference is received under Article 63 (2) of the Constitution, it must be decided accordingly.'
He hoped that the government and opposition will engage in meaningful dialogue in the coming days to improve the atmosphere of the House, so that the Punjab Assembly can truly serve as the representative forum of the 120 million people of the province.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI moves LHC against police raids, harassment
A senior member of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has approached the Lahore High Court seeking protection for party workers and supporters allegedly facing harassment and illegal police raids ahead of the party's planned protest on August 5. The petition, filed by PTI leader Akmal Khan, names the Inspector General of Police Punjab, the Capital City Police Officer (CCPO) Lahore, DIG Operations, and Station House Officers of Shahdara and Ferozwala (District Sheikhupura) as respondents. The petitioner urged the court to restrain the police from conducting raids and harassing individuals participating in or mobilizing for the upcoming protest. In his plea, Khan argued that the Constitution grants every citizen the right to move freely, reside in any part of the country, and assemble peacefully — subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of public order. He emphasised that the right to form and be part of a political party is also protected under the Constitution, provided it does not operate in a manner prejudicial to the sovereignty or integrity of Pakistan. Citing Article 17 of the Constitution, the petitioner noted that any federal declaration regarding the illegality of a political party must be referred to the Supreme Court within fifteen days, and that only the court's decision in such matters is final. He requested the Lahore High Court to issue directions to police officials to stop harassing PTI workers and refrain from conducting raids at their homes without legal justification. The petition has been admitted for hearing, and the court is expected to issue a ruling after reviewing the stance of the concerned authorities.
Business Recorder
21 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab Assembly: opposition member suspended for 15 sessions
LAHORE: Acting Speaker of the Punjab Assembly Malik Zahir Iqbal Channer suspended a member for using inappropriate language in the House. The Punjab Assembly session began two hours and 30 minutes late under the chairmanship of Acting Speaker Malik Zahir Iqbal Channer. At the outset, Deputy Opposition Leader Mian Riaz Qureshi addressed the House, stating that peaceful protest is everyone's right. He said, 'Our party has called for a protest on August 5. For the past two days, the police have been harassing our workers and raiding their homes. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rehman responded, 'I am not aware of any raids on their homes. I will check with the police and Home Department. Peaceful protest is indeed everyone's right. If needed, we may even stand with them.' The previous day's session included questions related to the Finance Department, with only one question submitted by Uzma Kardar. However, due to her absence, it was postponed. Later, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rehman presented the Principal Policy Annual Report for 2023 and the six-month progress report on the implementation of the NFC Award for the fiscal year 2019-20. Government member Amjad Ali Javed raised an objection, stating that reports were supposed to be submitted but were not available. As usual, the Punjab Assembly witnessed verbal clashes between opposition and treasury members. The Parliamentary Affairs Minister urged the Speaker to proceed with assembly business, emphasising that debates should not hinder proceedings. The Speaker deferred opposition member Nadia Khar's adjournment motion regarding local government due to her absence and lack of response. Similarly, Qazi Ahmad Saeed's adjournment motion on Services and General Administration was also postponed. Opposition member Tayyab Rashid Sindhu raised concerns over an incident in Sheikhupura where a poor man's kidney was allegedly removed by a mafia. 'Such incidents have been happening for a long time. The government must take notice,' he said. Qazi Ahmad Saeed highlighted farmers' distress, stating, 'Influential people divert water to their lands, leaving poor farmers helpless. The Chief Irrigation Officer is highly incompetent. Despite repeated complaints, no action has been taken. My constituency in Rahim Yar Khan faces severe water shortages, which must be addressed.' Government member Amjad Ali Javed emphasised the Punjab government's focus on promoting computer education to boost Pakistan's exports. 'However, the Punjab Higher Education Commission's policies are creating obstacles. They have imposed a condition that computer science degrees will not be recognised without accreditation from a specific council. The council's fees are so high that major universities are shutting down their computer science departments. Students who have completed semesters are distressed. The commission must review its policy or relax the conditions,' he said. Acting Speaker Zahir Iqbal Channer suspended opposition member Ijaz Shafi for 15 assembly sittings for using unparliamentarily and inappropriate language. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
CJ contacts Omar over May 9 trial concerns
Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi speaks at a conference at the Federal Judicial Academy in Islamabad on July 25, 2025. SCREENGRAB Listen to article As the fate of dozens of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers hangs in the balance, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi has taken cognisance of a letter written to him by Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, who urged the country's top judge to ensure fair trials in the May 9 cases. The CJP opted not to take up the matter through judicial proceedings. Instead, he decided to meet Ayub personally in Peshawar, with the meeting expected to take place on Friday. However, sources have revealed that a verdict in a May 9-related case, wherein Omar Ayub is an accused, could be announced soon by the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Faisalabad. Opposition Leader in the Senate Shibli Faraz is also named in the same case and has separately written a letter to the CJP on Wednesday. In the event of Ayub's conviction, the proposed meeting may not go ahead. Adding to the internal turmoil, a PTI lawyer expressed frustration with the party's legal strategy, or lack thereof, in handling the May 9 cases. He pointed out that the party should have contested the multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) earlier and challenged the Supreme Court's order directing the ATCs to conclude these trials within four months. This would not be the first time CJP Afridi has engaged with political figures. Previously, he has met both government and opposition leaders to discuss judicial reforms. He had also referred a letter by PTI founder Imran Khan to the SC's constitutional bench committee for reconsideration. While the CJP is focused on expediting trials related to the May 9 events, legal experts note that he lacks constitutional authority to take suo motu action on PTI's grievances. As per procedure, he can only instruct his staff to present Ayub's letter to the CB committee, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, for possible judicial review. Back in April, instead of deciding dozens of pending bail pleas on merit, a three-member bench led by CJP Afridi directed ATCs to complete May 9 trials within four months. PTI leaders have since alleged that the SC is being misused against opposition figures. Senior lawyers argue that the apex court appears not to have learned from the Panama Papers episode, where setting rigid deadlines led to the perception that the judiciary facilitated convictions of Sharif family members. In his detailed four-page "appeal," Omar Ayub lamented alleged irregularities in the trial proceedings. The ATCs, bound by the apex court's instructions, are expected to wrap up all May 9 case proceedings by the first week of August. According to Ayub, the integrity of Pakistan's judicial process is under grave threat, as these trials, meant to uphold justice, have turned into tools of political persecution. According to Omar, the integrity of Pakistan's judicial process is under grave threat as these trials, which are supposed to exemplify justice, have instead become a means of political persecution. "The ATCs in Lahore, Faisalabad, Sargodha, and other cities are hearing cases related to May 9 with a speed and manner that shocks the conscience of any impartial observer. "Hearings commence early morning and extend late into the night; in fact, it is reliably reported that in some cases proceedings continue until 2:00 am to 3:00 am. "This is justice crushed and justice buried under the weight of exhaustion, coercion, and haste," he added. He stated that such a schedule was unprecedented in the annals of Pakistani jurisprudence as it disregarded the most basic principles of a fair trial, including the accused's right to a meaningful opportunity to prepare and present a defence, and the judiciary's solemn obligation to conduct trials with dignity, transparency, and impartiality. He also referred to the motto of the Supreme Court of Pakistan that justice must not only be done, it must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. He regretted that during the May 9 trials, this cardinal principle had been systematically violated. Omar claimed that the leadership, workers, and supporters of the PTI were wrongfully implicated through a process that appeared to be mala fide and politically motivated. Police reports and prosecutions lack credible evidence and are riddled with procedural irregularities, he added. He also narrated numerous instances of prosecutorial overreach and police misconduct, including the fabrication of FIRs, coercive interrogation tactics, and selective registration of cases against opposition figures, all undermining the rule of law and public confidence in the justice system. Referring to the right to counsel of choice, he said a fundamental right enshrined in Article 10A of the Constitution has been trampled. He said the ATCs frequently deny adjournments and, in many cases, threaten or proceed to appoint state counsels without the consent of the accused. "This practice not only breaches constitutional guarantees but also violates internationally recognised fair trial standards. including those set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 10) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 14), to which Pakistan is a party," he wrote. "If these trials are allowed to continue under current conditionshurried, secretive, and politically charged, the damage to Pakistan's judicial reputation and the people's trust will be irrevocable."
