Gov. Kim Reynolds seeks federal waiver for Medicaid work requirements
Gov. Kim Reynolds announced Tuesday the state has submitted a waiver to the federal government to implement work requirements for Iowans on the state's expanded Medicaid program.
The governor directed the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services to seek a waiver to the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for work requirements, according to a Tuesday news release — an effort she announced she would take action on at the beginning of the 2025 legislative session.
The news release Tuesday stated the waiver reflects the legislation being considered by Iowa lawmakers, Senate File 615. The bill has been approved by both chambers, but the Senate must approve an amendment from the House before it goes to the governor.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The Iowa Health and Wellness Plan, or IHAWP, the state's expanded Medicaid program, provides health coverage to able-bodied Iowans from ages 19 to 64 with household incomes at or below 133% of the federal poverty level. There are exceptions to the proposed work requirements, including for people who are considered medically frail or medically exempt under Medicaid , adults caring for a child under age 6 and people in substance abuse treatment programs for up to six months.
The bill proposes that non-exempt IHAWP recipients work at least 80 hours each month to be eligible for health coverage. According to the Iowa HHS proposal, the governor's waiver proposal sets a 100-hour per month requirement for individuals to remain eligible for coverage. If the federal waiver is rejected under the legislation, the state would be required to end the expanded Medicaid program for all recipients, regardless of whether they are working.
Reynolds said in a statement that she has prioritized ensuring Iowa's government programs 'reflect a culture of work.'
'If you are an able-bodied adult who can work, you should work,' Reynolds said. 'We need to return Medicaid back to its core purpose — to provide coverage to the people who truly need it.'
The state estimated that nearly 100,000 individuals currently on IHAWP report having no income, according to the governor's news release.
The Legislative Services Agency estimated 142,000 of the 181,000 Iowans currently on IHAWP would be subject to work requirements under the Medicaid work requirements bill, and that 32,000 Iowans would likely lose the health coverage if the legislation is implemented. Democratic lawmakers have argued work requirements will result in higher costs to the state, by pushing health care costs from low-income individuals currently on IHAWP to other areas of the state's health care system.
There will be two public hearings for the waiver — the first at Urbandale Public Library on April 23 at 10:30 a.m., and the second at Marshalltown Public Library on April 29 at 2 p.m., with both meetings available for remote access via Zoom.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons
An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum, Fox News Digital exclusively learned Thursday. 'California's refusal to comply with federal law and remove egregious gender ideology from federally funded sex-ed materials is unacceptable,' Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary at the Administration for Children and Families, said in comment provided to Fox News Digital Thursday. 'The Trump Administration will not allow taxpayer dollars to be used to indoctrinate children. Accountability is coming for every state that uses federal funds to teach children delusional gender ideology.' Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. The PREP program aims to educate California's youth, ages 10–19, on preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted infections, which the state says has led to students in the program 'delaying sexual activity, increasing condom or contraceptive use for sexually active youth, or reducing number of sexual partners.' 4 An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum. REUTERS 'Program services are engaging, nonjudgmental, medically accurate and tailored to the unique needs of youth participants and their communities,' the PREP website states. 'Services are offered in a range of settings, including schools, juvenile justice facilities, homeless shelters and foster care group homes. CA PREP activities also include community engagement and promotion of clinical linkages to youth-friendly reproductive health services.' Advertisement PREP specifically aims to assist those who 'reside, attend school or receive reproductive health services in a high-need geographic area; are homeless and/or runaway; attend an alternative or continuation school; are in or emancipated from foster care; are in the juvenile justice or probation system; identify as LGBTQ; are receiving treatment for mental health or substance abuse issues; have special needs; live in migrant farmworker families or are expectant/parenting female youth up to age 21.' The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. The probe was initially launched to ensure the state's sexual education programming is medically accurate and age-appropriate. 4 The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. AFP via Getty Images Previous grant funding shows California's PREP program received just under $6 million from the federal government in fiscal year 2022. All in, California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families reviewed the program's curriculum and other teaching materials, and found a lengthy list of subjects and language deemed to fall outside the program's 'authorizing statute,' in particular references to 'gender ideology.' In June, Fox News Digital reported Administration for Children and Families gave the sex education program a 60-day deadline to remove all references to gender identity or face potential termination of its funding. The 60-day deadline just ran dry, with the Administration for Children and Families subsequently terminating the funding and sending a letter to Sydney Armendariz, the division chief of Maternal Child, and Adolescent Health Division at the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and Matthew Green, the deputy director of the Center for Family Health at CDPH, declaring it was 'terminating all California State Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) awards and suspending the funding effective August 21, 2025.' The letter sent Thursday reported that following the Administration for Children and Families' June request to remove what it said was radical gender ideology from PREP teachings, California refused in a letter of its own. 4 The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'CDPH will not make any such modifications at this time for several reasons,' the California Department of Public Health said in a letter to ACF earlier this week, according to HHS. 'The listed reasons were: 1) PREP materials had already been reviewed and approved by ACF; 2) the materials are medically accurate; 3) the gender ideology content is relevant to purposes identified in the authorizing statute, specifically the adult preparation subjects listed at 42 U.S.C. § 713(b)(2)(C); and 4) ACF does not have authority to take an enforcement action.' Among the materials Administration for Children and Families found amid its review of the curriculum was a lesson for middle school-aged students that sought to introduce them to the concepts of transgenderism, Fox News Digital previously reported. 'We've been talking during class about messages people get on how they should act as boys and girls—but as many of you know, there are also people who don't identify as boys or girls, but rather as transgender or gender queer,' the lesson states to students. 'This means that even if they were called a boy or a girl at birth and may have body parts that are typically associated with being a boy or a girl, on the inside, they feel differently.' Other flagged lessons in the materials included curriculum for high school-aged students with instructions on what it means to be 'nonbinary' and language that informed students 'gender-identity' is 'essentially a social status.' 4 California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Christopher Sadowski 'In a disturbing and egregious abuse of federal funds, California has been using taxpayer money to teach curricula that could encourage kids to contemplate mutilating their genitals, 'altering their body… through hormone therapy,' 'adding or removing breast tissue,' and 'changing their name.' It instructed teachers to 'remind students that some men are born with female anatomy,'' HHS said in a Thursday press release of the teachings. The Administration for Children and Families also had raised concerns over materials for teachers within the program, including lessons on avoiding misgendering individuals. Advertisement 'All people have a gender identity,' the teacher training materials stated, Fox Digital previously reported. It also instructed educators to refer to people who identify with their sex 'assigned at birth' as 'cisgender,' and added that those who are not 'cisgender' may identify as 'non-binary, agender, bigender, genderfluid, (or) genderqueer.' Gradison's letter to the California health leaders Thursday underscored that Administration for Children and Families' decision to terminate the grant is final unless California health leaders file an appeal. 'This is the final decision of the Administration for Children and Families,' the letter reads. 'It shall be the final decision of the Department unless, within 30 days after receiving this decision, you submit a notice of appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB).'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court lets Trump admin cut off health grants it says advance DEI or ‘gender ideology extremism'
The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to cut off health research grants it contends advance diversity, equity and inclusion efforts or promote 'gender ideology extremism.' By a 5-4 vote, the justices lifted an order a federal court judge in Boston issued forcing the National Institutes of Health to restore funding for more than 1,700 grants focused on heart disease, HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol and substance abuse and mental health issues. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's liberals in dissent from the court's decision to permit the funding halt. While Barrett voted with most of the court's conservatives to let the administration stop the grant funding, she sided with Roberts and the liberals to form a majority that left in place the lower judge's order voiding several NIH policies aimed at enforcing Trump's anti-DEI edicts. Since the ruling leaves the grant recipients without federal funds for now, the Trump administration seems certain to claim it as yet another in a flurry of wins in emergency appeals it has filed with the Supreme Court. In a solo concurring opinion, Barrett indicated that the court's ruling Thursday signaled that the grant recipients should have brought their claims for lost funding not to a district judge in Boston but to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, which hears disputes over federal contracts. U.S. District Judge William Young ordered the health-related grants restored in June, following lawsuits filed by impacted grant recipients and 16 Democratic-led states complaining of cuts to programs at their state universities. Young, a Reagan appointee, used unusually strident language to condemn the targeted cuts, many of which ended grants studying the impacts of disease on specific minority groups. 'This represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community,' the judge said of the cuts. 'I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out.' However, in Thursday's ruling, Justice Neil Gorsuch accused Young of defying the Supreme Court by not abiding by an emergency ruling it issued in April, allowing the Trump administration to cancel $64 million in teaching-related grants. (That 5-4 ruling also found Roberts in dissent along with the three liberal justices.) 'When this Court issues a decision, it constitutes a precedent that commands respect in lower courts,' Gorsuch declared, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson penned a blistering 21-page solo opinion calling the court's latest ruling 'bizarre' and complaining in particular about her colleagues 'sending plaintiffs on a likely futile, multivenue quest for complete relief.' She even declared that the court's decision will result in animals used in medical experiments being 'euthanized.' Jackson also repeated her past assertions that the high court is bending over backward to favor the Trump administration. 'Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins,' she wrote. In filings with the high court over the NIH funding, the Trump administration complained that Young's order required the agency to 'pay out over $783 million in grants,' but grant recipients argued that 'figure appears to be invented out of whole cloth.' Solicitor General John Sauer ridiculed some of the grants shut down by the administration, pointing to funding for programs exploring 'intersectional, multilevel and multidimensional structural racism for English- and Spanish-speaking populations' and 'anti-racist healing in nature.' Sauer told the justices that a 'comprehensive internal review' found the grants ran afoul of one or more of three executive orders President Donald Trump issued shortly after he returned to office in January. Two of the directives targeted DEI-related programs and grants, while the third sought to affirm 'the immutable biological reality of sex' by ending policies and programs accommodating or benefiting transgender people. Sauer also put forward the argument that appeared to carry the day Thursday: Congress has mandated legal disputes over federal government grants and contracts be pursued only in the Court of Federal Claims. That court could eventually award financial damages to grantees if it determines their grants were illegally terminated, but is unlikely to provide immediate relief, according to legal experts. The Supreme Court's ruling on the NIH grants is not a final decision on the legality of the grant terminations. But it means the administration can withhold the funding while the legal fight plays out. The Trump administration has appealed Young's ruling to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, which last month declined the administration's request to put his decision on hold as the appeal proceeds.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
County commissioner says "we are doing everything we can" to keep Westmoreland Manor running smoothly
Westmoreland Manor, like many other health care facilities post-COVID pandemic, has seen some hard times. Despite capacity being down in recent years, Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas says the facility is in no way in dire straits. "Westmoreland Manor is an award-winning institution," said Kopas. "And it has only been cherished and used by generations of Westmoreland County residents. We owe it to them to make sure that we are doing everything we can to keep the manor operating as best it can, at self-sufficiency and at full capacity." Kopas said that a big issue for the Westmoreland Manor is that most of its residence pay for their care through Medicaid and Medicare, and since there is uncertainty around the future of those programs, that is likely causing people to be worried right now. "Not one dollar of county property taxes has gone into Westmoreland Manor for as long as anyone can remember, and it is really my intention to keep it that way," Kopas said. Kopas went on to say that like at other health care institutions, staffing is challenging and competitive, especially for nurses. He added that many different health care facilities right now are fighting over a finite number of qualified nurses. "In Westmoreland County, we are doing our part to make sure we have adjusted wages and hours, as well as the really good benefits that the county government offers," Kopas said. "So, I think we are well-positioned to keep our staffing level at the proper levels." Right now, Westmoreland Manor is looking to fill a variety of jobs, and the county is looking for qualified candidates to fill those positions. If you would like more information or are interested in applying, you can find more online.
