A Brief History of the ‘Galaxy Quest' TV Show
Speaking to Deadline, Johnson was asked about the most recent iteration of the project. In 2023, we learned it was still in the works at at Paramount+, the home of Star Trek's recent TV renaissance. He couched his response in a way that also covered a TV show based on the recent Oscar-winning drama The Holdovers: 'Both are being written, so we'll see.'
At least he didn't say 'the Galaxy Quest TV show is dead in the water,' which might be what some fans had started to think. The show was first announced a decade ago; a brief Variety article published April 21, 2015, wrote that 'Robert Gordon, who co-wrote the DreamWorks feature with David Howard, is in negotiations to work on the TV adaptation, as are original director Dean Parisot and executive producers Mark Johnson and Melissa Bernstein.' No further details were given, but the trade speculated it would be a re-telling of the movie's story spread out across a season of episodes.
(For the three people who haven't seen Galaxy Quest, it's about the washed-up stars of a cult-beloved sci-fi series; aliens, believing the show to be real, recruit the actors to help win a real-life intergalactic conflict.)
A few months later, in August 2015, Entertainment Weekly reported the Galaxy Quest TV show was in development at Amazon.
By 2017, comedian Paul Scheer had come aboard the project. He spoke about it to Slashfilm then and explained a bit more about his vision. 'Right now, I just handed in my first script to Amazon, so I'm in that zone. I'm excited about it … The thing I keep on saying about it, without giving too much away—because it's going to be so long before people get to see it, I don't want people to get too burnt out on me telling you what it's about before it gets to that point— but for me, it was really important to do service to a Galaxy Quest story that gives you everything that you want and indoctrinates people who have never seen Galaxy Quest into what the fun of that world is … and also to continue the story of our original characters and have consequences from the first film.'
He also noted that the show would be 'mixing two casts. It's separate kind of adventures that kind of merge, and I'm looking at this first season not as episodic, but as a serialized story. So, the only way I've been looking at it is, using everything from the first movie and making the reasons for everything not just—I want to avoid anything that could be viewed as a reboot for reboot's sake. There are real reasons behind these choices—maybe too much so.'
Talking to the Wrap in 2018, Scheer said it would be a good-natured spoof not just of Star Trek, but also Star Wars and nerdy fandom at large.
'My pitch for Galaxy Quest was, 'How can we kind of blow this out and pay off things for the fans that love Galaxy Quest, but more importantly—and the thing that I really wanted to do is—appeal to the 'me' of now. Who's the 18-year-old version of me that loved Galaxy Quest now? What would they want to see? Because I think that that is a movie that we haven't really made yet: the Tropic Thunder in the world of modern-day science fiction … When Galaxy Quest came out, it was a niche thing, Star Trek fandom is a niche thing. Now it is selling out Hall H in Comic-Con, so that's kind of the impetus for the continuation.'
That all sounded very promising, but after 2018, Galaxy Quest more or less went radio silent. Then in 2023—after covid, but just before the summer of industry strikes—fans got a fresh update.
Variety wrote that the show had shifted to Paramount+, with only Johnson still attached. That article also noted that the original push to adapt the movie had faded after the death of Alan Rickman, but he passed in early 2016—long before Scheer, who is seemingly no longer involved, was talking about his pitch for the show.
Variety's 2023 story said Paramount+ and Paramount Television Studios were 'in the nascent stages of adapting the cult classic comedy film into a television show.' It also noted 'there have [since 2015] been various writers attached to the project, though none of their versions have ultimately gone forward.'
Today's Deadline interview with Johnson notes that Paramount Television Studios is no more, but by Grabthar's Hammer, the Galaxy Quest TV show is seemingly still holding on. If there are any future developments besides the fact that it's 'being written,' we will certainly keep you posted. Do you think there's hope for this one—and will it be worth the wait if it ever happens?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Merging deep tech and biomedical science expertise, ChronicleBio aims to accelerate breakthroughs for millions living with complex chronic conditions
New venture harnesses multi-omic data and AI to develop the largest platform on complex chronic illnesses to drive breakthroughs in POTS, ME/CFS, Long COVID, and other neuroimmune disorders SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- ChronicleBio, a techbio startup focused on radically accelerating insights on neuroimmune disorders, officially launched Tuesday with a bold mission: to build the world's richest, AI-ready data platform for historically overlooked conditions like POTS, ME/CFS, Long COVID, and other complex chronic conditions. ChronicleBio is uniquely led by a founding team that unites elite tech, healthcare, and life sciences: Fidji Simo (Co-founder), current CEO of Instacart and the incoming CEO of OpenAI's applications division, brings deep expertise in consumer-scale technology, product innovation, and health systems transformation. Rohit Gupta (Co-founder & CEO), a biobanking and precision medicine leader who previously oversaw centers at Stanford and UCSF, is the leading scientific and strategic force behind ChronicleBio. Rishi Reddy (Co-founder & Executive Chairman), of Tarsadia Investments, brings an entrepreneurial and venture-backed perspective and a track record in health and life sciences investing. Together, they are tackling a critical gap in biomedical research. ChronicleBio is creating a scalable, ethically driven data ecosystem, integrating clinical, molecular, biospecimen, and patient-reported insights to drive biomarker discovery, patient stratification, and precision therapeutic development. "Entire communities of patients have been ignored for too long, not because their conditions aren't debilitating and prevalent, but because the systems weren't built to understand them," said Fidji Simo, co-founder of ChronicleBio. "ChronicleBio is developing a future where patients can enlist in research, and where the data we collect from them goes directly towards better diagnostics and therapeutics. By building these critical missing datasets and leveraging the massive advances in AI, we aim to accelerate the path to cures." These complex chronic conditions impact nearly 300 million people worldwide, but remain woefully understudied, leaving patients hopeless and without meaningful treatments. It's a disease space desperate for data, and ChronicleBio is offering the scalable solutions to provide it. "Neuroimmune disorders remain some of the most poorly understood in medicine and not for lack of interest, but because the underlying data simply doesn't exist at the scale or structure required for serious breakthroughs," said Rohit Gupta, co-founder and CEO of ChronicleBio. "We're empowering patients and clinicians to get involved in this effort to grow our research-grade biobank and AI-ready data platform so we can close that gap and provide the tools to finally interrogate these diseases with scientific rigor and precision, bringing an end to complex chronic conditions." ChronicleBio partners directly with patients, clinics, and research collaborators to generate longitudinal, multi-modal datasets, including genomics, immune profiling, and real-world outcomes designed for exploration and clinical trial readiness. Its platform is already being used in multiple high-integrity clinics in the U.S. and India, as well as through research collaborations with thousands of patients contributing data and biosamples. "We're creating an ecosystem with global reach, designed not just to generate data, but to fundamentally shift how we discover, develop, and deliver treatments at scale. The opportunity for impact—scientifically, medically, and societally—is enormous," said Rishi Reddy, co-founder and Executive Chairman of ChronicleBio. "We're building the foundational infrastructure for a massive medical need that has been hiding in plain sight." ChronicleBio's founding vision isn't just ambitious. It's personal. Both Simo and Reddy have been diagnosed with at least one of the very conditions the company is focused on researching. Gupta's family also suffers from neuroimmune disorders. The group's world-class expertise is outshined only by its heartfelt determination to rewrite the scientific narrative for the millions of patients overlooked by traditional research and transform lived experience into actionable discovery. ChronicleBio's approach includes: A global biobank platform collecting and connecting data on neuroimmune illnesses A proprietary, AI-ready data engine designed to integrate multi-omic, clinical, and real-world evidence Strategic partnerships with clinics, research consortia, and biotech sponsors looking to unlock hard-to-crack therapeutic areas A decentralized clinical trial network accelerating drug development through real-world access to patients and clinicians For more information, visit or follow ChronicleBio on LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and Facebook. Media Contact:media@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE ChronicleBio Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Jim Acosta says he was ‘honored' to interview AI Parkland victim amid intense backlash
Amid the intense backlash he is facing over an 'interview' with an AI version of a student killed in the 2018 Parkland high school shooting, former CNN anchor Jim Acosta told The Independent he was 'honored' to help the victim's family remember their son. The conversation featured Acosta speaking to an animated image of Joaquin Oliver, who would have been celebrating his 25th birthday on Monday. According to Joaquin's father Manuel, the avatar was based on a real photograph of his deceased son and was trained on general information and knowledge from his writings and social media postings. At the start of the interview, which was posted to Acosta's Substack page, the AI Oliver is asked what happened to him, prompting the model to answer in a somewhat robotic monotone. Additionally, besides the avatar sounding computerized, the motions of its face and lips appear jerky and erratic. 'I appreciate your curiosity,' the avatar said. 'I was taken from this world too soon due to gun violence while at school. It's important to talk about these issues so we can create a safer future for everyone.' The AI model went on to talk about the need for 'a mix of stronger gun control laws, mental health support and community engagement' when asked how to curb gun violence. 'We need to create safe spaces for conversations and connections, making everyone feel seen and heard. It's about building a culture of kindness and understanding,' it added. Acosta also touched on some more casual topics in his conversation with the AI Oliver, such as asking the avatar about movies and the NBA. Following the interview, Acosta brought on Manuel to discuss his decision to use an artificially generated version of his son and whether he planned to continue to do so going forward. 'I understand that this is AI,' Manuel said. 'I don't want anyone to think that I am in, some way, trying to bring my son back. Sadly, I can't, right? I wish I could. However, the technology is out there.' Manuel, who has become an outspoken gun control advocate since his son's death, also noted that the AI version of his son could help elevate the conversation about gun safety. 'We can just raise the voices,' he said. 'Now, Joaquin is going to start having followers… he's going to start uploading videos. This is just the beginning.' Another reason Manuel and his wife Patricia created the AI version of Joaquin, he noted, was just to hear their son's voice again. 'Patricia will spend hours asking questions. Like any other mother, she loves to hear Joaquin saying, 'I love you, mommy.' And that's important,' he told Acosta. 'I really felt like I was speaking with Joaquin. It's just a beautiful thing,' Acosta asserted to Manuel. Acosta, who launched an online Substack show after leaving CNN earlier this year, quickly faced outrage when he posted the interview online. Critics described it as 'one of the most unhinged and grotesque things' while wondering why Acosta would even take part in it. 'This is so insane and evil. It should never be done. I'm speechless,' Reason's Robby Soave tweeted, prompting Acosta to respond with a video of Manuel pushing back on the criticism over the interview. 'Joaquin, known as Guac, should be 25 years old today. His father approached me to do the story… to keep the memory of his son alive,' Acosta declared. 'Today he should be turning 25 years old, and my wife Patricia and myself – we asked our friend Jim Acosta to… have an interview with our son because now, thanks to AI, we can bring him back,' Manuel said in the social media video response. 'It was our idea, it was our plan, and it's still our plan,' he continued. 'We feel that Joaquin has a lot of things to say, and as long as we have an option that allows us to bring that to you and to everyone, we will use it.' Manuel ended the clip by asking critics to 'stop blaming people about where he's coming from, or blaming Jim about what he was able to do,' insisting that if 'the problem you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem.' Instead, Manuel concluded, the focus should remain on mass shootings. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago,' he stated. 'So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.' Asked about the criticism he's faced online over the interview, Acosta told The Independent that he'd essentially reiterate much of what Manuel had to say about the backlash in his video. 'I think I would say this - the family of Joaquin reached out to me to see if I would help them remember their son,' Acosta said. 'My heart goes out to them and I was honored to help them in this moment. I think Joaquin's father makes a good point that if you're bothered more by this than the gun violence that took his son, then there is something truly wrong with our society.' Meanwhile, Acosta's conversation isn't the first time that any of the victims of the Parkland shooting had been brought back via AI. Oliver, along with the voices of several other students and staff who were killed in the massacre, was used in a robocalling campaign for gun control last year called The Shotline. 'Six years ago, I was a senior at Parkland. Many students and teachers were murdered on Valentine's Day that year by a person using an AR-15 assault rifle,' the voice of Oliver stated in the call that was sent to lawmakers. 'It's been six years, and you've done nothing. Not a thing to stop all the shootings that have continued to happen since.' The voice added: 'I'm back today because my parents used AI to re-create my voice to call you. How many calls will it take for you to care? How many dead voices will you hear before you finally listen?' Additionally, AI avatars have been used to simulate victim impact statements in criminal cases. In May, for instance, an AI version of a man who was killed in a road rage shooting addressed the alleged killer in court. 'I believe in forgiveness, and a God who forgives. I always have and I still do,' the animated model of the victim said. The judge in the case appeared moved by the video, which was produced by the victim's family. 'I loved that AI, thank you for that. As angry as you are, as justifiably angry as the family is, I heard the forgiveness,' the judge said. 'I feel that that was genuine.'
Gizmodo
3 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
‘Freakier Friday' Barely Scrapes By on Its Nostalgic Charms
Freaky Friday is back after over two decades since we last saw Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan swap bodies thanks to a suitably freaky family curse. However, Disney's new follow-up, in theaters this week, leaning heavily on the charms of a stellar ensemble, is a sequel constantly threatening to fall apart under the weight of uneven execution. In Freaky Friday, it was just mother Tess Coleman (Curtis) and her daughter Anna (Lohan) who swapped bodies, a kooky way for mother and child to better understand each other and come to terms with their respective journeys in life. In Freakier, directed by Nisha Ganatra, Ana is now all grown up herself with a teen daughter (Harper, played by Julia Butters) and ready to marry the father of said daughter's high school nemesis (Eric and Lily, played by Manny Jacinto and Sophia Hammons, respectively). While Tess attempts to help glue the new family dynamic together, there are plenty of interesting cracks forming among all the different relationships among them as they prepare to adapt to this new normal. Which is where, of course, the Coleman family curse triggers, hitting Anna, Tess, Harper, and Lily. With more body swaps this time around, things get convoluted quickly. Lohan is now playing Harper in Anna's Body, while Curtis plays step-sister Lily, and the duo seamlessly falls back in step with one another as they did 22 years ago. They really shine through some of the film's silliest hijinks, even if the setup to those slapstick moments feels nonsensical, even for a comedy. When Lohan and Curtis get to play, however, they give some much-needed depth and heart to the core of the film. Lohan likewise gets to lean into her romantic comedy sensibilities opposite Jacinto, and they make for a sizzling pairing, both in the comedic moments and in the more touching family relationship drama—it's just a shame that there isn't enough of them together in the film to mine that chemistry for all its worth. It takes Freakier far too long to really let us get to know the newcomers in Eric and Lily, their arrival undercut by needlessly overcomplicating Anna's backstory, covering the time between the two films with former high school drama. And that's kind of Freakier's big problem: it feels overstuffed in a lot of ways. Many gags go on for just a bit too long, even before the film digs into body-switching shenanigans, and a lot of the comedy, especially between the two teens, feels more like adults trying to write Gen Z kids rather than feeling particularly contemporary. Butters and Hammons are definitely underserved, having to play Tess and Anna in their teen bodies compared to the other half of the body-swapping drama—Freakier just wastes them until the final act, but it comes too suddenly and too late in the game to have any impact. That overstuffing definitely hits hardest in Anna's arc in the film, having to balance solo-parenting her daughter with her career managing an upcoming music artist, Ella (the scene-stealing Maitreyi Ramakrishnan). There's just too much going on that the film never does justice to, especially when it comes to why Anna left behind her own musical career with Pinkslip. For a comedy that also happens to run nearly two hours long, Freakier feels like it has too many characters in the mix, leaving so many of them (and the film's gags) getting short-changed trying to balance it all. What is most frustrating is that Freakier's smart updates to the body-swapping 'lore,' combined with the ensemble cast's chemistry selling it all in the first place, really work, only for the film itself to buckle under stereotypical constraints of the comedy genre. It's a movie that feels like someone kept interfering to add more jokes, throwing off the vibe of the film (alongside some questionable soundtrack choices, including not one, but two Chappell Roan needle drops that really just make it feel like someone realized she was having her moment last year, and was needed to make the film feel contemporary). The sheer force of Lohan and Curtis' dynamic getting to return to these characters brings some appeal to Freakier Friday (as do Manny Jacinto's charms and arms), but it's only barely enough to make up for the film's messy, overstuffed feeling, making this long-awaited return more of a Forgettable Friday than a particularly Freaky one. Freakier Friday hits theaters August 8. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
