Ancient footprints from Australia reveal earliest-known reptile
The fossilized footprints, apparently made on a muddy ancient river bank, include two trackways plus one isolated print, all displaying hallmark features of reptile tracks including overall shape, toe length and associated claw marks, researchers said. They appear to have been left by a reptile with body dimensions similar to those of a lizard, they said.
The footprints reveal that reptiles existed about 35 million years earlier than previously known, showing that the evolution of land vertebrates occurred more rapidly than had been thought.
"So this is all quite radical stuff," said paleontologist Per Ahlberg of the University of Uppsala in Sweden, who led the study published on Wednesday in the journal Nature, opens new tab.
The Australian footprints were preserved in a sandstone slab measuring about 14 inches (35 cm) across that was found on the banks of the Broken River near the town of Barjarg in the state of Victoria.
The story of land vertebrates started with fish leaving the water, a milestone in the evolution of life on Earth. These animals were the first tetrapods - meaning "four feet" - and they were the forerunners of today's terrestrial vertebrates: amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds. Footprints in Poland dating to about 390 million years ago represent the oldest fossil evidence for these first tetrapods, which lived an amphibious lifestyle.
These creatures were the ancestors of all later land vertebrates. Their descendants split into two major lineages - one leading to today's amphibians and the other to the amniotes, a group spanning reptiles, mammals and birds. The amniotes, the first vertebrates to lay eggs on land and thus finally break free of the water, cleaved into two lineages, one leading to reptiles and the other to mammals. Birds evolved much later from reptile ancestors.
The Australian footprints each are approximately 1-1.5 inches (3-4 cm) long. They appear to have been left by three individuals of the same reptile species, with no tail drag or body drag marks. No skeletal remains were found but the footprints offer some idea of what the reptile that made them looked like.
"The feet are rather lizard-like in shape, and the distance between hip and shoulder appears to have been about 17 cm (6.7 inches). Of course we don't know anything about the shape of the head, the length of the neck or the length of the tail, but if we imagine lizard-like proportions the total length could have been in the region of 60 cm to 80 cm (24 to 32 inches)," Ahlberg said.
"In terms of its overall appearance, 'lizard-like' is probably the best guess, because lizards are the group of living reptiles that have retained the closest approximation to the ancestral body form," Ahlberg added.
The modest size of the earliest reptiles stands in contrast to some of their later descendants like the dinosaurs.
This reptile probably was a predator because plant-eating did not appear until later in reptilian evolution. The bodies of herbivorous reptiles tend to be big and clunky, whereas this one evidently was lithe with long, slender toes, Ahlberg said.
The researchers also described newly identified fossilized reptile footprints from Poland dating to 327 million years ago that broadly resemble those from Australia. Those also are older than the previous earliest-known evidence for reptiles - skeletal fossils from Canada of a lizard-like creature named Hylonomus dating to around 320 million years ago, as well as fossil footprints from about the same time.
The reptile that left the Australian footprints lived during the Carboniferous Period, a time when global temperatures were similar to today's, with ice at Earth's poles but a warm equatorial region. Australia at the time formed part of the ancient supercontinent Gondwana and lay at the southern edge of the tropics. There were forests, partly composed of giant clubmoss trees.
"The tracks were left near the water's edge of what was probably quite a large river, inhabited by a diversity of big fishes," Ahlberg said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
The simple food swaps that can double your weight loss
'If two diets are nutritionally equal, according to nutritional guidance, does the level of processing still affect weight and health?' It's the question Dr Sam Dicken, a research fellow in the department of behavioural science and health at University College London (UCL), set out to answer in a landmark study published in Nature. The results showed that people who ate a diet of minimally processed foods (MPFs) lost twice the weight as those eating ultra-processed foods (UPFs) – even when both diets met Government healthy-eating guidelines. In the UK, more than half our calories come from UPFs such as ready meals, breakfast cereals and mass-produced bread. These everyday foods have been linked to more than 30 chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes and stroke. Until now, most research has centred on nutritionally poor UPFs – high in sugar, salt and saturated fat, while low in fibre. This is the first study to focus on 'healthy' UPFs that meet nutritional recommendations for fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrate, salt, fibre, fruit and vegetables. 'Not all UPFs are inherently unhealthy,' says Dr Dicken, the lead author of the study. 'Supermarkets now offer plenty of healthier, nutritionally balanced UPFs, like wholegrain breakfast cereals and high-fibre ready meals.' Rob Hobson, a nutritionist and the author of Unprocess Your Family Life, says the study adds to concerns about the role of UPFs in weight gain and wider health. 'It's not just about additives, calories or sugar, but how food is made and how that affects our eating behaviour,' he explains. 'Relying less on UPFs – even ones marketed as 'healthy' – can support better weight management and long-term health.' While cutting out all UPFs is unrealistic in our current food environment, making a few, smart food swaps can make all the difference, say the scientists. Here's how to do it. Swap breakfast cereal with milk for overnight oats with frozen or fresh fruit Most breakfast cereals are ultra-processed, even those labelled 'wholegrain'. While often fortified with vitamins and minerals, they are typically sweetened and low in fibre – leaving you hungry again by mid-morning. 'Switching from a sugary, ready-made cereal to homemade oats with milk and fruit reduces calorie and sugar intake while boosting fibre, protein, antioxidants, vitamins and calcium,' says Dr Adrian Brown, the study's co-author and a senior research fellow in nutrition and dietetics at UCL. ' Oats provide slow-release energy, helping control blood-glucose levels, which may keep you feeling fuller for longer. Overall, they're a better option.' A review in Current Nutrition Reports found eating oats can support weight management by reducing body fat and regulating appetite. Rob Hobson's quick-and-easy overnight oats recipe Mix 50g rolled oats with 100ml semi-skimmed milk and 100ml apple juice Add half a grated apple, 1 tbsp chia seeds, and a squeeze of lime juice. Leave overnight in the fridge Top with berries and a spoonful of natural yogurt Swap a meal-deal chicken sandwich for homemade chicken-salad flatbread Even healthy-sounding sandwich fillings, such as chicken, can be processed or loaded with saturated fat and calories, especially with added mayonnaise. ' Pre-packaged sandwiches, often made with ultra-processed bread, have a soft texture that may encourage faster eating and less awareness of fullness,' says Hobson. A study in Cell Metabolism found people on a UPF diet ate twice as fast and consumed 50 per cent more calories per minute – an extra 500 calories per day. 'A homemade flatbread with grilled chicken, salad and a yogurt-based dressing contains lean protein and fibre in a more structured meal, encouraging you to eat more slowly and feel more satisfied,' says Hobson. Rob Hobson's quick chicken flatbread recipe Fill a wholemeal flatbread with 80-100g grilled chicken breast, mixed salad leaves, sliced cucumber and tomato Add a spoonful of plain yogurt, lemon juice and fresh herbs, such as coriander or parsley Swap a spaghetti bolognese ready meal for a homemade equivalent 'A ready-made spaghetti bolognese will contain processed meat that may be higher in fat and saturated fat,' says Dr Brown. 'It will be more energy-dense, providing more calories per bite.' The soft texture doesn't require much chewing, so you will eat faster and potentially override your body's satiety signals, consuming more before you realise you are full. 'Switch to a homemade version, made with lean, 5 per cent mince, and you'll likely eat fewer calories and less saturated fat for the same portion size,' says Dr Brown. 'Improve the protein and fibre content by adding lentils, vegetables, herbs and spices, and serving with wholewheat pasta. This will help you feel fuller.' Swap low-fat fruit yogurt for low-fat natural yogurt with fruit Low-fat fruit yogurts are often highly processed, with added sugars or sweeteners, flavours and thickeners. 'The label may show moderate calories, but the texture and sweetness can make them less filling and more rewarding to the brain, encouraging you to eat more,' says Hobson. 'A natural yogurt with whole fruit or a little honey is less processed, has more texture, and provides protein and natural fats that keep you fuller for longer. You can also control the sugar content.' If you're trying to lose weight, Dr Brown advises checking labels. 'Some natural yogurts are higher in fat – look for a reduced-fat option,' he says. Swap processed nut snacks for whole nuts 'Processed nut snacks [such as a fruit-and-nut bar], especially flavoured ones, are often UPFs even if they include nutritious ingredients,' says Hobson. 'Their engineered textures and sweet-salty profiles can drive reward-driven eating.' That's why it's so hard to stop at one handful. Whole nuts with dried fruit provide more fibre, slowing down eating speed and energy release. 'This reduces calorie intake and help control appetite,' says Hobson. A Harvard study found people who ate whole nuts were less likely to gain weight gain. If processed fruit and nut bars are your go-to, Dr Brown recommends the following: 'Swap for a small, 25g handful of unsalted nuts, such as almonds or walnuts, plus a piece of fruit,' he says. 'You'll get less salt, more vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and fibre – and the fruit counts towards your five a day.' What we can learn from the UPF v MPF trial In the trial, 55 overweight adults were given either: a UPF diet of convenience foods, such as cottage pie ready meals, fortified cereals and pre-packaged sandwiches an MPF diet of homemade meals, such as cottage pie, overnight oats with berries, and chicken salad with flatbread Both diets met the UK's Eatwell Guide, which outlines the main food groups and their recommended proportions for a healthy, balanced diet. Meals were delivered for eight weeks, with no calorie counting or portion control. After a four-week break, participants switched diets, for another eight weeks. Both groups lost weight, but people eating MPF meals lost twice as much (2 per cent of body weight, versus 1 per cent on the UPF diet). 'Continued over a year, the MPF diet could mean a 9 to 13 per cent weight loss, compared with 4 to 5 per cent on the UPF diet,' says Dr Dicken. 'That's significant.' The MPF diet also led to greater fat loss, especially visceral fat, which raises the risk of metabolic disease. Neither diet caused muscle loss – likely because the diets were nutritionally balanced. 'The main message is that nutritional guidelines work – both groups lost weight,' says Dr Dicken. 'However, processing still makes a difference. Choosing foods that are less processed may help you lose more weight.' UPFs are engineered to be moreish. 'They can often be energy-dense, with more calories per bite, and softer in texture,' says Dr Dicken. 'This makes them easier to eat quickly, so you consume more before your brain realises you're full.' By contrast, MPFs are bulkier, higher in fibre and take longer to eat, so they are more filling. In the trial, MPF participants consumed about 290 fewer calories a day, compared with 120 fewer on the UPF diet. They also found it twice as easy to resist cravings. Healthy weight loss tips from the experts Dr Sam Dickens says: Follow the Eatwell Guide: more fruit, vegetables, wholegrains, pulses, nuts, lean proteins. Fewer than 0.1 per cent of Britons follow all the guidelines. Prioritise high-fibre foods. Check calorie density and be cautious with calorie-dense foods that have a soft texture, because they're easier to overeat. Using front-of-pack labelling as a guide, aim for foods with around 120-130 kcal per 100g. Dr Adrian Brown says: Speak to a GP or practice nurse. You may be eligible for structured support, such as the NHS Digital weight management programme or a local referral scheme. Avoid focusing solely on weight loss. Concentrate on improving your general health and small-scale victories, such as better sleep, improved energy, or being able to play with your grandchildren. Having other goals keeps you motivated and supports long-term success. If it feels overwhelming, reach out for support. Weight regulation is complex. No one should feel they're expected to do it alone.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Biomechanics study shows how T. rex and other dinosaurs fed on prey
WASHINGTON, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Tyrannosaurus subdued prey with raw power, using bone-crushing bite force. But other meat-eating dinosaurs that rivaled T. rex in size used different approaches. Giganotosaurus relied more on slashing and ripping flesh. And the long and narrow snout of Spinosaurus was well-adapted for catching fish. Researchers have documented the feeding biomechanics of meat-eating dinosaurs in a comprehensive analysis of the skull design and bite force of 17 species that prowled the landscape at various times from the dawn to the twilight of the age of dinosaurs. The study found that Tyrannosaurus possessed by far the highest estimated bite force, with a heavily reinforced skull and massive jaw muscles. But it showed that other dinosaur predators evolved successful approaches to bringing down prey even without matching the T. rex chomp. "We found that large predatory dinosaurs didn't all evolve the same kind of skull to deal with the challenges of feeding at massive size," said vertebrate paleontologist Andre Rowe of the University of Bristol in England, lead author of the study published this month in the journal Current Biology, opens new tab. "Some, like T. rex, reinforced the skull to tolerate extremely high bite forces and the associated skull stresses. Others, like Allosaurus or Spinosaurus, went with lighter or possibly flexible builds that spread out stress in different ways. There's no single 'correct' way to be a giant meat-eater, and that's the point," Rowe added. The study focused on species within the group, or clade, called theropods that includes the meat-eating dinosaurs. They ran from Herrerasaurus, which lived in Argentina about 230 million years ago and is one of the earliest-known dinosaurs, all the way to T. rex, which was present in western North America when an asteroid struck Earth 66 million years ago and ended the age of dinosaurs. The researchers used three-dimensional models of the skulls of the 17 species, including two different specimens of Tyrannosaurus, and applied a method for simulating how structures respond to physical stress. They estimated muscle forces using digital muscle reconstructions based on living relatives of the dinosaurs - birds and crocodiles - then applied those forces to the skull models to simulate bites. "Our focus wasn't raw bite force. We were testing how the skulls distributed that force under load, and how these distributions varied by each lineage of carnivores," Rowe said. The early theropods examined in the study such as Herrerasaurus, which lived during the middle of the Triassic Period, and Dilophosaurus, which lived early in the Jurassic Period, exhibited much lower stress resistance than their later counterparts. They were lightly built dinosaurs and not well adapted to high bite forces, Rowe said. The increase in bite force and skull strength unfolded gradually over time, reaching its apex with Tyrannosaurus and its close relatives in a lineage called tyrannosaurs such as Daspletosaurus and Albertosaurus, which like T. rex appeared late in the Cretaceous Period. "In tyrannosaurs, there's a big jump in skull strength and bite mechanics, coinciding with deeper skulls, more robust bone architecture and changes in jaw muscle attachment. So the ramp-up wasn't immediate. It evolved over time and in certain lineages more than others," Rowe said. Tyrannosaurus, Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus were three of the largest theropods, but their skulls were quite different. Perhaps the largest-known Tyrannosaurus is a specimen named Sue at the Field Museum in Chicago, at 40-1/2 feet (12.3 meters) long. Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus rivaled T. rex in size. Giganotosaurus lived in Argentina in the middle of the Cretaceous, while Spinosaurus inhabited North Africa at around the same time, both predating Tyrannosaurus by roughly 30 million years. "Giganotosaurus was large, but its skull wasn't built for the same kind of high-force feeding as T. rex. Spinosaurus had a long, narrow snout, which is consistent with a diet focused on fishing, though we have fossilized evidence that it ate other animals, such as pterosaurs," Rowe said, referring to the flying reptiles that were cousins of the dinosaurs. One of the key takeaway messages, Rowe said, is that giant body size did not funnel all theropods toward the same design. Stronger bite force was one strategy, but not the only one, Rowe added. "Some animals win with raw power, others by striking quickly or repeatedly. What we're seeing here is a spectrum of ecological adaptations. These animals weren't all trying to be T. rex clones. They were solving the same problem in different ways," Rowe added. "That kind of evolutionary flexibility," Rowe added, "probably helped them dominate ecosystems for so long."
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Health Rounds: Blood test finds early ovarian cancer
Aug 15 (Reuters) - An experimental blood test detects early-stage ovarian cancer in patients with vague symptoms that would likely be misdiagnosed using currently available methods, researchers said in a new report. Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, largely due to delays in diagnosis until after the disease has spread in the body, at which point it's harder to treat, according to the researchers. More than 90% of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer experience symptoms that can be mistaken for benign conditions, such as bloating, abdominal pain, and digestive issues. Not only have there been no reliable blood tests for these patients, but existing invasive tests often miss early-stage ovarian tumors, the researchers noted inCancer Research Communications, opens new tab. Using machine learning tools, the researchers identified multiple biomarkers - from across a wide range of molecules and processes in the body - that could be combined into a single test that detects all sub-types of the disease, at all stages, they said. Trialed at a large medical center on blood samples from nearly 400 women with possible symptoms of ovarian cancer, the test was 92% accurate at identifying those with any stage of ovarian cancer and 88% accurate at identifying those with Stage I or Stage II disease, according to the report. Oriana Papin-Zoghbi, chief executive officer of the company developing the new test -Denver, Colorado-based AOA Dx - said the findings show its potential to aid 'in making faster, more informed decisions for women who need urgent clarity during a challenging diagnostic process.' PREVENTING ELDERS' 'LEAKY BRAIN' MIGHT STAVE OFF COGNITIVE DECLINE The blood-brain barrier gets leakier with age, contributing to memory deficits – and new discoveries of the mechanisms behind this process might lead to new ways of preventing cognitive decline, researchers say. The blood-brain barrier - a layer of tightly-junctioned cells lining the brain's blood vessels - keeps viruses, bacteria and toxins out while allowing helpful nutrients and chemicals in. 'Basically, it's a mechanism that separates the central nervous system from everything else,' study leader Yulia Komarova of University of Illinois Chicago said in a statement. In previous research, Komarova and her colleagues found that removing a protein called N-cadherin from the cells lining blood vessels made the vessels leakier in the brain. In a new study published in Cell Reports, opens new tab, her team found that mice without N-cadherin could learn tasks as well as normal mice, but they quickly forgot what they learned. In further experiments, they found when N-cadherin proteins on neighboring cells interact, they stabilize a protein, called occludin, which helps form the tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier that maintains the integrity of the blood-brain barrier. Examining human brain tissue collected during epilepsy surgeries, the researchers found that samples from patients in their 40s and 50s had lower levels of N-cadherin and occludin than samples from patients in their late teens and 20s. Komarova's team is now investigating whether steps in the signaling pathway activated by N-cadherin could be therapeutic targets. 'This paper shows that actually there might be a much bigger therapeutic window for treatment of any age-related cognitive decline condition,' she said. Previous studies may have underestimated the number of deaths related to wildfire smoke in Europe by as much as 93%, according to a report in The Lancet Planetary Health, opens new tab. In new research, using daily mortality records from 654 contiguous regions in 32 European countries, researchers found that for every 1 microgram per cubit meter increase in wildfire smoke particles, all-cause mortality rose by 0.7%, respiratory mortality by 1%, and cardiovascular mortality by 0.9%. Annually since 2004, short-term exposure to wildfire pollution was responsible for an average of 535 deaths from all causes, the researchers calculated – while estimates in previous studies had put that number at around 38 deaths per year, they said. 'Human-driven climate change is one of the main causes of the rising frequency and intensity of wildfires, as it creates favorable conditions for their spread and increases the number of days with very high or extremely high fire risk,' study leader Anna Alari of the Barcelona Institute for Global Health said in a statement. 'Improving estimates of (wildfire smoke related) mortality will help better track the burden of this climate change-related threat to public health.' A separate study found that as wildfire pollution levels rise, firefighters' hearts work harder, researchers wrote in Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, opens new tab. After fighting the Park Fire in California, firefighters' heart rate at rest would rise by an average of 1.4 beats per minute for every 10-ug/m3 increase in particulate matter. Although the increase in resting heart rate was modest, and the rate remained within normal levels, even slight elevations have been associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality over time in large population studies. (To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)
