China Flags Security Risks in Nvidia H20 Chips, Threatening China Sales
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
State Media Raises Security Red Flags
The focus of the concern is security. A social media account linked to state broadcaster CCTV claimed the H20 chips could have hardware 'backdoors.' According to these claims, such a feature could allow someone to bypass normal security checks or shut the chips down from a remote location. The same account also said the chips are not advanced in design and are not environmentally friendly.
Other outlets, including People's Daily, called on Nvidia to give clear proof that the chips are safe to use. These reports reflect China's broader push to reduce risk from foreign technology and increase local supply in key sectors.
On July 31, the chips contained any security risks. Reports cited unnamed American AI experts who said the chips could be tracked, located, and possibly disabled from outside the country.
Nvidia Denies Allegations
However, Nvidia has rejected all of these claims. The company said there are no backdoors in its products. In fact, Chief Security Officer David Reber said a built-in kill switch would be a permanent flaw that no responsible vendor would include.
This dispute comes after the Trump administration blocked sales of H20 chips to China in April. That ban was lifted in July. The outcome matters for Nvidia's business, as China is a large market for AI hardware.
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
average NVDA stock price target of $186.24. This implies a 1.94% upside from the current price.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China Urges Firms to Avoid Nvidia H20 Chips After Trump Resumes Sales
(Bloomberg) -- Beijing has urged local companies to avoid using Nvidia Corp.'s H20 processors, particularly for government-related purposes, complicating the chipmaker's return to China after the Trump administration reversed an effective US ban on such sales. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park Over the past few weeks, Chinese authorities have sent notices to a range of firms discouraging use of the less-advanced semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The guidance was particularly strong against the use of H20s for any government or national security-related work by state enterprises or private companies, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is sensitive. The letters didn't, however, constitute an outright ban on H20 use, according to the people. Industry analysts broadly agree that Chinese companies still covet those chips, which perform quite well in certain crucial AI applications. President Donald Trump said Monday that the processor 'still has a market' in the Asian country despite also calling it 'obsolete.' Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. both recently secured Washington's approval to resume lower-end AI chip sales to China, on the controversial and legally questionable condition that they give the US government a 15% cut of the related revenue. But even with Trump's team on board, the two companies face the challenge that their Chinese customers are under Beijing's pressure to purchase domestic chips instead. Beijing's overall push affects AI accelerators from AMD in addition to Nvidia, one of the people said, though it's unclear whether any letters specifically mentioned AMD's MI308 chip. Shares of Chinese AI chip designer Cambricon Technologies Corp. surged to their daily limit of 20% on the news of China's guidance, leading a rally in peers such as Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Beijing's stance could limit Trump's ability to turn his export control about-face into a windfall for government coffers, a deal that highlighted his administration's transactional approach to national security policies long treated as nonnegotiable. Still, Chinese companies may not be ready to jump ship to local semiconductors. 'Chips from domestic manufacturers are improving dramatically in quality, but they might not be as versatile for specific workloads that China's domestic AI industry hopes to focus on,' said Homin Lee, a senior macro strategist at Lombard Odier in Singapore. Lee added that he anticipates 'strong' demand for the chips the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell. Rosenblatt Securities analyst Kevin Cassidy said he doesn't anticipate that Nvidia's processor sales to China will be affected because 'Chinese companies are going to want to use the best chips available.' Nvidia and AMD's chips are superior to local alternatives, he said. Beijing asked companies about that issue in some of its letters, according to one of the people, posing questions such as why they buy Nvidia H20 chips over local versions, whether that's a necessary choice given domestic options, and whether they've found any security concerns in the Nvidia hardware. The notices coincide with state media reports that cast doubt on the security and reliability of H20 processors. Chinese regulators have raised those concerns directly with Nvidia, which has repeatedly denied that its chips contain such vulnerabilities. The Financial Times reported that some Chinese companies are planning to decrease orders of Nvidia chips in response to the letters. Right now, the people said, China's most stringent chip guidance is limited to sensitive applications, a situation that bears similarities to the way Beijing restricted Tesla Inc. vehicles and Apple Inc. iPhones in certain institutions and locations over security concerns. China's government also at one point barred the use of Micron Technology Inc. chips in critical infrastructure. It's possible that Beijing may extend its heavier-handed Nvidia and AMD guidance to a wider range of settings, according to one person with direct knowledge of the deliberations, who said that those conversations are in early stages. AMD declined to comment on Beijing's notices, while Nvidia said in a statement that 'the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure.' China has ample supplies of domestic chips, Nvidia said, and 'won't and never has relied on American chips for government operations.' China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Cyberspace Administration of China didn't respond to faxed requests for comment on this story, which is based on interviews with more than a half-dozen people familiar with Beijing's policy discussions. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. The Chinese government's posture raises questions about the Trump administration's explanation for why the US is allowing those exports mere months after effectively banning such sales. Multiple senior US officials have said their policy reversal was the result of trade talks with China, but Beijing has publicly indicated that the resumed H20 shipments weren't part of any bilateral deal. China's recent notices to companies suggest that the Asian country may not have sought such a concession from Washington in the first place. Beijing's concerns are twofold. For starters, Chinese officials are worried that Nvidia chips could have location-tracking and remote-shutdown capabilities — a suggestion that Nvidia has vehemently denied. Trump officials are actively exploring whether location tracking could be used to help curtail suspected smuggling of restricted components into China, and lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require location verification for advanced AI chips. Second, Beijing is intensely focused on developing its domestic chip capabilities, and wants Chinese companies to shift away from Western chips in favor of local offerings. Officials have previously urged Chinese firms to choose domestic semiconductors over Nvidia H20 processors, Bloomberg reported last September, and have introduced energy efficiency standards that the H20 chip doesn't meet. Nvidia designed the H20 chip specifically for Chinese customers to abide by years of US restrictions on sales of its more advanced hardware, curbs designed to limit Beijing's access to AI that could benefit the Chinese military. The H20 chip has less computational power than Nvidia's top offerings, but its strong memory bandwidth is quite well suited to the inference stage of AI development, when models recognize patterns and draw conclusions. That's made it a desirable product to companies like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. in China, where domestic chip champion Huawei Technologies Co. is struggling to produce enough advanced components to meet market demand. By one estimate from Biden officials — who considered but did not implement controls on H20 sales — losing access to that Nvidia chip would make it three to six times more expensive for Chinese companies to run inference on advanced AI models. 'Beijing appears to be using regulatory uncertainty to create a captive market sufficiently sized to absorb Huawei's supply, while still allowing purchases of H20s to meet actual demands,' said Lennart Heim, an AI-focused researcher at RAND, of China's push for companies to avoid American AI chips. 'This signals that domestic alternatives remain inadequate even as China pressures foreign suppliers.' In his remarks Monday, Trump said China's Huawei already offers chips comparable to the Nvidia H20, echoing previous remarks by officials in his administration who've defended the decision to resume H20 exports partly on those grounds. The US should keep the Chinese AI ecosystem reliant on less-advanced American technology for as long as possible, these officials say, in order to deprive Huawei of the revenue and know-how that would come from a broader customer base. Other administration officials have strongly objected to that logic, Bloomberg has reported, arguing that resuming H20 exports will only embolden China's tech champions and bolster the country's overall computing power. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other Trump officials have also claimed that the H20 move was part of a deal to improve American access to Chinese rare-earth minerals — despite the Trump team's previous assertions that such an arrangement wasn't on the table. 'As the Chinese deliver their magnets, then the H20s will come off,' Lutnick said last month. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in late July that the magnet issue had been 'solved.' The first Nvidia H20 and AMD MI308 licenses arrived a bit over a week after Bessent's declaration — after Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang met with the president and both companies agreed to share their China revenue with the US government. --With assistance from Yanping Li, Sangmi Cha and Emily Forgash. (Updates with additional analyst commentary in ninth paragraph.) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump threatens to sue ‘loser' Fed chair Powell: ‘Steve 'Manouychin' really gave me a ‘beauty'
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Tuesday said his next line of attack against 'loser' Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for refusing to lower interest rates could be a lawsuit over his $2.5 billion headquarters renovation. The president even slammed his own first-term treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, for recommending the head of the Central Bank. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell must NOW lower the rate. Steve 'Manouychin' really gave me a 'beauty' when he pushed this loser,' Trump wrote, misspelling the name of his then-cabinet member who encouraged him to pick Powell in 2017. Advertisement 4 President Trump — frustrated by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's refusal to lower interest rates — has accused Powell of squandering public resources on a $2.5 billion headquarters renovation. AP 'The damage he has done by always being Too Late is incalculable. Fortunately, the economy is sooo good that we've blown through Powell and the complacent Board. I am, though, considering allowing a major lawsuit against Powell to proceed because of the horrible, and grossly incompetent, job he has done in managing the construction of the Fed Buildings,' the president said. He added that the construction project 'should have been a $50 Million Dollar fix up.' Advertisement 4 Trump slammed his former treasury secretary, Steve Mnuchin (right, next to his wife Louise Linton), for even recommending Powell in his first term. AP It's unclear what the lawsuit's claims would be. Powell's press office did not immediately respond to a Post request for comment. The president slammed Powell shortly after the monthly release of inflation data for July, with the Consumer Price Index showing a 2.7% annual increase in prices — remaining above the Fed's 2% target but well below a 9.1% peak under former President Joe Biden in June 2022. Powell has refused to lower interest rates at all in 2025 — with Trump alleging political motivations after three cuts last year, including two reductions shortly before the presidential election. During that race, Vice President Kamala Harris faced criticism for her role in the incumbent administration's economic program. Advertisement 4 Trump said Tuesday that he may sue Powell. Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Powell has justified the unchanged rates by citing the unknown effect of Trump's tariffs on inflation. The Fed's next meeting to discuss possible rate cuts is scheduled for Sept. 16. High interest rates have made it more expensive to finance home purchases and for businesses and consumers to take out loans, including to lease cars and reduce credit-card balances. Advertisement Trump and his team recently appeared to back away from allegations that Powell may have broken the law over the government building renovations, which could have provided a potential justification for termination. 4 Trump tours the building's construction site with Powell last month. REUTERS Congressional Republicans had suggested that Powell lied to a Senate committee — a crime punishable by five years in prison — by testifying that the building lacked various luxury features, insisting that plans had changed. Trump's budget chief, Russ Vought, then wrote to Powell last month pointing out an apparent Catch-22: that he may have violated the National Capital Planning Act by making unapproved changes to plans. Powell replied that he considered the changes minor enough that disclosure was not required. Trump, a billionaire real-estate developer, said he had no plans to fire Powell after touring the site on July 24 — attributing cost overruns to wasteful decisions including to retroactively build basements and parking spots beneath historic buildings just north of the National Mall. Trump has said he wants Powell to resign but that if he won't do so, he plans to empower a replacement when his term expires in May 2026 who will immediately move to lower interest rates by more than 2%.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
China may have more engineers, but it still lacks a culture of innovation
China announced last month a $100 billion push into artificial intelligence, intensifying what is already a fierce race for global tech dominance. Policymakers in Washington are watching with concern, and rightly so. China graduates more than 1.38 million engineers each year, about seven times more than does the U.S. The numbers sound alarming and suggest we're falling behind. But that's not the full story. While engineering degrees are critical, they don't guarantee technological leadership. What really drives innovation is not how many people you train, but how you train them. And here, China faces a deeper, cultural problem that raw output can't solve. The Chinese education system is highly structured and built for scale. But it's also rigid, top-down and deeply rooted in deference to authority. In most classrooms, memorization takes precedence over questioning and the teacher's word is rarely challenged. Correcting a professor's mistake could cause them to 'lose face,' a cultural breach that most students won't risk. This environment produces excellent test-takers but not risk-takers. It produces technical workers who are strong on facts but weak on critical thinking. They can follow a formula, but they struggle to break new ground. This is a key reason China, despite its massive engineering workforce, has yet to deliver the kind of world-changing breakthroughs we've seen from the U.S., from the microprocessor to the iPhone to mRNA vaccines. These innovations didn't come from rote learning. They came from interdisciplinary research, unorthodox thinking and cultures that reward questioning everything. Even when it comes to research output, China's surge in published papers masks a more complex reality. While China now leads the world in scientific publishing volume, scholars like Ming Xia have pointed out that much of this work lacks the originality, rigor and theoretical depth typical of Western scholarship. Plagiarism and fabrication remain persistent problems, even at top institutions. At Tsinghua University, one professor felt compelled to reassure students that if they wrote something publishable, he wouldn't steal it and submit it under his own name. The root issue is systemic. Many Chinese academics were trained in the same system they now uphold, one that prizes metrics and obedience over ideas and inquiry. As a result, scholarship often becomes descriptive, not theoretical. It explains what exists but rarely asks why it matters or how to build something new from it. Contrast that with American higher education. Our universities aren't perfect — they can be chaotic, expensive and uneven, but they're designed to cultivate thinkers, not just technicians. Students are encouraged to disagree with their professors, to explore across disciplines and to challenge the conventional wisdom. The freedom to question isn't a side effect of our system. It's the whole point. Yes, China has closed gaps in recent years by acquiring Western technology through joint ventures, forced transfers and even cyber espionage. But copying isn't creating. Without a culture that fosters original thought, China may scale existing tech but it won't lead the next wave of innovation. That doesn't mean the U.S. can relax. We need to double down on what works, investing in universities, supporting fundamental research and attracting the best minds from around the world. At the same time, we must protect critical technologies and intellectual property from exploitation. Still, we should remember what gives America an edge: a culture that values curiosity, dissent and the freedom to think differently. That's the foundation of every breakthrough we've ever made. In the long run, engineering dominance isn't just about how many degrees a country prints. It's about whether those engineers are trained to challenge the status quo and imagine something better. If the U.S. keeps leaning into its strengths of diversity, openness and academic freedom, we won't just keep pace with China. We will continue to lead.
