
Air Canada grounded as striking union defies order to get back to work
The carrier, which normally carries 130,000 people daily and is part of the global Star Alliance of airlines, had planned to start ramping up operations on Sunday evening, after a labour relations board ordered the union to return to work and start binding arbitration.
The union said no, setting up an almost unprecedented standoff with the Canadian government, which had requested the back-to-work order.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents 10,000 Air Canada cabin crew, had pushed for a negotiated solution, saying binding arbitration would take pressure off the airline.
The attendants are striking for better wages and to be paid for work on the ground, such as boarding passengers. They currently are only paid when planes are moving, sparking some vocal support from Canadians on social media.
CUPE invited Air Canada back to the table to "negotiate a fair deal," calling the order to end its strike unconstitutional.
The airline said it would delay plans to restart operations from Sunday until this evening and described the union as illegally defying the labour board.
The government's options to end the strike now include asking courts to enforce the order to return to work and seeking an expedited hearing.
The minority government could also try to pass legislation that would need the support of political rivals and approval in both houses of parliament, which are on break until September 15.
"The government will be very reticent to be too heavy-handed because in Canada the Supreme Court has ruled that governments have to be very careful when they take away the right to strike, even for public sector workers that may be deemed essential," said Dionne Pohler, professor of dispute resolution at Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School.
Another option is to encourage bargaining, Pohler said.
The government did not respond to requests for comment.
On Saturday, Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government moved to end the strike by asking the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order binding arbitration. The CIRB issued the order, which Air Canada had sought, and unionised flight attendants opposed.
The previous government, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, intervened last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy, but it is highly unusual for a union to defy a CIRB order.
The CUPE said its rejection was unprecedented when such an order was made according to rules, known as Section 107, that the government invoked in this case.
Travelers at Toronto Pearson International Airport over the weekend said they were confused and frustrated about when they would be able to fly.
Italian Francesca Tondini, 50, sitting at the Toronto airport, said she supported the union even though she had no idea when she would be able to return home.
"They are right," she said with a smile, pointing at the striking attendants.
The dispute between cabin crews and Air Canada hinges on the way airlines compensate flight attendants. Most, including Air Canada, have traditionally paid them only when planes are in motion.
In their latest contract negotiations, flight attendants in both Canada and the US have sought compensation for hours worked, including for tasks such as boarding passengers.
New labour agreements at American Airlines and Alaska Airlines legally require carriers to start the clock for paying flight attendants when passengers are boarding.
American's flight attendants are now also compensated for some hours between flights. United Airlines' cabin crews, who voted down a tentative contract deal last month, also want a similar provision.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Putin will face a 'rough situation' if he does not agree to a peace plan, Trump says
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has told Fox News that it will be a 'rough situation' if Russia does not agree to a peace plan. Trump made his comments speaking to Fox News, where he discussed yesterday's unprecedented meeting of European leaders in the White House as they seek an end to the war raging within Ukraine. The war, which has been ongoing for over three years, has shown no signs of slowing. This has lead to an increased diplomatic push for a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his US counterpart met in Washington yesterday to discuss the war after Trump's meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, which ended without a breakthrough. Flanked by European leaders, Zelenskyy and Trump gave statements to the media and posed for the 'family photograph' – which featured the two alongside President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen, French president Emmanuel Macron, Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni, Nato chief Mark Rutte, British prime minister Keir Starmer, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Finnish president Alexander Stubb. After the initial meeting, the leaders held a private meeting. Security guarantees were agreed for Ukraine by Trump as part of any agreement to end the war. Trump said that he then called Putin, who accepted this. Putin then told Trump that he is willing to meet Zelenskyy , while Zelenskyy said he was ready for what will be the first first face-to-face meeting between the two men since Russia's invasion of Ukraine nearly three and a half years ago. Advertisement FOX: What was the reaction among European leaders when you decided to call Putin during your meeting? TRUMP: I didn't do it in front of them. I thought that would be disrespectful to President Putin. — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 19, 2025 Today, speaking to Fox News, Trump said Putin would face a 'rough situation' if he did not co-operate in the peace process, while Volodymyr Zelenskyy had to 'show some flexibility'. He restated his position that Ukraine would not be able to get back Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, and would not be joining Nato as part of the peace deal. Ahead of a hoped-for meeting by the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, Trump told Fox News: 'I hope President Putin is going to be good and if he's not, that's going to be a rough situation. 'And I hope that Zelenskyy, President Zelenskyy, will do what he has to do. He has to show some flexibility.' Ukraine was 'not going to be a part of Nato', he said, but European troops would deter any future Russian invasion. '(Ukraine) are not going to be a part of Nato but we've got the European nations, so they'll front-load it and they'll have – some of them, France and Germany, a couple of them, the UK – they are going to have boots on the ground. 'I don't think it's going to be a problem, to be honest. I think Putin is tired of it, I think they are all tired of it, but you never know. We are going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks, that I can tell you.' He said it was 'possible he doesn't want to make a deal'. Related Reads Number of European leaders to join Zelenskyy in the White House tomorrow Trump and Putin end meeting in Alaska with no deal on Ukraine but insist 'progress' was made Later, he said, 'Our country has gone from a dead country one year ago. We're the hottest country in the world, and every one of those people said it yesterday. They said, 'in six months, you've made this the hottest country in the world'.' Trump added he was questioned about what would happen if US voters put 'some anti-business president' in the White House and continued: 'I said, 'well, life is full of nasty little surprises, but I don't think it's going to happen'.' On Europe, he said that the leaders present yesterday are 'very good people' who are 'very good leaders of their countries'. 'You know, they're consumed far more with this than we are, because they're right there… We have an ocean that's separating us […] a big, beautiful ocean, and they don't, you know, they're right there'. 'It's a different kind of a thing for them,' he added. On security, Trump said that 'they're willing to put people on the ground' and added: 'We're willing to help them with things, especially probably if you could talk about by air, because there's nobody has the kind of stuff we have.' With additional reporting by PA Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Strike by 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants declared illegal
The Canada Industrial Relations Board has declared a strike by 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants illegal and ordered them back on the job after they ignored an earlier order to return to work. The strike at Canada's largest airline entered its third day on Monday and is affecting about 130,000 travellers per day during the peak summer travel season. The two sides remain far apart on pay and other issues. We are in a situation where literally hundreds of thousands of Canadians and visitors to our country are being disrupted by this action. I urge both parties to resolve this as quickly as possible Air Canada suspended plans to restart operations on Sunday after the union defied an earlier return-to-work order. 'The members of the union's bargaining unit are directed to resume the performance of their duties immediately and to refrain from engaging in unlawful strike activities,' the Canada Industrial Relations Board board, or CIRB, said in a written decision. The board, an independent administrative tribunal that interprets and applies Canada's labour laws, said the union needs to provide written notice to all of its members by noon on Monday that they must resume their duties. It was not immediately clear what recourse the board or the government has if the union continues to refuse. 'We are in a situation where literally hundreds of thousands of Canadians and visitors to our country are being disrupted by this action,' Prime Minister Mark Carney said. 'I urge both parties to resolve this as quickly as possible.' Mr Carney said his jobs minister would have more to say later. He said it was disappointing that talks have not led to a deal, and added that it is important that flight attendants are compensated fairly at all times. Picketers march around the departures level at the Vancouver International Airport (Ethan Cairns/The Canadian Press via AP) The labour board previously ordered airline staff back to work by 2pm on Sunday and for the union to enter arbitration, after the government intervened. Air Canada then said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening. But when the workers refused, the airline said it would resume flights on Monday evening instead. However, there was no sign that the Canadian Union of Public Employees, or Cupe, would relent. Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day. Cupe national president Mark Hancock on Sunday had ripped up a copy of the initial back-to-work order outside Toronto's Pearson International Airport, and said members would not go back to work this week, to the cheers of picketing flight attendants. Flight attendants walked off the job around 1am EDT on Saturday, after turning down the airline's request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which allows a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract. Air Canada and Cupe have been in contract talks for about eight months, but remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work that flight attendants do when planes are not in the air. The airline's latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions, over four years, that it said 'would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada'. But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year did not go far enough because of inflation. Passengers whose flights are impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada. Last year, the government forced the country's two major railroads into arbitration with their labour union during a work stoppage. The union for the rail workers is suing, arguing the government is removing a union's leverage in negotiations.

The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Swatch says sorry for ‘slanted eyes' ad following online uproar in China
SWISS WATCHMAKER SWATCH has apologised and removed an advert featuring a model pulling the corners of his eyes after the image prompted accusations of racism and calls for a boycott on Chinese social media. Internet users slammed the 'slanted eye' gesture made by the Asian male model as racist. In a post on Instagram and Chinese social media platform Weibo on Saturday, Swatch acknowledged the 'recent concerns regarding the portrayal of a model' in the advert and said it had deleted the promotional material worldwide. 'We sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused,' the company wrote. Many online were not content with the company's response and continued to call for boycotting Swatch Group brands, which include Blancpain, Longines, and Tissot. A Weibo user with more than one million followers accused the company of 'racism against Chinese' and suggested the firm should be punished by regulators. Advertisement A screenshot of one of the ads on Swatch's site. The image has since been taken down. Others accused Swatch of deliberate discrimination and urged consumers to boycott the company. 'The brand's image has collapsed. (Swatch) thinks they can just apologise and salvage everything? It's not that simple,' another user wrote. China is one of Swatch Group's biggest markets. But along with many other Western luxury brands, the watchmaker has struggled to maintain growth as the world's second largest economy has slowed and consumers have shifted to more affordable brands. In July, the group reported an 11.2 per cent drop in net sales for the first six months of the year. It said the slump was 'exclusively attributable' to sluggish demand in China. Swatch is not the first foreign brand to face accusations of racist advertising in China. Italian luxury fashion brand Dolce & Gabbana was heavily criticised in 2018 after it posted promotional videos showing a Chinese model awkwardly using chopsticks to eat Italian food. In 2023, French brand Dior also sparked uproar with an advertisement showing a model pulling up the corner of her eye.