Here's what you need to know about credit card reward points
Perhaps you've seen someone relishing their business class upgrade, partly 'paid' for with points, on social media.
But, Angel Zhong — a professor of finance at RMIT University in Naarm/Melbourne — says points also come with risks.
If credit card point programs are a mystery to you, here's what you need to know.
Credit card rewards schemes, including point programs, vary from lender to lender, but the basic principles of each have a lot in common.
Professor Zhong says, "it really depends on the specific terms and conditions, but usually you get points for every dollar that you spend."
Reward points can then be spent on perks and benefits which differs between credit cards and institutions, but can include gift cards, retail purchases and discounted travel offers.
These type of credit cards may "also offer exclusive perks", such as "access to airport lounges, travel insurance and concierge services".
The government's MoneySmart site says credit card reward programs "sound good" because "you could earn points you can use to buy movie tickets or flights" just by spending on the card.
Toni Eager is a senior marketing lecturer at the Australian National University in Canberra, on the land of the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people.
She says rewards schemes, including points are "a way of keeping customers".
"People might like certain reward schemes more than others, or it's something that keeps people using the card that they already have rather than going out and looking for cheaper interest rates."
Dr Eager says consumers need to be financially literate to get good value from reward points schemes, which reward spending.
"Whether it encourages people to overspend or changes their spending habits comes down to financial literacy."
Consumer group Choice says credit cards are not for everyone.
"Unless you're a big spender, credit cards with rewards schemes are mostly a gimmick, and they nearly always charge hefty annual fees and high interest rates."
These costs can "easily nullify the rewards".
Professor Zhong also says to be mindful that "you pay for what you get." Credit cards with extra perks will also have higher fees and interest rates.
"It makes them more costly if you don't pay your balances in full or on time."
She also warns that banks and lenders can change their loyalty programs including the value of points, and points can also expire.
"Read the terms and conditions carefully, especially when it comes to the changing value of your points."
Prfoessor Zhong says, "point hackers" are people who regularly open and cancel credit cards. The practice is known as "credit card churning".
"You open multiple credit cards to take advantage of the bonuses, and then you close them and repeat the process again with new cards."
She says many lenders waive the first annual fee for these types of credit cards, which can also come with bonus offers (additional points or cashback for example) and a zero per cent balance transfer fee for a set period.
The card can then be cancelled before the annual fee for the second year is charged.
Initial bonuses usually come with conditions, such as "spending a certain amount in the first three months".
Professor Zhong says credit card churning can lower your credit score, and "frequent credit card application and cancellation might be a bit of a red flag" if you're applying for a mortgage.
Doing this with different credit cards simultaneously increases the risk you miss a repayment, or you fail to make full use of the rewards, she says.
MoneySmart recommends looking for a low interest rate and features you'll use in a credit card.
If you're considering a credit card with a reward scheme, "check if the benefits you get are worth the higher cost".
Professor Zhong says to "choose a card that aligns with your spending habits so that you can maximise the points [and] maintain a healthy financial lifestyle".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Relief in sight for homeowners as RBA poised for interest rate cut
The Reserve Bank of Australia is expected to announce its third cut in interest rates, after holding its rate in July despite the ongoing ease in inflation. According to a new Finder survey, 91 per cent of economists believe the RBA will cut the cash rate following its two-day meeting, which begins on Monday, with a 25 basis point cut bringing the cash rate down from 3.85 per cent to 3.60 per cent. The cash rate was held firm last month, with RBA governor Michele Bullock explaining the decision was about 'timing rather than direction', and was waiting on more data to confirm the decreasing inflation. At the end of July, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) published its quarterly inflation figures, which fell from 2.4 per cent to 2.1 per cent between March and June. Trimmed inflation, also known as underlying inflation, also dropped from 2.9 per cent to 2.7 per cent. Both headlining and underlying inflation rates are now within the RBA's 2-3 per cent target band, indicating inflation is low enough for the RBA to move forward. Mortgage holders are likely to be the biggest winners if the official cash rate is reduced on Tuesday. A homeowner with a $500,000 mortgage are set to save $2884 per year if the cash rate is passed on in full. Fnder head of consumer research Garahm Cooke said the RBA's failure to cut rates lash month was a disappointment for mortgage holders. 'If the RBA doesn't cut next week, they are risking an all-out attack on their legitimacy in the eyes of many homeowners,' he said. 'Last month's decision to hold shocked the market, and we are now seeing a 90 per cent plus certainty of a cut. With inflation well within the target range, there is no reason to hold. 'Banks will be under intense scrutiny to pass on a cut in full,' he said. Despite the overwhelming majority of economists predicting the fall in interest rates, University of Sydney's Stella Huangfu suggested the RBA should hold out for two reasons. 'First, June quarter trimmed mean annual CPI inflation is still 2.7 per cent, which is high within the 2–3 percentage target band and slightly above the RBA's forecast of 2.6 per cent,' she said.

ABC News
9 hours ago
- ABC News
Premier Rockliff announces phase out of greyhound racing in Tasmania
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff announces his government will cut funding to greyhound racing from 2029, effectively phasing out the industry in the state

News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Hostile countries could weaponise AI, cybersecurity expert warns
Artificial intelligence developed outside the West could teach Australians 'how to make a dirty bomb' and let authoritarian regimes push alternate realities, the country's leading cybersecurity expert says. Big tech is promising AI will revolutionise every aspect of modern life, from how people find information to how they do their jobs. The promise has been heard in capitals across the world, with governments scrambling to figure out how to reap the economic benefits of early adoption while also not knowing what they are dealing with. Jobs are top-of-mind, but the challenges stretch far beyond which roles could be stamped out in the relentless march of technological progress. Alastair MacGibbon is the chief strategy officer at CyberCX – a Canberra-based cybersecurity firm that helps government and businesses thwart threats from hostile states to private hackers. Among the biggest challenges of AI, according to Mr MacGibbon, is hostile governments waging informational warfare. 'The concept of AI models developed outside of the West being used in the West is highly problematic,' he told NewsWire. 'This is why I was so concerned about DeepSeek because with AI models, one can distort truth.' China's DeepSeek model wiped a trillion dollars in value off US tech titans when it launched in January. Nvidia alone suffered a $600bn blow. The disruption was largely because DeepSeek is free and open source, unlike its American rivals, meaning anyone with an internet connection can use it. While DeepSeek is backed by Chinese hedgefund High-Flyer, the platform is riddled with code linking it to the government. NewsWire earlier this year also confirmed DeepSeek had a deeply embedded bias that persisted even when the model was downloaded and run offline. It repeatedly refused to answer questions about the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. Mr MacGibbon said Beijing could tweak history and make it seem as though the massacre did not 'even happen'. 'Why wouldn't you ideologically want to poison the knowledge base of the world?' he said. 'More broadly, AI models are increasingly being trained on data that was AI generated, and you're sort of getting this weird sort of beigeness of truth that is being reflected in AI results. 'So imagine what an AI model that's trained by or developed in a totalitarian, revisionist regime will do for truth. 'It should scare people considering the role we see AI playing this generation.' Even Western models can get things wrong. Elon Musk's Grok repeatedly misidentified a photo of a severely emaciated girl in Gaza, telling users on X it was taken in Yemen in 2018. This photo by AFP's Omar al-Qattaa shows a skeletal girl in Gaza on August 2, 2025. But Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot says the image was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago — AFP News Agency (@AFP) August 6, 2025 The photo was taken by a photographer for Agence France-Presse in August this year. The news agency swiftly corrected Grok, which conceded it was mistaken. Upon review, the photo is indeed from Gaza, taken August 2, 2025, by AFP's Omar al-Qattaa, showing 9-year-old Mariam Dawwas, severely malnourished due to the ongoing conflict. Any prior misidentification as a 2018 Yemen image was an error, likely from visual similarities in… — Grok (@grok) August 7, 2025 But Western models have guardrails that block users from using them for harm, such as bomb-making. Mr MacGibbon said AI developed by non-Western countries could drop those safeguards, either by shoddy work or by design. 'It's easy enough to get around the guardrails of the semi-responsible Western AI companies, who vary from marginally responsible to marginally irresponsible in terms of their guardrails about social harm and their responsibility,' Mr MacGibbon said. 'Imagine people who want to cause harm and dissent. 'So the combination of truth no longer being the truth, and the ability to give you access to how to … throw sand in the gears of the West. 'I don't think that's at all beyond the realms of the madness of these regimes.'