Meat traders delighted after South Africa resumes poultry imports from Brazil
Image: File
The Association of Meat Importers and Exporters (AMIE) on Monday welcomed the formal resolution of the temporary suspension on poultry imports from Brazil.
Two weeks ago, the Department of Agriculture partially lifted the ban on imports of poultry and poultry products from Brazil, which was imposed due to an outbreak of Avian flu contained to one state in Brazil.
This resolution, confirmed by a directive issued by the Directorate of Animal Health on 4 July 2025, allows for the resumption of imports of poultry meat and products from all Brazilian states, except for specific consignments produced during the defined suspension period.
The AMIE also commended both the South African and Brazilian authorities for their constructive engagement in finalising the necessary veterinary certification and import protocols.
It said importers may now proceed with new applications for veterinary import permits in line with updated requirements.
AMIE CEO, Imameleng Mothebe, said that they were deeply encouraged by the conclusion of this process and extend their appreciation to the Department of Agriculture.
'The reopening of trade with Brazil is vital for ensuring the steady supply of poultry products, particularly mechanically deboned meat (MDM), which plays a critical role in the production of affordable processed meats,' Mothebe said.
'This resolution will help restore stability to the supply chain, ease cost pressures, and support food security for South African consumers.'
Mothebe also noted the clear procedural guidance provided by the department and encouraged all importers to comply fully with the new conditions to ensure a smooth and compliant re-entry of product into the market.
'We look forward to continued constructive collaboration with government and trade partners to strengthen South Africa's food system, and to ensure it remains resilient, safe, and accessible to all.'
Dipepeneneng Serage, deputy director-general for agricultural production, biosecurity and natural resources management at the Department of Agriculture, said they lifted the suspension ban owing to Brazil having declared free status at the World Organisation for Animal Health.
Serage said Brazil had contained the Avian flu and later eradicated the outbreak, which it managed to confine to one State of Rio Grande do Sul.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: Shoprite still the checkout champion in retail wars
While there are opportunities to make money in the South African economy, you have to be pretty selective about where you look. It's not news to you that South Africa's economic growth has been less than inspiring, leading to South Africans becoming poorer by global standards. Nedbank's recent results are evidence of lacklustre economic activity, with the bank struggling to get enough loans out into the wild to offset the impact of a dip in interest rates. In the retail sector, The Foschini Group put forward some fascinating arguments at their Capital Markets Day about the shocking trend in the average South African's real income (ie adjusted for inflation) over the past decade and why this is forcing the group to see its value offerings as the best local growth engine. These corporate nuggets are a useful reminder that while there are definitely opportunities to make money in the South African economy, you have to be pretty selective about where you look. One of the most interesting ways to see this play out each year is in the retail sector, a competitive bloodbath of companies trying to compete for some of the most price-sensitive consumers in the world. There's no rising tide that lifts all boats here. Instead, there are boats that can get past the challenging waves and there are others that are getting smashed into the harbour. Last week in this column, I covered Boxer vs Woolworths Food as an excellent example of the power of having a focused model in a difficult economy. It's amazing how the clothing retail sector is filled with executives who find themselves drawn to offshore opportunities (traps?), with Woolworths continuing to suffer an Australian hangover. The Foschini Group is unfazed by this, with a clear message to the market that they will continue to pursue an international strategy despite reporting disappointing numbers in their UK and Australian businesses. The grocery sector has also seen some truly ugly offshore expansion stories. Spar is the standout example, with the group still reeling from its European exposure. Closer to home, even a grocery giant like Shoprite has learnt some hard lessons from trying to grow in Africa. For better or worse, the local market is where the best money is to be made by our retailers. This is where they understand their customers and can execute sensible strategies around store formats, supply chains and acquisitions (where those opportunities are still available in the market). The success that Shoprite has seen through focusing on South Africa rather than Africa is lovely to behold, while even Pick n Pay is starting to see the benefits of a turnaround strategy that has simplification at its core. This brings us to this week's corporate updates, with important financial news coming in from market leader Shoprite and laggard Pick n Pay. Before digging into these numbers, it's worth noting that the year-to-date performance is poor for both stocks, with Shoprite down nearly 10% and Pick n Pay down 15%. Before the latest results came out, Pick n Pay was actually 'ahead' this year, ie less negative than Shoprite. The share price performance can tell a different story from the underlying business performance because of the expectations baked into the share price. The market has incredibly high expectations for Shoprite, with Pick n Pay seen as a much more speculative play. We'll start with Pick n Pay, before ending off with Shoprite at the top of the food chain. Positive momentum at Pick n Pay – unless you're a franchisee There's an incredibly odd situation at Pick n Pay that goes against conventional wisdom. The corporate-owned stores are showing a faster turnaround than the franchise stores, despite the latter typically benefiting from being owner managed. Although this sounds great in theory, the problem is that Pick n Pay has a vast base of franchise stores. For the turnaround to be successful, they need both corporate-owned and franchise stores to pull their weight. In the past three reported periods (being the first and second halves of FY25, as well as the first 17 weeks of FY26), corporate-owned stores grew turnover by 3.1%, 3.6% and 4.0% respectively. In stark contrast, franchise supermarkets managed -1.4%, 1.1% and 0.2% respectively. It's not hard to spot the more consistent story with positive momentum. As encouraging as the corporate-owned story is, Pick n Pay's efforts to shrink into profitability have led to a situation where total sales growth is non-existent. Essentially, the store closures are offsetting the growth in other stores. While this is the right decision in terms of the turnaround, it doesn't exactly tell a story of growth. Pick n Pay Clothing remains the gem, with an astonishing 12.5% increase in like-for-like sales in the latest 17-week period. While the timing of winter has played a role here and this isn't indicative of sustainable growth, this store format's consistently strong performance shows that Pick n Pay can still win when they get the model right. Lots of wagging tails at Shoprite Shoprite's latest update covers the 52 weeks to 29 June 2025, so it's not directly comparable to Pick n Pay's release. Still, it tells an incredible story of a group that just doesn't stop winning, with HEPS from continuing operations expected to be 9.4% to 19.4% higher. This was driven by sales growth of 8.9%, with Supermarkets RSA leading the charge with growth of 9.5%. Digging deeper into Supermarkets RSA reveals that Checkers and Checkers Hyper delivered growth of 13.8%, while Shoprite and Usave were far more modest at 5.2%. Boxer is giving Shoprite a proper go when it comes to lower-income shoppers, whereas higher-income shoppers have flocked to Checkers at a time when Pick n Pay has been shedding customers. It's not all good news, though. There's a concerning trend in sales momentum from the first half to the second half of the year, with Supermarkets RSA growing 10.4% in the first half and 8.5% in the second half. There's certainly nothing wrong with 8.5% growth, but Shoprite is trading on a demanding earnings multiple and any slowdown in growth will be a concern for the market. Unlike Pick n Pay, which must shrink into profitability, Shoprite is expanding in key verticals. They love the pet opportunity for example, with Petshop Science opening 60 new stores to take the total footprint to 144 stores. Interestingly, the worrying trend in the birth rate is on full display at Shoprite, with just one new Little Me store opened in this period, taking the total to 11 stores. With the furniture business being sold to Pepkor and with a decision to further reduce the exposure to certain countries in Africa, Shoprite's focused grocery strategy is working beautifully. They are experimenting in other categories, but they understand what the core of the business must be in order to continue being successful. The risk, as always, lies in overpaying for the shares. Based on the guided range for HEPS with a midpoint of R13.57, the price/earnings (P/E) multiple is just below 20x. My observation of retail stocks on the JSE is that they start to run out of puff at a P/E above 20x, so there's not much room for multiple expansion here. If Shoprite can maintain this kind of growth in HEPS though, investors won't need multiple expansion to be rewarded. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Lessons for SA from Brazil in balancing incoming investment with local industrial development
Extracting greater value from the BRICS partnership has been highlighted as a key strategy for South Africa to diversify export markets and attract investment – particularly in the face of the US tariffs now in effect, and warnings of further tariff hikes targeted at BRICS countries. However, we must strike a balance between investment that strengthens local manufacturing, creates jobs and stimulates export value, and investment that weakens local industrialisation and employment. Nelson Mandela Bay's economy is anchored in manufacturing, which is dominated by the assembly of automobile and auto components, as well as other sectors such as pharmaceuticals and beverages. The experience of the Brazilian automotive manufacturing sector, which has attracted more than $4.5-billion in investment from Chinese automakers over the past few years, provides a number of lessons on both sides of the equation that can be learnt by South Africa and other BRICS partners to ensure new investments are mutually beneficial. While Brazil succeeded in attracting substantial foreign investment, domestic production remained dominated by foreign components imports, with little use of locally manufactured components. This highlights a persistent challenge for Brazil and other emerging economies: how to leverage foreign investment for genuine industrial upgrading and localisation of components, rather than merely becoming a minor assembly point. South Africa is already experiencing a rapid influx of Asian-manufactured vehicles into our local market, edging out sales of locally produced vehicles. Incoming manufacturing investments include the assembly of imported vehicles that are already partly assembled with all their components (semi-knockdown, or SKD assembly), which add little value in terms of manufacturing employment or growing local component manufacturing. This production mode is eroding the strength that completely knockdown (CKD) manufacturing, as performed by the long-standing original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), brings to the local economy, with its far greater levels of investment, employment and localisation of manufacturing. CKD manufacturing enables deep value chains that develop an interconnected ecosystem of local Tier 1 and Tier 2 component manufacturing, along with a surrounding network of local suppliers of goods and services, that has a ripple effect into all other sectors of the economy. Given the current situation of not only the US tariffs but also the need to strengthen the policy and incentives environment to encourage CKD over SKD manufacturing, prevent dumping of cheap products into the South African market, and support local manufacturers to respond to the global shift to new energy vehicles, the experience of the Brazilian automotive industry warrants attention. Brazil is a key market for the global automotive industry, recognised as the world's sixth-largest car market and holding the dominant position in Latin America. Substantial market size coupled with its strategic role as a gateway to the broader Latin American region, makes Brazil an exceptionally attractive growth opportunity for global automakers. The country's expanding middle class and a growing demand for eco-friendly transport solutions, supported by government policy, further amplify its appeal, positioning it as a key destination for new energy vehicle exports and investment. The massive investments in Brazil by Chinese automakers, with their advanced EV technologies and aggressive expansion strategies, have disrupted the long-standing dominance of traditional Western and Japanese brands and Brazil's CKD auto manufacturing sector. This is similar to the disruption in South African automotive manufacturing, which has grown rapidly in the past five years. Like South Africa, Brazil faces a delicate balancing act between attraction of foreign direct investment with its long-standing objective of fostering a robust and self-sufficient local automotive industry. Tariff exemptions initially led to a rush of fully built-up Chinese vehicles into the Brazilian market, a 'dumping' strategy that undermined local manufacturers. Chinese investors initially pursued SKD assembly, importing most parts, particularly high-value EV batteries where China has substantial capacity. Job creation commitments were much lower than initially promised – due to factors including Brazil's substantial skills gaps, the use of imported labour and the lower job creation of SKD manufacturing and lack of creation of local supporting value chains of any substance. Due to different approaches to labour, Chinese companies also encountered significant friction with Brazil's strong labour union movement, attracting outrage at the treatment of workers. The focus on SKD assembly resulted in limited technology transfer and did not stimulate growth of local supply chains, reducing the industry to an assembly line dependent on China's value chains and imported labour, rather than enabling innovation and the creation of direct and indirect jobs as seen in CKD manufacturing. The influx of Chinese investment created a fundamental tension with Brazil's national industrial development goals, which aim for deep local value creation, job security and genuine technology transfer. Brazil has since reintroduced import tariffs on EVs, commencing in 2024 and projected to reach 35% by July 2026, serving as a significant policy driver compelling automakers to establish local production. It is also now implementing robust policies on investment, to deepen manufacturing supply value chains into component production, with policies also related to technology transfer and adherence to labour laws. Achieving sustainable long-term success in Brazil for automakers requires moving beyond assembly to deeper localisation, investing in local research and development and skills development, and proactively engaging with labour unions to build trust and ensure compliance. For the Brazilian government, a refined industrial policy that actively incentivises technology transfer, supports local supplier development and invests strategically in critical infrastructure and workforce retraining is paramount to truly harness the benefits of the EV transition and foreign investment for national industrial upgrading. In moving to ensure that investment meets local industrialisation and employment goals, Brazil has flexed its considerable muscle – as a top-tier global automotive market and having a significant renewable energy matrix – to ensure that it is not a passive recipient of foreign investment. It actively employs policy tools, such as tariffs and the 'green mobility and innovation programme' (Mover), to assert its national interests. By insisting on local production and job creation, Brazil positions itself as a critical arena for global EV dominance. The willingness of major Chinese automotive players to adapt to local market demands, such as producing ethanol-flex hybrids, underscores Brazil's significant leverage in shaping the terms of engagement for foreign automakers. This adaptation to local needs and policies is a testament to Brazil's ability to influence foreign investment to align with its unique market characteristics. A further consideration as South Africa seeks to strengthen trade and investment relationships with the BRICS countries is that of the nature of the exports. While South Africa's exports to the European Union and to BRICS and related markets are roughly equivalent at about $20-billion per annum, there is a key difference in that exports to BRICS comprise mostly unbeneficiated minerals and other raw materials while those to the EU (and the US) are, in addition to minerals, more focused on a diversified range of added-value manufactured products. In the latter case, innovation is stimulated, intellectual property generated and higher-value employment is created along with integrated value chains. South Africa needs to shift the balance of its trading equation from being a source of low-margin raw materials to a source of high-margin, value-added products, as well as a destination for value-adding investment. Another key factor to ensure the sustainability of CKD vehicle manufacturing is to make it an entry requirement for incoming investors to not only compete in the domestic market, but to also have export markets for vehicles and/or locally produced components. Simply displacing domestic vehicle sales of OEMs who already produce in the country, further exacerbates the risk of factory closures. In the same way that there needs to be rules of entry for manufacturers entering the country, this also needs to be in place to ensure that orderly and responsible exits take place from the market. This should be centred on protecting the surrounding ecosystem of suppliers, and providing a level of mitigation and transition support to enable them to explore alternative options. We can retain local manufacturing by putting mutually beneficial investment and trading relationships at the centre of negotiations, rather than perpetuating extractive relationships. This we believe is essential if we are serious about retaining and attracting investment and employment, especially in the Bay, which is the area in South Africa most adversely affected by the current global trade shifts. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
TymeBank's R750m lending leap via acquisition of SanlamTyme JVCo
As the Competition Tribunal approval clears the way for TymeBank's acquisition of SanlamTyme JVCo and the SPL loan book, CEO Karl Westvig's commitment to fair lending faces its biggest test yet. The last time TymeBank CEO Karl Westvig spoke to Daily Maverick, he made bold promises about the digital bank's approach to loan books. 'The mission has always been to be able to profitably bank an entry-level customer… And it's not through the cross sell. It's through core banking,' he insisted. This is banking philosophy 101 from someone who clearly reads the right textbooks, but the market has a way of testing such noble intentions. TymeBank is paying R31.5-million for the 50% JVCo stake, plus approximately R400-million for half of Sanlam's loan book, plus another R320-million for a reference share entitling it to half of the credit life insurance profits from the JVCo loan book. That's a R750 million bet on an expanded lending business for a bank that has built its reputation on being different. 'These are some of the most abused people in the world,' Westvig acknowledged when previously discussing his predominantly low-income customer base. It's rare blunt honesty from a banking executive about the vulnerable position of South Africa's unbanked and underbanked population. Walking in Capitec's shadow Westvig was quick to draw a comparison with the titan of Techno Park that lords over SA's banking sector. 'Capitec fundamentally was a lending business… We've built our business as a transaction-led and savings-led bank.' It was a fair point, but also slightly disingenuous. Capitec's lending-first approach has made it one of South Africa's most profitable banks, particularly among lower-income customers. TymeBank's transaction and savings model might sound more palatable, but profitability in banking, especially when serving entry-level customers, typically requires some form of credit extension. Which brings us to the elephant in the room: this SanlamTyme acquisition is precisely about getting into lending in a bigger way. The question becomes whether TymeBank can maintain its 'fair and reasonable and competitive' lending promise while dealing with the realities of default rates and collection challenges that come with unsecured lending to financially vulnerable customers. Playing the loan game Here's the challenge: TymeBank is inheriting an existing loan book from Sanlam Personal Loans. The collection practices, interest rates, and terms of these existing loans were set by Sanlam, not TymeBank. How the digital bank handles this transition, particularly any customers who may be struggling with repayments, will be the first real test of Westvig's non-predatory commitment. The broader South African lending market is notorious for aggressive collection practices, astronomical interest rates on unsecured loans, and terms that can trap borrowers in cycles of debt. TymeBank's entry into this space, regardless of good intentions, puts it in direct competition with established players who have built profitable businesses on precisely the practices Westvig claims to oppose. What this means for you Expect TymeBank to launch more personal loan options soon, but without the exploitative hooks. If you've been excluded from formal credit before, this deal could open the door. For South Africans tired of tiered fees and opaque charges, TymeBank just got a lot more powerful. The numbers will tell the story The transaction's longstop date is 31 March 2026, with Sanlam planning to reinvest the proceeds into its broader growth strategy. That gives TymeBank roughly 18 months to prove that its approach can work at scale in the lending business. The success of this venture will ultimately be measured not by Westvig's well-intentioned statements about financial inclusion and fair lending, but by TymeBank's loan loss provisions, default rates and, most importantly, customer complaints about collection practices in the quarters ahead. If TymeBank can indeed provide competitive, fair lending to South Africa's underbanked population while maintaining profitability, it would represent a genuine breakthrough in financial inclusion. But the graveyard of financial services is littered with good intentions that couldn't survive market realities. DM
