
US judge blocks Trump plan to close Harvard's doors to international students
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued an injunction barring Trump's administration from carrying out its latest bid to curtail Harvard's ability to host international students amid an escalating fight pitting the Republican president against the prestigious Ivy League school.
The preliminary injunction extends a temporary order the judge issued on June 5 that prevented the administration from enforcing a proclamation Trump signed a day earlier that cited national security concerns to justify why Harvard could no longer be trusted to host international students.
She ruled after Trump's Friday announcement that his administration could announce a deal with Harvard 'over the next week or so' to resolve the White House's campaign against the university, which has waged a legal battle against the administration's various actions against the school.
Trump signed the proclamation after his administration had already frozen billions of dollars in funding to the oldest and wealthiest U.S. university, threatened Harvard's tax-exempt status and launched several investigations into the school.
The proclamation prohibited foreign nationals from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programs for an initial period of six months, and directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard.
But Burroughs said Trump's administration was likely violating Harvard's free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment by retaliating against it for refusing to meet its demands to cede control over the school's curriculum and admissions and by targeting it based on what officials viewed as the university's left-leaning orientation.
The judge said that 'at its root, this case is about core constitutional rights that must be safeguarded: freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom of speech, each of which is a pillar of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism.'
'Here, the government's misplaced efforts to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints seemingly because they are, in some instances, opposed to this Administration's own views, threaten these rights,' she wrote.
Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard said the ruling will allow it to continue hosting international students and scholars while this case moves forward. It added it will continue to defend the rights of the school, its students and scholars.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The university has filed two separate lawsuits before Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, seeking to unfreeze around $2.5 billion in funding and to prevent the administration from blocking the ability of international students to attend the university.
The latter lawsuit was filed after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows it to enroll foreign students.
Almost 6,800 international students attended Harvard in its most recent school year, making up about 27% of its student population.
Noem, without providing evidence, accused the university of 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party.'
Her action was temporarily blocked by Burroughs almost immediately. While the Department of Homeland Security has since shifted to challenging Harvard's certification through a lengthier administrative process, Burroughs at a May 29 hearing said she planned to issue an injunction to maintain the status quo, which she did officially on Friday.
A week after the hearing, Trump signed his proclamation, which cited concerns about Harvard's acceptance of foreign money including from China and what it said was an inadequate response by the school to his administration's demand for information on foreign students.
His administration has accused Harvard of creating an unsafe environment for Jewish students and allowing antisemitism to fester on its campus. Protests over U.S. ally Israel's treatment of Palestinians during its war in Gaza have roiled numerous universities' campuses, including Harvard's.
Rights advocates have noted rising antisemitism and Islamophobia in the U.S. due to the war. The Trump administration has thus far announced no action over anti-Arab and anti-Muslim hate. Harvard's own antisemitism and Islamophobia task forces found widespread fear and bigotry at the university in reports released in late April.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Markets steady amid global turmoil as investors bet on resilience despite rising geopolitical tensions
An eerie calm has descended over markets. Despite the ongoing geopolitical uncertainty that has been playing out over the last few weeks, with the grim escalation of war between Israel and Iran, and then the US even entering the fray before a fragile truce took hold this week — investors have refused to panic. Economic data paints a similarly bleak picture. Last week, the World Bank slashed its prediction for global growth to 2.3%, and US growth to 1.4%. It warned that if Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs resumed when the 90-day pause ended on Tuesday, 8 July 2025, global trade could seize up in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also sharply downgraded its US growth projection and raised its inflation forecast. Stagflation, the toxic combination of economic stagnation with stubborn inflation, is increasingly a possibility. And yet investors have not blinked. Since the tariff announcement in early April, equity markets have rallied. The S&P 500 has surged 24% from its April lows and now hovers near record highs. And while 10-year US Treasury yields have climbed nearly a full percentage point since last autumn to 4.4% (bond yields move inversely to prices), they too have stabilised — despite constant worries over deteriorating US fiscal projections. As this column predicted would happen in April, markets have climbed a 'wall of worry'. Three factors may explain this apparent calm. First is the built-in assumption that Trump's bark is worse than his bite, and that in the end he 'chickens out'. This has been dubbed the 'Taco' trade, or Trump always chickens out. Here, his negotiating style is seen as deliberately extreme, designed to shock with such unthinkable opening gambits that opponents subsequently accept a moderated offer largely more favourable to the US but within the realms of economic and political sanity. This pattern has played out on tariffs and even with his measured military moves against Iran, where targeted initial strikes were followed by aggressive rhetoric on regime change. Then, after Iran's retaliation was brushed off as 'very weak', he proudly announced 'CEASEFIRE' and the end of the '12 Day War'. Investors are gambling that these threats won't escalate into actual policy disasters. Risks Of course, this assumption carries risks. One day Trump may decide to prove his critics wrong and follow through. Or these dangerous gambits could spiral into unintended conflict, such as happened in the brief but alarming US-China trade war. Investors are clearly betting that the Taco trade holds when it comes to Trump 'implementing' the so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs on 8 July. He will have to rapidly announce some sort of face-saving compromise in the next few weeks as there are still glaringly few signs of his '90 deals in 90 days'. The second factor is that as with everything regarding the market, it is a question of timing. While wars in the Middle East, higher oil prices, looming tariffs and a slowing global economy are theoretically not great for markets, for the moment corporate earnings remain strong, especially those of the mega cap tech stocks underpinning the markets. Any potential downside seems to be rather distant, and until then investors want to participate. As long as companies continue to deliver, investors fear missing out on gains more than they fear the potential downside. Even the Bank for International Settlements, which warned last week of uncertainty from tariffs dragging on investment and output, predicts that the most significant impact will hit in 2026 — not this year. Finally, markets tend not to notice the accumulative effects of myriad threats until something bad enough happens to trigger a collective meltdown. The last two great bear markets of the last three decades — the Covid pandemic and the financial crisis sparked by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 — followed periods when markets brushed off multiple warning signs. It often takes a 'black swan' event to shatter this complacency. Catalyst And if that happens, the catalyst is more likely to come from the US economy than the Middle East. While tariffs and oil prices are clear risks, much of current economic data suggests surprising resilience: the labour market remains solid, inflation is moderating, and corporate results are still strong. But if unemployment starts rising materially, inflation jumps up or if economic weakness spreads to the financial system and triggers tighter credit, the calm could break quickly. Seasoned traders are already seeing cracks starting to show in equities. The US dollar, which baffled many by weakening in the first quarter despite tariff threats, has resumed its role as a safe haven, rising since Israel's strike on Iran. Where it goes over the next few months will be critical in determining whether it really continues to be the world's safe haven. Perhaps even more important will be the US bond market, which could well be where the first landmines start exploding. This column has previously warned of the dangers lurking in the US debt market. Rapidly rising US bond yields, such as what happened in April, would once again trigger panic. Emerging markets, such as South Africa, are already feeling the strain. South African equities have sold off from their recent all-time high, and while the rand has strengthened against the greenback since early April, it is now trading sideways. Investors should remain extremely cautious. Despite the global economy supposedly looking resilient in the face of geopolitical carnage, it will not take much for markets to take fright. This is particularly true of emerging markets like South Africa. While recent months have allowed savvy investors to claw back earlier losses, that window of opportunity may be closing. Now is not the time for complacency — but for caution. DM

The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Israel says Iran violated ceasefire announced by Trump, orders new strikes
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he had ordered the military to strike Tehran in response to what he said were missiles fired by Iran in a violation of the ceasefire announced hours earlier by US President Donald Trump. Iran denied violating the ceasefire. The armed forces general staff denied there had been a launch of missiles towards Israel in recent hours, Iran's Nour News reported. The developments raised early doubts about the ceasefire, intended to end 12 days of war. Katz said he had ordered the military to 'continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran' in light of 'Iran's blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the president of the US'. Hours earlier, Trump had posted on Truth Social: 'The ceasefire is in effect. Please do not violate it.' Israel and Iran had confirmed the ceasefire after it was announced by Trump. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had achieved the goals it had set in launching its June 13 surprise attack on Iran to destroy its nuclear programme and missile capabilities. 'Israel thanks President Trump and the US for their support in defence and their participation in eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat,' Netanyahu said. Iran said its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes and denied seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Iran's top security body, the Supreme National Security Council, said its military had forced Israel to 'unilaterally accept defeat and accept a ceasefire'. Iran's forces would 'keep their hands on the trigger' to respond to 'any act of aggression by the enemy', it said. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi had earlier said Iran would halt its retaliatory strikes provided Israel stopped attacking at 4am in Tehran. Global stock markets surged and oil prices tumbled on Tuesday after the announcement of the ceasefire in the hope it heralded a resolution of the war two days after the US joined it by hitting Iranian nuclear sites with huge bunker-busting bombs. Reuters


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump says Iran-Israel ceasefire in force
JERUSALEM - US President Donald Trump said a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was in force on Tuesday, urging both sides to "not violate it" on the 12th day of the war between the two arch-foes. "THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. The US leader had earlier said the truce would be a phased 24-hour process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations first. He said Israel would follow suit 12 hours later. Israeli rescuers said four people were killed in an Iranian strike, after state media in the Islamic republic reported waves of missiles were headed toward Israel. Neither Iran nor Israel have confirmed the agreement touted by Trump on ending the conflict that has killed hundreds in Iran and two dozen in Israel. Only hours before Trump's latest announcement, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had said that "as of now, there is NO 'agreement' on ceasefire or cessation of military operations". "However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 am Tehran time, we have no intention to continue our response afterwards," he said on social media. But Israel's army said sirens were activated in northern Israel - where moments before Iran's state broadcaster IRIB reported a wave of missiles were headed. At least four people were killed in the multi-wave Iranian missile attack shortly before the staggered ceasefire announced by Trump was meant to enter into force, emergency services and the military said. The Magen David Adom rescue service said three people were pronounced dead at the scene of a strike in the southern city of Beersheba while a fourth was added in an update to its figures. Explosions also continued to rock Tehran overnight, with blasts in the north and centre of the Iranian capital described by AFP journalists as some of the strongest since the conflict broke out. Any cessation in hostilities would come as a huge relief to world leaders frantic about an escalation in violence igniting a wider conflagration. The adversaries had been swapping missile fire since Israel carried out surprise "preemptive" strikes against Iran on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites, and prompting Trump to warn of a possible "massive" regional conflict. STRIKES ON US BASE The US leader's truce announcement came hours after Iran launched missiles at the largest US military facility in the Middle East - Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar - in a move Trump shrugged off as "very weak." Calling for a de-escalation, Trump said Tehran had given advance notice of the barrage. Iran's National Security Council confirmed having targeted the base "in response to the US aggressive and insolent action against Iran's nuclear sites and facilities". But it added that the number of missiles launched "was the same as the number of bombs that the US had used" - a signal that it had calibrated its response to be directly proportional rather than escalatory. "This was calibrated and telegraphed in a way that would not result in any American casualties, so that there is an off ramp for both sides," Ali Vaez, a senior advisor at the International Crisis Group, told AFP. The offensive came after the United States joined its ally Israel's military campaign against Iran, attacking an underground uranium enrichment centre with massive bunker-busting bombs and hitting two other nuclear facilities overnight Saturday into Sunday. As international concern mounted that Israel's campaign and the US strikes could ignite a wider conflict, French President Emmanuel Macron insisted that "the spiral of chaos must end" while China warned of the potential economic fallout. 'BLATANT AGGRESSION' Iran said its assault in Qatar wasn't targeting the Middle Eastern neighbour, but the government in Doha accused Tehran of "blatant aggression" and claimed its right to a "proportional" response. Iran's state media quoted the Revolutionary Guard Corps announcing that six missiles had hit Al Udeid, which had been evacuated beforehand, according to the Qataris. The broadside was made up of "short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles," a US defence official said. AFP reporters heard blasts in central Doha and in Lusail, north of the capital, on Monday evening, and saw projectiles moving across the night sky. Iranians gathered in central Tehran to celebrate, images on state TV showed, with some waving the flag of the Islamic republic and chanting "Death to America". Qatar earlier announced the temporary closure of its airspace in light of "developments in the region", while the US embassy and other foreign missions warned their citizens to shelter in place. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people, Iran's health ministry has said. Twenty-four people have died in Iran's attacks on Israel, according to official figures.