Labour ‘only just getting started' says Starmer as he faces ‘tax raid' questions
The Prime Minister said he would not 'write the budget months out' from the autumn, after Kemi Badenoch alleged the Treasury could introduce a pensions levy.
Reflecting on his first year in Downing Street, Sir Keir told the Commons that Labour MPs will 'happily' face their constituents during the summer recess, which begins next week.
He claimed the Government had already paved the way for 4.5 million extra NHS appointments and added: 'So we're going to tell our constituents that, then we're going to tell them about the free school meals we're rolling out, free breakfast clubs, the free childcare and school uniform costs. We'll tell them about that.
'And then when we've done that, we'll move on to affordable houses and tell them about the £39 billion we're investing. When we've finished that, we'll tell them about the rail and road upgrades across the country with a £120 billion investment and, of course, the three trade deals.
'And, Mr Speaker, we're only just getting started.'
Sir Keir was responding to Mrs Badenoch during their final Prime Minister's Questions exchange before the recess, after the Conservative leader said: 'It's the end of term, so why don't we go through his end-of-term scorecard? The economy is contracting; inflation, highest in the G7; unemployment up every month under this Government; spending out of control, borrowing costs more expensive than Greece, and this is just the first year.'
She also told MPs: 'The fact is, this summer, they're going to have to go to their constituents and explain why they've been making such a mess over the last 12 months.
'And isn't (it) the case that the worst – given that this is just their first year – the worst is yet to come?'
Mrs Badenoch had earlier pressed Sir Keir to describe a 'modest income'.
Referring to a rise in inflation to 3.6% in June, up from 3.4% in May, she said: 'We just heard that inflation is up again, the worst in the G7.
'We left him with 2% inflation. We have borrowing up, unemployment up, taxes are up under his Government.
'The fact is, the Prime Minister doesn't get it, so let me tell him: his budget last year had high taxes. That's why the economy is contracting.
'But the Government has said that they won't put up taxes for people on modest incomes, but they also seem incapable of explaining who is in that category.
'So can the Prime Minister clear up the confusion and tell us what he thinks a modest income is?'
Sir Keir replied: 'I think of the working people across this country who put in every day and don't get back what they deserve, and that's who we're working for. That's who we're fixing the country (for).
'The sort of people that work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy themselves out of problems.
'And that's who we're working for, and that's why we put the national living wage up, that's an extra £1,400.'
He added: 'We know exactly who we're working for. She comes here every week and just talks the country down.'
Mrs Badenoch denied that and added: 'I'm talking him down.'
She said: 'The Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Darren Jones) said that working people are people who don't get a pay slip, but millions of self-employed people don't get a pay slip. So are the self-employed next in line for a Labour tax raid?'
The Prime Minister replied: 'The self-employed were the very people who suffered under their watch, repeatedly suffered under their watch, particularly, if I remember, during Covid, when they didn't get the support that they needed. But she talks the country down. She cherry picks.'
Mrs Badenoch said the Government is 'considering taxing' pension contributions and asked: 'Does the Prime Minister agree with me that a tax on pension contributions is a tax on working people?'
The Prime Minister described his party's manifesto commitments made last year as 'absolutely clear' and said: 'I'm not going to write the budget months out.'
He continued: 'I'm proud of the decisions that we took to invest in our NHS, to invest in our public services, all the decisions that they opposed. And it's no wonder that after a first year of a Labour Government business confidence is (at) a nine-year high. That's longer than she's been in government.'
To a call of 'withdraw' from the Opposition benches, Sir Keir replied: 'I'm not withdrawing – I'm going to repeat: business confidence is at a nine-year high.'
A Conservative spokesman later said: 'Labour won't rule out hitting the self-employed with new taxes.
'They won't rule out a tax raid on pensions. And the Prime Minister says 'modest incomes' refers to anyone without savings, raising the prospect of a tax on savings in the autumn. Labour are treating working people with contempt.
'Hiking taxes is not inevitable – it is a choice brought on by the Government's economic incompetence.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Do not let LGBT veterans scheme to ‘become damaged', 45 MPs urge Healey
In a letter to John Healey, the cross-party MPs warned that some veterans facing financial crisis are 'suffering from severe mental health issues' without support 'from the outset'. LGBT veterans who faced mistreatment, including dismissal and bullying, because of their sexuality between July 1967 and January 2000 can make a claim through a financial recognition scheme worth £75 million. Liberal Democrat MP Ben Maguire, who signed the letter, accused the Government of 'now failing the very veterans they pledged to support'. The North Cornwall MP said: 'The slow pace of delivery is unacceptable and causing avoidable distress. 'Many of these LGBT veterans have already endured lifetimes of shame, stigma and rejection.' Mr Maguire added: 'These veterans should not have to suffer all over again because of bureaucratic delays. 'That's why I'm very pleased to have colleagues from right across Parliament join me in demanding faster payments, and clearer transparency, for MPs and the public.' The letter has 46 backers in total, including the Liberal Democrats' defence spokeswoman Helen Maguire, several Labour and Plaid Cymru MPs, and Stonewall charity co-founder Lord Cashman. Dame Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative MP for Gosport who also signed the letter, told the PA news agency that LGBT veterans had faced an 'injustice that's gone on for far too long'. The MPs have requested that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) 'widens the criteria for prioritisation to include all those in financial crisis', to applicants 'who are in most need of a swift decision suffering from financial crisis – not just when they are in ongoing bankruptcy proceedings in court'. Fast-tracked applicants under the existing scheme include claimants who are facing bankruptcy or having their home repossessed through a court process. 'Many of these veterans who are in financial crisis, but are not yet in the court system, are still suffering from severe mental health issues because of a lack of financial support provided by the redress scheme from the outset,' the MPs warned. They suggested that instead of making veterans who were dismissed or administratively discharged wait for their full award, 'by making an immediate payment of £50,000 to all these veterans who qualify, the MoD can alleviate the pressure and anger being felt by this community and would provide a quick win for the MoD' before a panel considers whether to issue further payouts on a case-by-case basis. 'These veterans have struggled immensely to progress their claims, and after years of waiting for signs of hope are still waiting for settlement and closure,' the MPs added. 'We cannot allow this process to become damaged in the same way as other compensation schemes have.'
ITV News
15 minutes ago
- ITV News
Northumberland to be linked to 'world's biggest' offshore wind farm as plans approved
A massive offshore wind farm, which will be linked to Northumberland, has been approved by the Scottish Government. Developers behind the project have called it the "world biggest" offshore wind farm. Berwick Bank will feature up to 307 turbines, and SSE Renewables say they would provide 4.1 gigawatts of capacity, enough to power up to six million homes annually. The turbines would be in Scottish waters off the coast of East Lothian, and would have two links to the grid via undersea cables - one at Blyth in Northumberland, and the other near Dunbar in East Lothian. Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes welcomed the approval, saying the Government had given the application 'extremely careful consideration'. She said: 'The decision to grant consent to Berwick Bank is a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy.' Developers SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds to be approved by ministers. UK Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said the announcement means there have been enough wind farms approved in the UK to meet the Government's ambition of delivering clean power by 2030. He said: 'We welcome this decision, which puts us within touching distance of our offshore wind targets to deliver clean power by 2030 – boosting our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower.'
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Keir Starmer already U-turning on Palestine?
The statement Keir Starmer made on Tuesday announcing the government's intention to recognise the state of Palestine sounded as if it had been drafted and re-drafted so many times that no one thought to check if it still made grammatical or logical sense. Hence the initial confusion: did this mean Britain will recognise Palestine or not? The statement said the government would do so at the United Nations General Assembly in September 'unless…' the Israeli government did four things. But one of the conditions listed was a commitment to a two-state solution, something to which Benjamin Netanyahu would never agree. So it seemed clear that, whatever the deliberate ambiguities of the rest of the statement, recognition would be going ahead in September. It was a victory for those members of the cabinet who had been pushing for it – David Lammy, Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper, Wes Streeting and others – with the support of the silent majority of Labour MPs. Not that there was any triumphalism – unless you count Emily Thornberry, Labour chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, saying: 'I think it's great news' – because the situation in Gaza is so serious and the chances of recognition making a difference on the ground are so small. But there was no question that this was an important shift in government policy that had been brought about by quiet pressure behind the scenes from the Parliamentary Labour Party. Then questions started to be asked about the rest of the prime minister's statement: about the demand that Hamas release the hostages and the phrase 'no one side will have a veto' on the government's final decision in September. Did that mean that recognition of Palestine would be conditional on the release of the hostages? When Starmer was asked, in a short encounter with journalists today, he wouldn't give a Yes or No answer to that question, which I take to be the equivalent of 'No'. So I think British recognition will go ahead, unless something dramatic happens over the next month, such as Netanyahu ceasing to be prime minister of Israel. I don't think Starmer wanted to make this change. But I think he was going to do it before Emmanuel Macron changed French policy on recognition last week. Macron set the context, and Mark Carney, the leader of the third G7 nation to make the switch, confirmed it with his announcement last night. What mattered above all was the state of opinion among Labour MPs. Starmer can remember what happened to Tony Blair in July 2006 – and if he can't, Jonathan Powell, his national security adviser, who was Blair's chief of staff, can remind him. That was when Israel responded to Hezbollah's killing of two Israeli soldiers by invading Lebanon. Labour MPs wanted Blair to condemn this 'disproportionate' response. Blair refused. Labour MPs wrote letters demanding a change of leadership. Tom Watson, a junior defence minister, resigned. By September, Blair was visiting a north London academy school to announce that the imminent annual Labour conference would be his last as prime minister – although he didn't actually leave office for another nine months. Starmer, after a year in Downing Street, is in a similar position to Blair after nine years. Blair, having already said he wouldn't fight another election, refused to bow to his party. 'If I had condemned Israel, it would have been more than dishonest,' Blair wrote in his memoir. 'It would have undermined the world view I had come to hold passionately. So I didn't.' Starmer cannot afford such a devil-may-care attitude, so he has yielded to pressure from his MPs. There have been some attempts to explain the shift in his position that I think are not quite right. He is trying to head off the Corbyn-Sultana party, it is said, especially in constituencies, such as his own, with a significant Muslim vote. These are factors, of course, although the Corbynites are not going to be assuaged by recognition of Palestinian statehood – Zarah Sultana thinks Starmer belongs in The Hague, presumably for the crime of disagreeing with her. But the main reason Starmer has shifted his position is because Labour MPs demanded it. No prime minister can defy their parliamentary party for long on an issue that they care about. That is why Starmer U-turned on the winter fuel payment and on disability benefits, and it is why he has U-turned on this. Whatever you may think of the right or wrong of the final position – and I can guess what Blair's view would be on each of them – the reason for it is that it is what the majority of Labour MPs want. They want to recognise Palestine because they think it is a way to try to end the conflict in Gaza. Some of them may want to appease their constituents, but most of them are sincere in their horror of this unequal war – in which they reflect British public opinion generally. Whatever anyone thinks of Starmer's decision, they should not be surprised by his instinct for survival.
