logo
Wary response in Bay Area after Trump reportedly halts workplace raids at farms, hotels, eateries

Wary response in Bay Area after Trump reportedly halts workplace raids at farms, hotels, eateries

As the Trump administration reportedly pauses immigration raids and arrests across most of the agricultural industry and hotels and restaurants, some Californians working in those sectors predicted the move will do little more than offer a false sense of security for undocumented workers.
'This is not a victory,' said Reyna Maldonado, owner of Las Guerreras, a Mexican restaurant in downtown Oakland. 'It's a political calculation, and we have every reason to remain skeptical.'
The Trump administration on Thursday directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to largely put a hold on enforcement operations across agricultural restaurant and hotel workplaces, according to an email obtained by the New York Times and reported by other outlets. The direction came as President Donald Trump acknowledged on social media that his aggressive immigration crackdown was hurting industries that he counted on for support.
'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he wrote in a social media post.
The industries singled out by Trump are major operators in California, so the impacts of an immigration crackdown and a potential reversal could be significant. The state produces more than a third of the nation's vegetables and three quarters of its fruits and nuts, according to the state agricultural department. California is also the top tourism destination in the country.
The policy shift comes amid a push by the administration to detain and deport more undocumented immigrants that has sparked massive protests, particularly in California. Trump has deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines in response to ongoing demonstrations in Los Angeles.
Workplace raids have been part of immigration agents' strategy, but they've also detained many immigrants showing up to required court appearances in San Francisco and elsewhere. The expansion of raids to include non-criminals working in various industries has been particularly controversial.
Prior to reports of the policy shift, the California Farm Bureau on Friday put out a statement saying that the administration's immigration enforcement tactics were 'having a disruptive effect on California's rural communities and the farmers, ranchers, workers and families who live and work there.'
'If federal immigration enforcement activities continue in this direction, it will become increasingly difficult to produce food, process it and get it onto grocery store shelves,' Bryan Little, senior director of policy advocacy at the California Farm Bureau, said in the statement.
Rumors of immigration raids spread across California's Central Valley fields this week, stoking fear among laborers and leading some to stay home from work.
Andy Naja-Riese, CEO of Agricultural Institute of Marin, which operates more than a half dozen farmers markets, said Saturday he was hopeful that those who are working in the fields would not be subject to deportations and that they could 'continue to do the work that they do and stay here with their families and their neighbors.'
In Oakland, Maldonado, a Mexican immigrant and recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, has held several team meetings in recent weeks to talk with her restaurant staff about evacuation plans in case of a raid and to ensure that everyone, including undocumented workers, knew their rights.
'It's been extremely difficult for all of us to come to work with so much tension and stress,' she said. 'As business owners, we're living with one foot in our dream, and the other one in a nightmare.'
Despite the administration reportedly shifting its mass deportation campaign away from farms, hotels and restaurants, Maldonado said Saturday that she felt little relief.
'The lack of safety doesn't stop at restaurants. ICE is going to continue to show up in neighborhoods, other workplaces and at homes,' she said. 'This is a tactic to confuse the public, ease criticism from industries that heavily depend on immigrant labor and then quietly continue to terrorize undocumented people.'
News of the new guidance broke the evening before No Kings protests launched in more than 2,000 cities across the nation in opposition to a large-scale military parade planned by the Trump administration to celebrate the president's 79th birthday.
In San Francisco, protester Alexis Mauricio stood in Civic Center Plaza holding a sign that read "Tu Lucha es Mi Lucha," meaning "your fight is my fight." Inside each letter she had illustrated a flag from different countries, including Mexico, Brazil, Honduras and the United States.
Mauricio, 30, said she was unimpressed by Trump's decision to pull back on the workplace raids.
"I'll believe it when I see it," she said. "Those people never should have been targeted in the first place."
Reporter J.D. Morris contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran
Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran

Israeli ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said the goal in the war against Iran is not to contain it but to win it, as the two countries continue to exchange strikes for a third day. During an appearance on ABC's 'This Week,' host Martha Raddatz asked Leiter how Israel would avoid escalating and attempt to contain the war. 'Martha, the objective is not to contain the war,' Leiter responded. 'The objective is to win the war.' 'Eighty years ago, we had a little man with a mustache running around Europe that nobody believed him when he said he was going to destroy the Jewish people,' he continued. 'We lost 6 million. Now we've got a crazed new Hitler running around the Middle East saying he's going to destroy us. 'We have to take him at face value… He's got a concrete plan to destroy us.' Her comments come after Israel and Iran continued to exchange airstrikes on Sunday. Another round of U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks was scheduled in Muscat, Oman, but was cancelled amid the fighting. When Raddatz mentioned that Trump did not want Israel to strike Iran because it would 'blow it,' Leiter said Trump was 'congratulatory about our strike,' noting that he had been given a 'heads-up' by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When pushed further on whether Israel would accept a deal between Iran and Israel, Leiter said not unless Iran is willing to halt the nuclear program entirely. 'He wants the nuclear program in Iran to be halted in its entirety,' Leiter said. 'He said it very clearly: dismantle the centrifuges, dismantle the infrastructure, and stop in total the enrichment of uranium. So, if that can be achieved through negotiation, so be it. We'll be very happy. But it hasn't been.'

Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates

CNN

time28 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates

Amid ongoing waves of tit-for-tat strikes between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump is publicly and privately making clear his desire to keep the United States out of the fray for now, wary of becoming bogged in another Middle East war and highly attuned to the changing politics of his party. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel has spoken with the US about possibly increasing its level of involvement, though one Israeli official cautioned those conversation have not yet included 'practical' discussions of the finer details. And while Trump hopes to avoid a prolonged conflict that could further destabilize the Middle East, some in the administration recognize that American military assistance may help Israel conclude its objectives more quickly, the sources said. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News on Sunday morning. The competing interests have created a complicated dynamic for a president eager to make good on his pledge to bring peace to the world's troubled regions. Since Israel launched its first attack early Friday morning, the US has offered defensive support to Israel intercepting an onslaught of Iranian reprisal strikes. But Trump has stopped well short of joining Israel's military in its attempts to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, resisting pressure from fellow Republicans to join the fight. He said in a social media post Saturday that he felt the conflict 'should end' as he continues to hold out hope for a negotiated agreement that would curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions, even after planned talks this weekend in Oman between the US and Iranian negotiating teams were called off. At stake is Trump's promise to act as a global peacemaker — or, as he told his inaugural crowd in January, to 'bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent and totally unpredictable.' That vow has already been tested by his inability to bring about an end to the Ukraine conflict and halting efforts to stop the fighting in Gaza. Now, as a new flashpoint is threatening to spiral out of control on Trump's watch, the commander-in-chief is attempting to limit US involvement. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late Saturday amid a fresh round of attacks in the region. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' The post sent the message that Trump's line for getting more directly involved in Israel's assaults would be an attack on American facilities or personnel in the region. Short of that, the US role in the conflict so far has largely been defensive. The Israeli operation against Iran is expected to take 'weeks, not days' and is moving forward with implicit US approval, according to White House and Israeli officials. The Trump administration has not critiqued the weeks-long timeframe in private discussions, an Israeli official told CNN. A White House official said the administration was aware and implicitly supportive of Israel's plans. When asked about how long the conflict could continue, the official said it depended on Iran's response. 'The Trump administration firmly believes this can be solved by continuing negotiations with the US,' the official said, adding that the US was not going to direct Israel to do anything but defend itself. American military planners have long had prepared options for joint US-Israeli actions against Iranian facilities should a US president ultimately decide to try taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, some of which are buried deep underground. There is little to indicate Trump has come close to approving such options, however, and according to an Israeli official, the possibility of offensive US support for Israel's strikes inside Iran had not been discussed on a 'practical basis.' 'We are not there, on a practical basis,' the Israeli official said. 'If at some point, the United States decides to take an offensive role, I don't think we'll be in a position to try and talk them out of it – but that's not our ask,' the official said, adding that such a move would be a sovereign decision of the US. The official explained that the endgame is to make sure that Iran is 'no longer an existential threat' to Israel, with both its nuclear and ballistic missiles program. 'If it's done in conjunction with allies, fine, but if it's not done in conjunction with allies, we have to do it ourselves,' the official said. Inside the White House, there continues to be heavy skepticism about getting involved in the conflict further, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. Trump remains concerned about getting dragged into a war he didn't start and wanted to avoid, and is acutely aware of the complicated politics at play, those officials said. Though he publicly warned Israel against launching an attack on Iran ahead of Friday's strikes, he said afterward he was supportive of the effort and well aware that it was being planned. Prev Next Trump has long promised not to engage in 'nation building' adventurism overseas, decrying his predecessors for sending American troops to die in wars that generated little benefit back home. 'For at least two decades, political leaders from both parties have dragged our military into missions it was never meant to be' a part of, said Trump told graduating cadets at West Point last month. 'They sent our warriors on nation-building crusades to nations that wanted nothing to do with us, led by leaders that didn't have a clue in distant lands,' he said, vowing to never repeat the mistake. Now, however, he is under pressure from some of his Republican allies to take a more interventionist role. 'If diplomacy fails, going all in for Israel shows that America is back as a reliable ally and a strong force against oppression. It would strengthen our hand in all corners of the world, as well as all other conflicts we face,' Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote on X last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store