logo
NAAJA calls for 'emergency intervention' in NT justice system, after second death in custody

NAAJA calls for 'emergency intervention' in NT justice system, after second death in custody

One of Australia's largest Aboriginal legal services is calling for an "emergency intervention" to "de-escalate" tensions in the Northern Territory's justice system, following two deaths of Aboriginal men in police custody in less than a fortnight.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains the name of an Indigenous person who has died, used with the permission of their family.
The North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency (NAAJA) is the latest in a growing list of organisations urging the federal government to "step in" in the wake of the death of Kumanjayi White in Alice Springs.
The 24-year-old Warlpiri man, who lived with disabilities, died late last month after being restrained by police on the floor of a Coles supermarket.
His death has sparked vigils and rallies across Australia.
The NT Police Force (NTPF) has rejected requests from multiple bodies, including from the NT's two largest land councils and Indigenous Australians Minister Malarndirri McCarthy, to hand the investigation to an independent body.
The Central Land Council (CLC) has urged the federal government to withhold its funding to the NT government until it establishes an "independent police conduct commission".
On Saturday, less than a fortnight after Mr White's death, a senior elder from Wadeye died in the custody of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) at Royal Darwin Hospital.
The AFP said the man suffered a "sudden and serious medical episode" upon arriving at the hospital, while the NTPF said his cause of death remained "undetermined pending a post-mortem".
NAAJA acting chief executive Anthony Beven said the NT government could not afford to wait for an investigation into Mr White's death to respond.
He said NAAJA was urging the government to hold a "forum" with First Nations leaders and both Commonwealth and NT authorities to address the territory's soaring incarceration rate.
"The only way we expect that there will be change is if we have a forum where all the parties come together and we have an emergency intervention into what's happening in the territory," he said.
Since winning government in the NT in August, the Country Liberal Party (CLP) has enacted a series of justice reforms.
Those reforms have collectively reduced the circumstances under which people can be granted bail and allowed police to make arrests for public intoxication.
Both remand prisoner and total prisoner numbers have surged dramatically since the CLP took office, after rising steadily over previous years.
Government data shows last week the proportion of NT prisoners on remand reached 49.7 per cent, meaning half of all inmates are yet to be convicted or sentenced in court.
Mr Beven said the government's bail reforms had "watered down" the presumption of innocence, making First Nations people "fearful" of police officers and the justice system.
"They're seeing their family — their sons, their daughters, their husbands, their wives — being locked up and held on remand for long periods of time," he said.
In response to Kumanjayi White's death, the chairs of both the CLC and the Northern Land Council (NLC) have released statements describing a deteriorating relationship between Aboriginal Territorians, the government and law enforcement.
CLC chair Warren Williams said the Aboriginal communities the council represented "don't trust this government and its police force to keep us safe".
In a statement, NLC chair Matthew Ryan said Aboriginal people "fear police instead of trusting they will protect and serve their communities".
Mr Beven said NAAJA wanted to "de-escalate" the distrust through its proposed forum.
"There's so many good police officers in the territory who are doing wonderful things to keep our community safe, and they're an essential part of the territory," he said.
In a statement, an NT government spokesperson said it would "continue to back our police and are proud to see officers serving and protecting their own communities".
"We respect the active police and coronial investigations," the spokesperson said.
"Following extensive consultation, we will continue progressing justice reforms that put the rights of victims ahead of offenders."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Silence over Marinus Link deal defended, but it could cost Liberals government
Silence over Marinus Link deal defended, but it could cost Liberals government

ABC News

time16 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Silence over Marinus Link deal defended, but it could cost Liberals government

The business case for Tasmania's biggest ever infrastructure project details significant power price increases for industrial businesses and warnings that the government may be exposed to "very significant" financial risk in the future. But it also says proceeding now "maximises the opportunities from the state's natural competitive advantages in renewable energy, improves energy security and increases economic growth". The state was signed up to Marinus Link on Thursday night by the Liberal government, which is governing in caretaker mode, and which promised — but failed — to release the business case beforehand. The project is a proposed multi-billion-dollar undersea cable connecting Tasmania and Victoria, designed to futureproof energy and communications needs on both sides of Bass Strait. Tasmanian Energy Minister Nick Duigan signed the deal on Thursday night and he and Premier Jeremy Rockliff announced it in Burnie as a summary of the whole-of-state business case was made public. A decade in the making with the federal and Victorian governments, and signed as crossbench MPs and the Labor opposition cried foul about secrecy, it can now be seen by the public. Mr Duigan said the silence was necessary during the negotiations to ensure the government did not "trade away Tasmania's advantage". Mr Rockliff said the deal that had been struck was "a bloody good deal for Tasmania". "We're not going to show our hand and give away Tasmania's best interests," he said. He said the state's portion of the investment was capped at $103 million, for 17.7 per cent of the project equity, which can be sold back to the federal government once the project is completed. Mr Duigan said the deal negotiated in recent weeks with the federal government included a $346 million GST-free grant to develop the north-west transmission lines that would feed power to the Marinus Link, which would deliver a "substantial benefit to customers". However, he could not detail how that would affect the average Tasmanian household energy bill. He did say the "typical household" would see an annual power price reduction of between $25 and $34, before the figures in the new deal were included. Mr Duigan could not put a number on how the new deal would affect household power bills, but he expected them to be "somewhat better" off. A 25-page executive summary was published by the Treasury department shortly before Mr Duigan and Mr Rockliff made their announcement. Mr Duigan said the full business case — which is about 400 pages long — was still being worked through by Treasury, which he said needed to redact certain information that was not Tasmania's to publish. The executive summary does detail how Marinus Link would affect electricity bills through the cost of building new transmission infrastructure, and wholesale energy costs. "Future government policy on the Tasmanian regulatory framework and customer rebates, together with decisions of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator, will be critical in determining the final electricity bill outcome for Tasmanian customers," the report reads. Although Mr Duigan has claimed lower power prices for households and small businesses, the report details "very large increases" for the state's major industrials — which include Bell Bay Aluminium, the Nyrstar zinc smelter and the Boyer paper mill. Together, the major industrials would see their prices rise about $20 million in the years beyond 2030 with construction of Marinus, compared with the past financial year. That is an increase of about 45 per cent on their combined spend of $42 million in 2024-25, and would come at a time "when there appears to be a range of pressures building on major industry nationwide". Mr Rockliff said the project would provide an extra $470 million to the state's bottom line each year, in the form of Hydro Tasmania's trade in electricity. He said this would allow for greater investment each year in the state's schools, hospitals and roads, and said it would create more than 2,000 jobs in the state. But the business case notes further costs and the possibility of significant risk if the project does not proceed as smoothly as is hoped. More than $100 million in equity contributions to the Marinus Link company after the final investment decision (FID) "may be required", which would need to be considered in this year's budget. And the governments involved are exposed to "increasing financial risks and potentially very significant additional equity calls" if environmental or planning approvals are not achieved. "The previously agreed sole underwriting of such risks by the Australian government fall away once notices-to-proceed are made to suppliers subsequent to a positive FID in the third quarter of 2025," the business case reads. It also notes that Hydro Tasmania would face "increased competition" in the renewable energy space in the future, which may affect its potential revenue opportunities. Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Michael Bailey welcomed the news the deal had been signed and said it would be "a pivotal moment" for the state. "Tasmania's energy generation isn't keeping up with demand. "Marinus Link will underpin new generation projects and help grow the economy and support businesses around the state that need more energy," Mr Bailey said. The Tasmanian end of the undersea cable will be in Burnie. The city's mayor, Teeny Brumby, said it was a "catalytic" moment. "It unlocks unprecedented economic, environmental and social benefits for our region," Councillor Brumby said. The announcement was also welcomed by Hydro Tasmania and the Marinus Link company, as well as by the state's telecommunications advocacy group, TasICT. However, the announcement also signalled the end of independent Braddon MP Craig Garland's potential support of a future Liberal government. Long outspoken against Marinus, Mr Garland said he now believed only Labor could deliver stable government for Tasmania. For his part, Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians "won't have confidence" in Marinus until all relevant information is released, and said the Liberals had been "needlessly secretive". But Mr Rockliff said he would stand by Marinus, even if it cost him his job.

Man sentenced for lighting own unit on fire out of frustration at noisy neighbours
Man sentenced for lighting own unit on fire out of frustration at noisy neighbours

ABC News

time16 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Man sentenced for lighting own unit on fire out of frustration at noisy neighbours

A Canberra man who tried to claim he was acting in self-defence when he set his own unit on fire, because he was frustrated after years of loud music from his neighbour, has been sentenced for arson in the ACT Supreme Court. Steven Kazmar-Hall, 39, was found guilty of arson after he set the fire in April last year. The court heard he had run up the street afterwards to escape the fire. The court rejected his self-defence argument that he had set the fire out of frustration because of mental health effects from noise he had endured for three years. Acting Justice Rebecca Christensen said in her judgement, the fire left the home uninhabitable, although it did not spread beyond his unit. The evidence presented in the trial included photographs of the "sizeable sound system" that was used by the neighbour in his unit. Acting Justice Christensen said it was a serious offence that put other vulnerable residents at risk. "Not only was their safety, and their lives, put at risk, but a number of tenants seemingly experienced significant distress from the fire," Acting Justice Christensen said. "The offender himself at the trial described that there were people 'screaming' after his conduct." But Acting Justice Christensen said Kazmar-Hall's culpability was reduced. "This would lead to significant distress and frustration for anyone, let alone a person suffering the mental health challenges of the offender." But Acting Justice Christensen said it was still serious offending. Kazmar-Hall has been in custody since the fire. He was sentenced to eight months in jail, but was freed after the sentencing because he had already served his time.

Before the Falconio trial, Bradley John Murdoch was accused and acquitted of rape and abduction
Before the Falconio trial, Bradley John Murdoch was accused and acquitted of rape and abduction

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Before the Falconio trial, Bradley John Murdoch was accused and acquitted of rape and abduction

Before Bradley John Murdoch was arrested for English backpacker Peter Falconio's disappearance and the attempted kidnapping of Joanne Lees, the killer faced charges of raping a woman and her 12-year-old daughter. WARNING: This story contains content that some readers may find upsetting. He was eventually acquitted of all charges relating to the case, but the events of the alleged 20-hour kidnapping ordeal that were relayed in the South Australian District Court have some similarities to the Falconio and Lees case. In 2003, more than two years after Murdoch had killed Mr Falconio at Barrow Creek in the Northern Territory, a court heard the mother and daughter, who were allegedly abducted from their Riverland home, were also bound, gagged and sexually assaulted during the 20-hour ordeal. The mother, who cannot be named, told the court that as the alleged incident came to an end, she did not know if she and her daughter would survive. "After the trailer was packed up, he sat near the trailer staring at us … and I didn't know if he was going to let us go or not," she said in 2003. "Are you going to kill us?" she asked. In the South Australian case, Murdoch was charged with two counts of rape, two counts of abduction, assault and two counts of indecent assault, but he was later acquitted. According to the court transcripts, Murdoch, who died on July 15, had been a regular guest at the Riverland home the mother and daughter shared with the mother's de facto partner, who was away receiving cancer treatment in Adelaide. They had known each other for 18 months. It was alleged that when he stayed, Murdoch used a small guest house at the back of the property as an occasional base for his drug-running operation between the Riverland and Broome, in Western Australia. On his last visit to the property in August 2002, Murdoch, who the court heard was using amphetamines and cannabis daily, put black plastic on the windows of the small flat. The court heard on the pretence of helping him unpack maps, Murdoch asked the 12-year-old daughter to come out to the guest house before he allegedly raped her. "I think he said: 'If you move, I'll give you brain damage'," she told the court. She said Murdoch carried her out to his LandCruiser and chained her up before going inside to the main house to abduct her mother. Prosecutor Liesl Chapman, now District Court Judge Liesl Kudelka, said in her opening statement to the jury that Murdoch told the mother: "Shut up and put some warm clothes on" before he took her outside. "The accused was wearing a gun in his shoulder holster," Ms Chapman said. "She saw the LandCruiser and [her daughter] in the back. "The accused said to [her], 'I need some insurance to get away from this place, get in the back or I'll shoot you'." The prosecution said that Murdoch had spoken about the disappearance of Peter Falconio several times before and during the abduction. "[The mother] asked the accused, 'Why are you doing this?'" Ms Chapman said. "He said words to the effect, 'you were in the wrong place at the wrong time'. "He said that the cops had framed him for the Falconio murder and that's why he was on the run. "He kept saying that he was being framed." Ms Chapman said he told the mother he was going to Western Australia to kill a fellow drug associate and planned to turn the gun on himself. "The Crown case is that his state of mind about being framed for a very high-profile murder explains his extreme criminal behaviour in South Australia," Ms Chapman said. "He was paranoid that he was being set up. "He was using amphetamines, commonly known as speed, which … can increase paranoia. "At that stage he didn't care anymore, he raped a 12-year-old girl and then took her and her mother as insurance in order to get out of there." Bradley John Murdoch's defence team argued in court that the case against him was a "made-up story". The court heard that there was a "conspiracy against" Murdoch created by his enemies, to frame him for the murder of Peter Falconio and that the claims of rape, abduction, assault and sexual assault were part of a "set-up". Just three days before he arrived in the Riverland, Murdoch's brother had given DNA evidence to Northern Territory police and the Falconio investigation team had Bradley Murdoch in its sights. The court heard in the early hours of Thursday, August 22, 2002, Murdoch drove away from the Riverland property with the mother and daughter shackled in the back. "I did what I was told because he had a gun," the mother said in court. "I was so scared I didn't know if he was going to shoot me and [my daughter]. "She [the daughter] was white as a ghost and she was terrified." The mother said they were initially handcuffed, and Murdoch stopped the LandCruiser three times over the next 20 hours, during which he was also alleged to have raped the mother. He also bound them with cable ties, similar to the ones used when Murdoch abducted Joanne Lees. She described him at one point as like "a raging bull". "He was verging on psychotic, like really angry and terrifying," the mother said. Eventually, she demanded Murdoch cut the cable ties off as they were hurting their wrists and cutting her daughter's circulation. The court heard the mother told the accused he was "pathetic for tying up a 12-year-old child". Then the court heard his mood changed, he brought clothes out for the pair and became "more sympathetic". "To me it seemed like he thought that he had done nothing wrong and he was just talking to us normally like he used to when we used to be friends," the mother said. The court heard he eventually dropped the pair at a Port Augusta service station and gave them $1,000 to get home, before allegedly making a final threat to kill them if they went to police. The mother and daughter said even after being released they remained fearful that he was still in the area watching them. They caught a cab to the Royal Adelaide Hospital, where the mother's partner was, but a report wasn't made to police for another five days. Murdoch was arrested by heavily-armed police outside a Port Augusta supermarket, and was remanded in custody to face court in South Australia. Inside the LandCruiser after Murdoch's arrest police alleged they found chains, clothes, cannabis, methamphetamine and $5,000. But, during a two-week trial, the prosecution failed to make its case and Murdoch was acquitted. Seconds later, as he walked out of the court, he was arrested inside Adelaide's Samuel Way building for Peter Falconio's murder and the abduction of Joanne Lees and escorted through a media scrum outside. He was then taken to Darwin where he was found guilty in 2005. Central Queensland University criminologist, Associate Professor Xanthe Mallett, said while there were obviously similarities between the Falconio and Lees case and the Riverland allegations, ultimately the South Australian jury could not be convinced of Murdoch's guilt. "It is a big deal to come forward, it turns your life upside down, it re-traumatises the victim-survivors and so to go through all of that and then for the perpetrator to be found not guilty is heartbreaking," Dr Mallett said. "We are talking 20 years ago, if there was gap between the alleged crime and somebody reporting then that certainly made it harder to prove … and sex crimes are very hard to prove anyway. Dr Mallett said it could be very hard to prove criminal cases beyond what a jury considered reasonable doubt. "Even if, on the balance of all the evidence, they think they probably are [guilty], that doubt is what makes the difference and that can be a very difficult level to achieve," Dr Mallett said. South Australia's Commissioner for Victim's Rights Sarah Quick said sexual assaults remained difficult to successfully prosecute, in part, because victims' evidence was often "fragmented, confused, and non-linear recollections are common". "The cumulative effect of giving evidence, being cross-examined, and then not being believed is deeply distressing," Commissioner Quick said. "Research demonstrates that harmful misconceptions and stereotypes about sexual assault remain widespread."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store