Silence over Marinus Link deal defended, but it could cost Liberals government
But it also says proceeding now "maximises the opportunities from the state's natural competitive advantages in renewable energy, improves energy security and increases economic growth".
The state was signed up to Marinus Link on Thursday night by the Liberal government, which is governing in caretaker mode, and which promised — but failed — to release the business case beforehand.
The project is a proposed multi-billion-dollar undersea cable connecting Tasmania and Victoria, designed to futureproof energy and communications needs on both sides of Bass Strait.
Tasmanian Energy Minister Nick Duigan signed the deal on Thursday night and he and Premier Jeremy Rockliff announced it in Burnie as a summary of the whole-of-state business case was made public.
A decade in the making with the federal and Victorian governments, and signed as crossbench MPs and the Labor opposition cried foul about secrecy, it can now be seen by the public.
Mr Duigan said the silence was necessary during the negotiations to ensure the government did not "trade away Tasmania's advantage".
Mr Rockliff said the deal that had been struck was "a bloody good deal for Tasmania".
"We're not going to show our hand and give away Tasmania's best interests," he said.
He said the state's portion of the investment was capped at $103 million, for 17.7 per cent of the project equity, which can be sold back to the federal government once the project is completed.
Mr Duigan said the deal negotiated in recent weeks with the federal government included a $346 million GST-free grant to develop the north-west transmission lines that would feed power to the Marinus Link, which would deliver a "substantial benefit to customers".
However, he could not detail how that would affect the average Tasmanian household energy bill.
He did say the "typical household" would see an annual power price reduction of between $25 and $34, before the figures in the new deal were included.
Mr Duigan could not put a number on how the new deal would affect household power bills, but he expected them to be "somewhat better" off.
A 25-page executive summary was published by the Treasury department shortly before Mr Duigan and Mr Rockliff made their announcement.
Mr Duigan said the full business case — which is about 400 pages long — was still being worked through by Treasury, which he said needed to redact certain information that was not Tasmania's to publish.
The executive summary does detail how Marinus Link would affect electricity bills through the cost of building new transmission infrastructure, and wholesale energy costs.
"Future government policy on the Tasmanian regulatory framework and customer rebates, together with decisions of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator, will be critical in determining the final electricity bill outcome for Tasmanian customers," the report reads.
Although Mr Duigan has claimed lower power prices for households and small businesses, the report details "very large increases" for the state's major industrials — which include Bell Bay Aluminium, the Nyrstar zinc smelter and the Boyer paper mill.
Together, the major industrials would see their prices rise about $20 million in the years beyond 2030 with construction of Marinus, compared with the past financial year.
That is an increase of about 45 per cent on their combined spend of $42 million in 2024-25, and would come at a time "when there appears to be a range of pressures building on major industry nationwide".
Mr Rockliff said the project would provide an extra $470 million to the state's bottom line each year, in the form of Hydro Tasmania's trade in electricity.
He said this would allow for greater investment each year in the state's schools, hospitals and roads, and said it would create more than 2,000 jobs in the state.
But the business case notes further costs and the possibility of significant risk if the project does not proceed as smoothly as is hoped.
More than $100 million in equity contributions to the Marinus Link company after the final investment decision (FID) "may be required", which would need to be considered in this year's budget.
And the governments involved are exposed to "increasing financial risks and potentially very significant additional equity calls" if environmental or planning approvals are not achieved.
"The previously agreed sole underwriting of such risks by the Australian government fall away once notices-to-proceed are made to suppliers subsequent to a positive FID in the third quarter of 2025," the business case reads.
It also notes that Hydro Tasmania would face "increased competition" in the renewable energy space in the future, which may affect its potential revenue opportunities.
Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Michael Bailey welcomed the news the deal had been signed and said it would be "a pivotal moment" for the state.
"Tasmania's energy generation isn't keeping up with demand.
"Marinus Link will underpin new generation projects and help grow the economy and support businesses around the state that need more energy," Mr Bailey said.
The Tasmanian end of the undersea cable will be in Burnie.
The city's mayor, Teeny Brumby, said it was a "catalytic" moment.
"It unlocks unprecedented economic, environmental and social benefits for our region," Councillor Brumby said.
The announcement was also welcomed by Hydro Tasmania and the Marinus Link company, as well as by the state's telecommunications advocacy group, TasICT.
However, the announcement also signalled the end of independent Braddon MP Craig Garland's potential support of a future Liberal government.
Long outspoken against Marinus, Mr Garland said he now believed only Labor could deliver stable government for Tasmania.
For his part, Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians "won't have confidence" in Marinus until all relevant information is released, and said the Liberals had been "needlessly secretive".
But Mr Rockliff said he would stand by Marinus, even if it cost him his job.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
5 minutes ago
- ABC News
Garma festival sees pressure put on federal government to tie NT funding to Indigenous outcomes
A federal minister has reminded the Northern Territory government that there are "no blank cheques" and Commonwealth money needs to be tied to positive outcomes. Education Minister Jason Clare made the remark at the Garma Festival, after Yothu Yindi Foundation chief executive Denise Bowden issued a grim warning to the federal government ministers in attendance. 'It is a destructive tide that keeps breaking in on Aboriginal people,' Ms Bowden said. 'If we do not stem this tide of history, it will do its work and wash away the ancient knowledge and the ceremonies and traditions that keep the world in balance and give us hope. 'Don't be fooled by the beauty of Garma. The day-to-day life of Yolŋu people remains forever challenging. It's exhausting, it is soul-crushing. "Action is needed now. Don't leave Garma and put things on endless repeat, don't be fooled into thinking your attendance here is enough." Shortly after her address, Mr Clare was asked what his obligations were as education minister. "It's not a blank cheque. The money has got to be tied to the sorts of things that we know work," Mr Clare said. "I want kids in school, not in jail, and that's what that funding is all about." The shift in language comes amid increasing pressure on the federal government to use all powers at its disposal, including funding arrangements, to compel the CLP Territory government to meet its obligations under the Closing the Gap agreement. The CLP government was elected in 2024 and has brought a "tough on crime agenda" to the territory, including lowering the age of criminal responsibility and reinstating the use of spit hoods in youth detention. The North Australia Aboriginal Justice Agency estimates 40 Indigenous people have been taken into custody every day since the CLP came to power, and overall prison populations have increased by 40 per cent from 2019 to June 2024. The policies have received significant pushback, especially from Indigenous communities and organisations, including the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency, which says the CLP government is refusing to meet or consult on legislation that will result in more Aboriginal people in prisons. Independent member for Mulka and Yolŋu man Yingiya Guluya said the federal government must stop funding the territory government if the money was being used to put Indigenous children in prison. "I need to send a message to the federal government: stop sending money, providing money to the Northern Territory government to build more prisons," he said. "It is systemic racism what's happening. Not looking after and listening to the Indigenous people, and we're not having a fair go." The calls for the federal government to intervene in the funding arrangement between the Commonwealth and the territory first came from the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency (NAAJA), which has reported children as young as 11 being kept in watch houses for 48 hours, where they are alongside adults and the lights remain on 24 hours a day. Mr Guluya has visited watch houses and described the situation as "worse than a third world country". "I couldn't believe it, my tears just fell out," he said. "My heart was heavy to see young children, especially young girls staying in a watch house for a day or two or more. "The facility they live in is just outrageous. It's a horror. "It's the system that government is creating there." Indigenous Australians Minister Malarndirri McCarthy said she shared concerns about the incarceration of children. "I am deeply troubled by what I've seen and what I have heard, and this is a conversation I'd like to have directly with the chief minister," she said. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Katie Kiss said while Garma had seen some "good announcements" from the federal government, big agenda items were not addressed. "The elephant in the room is our kids in out-of-home care and our kids in detention centres and deaths in custody that didn't even get a mention," Commissioner Kiss said. "All the money over here doesn't make a difference if that child can't leverage a future that's meaningful for themselves." Mr Guluya is calling for funding to be allocated to Indigenous communities to create on-country rehabilitation centres and keep children out of prisons. "Rather, listen to us in the community, and we want to build a rehabilitation centre on country. Resource to Indigenous people so that we build a proper education centre, learning centres, and so that young people learn to become, to know and understand who they really are." The NT government has been approached for comment.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Donald Trump's tariffs have a large role to play in Australia's interest rates cycle
When the RBA handed down its most interest rate decision last month, it shocked economists and the public by holding the cash rate at 3.85 per cent. The widely held consensus had been strongly in favour of another 0.25 per cent cut to follow the previous one in May. In the weeks since the Reserve Bank's decision, economic data has been mixed, with some elements such as the recent retail sales report providing support for the RBA's message of caution, while on the other hand, the recent substantial rise in unemployment was far more supportive of the cash rate being cut. In several important ways the RBA's uncertainty about the path forward for interest rates is arguably justified. Trump, Trade And Global Uncertainty At a global scale, the implementation of the Trump Administration's various tariffs and threats of even greater trade barriers to nation's not willing to make a swift agreement with the United States remains a source of major questions for central banks around the world. The challenge posed by tariffs to the path of interest rates was recently summed up by JPMorgan Chase (the world's most valuable bank) CEO Jamie Dimon at an event hosted by the Irish government. 'The market is pricing a 20% chance (of rising interest rates). I would price in a 40-50% chance I would put that as a cause for concern,' Dimon said. Dimon went on to cite the Trump administration's tariffs, the restructuring of global trade and the growing U.S government budget deficit as inflationary forces impacting the path forward for interest rates. While U.S interest rates can and do rise and fall independently of those of other nations, they are also the most important global benchmark. Theoretically, the U.S Federal Reserve holding a higher interest rate than the RBA can have two major knock on effects for Australia. It can force a repricing of Australian interest rates to better reflect the global benchmark. Or if the RBA chooses to allow the distance between the RBA cash rate and the U.S federal funds rate to expand, it places downward pressure on the value of the Australian dollar in a vacuum. A Mixed Bag For Australia At a domestic level, there is also a high degree of uncertainty impacting the path forward for interest rates. With government currently the driving force behind broader economic growth and employment growth in generally taxpayer funded sectors of the economy (public administration, education and, healthcare and social assistance) the main driver of the resilience of the labour market, it's challenging for the RBA to know exactly when a rate cut would be appropriate. Meanwhile, the deeply mixed nature of retail sales growth depending on the lens with which it is viewed also complicates matters. For example, looking at the latest headline retail sales showing a 1.2 per cent rise in turnover or June in a vacuum, it would be hard to justify a rate cut. But when the focus is shifted to an inflation adjusted figure that looks at retail sales per working age adult, the data for the June quarter reveals a return to recession in per capita terms. This is due to expansion of the population, the vast majority of which is occurring via migration acting as more or less the only driver of the retail economy in aggregate. History And Market Pricing Based on RBA rate cut cycles seen in the last 35 years, where the cash rate has been cut by at least one percentage point, the average rate cut cycle sees mortgage rates fall by approximately 33.3 per cent. If we remove the rate cut cycles driven by major emergencies such as the Global Financial Crisis and the early 1990s recession, the average reduction in mortgage rates falls to 27.0 per cent. If we were to see a similar reduction in interest rates today, we would see a total fall in the cash rate of approximately 1.75 percentage points. This would leave the average payable rate on a variable mortgage for an owner occupier at 4.58 per cent. In terms of the pricing of the future path of interest rates from financial markets, the next full 0.25 per cent rate cut is priced in for the RBA's August meeting, with the next expected to follow in November. Overall, market pricing has interest rates falling by a total 1.33 percentage points, with the cash rate hitting a low of 3.02 per cent during the middle of next year. The Outlook For Rates While the direction of interest rates is ultimately in the hands of the Reserve Bank, under the current circumstances government is also playing a significantly greater role in influencing the path forward than has been historically normal. With the growth in the domestic consumer economy concentrated in the 65 and over age demographic and otherwise reliant on population growth, the level of migration set by the Albanese government will be vital in determining to what degree aggregate consumer demand is weak enough to warrant further cuts in interest rates. Meanwhile, the level of employment growth stemming from government policy will also be a key consideration. If the current pullback continues without a corresponding increase from the private sector, the urgency and magnitude with which the RBA approaches the ongoing rate cut cycle may intensify significantly. Ultimately, it's entirely possible that events beyond our shores end up playing a significant role in the direction of Australian interest rates, whether that be as a result of President Trump's tariffs or the Chinese economy slowing more swiftly than expected due to the ongoing trade conflict and still simmering domestic economic issues.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Police 'scrambling' as pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march gets green light
Police are "scrambling" to alert motorists about a pro-Palestinian march over the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday after the event secured a tick of approval from NSW's highest court. Following the Supreme Court ruling on Saturday morning, NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna urged those planning to take part to act safely and peacefully. He said the "whole gamut" of officers would be deployed to monitor the demonstration. "We are there to keep everyone safe ... we will have police right along the route and we'll be making sure this is done as safely and peacefully as possible," he told reporters. "Anyone who thinks they're going to come along and hijack this protest or do the wrong thing, police will take swift action." Disruption 'in the nature of peaceful protests' Justice Belinda Rigg rejected a prohibition order sought by police over the planned protest, organised by the Palestine Action Group, which is expected to draw thousands. The application on behalf of the NSW police commissioner sought to prohibit the march on public safety grounds. However, Rigg said in her judgement that arguments it would cause disruption were not sufficient. "It is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption to others," she said. Rigg noted there was significant support for the march from hundreds of organisations including Amnesty International, various churches, the Jewish Council of Australia, the nurses and midwives association and other trade unions. NSW Police took court action to categorise the march as unlawful and unauthorised, arguing that closing the bridge with less than a week's notice was unreasonable. A prohibition order would not have banned attendance at the protest, but would have meant participants would lack legal protection against offences like blocking roads or traffic. The Supreme Court decision means those attending Sunday's protest will be provided these legal rights. Outside court, Palestine Action Group Sydney spokesperson Josh Lees said: "This will go down, I think, as one of those moments in history when the people of the world and in our case, the people of Sydney and NSW, stood up to be on the right side of history." The group had called for a "march for humanity" over the Sydney Harbour Bridge in response to mounting evidence of "widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease" in Gaza, according to the United Nations. 'There to keep everyone safe' Police on Saturday implored those planning to take part to act peacefully and respectfully, warning them they would be closely monitored. Protesters are expected to march from the CBD to North Sydney, with the bridge closed from 11.30am to about 4pm. Police Minister Yasmine Catley urged people to avoid the city if possible. "Make no mistake there is going to be massive, massive disruption ... there will be significant delays," she said. "But we believe police will be able to handle the protest on the bridge so long as people are peaceful, that they listen to what police ask them to do and that they are sensible." What happened in court? On Friday, NSW Police argued the force would not be able to create a safe environment for the rally and raised the possibility of a crowd crush. Lachlan Gyles SC, who represented NSW Police, told the court: "This is really unprecedented in terms of scale, the level of risk, the lack of time to prepare." He accused Lees of ignoring his duty of care to public safety. Under cross-examination, acting assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson raised the possibility of a crowd crush. "I'm personally concerned about that," he said. LISTEN TO "We (Palestine Action Group) want to work with them to facilitate a march over the bridge that is safe and peaceful," he said. Felicity Graham, the group's barrister, told the court it would be safer for police to authorise the protest, as people would march regardless of the decision. "A prohibition order may well increase the number of people who attend the protest, and exacerbate the potential for unrest and violence," she said. Outside the court, Lees said on Friday the group was open to delaying the rally. "We put forward a whole proposal for 24 August, we would have our march over the Sydney Harbour Bridge that would march identical routes to the World Pride March in 2023," he said. Graham also said that the growing support for the march, which includes members of parliament, organisations, and high-profile figures, should be considered. Rigg reserved her decision under Saturday morning. The bridge has previously been shut, including for a reconciliation rally in 2000, which attracted more than 250,000 people. — With additional reporting from the Australian Associated Press