logo
New York City Predicted Record Tourism. Then Came Trump.

New York City Predicted Record Tourism. Then Came Trump.

New York Times08-05-2025

New York City is expected to welcome 400,000 fewer tourists this year than it did in 2024, a decline primarily driven by negative sentiment toward the United States among foreign travelers who have reconsidered their vacations.
The city's tourism agency, New York City Tourism and Conventions, had entered 2025 with optimism after the coronavirus pandemic disrupted travel five years ago and had projected a full recovery this year with a record number of visitors.
But the agency has now twice revised downward its initial forecast of 67.6 million visitors — international and domestic — since President Trump declared a trade war on allies, mused about annexing other countries and ramped up an immigration crackdown that has resulted in the detentions of several foreign tourists.
The latest forecast, which will be released on Thursday, now estimates that 64.1 million tourists will visit the city. That includes 400,000 more domestic travelers than last year, but 800,000 fewer foreign travelers.
The new forecast sees 12.1 million international travelers, a 17 percent drop from earlier 2025 projections. The decline has been led by a drop-off in tourists from Canada, who have boycotted trips to the United States over Mr. Trump's threat of making their country the 51st U.S. state.
International travel to the United States from other parts of the world has largely held up so far, but New York City relies on Canadian tourists. Travel analysts fear that continued economic uncertainty could scramble travel plans from the rest of the world.
While many more domestic travelers visit New York City than international ones, overseas visitors tend to stay longer and spend more. Last year, tourists spent $51 billion in New York City — with about half by foreign travelers. Spending this year is now forecast to decline by $4 billion.
Julie Coker, the head of New York City Tourism and Conventions, said that her agency was marketing the city in foreign countries under a campaign titled 'With Love + Liberty, New York City.'
The agency, a nonprofit that is partially funded by the city, wants travelers to know, she said, 'that New York City is still the most welcoming, inclusive and diverse city in the world.'
Tourism is a vital pillar of New York City's economy. The industry helps sustain numerous sectors — including Broadway, museums and restaurants — and employs more than 260,000 people.
So far this year, about 117,000 fewer foreign passengers have arrived at Kennedy International Airport and Newark Liberty International Airport compared with the same period in 2024, according to an analysis of passenger entry data by The New York Times.
Hotel occupancy rates in New York City have stayed relatively flat this year, but bookings for the upcoming summer months, a peak travel season in the city, have not kept pace with last year, according to CoStar, a real estate analytics company.
John Fitzpatrick, who owns two hotels in Manhattan, said he had felt extremely positive about tourism in the city at the end of 2024, with bookings at his properties having the strongest few months since the pandemic.
But now, he said, bookings are down about 5 percent from last year. His hotels missed their April forecast, bookings for May are below projections and reservations in the upcoming months are not as robust as expected.
'Just as we get back up on our feet, we get kicked down again,' Mr. Fitzpatrick said. 'It's worrying.'
In conversations with Europeans during recent trips to Ireland, where he also owns a hotel, Mr. Fitzpatrick said he had heard that they are not just upset about the tariffs but are also afraid that they could be detained by the immigration authorities in the United States.
The talk had been of the more aggressive tactics by U.S. border authorities at ports of entry, including the detention of two German tourists for four weeks, he said.
'You want to go where you feel welcome,' Mr. Fitzpatrick said.
Some tourist spots in New York City have started to report a decrease in customers. The Empire State Building Observatory's operator said it saw a 4.6 percent decline in people in the first three months of the year compared with last year, adjusting for the shift in the Easter holiday this year. About 50 percent of its visitors are from overseas.
TopView Sightseeing, which operates a fleet of double-decker buses in Manhattan, has seen a 20 to 25 percent decline in customers. The company's owner, Asen Kostadinov, said the drop off started about a year ago and has worsened in 2025, with a noticeable decline in foreign travelers.
Mr. Kostadinov said that travelers appear to be more budget conscious, increasingly booking lower-cost packages with his company. He has also seen an uptick in business at his bike rental company near Central Park and his Statue of Liberty cruise tours, both of which charge less than the bus trips. In comparison, business at his sightseeing bus company in London has increased this year, he said.
As a result of slower business in New York City and the economic uncertainty, Mr. Kostadinov said he has let go some corporate employees, cut bus drivers and postponed planned investments, including a new bus depot.
'There is no question that the tariffs are causing some sort of anti-American sentiment,' Mr. Kostadinov said. 'I am an immigrant and I love America, but at the end of the day, we don't want to make enemies for no reason.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns
The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns

The spectacular falling out last week between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire who became one of his closest aides, put the spotlight on two dangerous developments affecting U.S. national security. The breakup provided Schadenfreude to the two men's critics and delivered entertainment value to social media audiences across the world. But it also revealed crucial vulnerabilities deriving from the ways in which important elements of U.S. military and intelligence operations, among others, have been personalized in both men's hands. While this is particularly alarming for the U.S., its repercussions extend beyond U.S. borders, to U.S. allies and others. When the world's most powerful man and the world's wealthiest entrepreneur started lobbing verbal missiles at each other from the social media platforms they each own, the crossfire included threats with serious geopolitical consequences. It may have looked like a high-profile schoolyard scuffle, but the two people involved are so powerful that the clash was far more consequential. It all started when Musk blasted Trump's massive budget bill currently making its way through Congress. If approved, the legislation would add trillions of dollars to the national debt. That was anathema to Musk, whose ostensible role in the Trump administration was to strengthen the government's finances. He initially vowed to slash $2 trillion in spending, later lowering his sights to $1 trillion. Ultimately the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut less than $200 million, and by some estimates it produced more costs than savings. Still, Musk lambasted the budget bill, and when Trump criticized him for that, it unleashed the furies, with Musk going as far as suggesting Trump should be impeached. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Among the many threats the erstwhile allies traded was a warning Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that '[t]he easiest way to save money … is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' to which Musk responded on his X platform that his SpaceX company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' The U.S. depends on the Dragon to send astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station, making it no small threat. Focusing on just these two posts, we can see the danger. First, there's the deeply alarming fact that Trump openly threatened to use the power of the presidency to exact personal revenge. We've seen this many times already since he returned to the presidency less than five months ago, but it's an undemocratic, corrupt practice that may be routine in dictatorships but should be unacceptable in solid democracies. Over the weekend, Trump once again threatened to use the power of his office against Musk, warning of 'very serious consequences' if Musk opted to fund Democratic candidates in next year's midterm congressional elections. In other words, he would use his office for political retribution, another affront against democracy. In addition to canceling contracts, as he suggested on Thursday when the war of words started, Trump could also unleash regulators on Musk's firms. As president, Trump's duty is to make decisions in the national interest. If the contracts made sense before the falling out, they should still make sense after it. But the contracts were actually deeply troubling before, and the dispute and threats highlight just how dangerously dependent the U.S., as well as other countries, have become on companies controlled by a single individual, and a volatile one with a troubling ideology at that. Musk retracted his threats to decommission Dragon, but the mere mention of the possibility alarmed NASA and shocked the space travel community. As mentioned, without Dragon, the U.S. has no way to send its astronauts and supplies to the ISS for now, as an alternative built by Boeing proved unreliable. But the threat to shut down Dragon is minimal compared to other off switches on Musk's console. The Pentagon and the entire U.S. security apparatus have become perilously dependent on Musk's companies. In addition to its contracts for the ISS, SpaceX carries out the overwhelming majority of all satellite launches around the globe, including those of military and intelligence satellites. Then there's the SpaceX subsidiary Starlink and its military version Starshield, both of which have become indispensable communications platforms, and not only for the United States. In 2022, when Russia launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine, Musk provided Starlink equipment to Kyiv, allowing Ukrainian troops to access the internet and communicate with each other and their commanders. A large part of the cost of that arrangement is borne by the Pentagon. The dangers of relying on Musk's company for such a fundamental function in the midst of an active war was already becoming evident when Musk started echoing Russian talking points. Then, a recently published biography of Musk claimed that when the Ukrainians asked for Starlink support in 2022 as part of an operation in Russian-occupied Crimea, Musk refused, saying that attacking the illegally annexed territory was 'going too far.' The revelation raised red flags at the Pentagon, where officials started speaking about the risk represented by Musk's ability to simply deny access to his products in the midst of a conflict. And yet, despite urgent calls by military officials for competitors to provide alternatives, few viable options have emerged. The Boeing space vehicle for taking astronauts to the ISS was a disappointment, and Eutelsat, a Franco-British competitor of Starlink, has launched only 600 satellites compared to Musk's 7,000, which represents the majority of the satellites orbiting Earth. What's more, Eutelsat's user equipment is more cumbersome. This March, while he was still working closely with Trump, Musk posted that 'Ukraine will inevitably lose' the war and noted ominously that Kyiv's 'entire front line would collapse' if he turned Starlink off. That's a not-so-veiled warning about Musk's power to cause havoc not only for Ukraine but for all of Starlink's users, of which the U.S. government is the biggest. The U.S. has a reported $22 billion in federal contracts with SpaceX. Musk already controls the launching of spy satellites as well as much of the communications systems the U.S. uses and would use should it go to war. If Trump launches construction of his promised missile shield, the Golden Dome, Musk would be a major player. This risky dependence on Musk is not the reason Trump has threatened to abuse his presidency against his former friend. That is all about revenge. But the U.S. should do everything in its power to ensure it can carry out its policies and objectives without being at the mercy of any single individual or company, even if that was not something Trump was concerned about before he had a reason to punish Musk. The acrimonious breakup, while entertaining, has also delivered two important warnings. It showed that Trump's use of his office for personal vendettas has become a regular, openly deployed practice in this presidency. And it has provided an urgent reminder that the U.S. and other countries have become dangerously dependent on the unpredictable and untrustworthy Musk. Frida Ghitis is WPR's senior columnist and a contributor to CNN and The Washington Post. Her WPR column appears every Thursday. You can follow her on Twitter and Threads at @fridaghitis. The post The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns appeared first on World Politics Review.

Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year
Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year

(Reuters) -Mattel has teamed up with OpenAI to develop toys and games with artificial intelligence, and expects to launch its first AI-powered product later this year, the Barbie-maker said on Thursday. The company, which also makes Hot Wheels and Uno cards, plans to "bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate play experiences with an emphasis on innovation, privacy, and safety," it said. The move comes at a time when toy manufacturers are battling muted demand backdrop as consumers rein in spending to brace for the economic fallout of U.S. President Trump's shifting trade policy. Mattel will also incorporate OpenAI's advanced AI tools like ChatGPT Enterprise into its business operations to enhance product innovation, the company said. "With OpenAI, Mattel has access to an advanced set of AIcapabilities alongside new tools to enable productivity, creativity, and company-wide transformation at scale," said OpenAI operating chief Brad Lightcap. Over the last year, Mattel has relied on producing films, TV shows and mobile games based on its products such as Hot Wheels and Barbie to offset a slowdown in its core toy business. Last month, Mattel withdrew its annual forecast and said it would raise prices on some products sold domestically in a bid to mitigate higher supply chain costs. Sign in to access your portfolio

Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation
Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation

Wall Street Journal

time27 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation

0900 ET – U.S. labor and inflation data deepen a decline in Treasury yields. Weekly jobless claims were unchanged from the previous week's upwardly revised pace, at 248,000. Economists surveyed by WSJ expected 246,000. Continuing claims, a measure of the unemployed population, was 1.96 million, the highest level since November 2021. May's wholesale price inflation was 0.1%, accelerating from April's 0.2% deflation and below consensus of a positive 0.2%. The combination of slower-than-expected inflation and concerning labor data underscores bets that the Fed may need to change its hawkish position. Yields were already declining and fell further after the data. The 10-year Treasury yield is at 4.360% and the two-year at 3.891%. ( @ptrevisani) 0614 GMT – A downside surprise in U.S. CPI data gave only a small boost to Treasurys, probably because tariff-driven price hikes still look imminent, says Capital Economics' James Reilly in a note. That said, these price hikes look discounted in markets, shielding Treasury yields from rising pressure, the senior markets economist says. 'We don't expect much upwards pressure on Treasury yields even as the inflationary impact of tariffs eventually feeds into U.S. consumer prices,' he says. Capital Economics expects core inflation to rise in coming months but it thinks that investors are already braced for a broadly similar outcome on tariffs, he says. (

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store