BDL denies it wants to shut Al-Qard Al-Hasan, Hezbollah slams measures
In remarks to Al-Jadeed TV, Central Bank sources said the report is baseless and that the bank communicated with Al-Arabiya's Al-Hadath television to inform it that its report is unfounded.
The report came after the Central Bank issued a circular on Monday barring banks and brokerages from dealing with Al-Qard Al-Hasan, described as Hezbollah's financial arm.
The Central Bank prohibited all licensed financial institutions in Lebanon from dealing directly or indirectly with unlicensed entities and listed Hezbollah's Al-Qard Al-Hassan as an example. The bank had issued similar circulars in the past but this was the first time it mentioned Al-Qard Al-Hassan by name.
Hezbollah's Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc meanwhile said 'the measures taken by the Central Bank and its governor against the Al-Qard Al-Hasan institution or against Lebanese firms, entities and individuals who are on the unjust lists of U.S. sanctions are a direct attack on the interests of our Lebanese society that violates the constitution and the laws.'
It accordingly warned that 'using the Central Bank as a tool to implement foreign policies and dictations against the interests of Lebanese citizens' is a 'dangerous blow to societal stability at a time the country needs to avoid turbulence.'
The bloc also stressed that Al-Qard Al-Hasan is 'a non-profit charitable organization that serves Lebanese citizens regardless of their affiliations' and that 'it will continue its work and perform its duties to the fullest extent possible.'
The U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on Al-Qard Al-Hasan in 2007, saying Hezbollah used it as a cover to manage "financial activities and gain access to the international financial system."
Al-Qard Al-Hassan, founded in 1983, describes itself as a charitable organization that provides loans to people according to Islamic principles that forbid interest. Israel struck some of its branches during its war with Hezbollah last year.
Operating as a not-for-profit organization under a licence granted by the Lebanese government, it has more than 30 branches, mostly in predominantly Shiite Muslim areas of Beirut and its suburbs, southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley.
A Lebanese official said the Central Bank move had been in the works for months, and reflected U.S. pressure on Lebanon to take action against Hezbollah's financial wing.
Nassib Ghobril, chief economist at Byblos Bank, said Lebanese banks were already careful to avoid dealing with Al-Qard Al-Hasan because it is under U.S. sanctions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Aoun signs decree on minimum wage increase for private sector
President Joseph Aoun on Monday, signed the decree regarding the increase of the minimum wage in Lebanon's private sector. On June 27, the government approved a 50 percent increase in the minimum wage, raising it to 28 million Lebanese pounds (312 dollars, a 56 percent increase) starting in July. Lebanon has been mired in a severe economic and financial crisis since 2019, with its national currency collapsing, leading to an erosion of salaries and purchasing power, while inflation has soared. Before the crisis, the minimum wage stood at 675,000 LL (Lebanese lira) — about 450 dollars at the official rate of 1,507.5 LL to the dollar.
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Lebanese Parliament greenlights bank resolution law
BEIRUT — The parliamentary subcommittee examining amendments to the draft law on the resolution of the banking sector approved the text on Monday, the state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported. This draft law, considered one of the main reforms awaited from the Lebanese government, must now be adopted by the Finance Committee before being submitted to Parliament. At the end of a meeting of the parliamentary subcommittee, chaired by MP Ibrahim Kanaan, he announced late in the afternoon that the subcommittee "has completed the study, approval, and modification of the bank resolution draft law." "We now have a text ready to be discussed by the Finance Committee, which I will convene this week, once the report that I will begin drafting today is finalized," he added, noting that this text "will include the minutes as well as the amendments." The draft law will be submitted to the General Assembly," he continued, noting that the Speaker of Parliament will set a date to discuss this text. He said: "Today's session covered the bank liquidation mechanism, how to organize claims, depositors' priority, the special court's role and powers, appeal procedures, and the link to the financial regularity law, especially since many of its articles, including Article 36, depend on passing the deposit recovery law." Two days ago, Finance Minister Yassine Jaber told L'Orient Today that he expected the bank resolution draft law to be submitted to Parliament before the end of the month, specifically on July 30. 'Today's session addressed all issues related to the bank liquidation mechanism, how to organize claims, depositors' priority over other creditors, the role, creation, and powers of the special court, the procedures for appealing decisions made by the High Banking Authority, as well as the link to the financial regularity and deposit recovery law — especially since the implementation of many of its articles, including Article 36, remains conditional on the adoption of the deposit recovery law,' said MP Ibrahim Kanaan. Two-tier structure approved The bank resolution law establishes the legal framework for restructuring Lebanon's dysfunctional banking sector, in crisis since 2019. Although quickly adopted by the government, the draft law faced months of intense negotiations in Parliament. A key point of contention was criticism from Central Bank Governor Karim Souhaid, who saw the composition and powers of the proposed High Banking Authority (HBA) as undermining his authority. During the Finance and Budget Committee's second session on the bill, held on May 8, Kanaan announced the creation of a subcommittee to reconcile differing viewpoints and produce a 'harmonized draft law.' On July 10, Governor Souhaid presented his counterproposal to MPs, introducing a two-tier structure for the HBA instead of the single-chamber model initially proposed by the government. This revised structure, ultimately approved by the subcommittee, divides responsibilities between two chambers. The first chamber, convened by the governor, retains the powers of the existing Sanctions Committee, including the authority to impose disciplinary measures under current legislation. The second chamber will decide the fate of banks slated for restructuring or liquidation and will oversee structural reform efforts in line with the new banking law. The president of the Banking Control Commission (BCC) holds full voting rights in the first chamber, they may only attend the second chamber's meetings in an advisory, non-voting capacity. According to sources, this compromise had been negotiated in advance during several closed-door meetings between Souhaid and ministers. However, some MPs from opposition and protest movements criticized the final structure, arguing it still concentrates too much power in the hands of the Banque du Liban (BDL, central bank) governor.
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
No breakthrough in Barrack's latest trip to Beirut, all eyes on Berri
BEIRUT — The ball is in the Lebanese court. That is the main message from U.S. envoy Tom Barrack during his third visit to Beirut on Monday, to discuss the issue of Hezbollah's disarmament. The diplomat reaffirmed that this matter is up to the Lebanese authorities, who must define the approach themselves. After his meeting with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the U.S. envoy said that Hezbollah's disarmament is "an internal Lebanese issue," as Hezbollah circles accuse the Americans of wanting to impose this disarmament to "reassure Israel." 'The United States is not here to force Israel to do anything. We are here to use our influence to bring calm minds together around a solution,' he continued, believing that the cease-fire agreement reached in November to end the war between Hezbollah and the Hebrew state 'did not work.' Arriving in Beirut on Sunday evening, the U.S. envoy was first received by President Joseph Aoun before his meeting at the Grand Serail. According to the presidency, Aoun handed him a 'draft memorandum of understanding' outlining Lebanon's commitments since the cease-fire. These include points from the truce agreement, the president's inauguration speech, and the ministerial statement of Salam's Cabinet. Among these commitments, the presidency cited 'the urgent need to save Lebanon by extending the state's authority over its entire territory with nothing but its own forces, monopolizing arms exclusively in the hands of the Lebanese Army and asserting the authority of the Lebanese constitutional institutions over decisions of war and peace.' These factors must be ensured 'simultaneously and in parallel with maintaining Lebanese sovereignty over all its international borders, reconstruction, and the initiation of economic recovery.' Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' In his remarks, Barrack stated that 'President Donald Trump attaches importance to the situation in Lebanon and the restoration of stability in the region.' 'My return to Lebanon comes as Syria and the region have once again become unstable, and today we must focus on Lebanon to restore stability,' he stressed, affirming that he would 'continue his meetings with Lebanese officials working towards solutions,' whether on security issues or economic reforms. He also claims not to have taken note of Hezbollah's 'remarks' on his roadmap, adding that for the American administration, Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' with which it does not engage in dialogue. In short, no tangible progress was recorded during this tour. The U.S. envoy still insists on the need to move to operational steps for the state's weapons monopoly, through a clear and public decision by official Lebanon and with the approval of all parties. Certainly, according to L'Orient Today's information, the Lebanese response he received reaffirms Lebanon's attachment to the weapons monopoly as well as its commitment to the ministerial statement and the presidential inaugural address. But what Washington now expects is a concrete mechanism for implementation and the start of its execution. This mechanism is still to be defined in its details. These details concern the launch date of its implementation, considering it is meant to be conducted in several stages. The first would consist of a clear government decision in favor of the state's monopoly on arms. The second would see Hezbollah begin to hand over its weapons north of the Litani River, notably missiles and drones, with the United States pressuring Israel to avoid escalation, cease its aggressions, violations, and targeted assassinations. The third step should concern Beirut and its suburbs, especially the southern suburb, concurrently with American pressure on Israel to initiate a withdrawal from occupied points. The fourth stage would be dedicated to the withdrawal of weapons from the Bekaa region. Nabih Berri's proposal In this context, Lebanon has clearly expressed its requirements, particularly the effective cease-fire implementation by Israel, the need to activate the monitoring committee's work on the agreement, and the importance of maintaining the role of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). Barrack emphasized that the Lebanese state must prove its effectiveness and remain attentive to regional developments. Lebanon has also insisted on obtaining guarantees regarding control of the situation in Syria, in light of concerns expressed by several Lebanese factions regarding the repercussions of recent events in Syria, especially after the clashes in Sweida. Some believe that Hezbollah is using Syrian instability as a pretext to keep its weapons, citing the defense of the Shiite communities' presence in the area and the protection of border region. But Barrack's logic is clear: to end Israeli violations and strikes, Lebanon must begin to regain the weapons monopoly, as the State alone is responsible for the security of its citizens. The Lebanese response has not received Hezbollah's approval, as it does not consider itself concerned by this document. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the American proposal, believing that Washington is trying to reach a new agreement and is pressuring the Lebanese Army to remove his party's weapons at the risk of provoking civil war. In this context, the main issue remains Tuesday's scheduled meeting between Barrack and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. According to some reports, Berri is expected to put forward a proposal consisting of a 15-day suspension of Israeli military operations during which a serious dialogue would take place with Hezbollah on the mechanism for returning weapons to the state. The Americans have not yet responded to this proposal, but according to well-informed sources, Barrack should travel to Israel to discuss it with officials. Other meetings The envoy was also received by Elias Audi, the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan of Beirut, with whom he discussed the situation in Lebanon and the region, and by Druze leader Walid Jumblatt. L'Orient Today learned that Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rai will meet with Barrack on Wednesday, who is also expected to meet with the commander of the army, General Rodolphe Haykal. A dinner bringing together several MPs is also planned at the U.S. Embassy.
