Anti-crime crusader who knocked on mayor's door with horrific props is arrested for attempted kidnapping
Trenton Abston, 25, was taken into custody on Wednesday and charged with attempted kidnapping, stalking and aggravated criminal trespass following the incident at Mayor Young's residence.
According to investigators, Abston scaled a 10-foot wall in the mayor's gated neighborhood late Sunday evening and knocked on the front door while visibly carrying a concealed object in his hoodie pocket.
Young, who was inside with his wife and children, did not answer the door.
'Paul Young reported that he did not know the male and his presence at his door at a late hour wearing a hoodie and gloves put him, his wife and children in fear for their safety,' a criminal complaint filed Wednesday stated.
Public and private security cameras captured clear footage of the suspect's face, which helped police 'identify, locate and arrest the suspect,' the Memphis Police Department wrote in a statement posted on Facebook.
On Tuesday, police identified Abston as a person of interest. His work manager later confirmed his identity in surveillance footage from Sunday night.
After his arrest, Abston consented to a search of his vehicle, where the items in question were recovered, The New York Times reported.
Police said Abston also knocked on the doors of several other homes that night, raising concern throughout the neighborhood.
According to the criminal complaint, Abston told investigators he intended to confront Mayor Young 'about crime in the city of Memphis.'
He also said he had researched Young's address and had driven past the residence several times to confirm it.
'Abston took substantial steps toward the commission of a kidnapping,' the complaint concluded.
The Memphis Police Department described the incident as 'an escalating threat to a public official' and underscored the seriousness of the charges.
'We understand the concerns raised by this incident and want to reassure the public that the Memphis Police Department remains fully committed to the safety of all residents, including our city's elected officials,' the department's statement said.
'We take any potential threat seriously and will continue to act swiftly and thoroughly.'
Abston is scheduled for a bail hearing on June 23, according to the Commercial Appeal.
Mayor Young, who was elected in 2023 and is serving his first term, has been outspoken about addressing violent crime in the city.
In a statement, he voiced concern over the increasingly dangerous overlap between online rhetoric and real-world violence, referencing the recent assassination of Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband.
'In today's climate, especially after the tragic events in Minnesota and the threats my wife and I often receive online, none of us can be too careful,' Young wrote on Facebook.
'The link between angry online rhetoric and real-life violence is becoming undeniable.'
He voiced concern over the increasingly dangerous overlap between online rhetoric and real-world violence, referencing the recent assassination of Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband
He also urged Memphians to reject political extremism and embrace respectful civic dialogue.
'What starts as reckless words online can all too quickly become something much more dangerous,' he continued.
'The angry rhetoric, the hateful speech, and the heated threats create a culture where violence feels like a next step instead of a red line. We cannot allow that line to be crossed. Political violence and intimidation - whether threatened or enacted - simply cannot become our norm.'
'Memphis, we have to change how we talk to and about each other. Disagreement must never lead to violence. That cannot be our norm. Let's do better.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Basketball legend Michael Jordan aiming to win £2.9m top prize in new sport but faces lie detector test if he wins
MICHAEL JORDAN has been eyeing a stunning £2.9million prize for winning a fishing competition. Dubbed the " Super Bowl of fishing", the White Marlin Open is a competition that has been running for more than half a century. 4 4 4 It has earned its name thanks to the high stakes involved, which can rival the US Masters with well over $100m (£74m) paid out to winners of the competition since it was founded by Jim Motsko in 1974. This year, the top prize will land a cool $3.9m, with basketball icon Jordan among those hoping to catch a place in history, according to The Times. However, sailing in his £11m 82-foot Bayliss named Catch 23 off the coast of Maryland last week, he was not the only billionaire competing among the 200 plus boats in the water. The world's richest fishing contest is not without its dangers, with spray from the waves of the sea hitting his boat's 40-foot tower as he and nine anglers tried to wrestle a white marlin to shore - and a 71lbs fish proving to be a particular challenge. The minimum participation fee is around £1,250 ($1,700) - though that means the top prize you can take home is £37,000 ($50,000) - but some pay more than £74,000 ($100,000) to buy in. And it is also laid out by strict rules, with fishermen needing to get their catch alone. Indeed, other than to prevent an angler from falling into the big blue, any touching of them during the fierce battle with the fish would result in the catch no longer being eligible for weighing at the scales. Boats are also under curfew, only being able to fish in three out of the five days - seven in 2025 due to adverse weather - and can only start to fish after 8am. Furthermore, any fish brought to the scales on Harbour Island must be hooked before 3.30pm, with the scales closing at 9.15pm. And finally, the crews of the winning boats must also face a polygraph - lie detector test - to try and ensure fair competition. The tests are run by former professionals, including some ex-police officers, and is a rule everyone signs up for before heading out to ocean. However, the rule came under a fierce legal challenge in 2016 when Phil Heasley was disqualified for a failed test after reeling in a 76.5lb white marlin that was set to earn him £2m ($2.8m). The challenge went to the US District Court, with Judge Richard Bennett ruling in favour of the White Marlin Open after upholding the tournament's right to use a polygraph. Madelyne Motsko, daughter of the competitions founder, said of the test: "We introduced it well over 20 years ago. "It just got to the point where, with the number of boats, it became a hard thing to police. So we thought it was a way to ensure a baseline level of integrity, and we use it for our big-money winners." On Heasley's case, she added: "That ended up being a whole two-year process. "But these are the rules that you need to follow and they are important because everyone who comes here needs to know that everything's above board; we pay out what we're supposed to pay out and there are no integrity issues. "They know if they're putting their money up, that it's going to go to the rightful winner. In the history of fishing tournaments, that's not always been the case. "So we fought very hard in court, spending a ton of money, to protect that reputation." The biggest blue marlin at the contest, caught by the crew of the Barbara B, tipped the scales at a whopping 929.5lb and fetched just shy of £914,000 ($1.24m). Jordan himself - seemingly more in the contest for the thrill than the cash - saw his Catch 23 net $389,000 in what was the second-biggest white marlin - said to have a steak-like texture with a stronger taste - by a difference of a single pound. He had landed in his private jet on Tuesday and joined the rest of the Catch 23 crew at the dock alongside the Sunset Grille, where he is often seen smoking a cigar. He has been a frequent visitor of Ocean City in recent years, though Saturday was his first time he had made it to the scales, with Harbour Island said to have gone wild as he waved to the crowd as his boat came in to dock. Tuna is also on the menu for anglers, with the winning 188lb tuna being worth $764,000 to Sea Hab and second-place 186lb tuna only being caught after a 5 and a half hour struggle. Many of the fish caught in the competition are released back to sea, due to having to be of a certain size to even qualify for the scales. Prize-winning fish are typically cut up and shared across local shelters, providing meals for the less fortunate.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The murder capital of the US and a former mayor on crack: DC's history of crime problems
President Donald Trump described Washington D.C. as a city riddled with 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor and worse,' setting the scene to place the nation's capital under federal control. Trump is throwing the full weight of his administration behind the deployment of around 800 National Guard troops to crack down on 'out of control' crime. But the president's depiction of Washington, D.C. as a violent, crime-ridden cesspit is nothing new and harks back to the 1800s, when it was described as a 'contemptible hamlet' by an architect who had lofty plans for the city before the Civil War. Later, in 1968, Richard Nixon said that D.C. was 'fast becoming the crime capital of the world,' and promised to turn it into 'an example of respect for law and freedom from fear.' And in the late 1980s and 1990s, D.C. claimed the title of 'murder capital' of the U.S. as homicide rates hit record rates during a drug crisis. At the same time, the city was presided over by a mayor who was arrested for smoking crack cocaine. A similar rhetoric is now being pushed by Trump despite the city's declining crime rate. But crime researchers say D.C. still has a serious problem. 'Although crime is declining, Washington is still far more dangerous than the capital of the United States should be,' Charles Fain Lehman, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, wrote in the Atlantic. Here, The Independent looks back at a city and its crime. 1800s: 'A contemptible hamlet' In 1791, French-American architect Pierre L'Enfant was appointed by George Washington to design the place that would later become Washington, D.C. L'Enfant had a grand vision for the Federal City, consisting of picturesque gardens, grand avenues and impressive mansions. By the early 1800s, he was disappointed by the reality and complained the city was a 'contemptible hamlet,' the historian and author J.D. Dickey wrote in his 2014 book Empire of Mud: The Secret History of Washington, D.C. 'Where he saw grand avenues for strolling, there were dirty lanes and broken pavements,' Dickey wrote. 'Where he saw smart theaters, churches, banks, and salons, there were squalid alleys, gambling halls, and bordellos catering to criminals and johns.' The culture of violence seen in recent decades has evolved out of the 19th century, the author said. 'Washington D.C. was an incredibly violent place, especially during its pre-Civil War and Civil War era, and up through the Gilded Age as well,' Dickey said on The Takeaway podcast. 'One reason it was so incredibly violent was because of the lack of police presence. You had a handful of constables who were expected to patrol beats that were miles long. Crime routinely broke out, mob violence, and all other aspects of bad and criminal behavior, as well as socially-accepted violence.' At the same time, the slave trade was booming in the capital. 'The legacy of slavery is a deep and disturbing one, and it's one that's really hard to get away from when you plunge into the history of the city,' Dickey added. After the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861, Congress established the Metropolitan Police Department in a bid to tackle the ensuing disorder. 'It was a time of constant danger in the Nation's Capital,' according to the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Memorial and Museum. 'With the beginning of the Civil War, an army was billeted in the city, government employees were increased by ten-fold, and hordes of unsavory elements descended upon the District's few square miles.' 1950–1970s: 'A utopia for criminals' and Nixon declares D.C. 'crime capital of the US' During President Dwight Eisenhower's first term, there were several consecutive years where the city experienced a decline in reported crime, though the authors of a controversial 1951 book declared D.C. 'a cesspool of iniquity and a Utopia for criminals.' Reported crime had dropped by nearly 20 percent over three years from 1954 to 1957, a 1978 Justice Department report noted. But a spate of violent offenses toward the end of the decade targeting public officials heightened public alarm. 'In August 1959 there was the mugging of the widow of former Deputy Defense Secretary Donald Quarles, the brandishing of a knife at Congressman Diggs, the murder of an Air Force sergeant, and a gang beating of a police officer,' the report said. 'These events mobilized renewed official concern and action.' In 1968, in the wake of the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr in Memphis and the subsequent riots that ignited across the country, Richard Nixon declared D.C. one of the 'crime capitals of the nation.' As anger rippled through the city, 13 people died in the violence and more than 900 businesses were destroyed. Police and firefighters became overwhelmed and federal troops moved in. 'The disorders and the crime and the violence that are now commonplace in Washington are more than a national disgrace,' Nixon said on the campaign trail, citing a 67 percent increase in the homicide rate between July 1967 and July 1968. Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by non-white populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence, the Associated Press noted. 1980s – late 1990s: A decade of 'unbelievable violence' Washington, D.C. was in the grip of a drug crisis from the late 1980s into the late 1990s as a crack cocaine epidemic, fueling gang violence, took hold. 'The city was going through a terrible time,' Ruben Castaneda, a former reporter at The Washington Post, told the BBC in 2014. 'Through the late 80s to mid-to-late 90s there were just unbelievable levels of violence behind crack cocaine, and fights over drug turfs, witness killings and retaliatory killings.' The annual homicide rate hit over 400 by 1989 as the city was once again branded the 'murder capital' of the U.S. Its image wasn't helped by the arrest of the city's scandal-plagued Mayor Marion Barry in 1991, who was caught on camera smoking crack cocaine in a sting operation. Despite serving a six-month prison sentence for cocaine possession in 1991, he remarkably reclaimed the job in 1995. Barry, who died in November 2014, wrote in his autobiography that back then he was fueled by a 'mix of power, attraction, alcohol, sex and drugs.' Despite his 'tumultuous' life, as former President Barack Obama put it, Barry was praised for advancing civil rights while he was in office. Meanwhile, by 1991, the city set a grim new record of 482 recorded murders, which was the worst murder rate in 20 years. 2000s – today: A declining crime rate but fears remain The levels of violence seen in the 80s and 90s are down a significant amount today. Lehman noted that a 2005 strategy targeting the people and places that drive violence, implemented by the Metropolitan Police Department and the federal government, saw homicide rates drop. 'The success of 2005's initiative shows that the administration does not need to preempt the District in order to bring crime down,' Lehman wrote in the Atlantic. In 2012, D.C. recorded an 'astoundingly low' 88 murders, which has ticked up again in the last 10 years, crime data analyst Jeff Asher, co-founder of the firm AH Datalytics, wrote in a Substack post. 'Murders in DC peaked in 2023, began falling in 2024, and have been steadily falling through July 2025,' Asher wrote. 'The bottom line is that violent crime in DC is currently declining and the city's reported violent crime rate is more or less as low now as it has been since the 1960s,' Asher added, with a disclaimer that not all crimes are reported to police. 'The city's official violent crime rate in 2024 was the second lowest that has been reported since 1966.' What is undeniable is the growing public concern over safety in D.C. A poll by The Washington Post conducted last year found that 65 percent of D.C. residents said crime is an 'extremely serious' or a 'very serious' problem, up from 56 percent in 2023. 'The city has a real problem,' Lehman said. 'Someone needs to be responsible for fixing it.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Alabama priest investigated after woman alleges ‘private companionship' arrangement beginning at 17
A Roman Catholic priest in Alabama is under investigation, church officials say – and he abruptly announced he is taking 'personal leave' – after a woman alleged to his superiors that he traded financial support for 'private companionship' including sex, beginning when she was 17. The accuser, Heather Jones, has also alleged that the clergyman, Robert Sullivan, recently paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars to remain silent about it, a claim she supported with bank records, an email and a copy of a legal agreement. Jones, 33, provided the Guardian with a formal written statement that contained her allegations against Sullivan, 61, and which she provided to the diocese of Birmingham. She said she came forward because Sullivan had continued working closely with families and their children as the pastor of Our Lady of Sorrows church in Homewood, Alabama, leaving her fearful that 'others may be vulnerable to the same type of manipulation and exploitation' she says she endured. Jones gave permission to be publicly identified by name, saying she hoped it would boost the credibility of her account. Birmingham diocese spokesperson Donald Carson said on Tuesday that the allegations against Sullivan were under investigation by an independent review board advising the local church. As was its protocol, Carson said, the diocese had forwarded the allegations to the Vatican entity which investigates cases of clergy misconduct. And Carson said Sullivan would be prohibited from public ministry until the resolution of the allegations against him. Voicemails the diocese left with Jones – and which she shared with the Guardian – offered her free therapeutic counseling. It was not immediately clear how much scrutiny Sullivan might draw from lay authorities. Carson said the diocese had reported Sullivan to the Alabama state agency that investigates child abuse cases because of the age Jones said she was when she met him. But officials at Alabama's department of human resources had said the case did not fit the criteria of one in which they could get involved. Law enforcement investigators have been reluctant to act in some cases of religious clergy accused of having sexual contact with teens who had reached the legal age of consent, which in Alabama is 16. Furthermore, Alabama is not among the US states with laws that say it is impossible for there to be consensual sexual relationships between clergy and legal adults who are under the clerics' spiritual guidance. Sullivan could, however, face consequences within the Catholic church. Canon law to which clergymen are subject has considered people younger than 18 to be minors – and sexual contact with them to be abusive – since the early 2000s, when the worldwide Catholic church implemented reforms amid the fallout of a decades-old clerical molestation scandal. Multiple attempts by the Guardian to contact Sullivan for comment were not successful Tuesday. As she wrote in her statement to the diocese in late July and recounted to the Guardian more recently, Jones grew up in foster care after being removed from her mother's custody 'due to severe neglect'. She wrote that she lacked 'consistent adult support' during her upbringing, leaving her ill-equipped to maintain employment or pursue a formal education – so she tried to make ends meet by working as a dancer at an 'adult establishment' outside Birmingham. Jones reported meeting Sullivan at that establishment when she was 17. He was a regular patron, tipped her during her shifts and soon offered to 'help change [her] life' if she called him on his phone number, she wrote. Sullivan proposed 'to form an ongoing relationship that would include financial support in exchange for private companionship', wrote Jones, who told the Guardian that the term encompassed sex. Jones said Sullivan subsequently began taking her shopping, dining, drinking, and to hotel rooms in at least six different Alabama cities in part to engage in sex – beginning when she was 17 and over the course of several years. Jones wrote that she 'was a minor with no experience navigating adult relationships' when she met Sullivan. She wrote: 'I was hesitant but ultimately agreed due to his persistence and the state [of mind] I was in.' Jones said Sullivan bought her a phone on which he frequently contacted her. He initially presented himself as a 'doctor', though she later learned he was a priest while his brother was a physician, she said. She wrote in her statement that discovering Sullivan belonged to the Catholic priesthood – whose members promise to be abstinent and teach that sex out of wedlock is sinful – was disturbing because she had attended church services throughout her youth and had difficulty reconciling 'his public role and private behavior'. Sullivan paid for Jones to attend a rehabilitation program after she experienced depression, emotional instability and addiction during their arrangement, she wrote. Jones wrote that Sullivan and an attorney representing him eventually had her sign a non-disclosure agreement in return for $273,000. She shared an unsigned copy of the NDA with the Guardian. She also provided a copy of a 27 March message from Sullivan's Our Lady of Sorrows email address, which had the sentence: 'Someone will be calling you to sign the NDA.' Four days after that email, bank records which she shared with the Guardian showed, Jones received a wire transfer of $136,500 from an account under the name of the attorney's law office. She received another $136,500 wire transfer from the same law office account a day later, the bank records indicated. Separately, in more than 125 different transactions from 18 July 2024 to 26 March, a Venmo account under Sullivan's name paid nearly $120,000 to Jones, according to a copy of records from the financial app that Jones shared with the Guardian. Jones said it was never clear whether Sullivan took that money out of his personal finances, and remembered wondering whether it possibly came from some other source. Jones said he gave her the Venmo money of his own accord to aid her in covering her living expenses. Jones recalled Sullivan telling her he was also happy to give her that money because he loved her – and so did Jesus Christ. Jones wrote that she later proposed to revise the NDA with Sullivan and requested $100,000 more. She said the agreement 'heavily favored his interests and offered no meaningful protection, healing or justice' for dealings with Sullivan she had come to regard as 'exploitative and predatory'. Sullivan and his attorney ignored her, Jones wrote. She provided her statement to the Birmingham diocese a few days after writing it on 23 July. Jones said she was willing to share phone records and pictures which she contended would corroborate her version of events with church investigators if they sought the materials. At Our Lady of Sorrows' 3 August mass, Sullivan told his congregants that Birmingham bishop Steven Raica had authorized him to take 'personal leave' that he requested after 'prayer and reflection'. 'Please continue to remember me in your prayers – as I will do the same for you,' Sullivan said shortly before the conclusion of the mass. On 10 August, Birmingham diocese vicar general Kevin Bazzel told congregants that Raica had appointed him as Our Lady of Sorrows' temporary administrator in Sullivan's absence. Sullivan had in June celebrated the 32nd anniversary of his ordination into the priesthood. He had also served six years as president of Birmingham's John Carroll Catholic high school and in 2023 was appointed director of its educational foundation, as the local Homewood Star newspaper previously reported. He announced his leave nearly four years after Raica had appointed him to serve as one of the diocese's vicars general, a high-ranking administrative post. In 2020, Sullivan had appeared on the ABC show Good Morning America, in which he discussed recovering from Covid with a helping hand from his brother, an infectious diseases doctor. Jones said she recently began law school and defied the NDA mentioned in her statement about Sullivan to the Birmingham diocese – which has an estimated membership of roughly a quarter of a million Catholics – because she was confident it would not hold up in court. She also wrote that she considered it vital to speak out about Sullivan because 'behind closed doors, his behavior toward me was not in alignment with the values he teaches'. Carson, the Birmingham diocese spokesperson, said the allegations against Sullivan were 'unfortunate for all involved'. 'We keep father … Sullivan and the woman who's making the allegations here certainly in our prayers,' Carson said.
