DOJ teases details about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell testimony they want released
The revelation was made in a late-night filing that urged a Manhattan judge to unseal the transcripts and release the documents to the public, given the 'abundant public interest' after it was announced that a review of the cases determined there was no Epstein client list.
4 Lawyers with the Justice Department Tuesday teased details about the grand jury transcripts from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal cases that they want released.
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Depa
Federal prosecutors said in the filing that the grand jury met in June and July of 2019 in Epstein's case — and only one witness testified, an FBI agent.
In Maxwell's case, the grand jury met in June and July of 2020, and again in March 2021, with the same FBI agent taking the witness stand in addition to an NYPD detective who worked in the FBI's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force also testified.
However, even if the judge agrees to the transcripts getting released, it would still only represent a small fraction of the mountain of Epstein-related investigative materials that the DOJ and FBI have — which the feds have said amounts to over 300 gigabytes.
Many of Epstein's victims — whose accounts were told to the grand jury by the agent and cop — ultimately testified at the 2021 trial that ended in Maxwell's conviction and some have also laid out their claims in lawsuits, the court documents said.
The feds said they are 'sensitive' to the risk of releasing identifying information about victims and third parties, which 'is why the government proposes redacting the transcripts before releasing them.'
4 Epstein's right-hand-women, Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted for helping him groom young women for his abuse.
All except for one of the victims mentioned in the grand jury transcripts have been notified about the transcripts potentially coming out, the court docs said.
While grand jury proceedings are customarily kept secret, exceptions can be made.
The DOJ argues that the public interest and 'the magnitude and abhorrence of Epstein's crimes' weigh in favor of the documents getting released.
In early July, the DOJ issued a letter announcing that they'd wrapped up their review of Epstein evidence and that there wasn't an Epstein client list, sparking a fresh wave of public fascination and outrage.
4 Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein procure girls so he could sexually abuse them.
US District Court for the Southern District of New York/AFP via Getty Images
In the letter, they specified they'd reviewed over 300 gigabytes of investigative materials related to the 66-year-old multi-millionaire hedge fund manager.
The records include a full list of the fruits of the raids on Epstein's Manhattan, Palm Beach and Virgin Islands mansions.
The DOJ has refused to divulge any of that information or provide any further details beyond a July statement saying that there is 'no basis' to disclose any of the Epstein files, which also include sick sex videos involving children.
US Attorney General Pam Bondi, who heads the DOJ, had previously claimed that she would release juicy details in the files and boasted that they were 'sitting on my desk right now' in a February interview with Fox News.
Meanwhile, DOJ officials in May told President Trump that his name was among those mentioned in the files, the Wall Street Journal reported.
4 Maxwell has been seeking to overturn her conviction on appeal.
REUTERS
It was unclear in what context Trump's name was mentioned, but Trump and Epstein were friendly throughout the 1990s into the early 2000s.
Trump said Tuesday that he cut ties with the convicted sex offender after Epstein used his Mar-a-Lago club spa as a hunting ground for young women.
The disgraced financier 'stole people that worked for me,' Trump told reporters.
Last week, West Palm Beach US District Judge Robin Rosenberg denied the DOJ's similar bid to have grand jury transcripts released from Epstein's criminal case in which he was granted a controversial sweetheart plea deal after admitting to child prostitution charges in Florida in 2008.
He was sentenced to 18 months in prison, but only served 13 months and was allowed out on work release for much of the time.
Epstein was charged in Manhattan in a child sex-trafficking case in 2019 and killed himself a month later while he was awaiting trial in a Lower Manhattan lock-up.
Maxwell's lawyers didn't immediately return a request for comment Wednesday morning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-Giants running back LeShon Johnson found guilty in largest federal dog-fighting case ever
Ex-NFLer LeShon Johnson was convicted of six felony counts related to his role in a federal dog-fighting bust earlier this year. A federal jury in Oklahoma found the former Giants running back guilty last week of violating the federal Animal Welfare Act's prohibitions against possessing, selling, transporting, and delivering animals to be used in fighting ventures, the Department of Justice announced on Monday. Johnson will be sentenced at a later date and faces a maximum penalty of five years behind bars and a fine of up to $250,000 on each count. Advertisement 3 Leshon Johnson holds a press conference at the practice field of Giants Stadium in 1998. New York Post/Mike Norcia Authorities seized 190 dogs and Johnson has surrendered them to the government, which is pursuing forfeiture of the animals. 'This criminal profited off of the misery of innocent animals and he will face severe consequences for his vile crimes,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. 'This case underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to protecting animals from abuse — 190 dogs are now safe thanks to outstanding collaborative work by our attorneys and law enforcement components.' Advertisement Johnson had been charged in March in what federal law enforcement dubbed the largest seizure of dogs ever in a federal case and had said that he had nearly 200 'pit bull-type dogs,' which were used in an 'animal fighting venture.' During the multi-day trial in Oklahoma, prosecutors presented evidence that Johnson had bred and trafficked dogs for his operation, called 'Mal Kant Kennels,' in order to fight them. 3 LeShon Johnson scoring a touchdown in 1999. New York Post/ W.A. Gunches Jr. 3 LeShon Johnson carrying the ball for the Giants in 1999. New York Post/ W.A. Funches Jr. Advertisement 'The FBI will not stand for those who perpetuate the despicable crime of dogfighting,' FBI Director Kash Patel said in a statement. 'Thanks to the hard work of our law enforcement partners, those who continue to engage in organized animal fighting and cruelty will face justice.' Johnson spent five years in the NFL and was drafted by the Packers in the 1994 draft before playing from 1995-97 with the Cardinals and playing the 1999 season with the Giants.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump-requested Epstein and Maxwell grand jury records cover only two witnesses
The grand jury transcripts President Donald Trump is seeking in New York as he tries to quell his base's outrage over the White House's decision not to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein cover only two witnesses, according to the Justice Department. Those witnesses are an FBI agent and a detective with the New York Police Department, DOJ officials said in a July 29 court filing. Both witnesses testified in the federal grand jury proceedings that led to charges against convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence. Only the FBI agent testified before the grand jury that charged Epstein with sex trafficking in 2019. The fact that just two people are on the witness list, both members of law enforcement, could mean the transcripts might not be revelatory, even if they are released. A Manhattan federal district court is currently deciding whether to unseal the records for public viewing. A Florida federal district court separately ruled July 23 that Epstein-related records tied to federal grand jury proceedings in that state must remain private. The New York police detective who testified in the Maxwell-related proceedings in Manhattan was serving with the FBI's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force at the time, according to the Justice Department. What will be new in grand jury transcripts? The Justice Department offered a couple of indications in the latest court filing that the transcripts might not reveal much that the public doesn't already know. In addition to just having two witnesses in the transcripts, the court filing suggests that at least a significant portion of what those witnesses said may have been repeated at trial by victims of Epstein and Maxwell. In other words, it wouldn't be new information to the public. "Many of the victims whose accounts relating to Epstein and Maxwell that were the subject of grand jury testimony testified at trial consistent with the accounts described by an FBI agent and the detective," according to the Justice Department's filing. Some of the victims also publicized their accounts in the context of civil lawsuits, the department added. Several witnesses testified in Maxwell's month-long trial in 2021, which ended with her conviction for conspiring to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts with Epstein and sex trafficking a minor to him. Prosecutors said Maxwell helped Epstein recruit, groom, and abuse minor girls from about 1994 to about 2004, including girls as young as 14. Will transcripts satisfy public outrage over Epstein? Justice Department officials asked for the transcripts to be released at the request of Trump, who said in a Truth Social post on July 17 that he made the request based on "the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein." Department officials have called for redacting personal identifying information if courts approve of making the records public. That caveat could further disappoint members of the public who have clamored for the government to release the names of any potential Epstein clients suspected of participating with the disgraced financier in a sex-trafficking ring. Several officials in Trump's administration have fanned the flames of those conspiracies for years, including FBI Director Kash Patel, who told right-wing media figure Glenn Beck in 2023 that the head of President Joe Biden's FBI had direct control of an Epstein "black book." However, in a memo released July 7, the Justice Department and the FBI said a review of the government's records on Epstein failed to turn up a client list and that no further disclosures were warranted. In the wake of that memo, even some congressional Republicans have clamored for the files' release or introduced legislation to try to force the Trump administration's hand. Republican leadership has so far blocked the legislation, and White House officials continue to resist those calls. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury records cover only two witnesses Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration won't release the Epstein files, but what would they contain?
The White House has continued to resist calls from Congress and President Donald Trump's own base to release the FBI's investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein. Instead, it has asked courts to release grand jury testimony and has interviewed convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell to try to satisfy demands for transparency. So far, those alternatives haven't satisfied conservatives who believe − as Trump allies suggested for years − that Epstein was involved in a sex trafficking conspiracy with many other rich and powerful people. Top Trump officials came into office promising a new level of transparency in the Epstein case, and many Trump supporters maintain the administration should release all of the files it has. But what exactly is in those sought-after files? What would the public learn from their release? To answer those questions, USA TODAY talked to former FBI agents and prosecutors. They said the files are likely to be much more expansive than what's in the grand jury testimony, including records on witness interviews and investigative trails. "It could be an enormous universe of original documents, interview notes, memos of analysis," said Michell Epner, a former New Jersey federal prosecutor who handled sex trafficking cases. Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, and Lauren Boebert, R-Colorado, cosponsored legislation in mid-July to release the government's Epstein records, with redactions to protect victims, active investigations and the national defense. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, announced July 22 that he was shutting down the House early for its summer recess to avoid a vote on releasing the Epstein files. Here's a look at what sorts of material the government is keeping hidden and the arguments for and against transparency: What could be in the FBI's 'Epstein files'? The FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, who died in a Manhattan federal jail cell in 2019 while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial, goes back decades, and could include a wide swath of material. Around 2006, federal investigators looked into allegations that Epstein was paying several minor girls to perform sex acts with him. That inquiry led to what many regard as a sweetheart deal for Epstein, in which he pleaded guilty in 2008 to two Florida state prostitution charges, avoided a sex trafficking charge, and served just 13 months in a local jail. The case related to criminal activities in Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, which was about 2 miles away from Trump's Mar-a-Lago club. The federal prosecutor who negotiated the deal, Alex Acosta, became the labor secretary in Trump's first administration but resigned after fallout from a 2018 Miami Herald investigation that revealed Acosta's role in the deal. In July 2019, the convicted sex offender was arrested on the more serious charge of sex trafficking a minor. That same day, the FBI raided Epstein's Manhattan mansion, collecting computer hard drives and other potential evidence. After Epstein died, law enforcement also raided his property in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Those investigations would have produced a range of materials and documents, according to former law enforcement officials. It would include records of various witness interviews and details that could span well beyond information that was relevant to the criminal charges brought against Epstein and Maxwell. "People volunteer whatever they want and and sometimes people are very vocal, and they tell you personal things that have nothing to do with the investigation," said Katherine Schweit, a former FBI special agent and former Illinois state prosecutor. That could mean the files contain information or allegations dealing with third parties who have never been charged with a crime. In a news release in February, the Justice Department said it planned to release "thousands of pages" of never-before-disclosed documents after reviewing and redacting them to protect the identities of Epstein's victims. In a memo in July, however, the department reversed course and said no further disclosure was warranted. Trump was reportedly told in May that he is named multiple time in the files. Trump and Epstein were friends for many years, living near each other and partying together as far back as the early 1990s. Archived video footage and photos revealed by CNN July 22 show Epstein attending Trump's wedding to his second wife, Marla Maples, at the Plaza Hotel in 1993. The two men's friendship ended in about 2004, around the time they battled over an oceanfront Palm Beach mansion, according to The Washington Post. Trump recently said he banned Epstein from his Florida Mar-a-Lago club because Epstein "stole" staffers from the spa, including Virginia Giuffre, a well-known victim of Epstein who died by suicide earlier this year. Will grand jury transcripts cover the Epstein files? The grand jury transcripts requested by the Justice Department probably amount to just a sliver of what the FBI has in its possession, Epner said. "Grand jury testimony – while it could be, in theory, very broad – in this case, is very narrow," Epner said. A federal judge in Florida already rejected the Justice Department's request for the release of grand jury transcripts from around 2006. Two separate requests for the grand jury transcripts that led to charges against Epstein and Maxwell in New York more than a decade later are still pending. Epner explained that grand jury materials are just a subset of the work product the FBI and DOJ likely put together in the course of their Epstein-related investigations. And the Justice Department isn't even seeking all grand jury materials – only the grand jury transcripts. That wouldn't include, for instance, bank records obtained through a grand jury subpoena. Theoretically, a list of grand jury witnesses can be long. Prosecutors may call many witnesses before a grand jury so they can be confident of what the witnesses will say under oath at trial. Some grand juries also conduct investigations and call a wide range of witnesses for that purpose. But that's not what happened in Maxwell and Epstein's New York criminal cases. Only two witnesses testified before the grand juries, according to the Justice Department. They were an FBI agent and a New York police detective who, at the time, was working with the FBI's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force. Those witnesses summarized what interview subjects said. That means the transcripts wouldn't include direct testimony from victims. It also suggests the grand jury processes in the two cases were streamlined rather than sprawling. In addition, if the Manhattan federal court agrees to release the transcripts, the Justice Department has said it plans to redact not just victim-related information, but also "other personal identifying information." That may mean blocking out identifiers for third parties tied to Epstein – the type of people whom members of the public may want to investigate as potential clients of Epstein. "I don't think the people that are behind all this, people that are have so much of an outcry about this, that they're going to be satisfied with just grand jury information, unless they don't know what it is," said Rick Smith, a former FBI special agent who now provides investigative services to law firms. That doesn't mean the grand jury transcripts couldn't contain revelations. Schweit noted that court rules that restrict testimony at trial are relaxed before grand juries, so the jurors who charged Maxwell and Epstein may have heard things that weren't discussed at Maxwell's public trial in 2021. "You might include in a grand jury somebody's criminal background, or ask questions about where they went to college and who their roommates were, and did they know this person or that person? Some things that in a regular court might be hearsay, it might be secondary information," Schweit said. Why not release the files? There are arguments against releasing the files. The Justice Department has said its review of the files didn't produce evidence to justify investigating anyone who hasn't been charged already. Assuming that was a fair assessment of the evidence, releasing the files could unfairly tie third parties to Epstein's suspected crimes. "The thing that happens with something like this is there are a lot of people out there that are scared to death of this thing, who had nothing to do with anything untoward," Smith said. Trump isn't the only famous person who has been tied to Epstein in ways that fueled speculation – without proof – of Epstein-related criminal conduct. Former President Bill Clinton flew repeatedly on Epstein's private jet, according to flight logs reported on by The Palm Beach Post. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak met with Epstein dozens of times and also took flights on the jet, according to a Wall Street Journal investigation. Others may simply have been present at one of the many glamorous parties Epstein attended in his social heyday. If the Justice Department one day finds new evidence and concludes investigating someone else is appropriate, releasing the evidence it has could jeopardize that investigation. There is no statute of limitations that would restrict federal prosecutors from going after someone else for suspected sex trafficking. "We want to ensure that we can continue to truthfully look for whether somebody is guilty or innocent, whether further investigation needs to be done," Schweit said. Still, releasing the files also could clear people who have come under suspicion in some corners of the court of public opinion. Actor Kevin Spacey, who – according to Law & Crime – acknowledged in court testimony flying on Epstein's plane along with Clinton, wants the files released so he can clear his name. "Release the Epstein files. All of them," Spacey, 65, posted on X July 15. "For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can't come soon enough. I hate to make this about me – but the media already has." And part of what makes the Epstein-related investigations different is the level and spread of conspiracy theories surrounding how Epstein died and who may have also been involved in his crimes. Several members of Trump's own administration fanned the flames of those conspiracy theories for years. Now, those same officials are facing a wide segment of the public that doesn't trust that all investigative leads have been followed. "If there wasn't so much of an outcry that there was a conspiracy, I don't think we'd be where we are right now," Smith said. "But now that the people that had the most say about it are in the position to do something about it, it becomes a problem." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: If Epstein files were released, what would be in them? Solve the daily Crossword
