Advice: Why is my family avoiding me after I cut off contact with my father?
A: I know you didn't mean any harm. And in fact, if you had simply reported the cost of the university-affiliated day care – from an article in a newspaper, for instance – there may have been some head-shaking at the unfairness of our economic system, but it might not have felt so personal.
What you did, inadvertently, was place yourself on one side of a dividing line: those who can afford, say, US$20,000 per child for day care and those who can't. Money is extremely efficient in creating lines like these – which is not an argument for avoiding the subject, only for raising it after consideration.
Limited bandwidth for texting
Q: We are in the middle of a medical emergency. Our young adult daughter needs an organ transplant immediately. Between travelling to be with her, consulting with doctors and planning her move before the transplant, we are at our limit. Everyone in our inner circle knows the story. Still, many of them send us texts about their news and travels. I am not one to ghost, but I can't summon the strength to answer anything other than 'How is she?' or 'How are you holding up?' Am I wrong not to respond to these texts? - Friend
A: Of course not! You are the best judge of your emotional capacity – and right now, you seem to have reached it looking after your daughter and the needs of your family. Who knows why your friends are sending newsy texts? Maybe they think they will be a welcome distraction. Don't give it another thought for now. There will be time to circle back to them later. Take care of yourself and your daughter.
The camera was candid, but I'm not smiling
Q: A kind man I know posted candid photographs on his Facebook page from an event I attended recently. One photo of me is so awful it shocked me. The angle is poor, and I look like a hideous toad. I wish I could get the word out about candid shots and their power to hurt. If I tell him how bad his photograph makes me feel, maybe he will learn something. Should I? - Subject
Judging photographs – like any art form – is a subjective business. You can't know how I will feel about a picture of me and vice versa. If you want the kind man to take down his photograph of you, ask him to. (I bet he will.) But I see no reason to tell him how horrible it made you feel. In this age of social media, it seems unrealistic to think that attendees of public events have approval rights over documentary photographs.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Philip Galanes
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Advice: Why is my family avoiding me after I cut off contact with my father?
Q: My husband has a well-paid job at an elite university. We send our two kids to the day care there. The combined cost is more than my annual salary. Over drinks with acquaintances, one of them raised the issue of day care costs. Someone said they were 'sooo expensive,' and another compared them to college tuitions. So, I finally said the number we pay. But when I saw the shock on their faces, I instantly regretted it. I didn't tell them to show off. I just thought it was more real to say what day care actually costs. Thoughts? - Mum A: I know you didn't mean any harm. And in fact, if you had simply reported the cost of the university-affiliated day care – from an article in a newspaper, for instance – there may have been some head-shaking at the unfairness of our economic system, but it might not have felt so personal. What you did, inadvertently, was place yourself on one side of a dividing line: those who can afford, say, US$20,000 per child for day care and those who can't. Money is extremely efficient in creating lines like these – which is not an argument for avoiding the subject, only for raising it after consideration. Limited bandwidth for texting Q: We are in the middle of a medical emergency. Our young adult daughter needs an organ transplant immediately. Between travelling to be with her, consulting with doctors and planning her move before the transplant, we are at our limit. Everyone in our inner circle knows the story. Still, many of them send us texts about their news and travels. I am not one to ghost, but I can't summon the strength to answer anything other than 'How is she?' or 'How are you holding up?' Am I wrong not to respond to these texts? - Friend A: Of course not! You are the best judge of your emotional capacity – and right now, you seem to have reached it looking after your daughter and the needs of your family. Who knows why your friends are sending newsy texts? Maybe they think they will be a welcome distraction. Don't give it another thought for now. There will be time to circle back to them later. Take care of yourself and your daughter. The camera was candid, but I'm not smiling Q: A kind man I know posted candid photographs on his Facebook page from an event I attended recently. One photo of me is so awful it shocked me. The angle is poor, and I look like a hideous toad. I wish I could get the word out about candid shots and their power to hurt. If I tell him how bad his photograph makes me feel, maybe he will learn something. Should I? - Subject Judging photographs – like any art form – is a subjective business. You can't know how I will feel about a picture of me and vice versa. If you want the kind man to take down his photograph of you, ask him to. (I bet he will.) But I see no reason to tell him how horrible it made you feel. In this age of social media, it seems unrealistic to think that attendees of public events have approval rights over documentary photographs. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Philip Galanes ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Woody the blind pig finds a new home after electric gate-opening antics in Dunedin
Life with her animal mates - the other pigs, the two goats, the cat, the dog and the sheep - was bliss for a while, but then Woody discovered how to open an electric gate. An electric gate had been installed on the driveway they shared with five neighbours. 'Woody worked out how to push the gate open and go for a wee wander,' Lindsay said. She got up the driveway and into the neighbours' 'flash' vege gardens. 'They were excellent, they were wonderful,' Lindsay said. 'They'd just send a message and say, 'Woody's in the garden again.' 'So we'd rush off and get her, very embarrassed though, coming back with a tail between our legs.' Woody would be returned home only to escape again, until the electric gate had to be tied up. 'My partner doesn't believe in pinning them in. 'She had free range of the whole property, five acres, she could come and go as she pleased, often at our front door waiting like a dog to be fed.' One neighbour was not keen on Woody's visits and suggested Rotch fence her. So Lindsay made the tough decision to list Woody on Facebook. Kym Craig contacted her immediately and offered to take the pet pig. 'She was just amazing, and she made that whole process so much easier.' Craig took Woody away in a horse float and rehomed her on another rural property, at Millburn. 'Woody's got a wee pen, sleeping in a wee hay pen ... but she did go missing on the first night at her house. I was like, 'Oh my goodness.'' Craig sends Lindsay pictures of Woody, now a happy pig in hay. 'She is gorgeous. The goats and the pig were always at the door waiting for a feed at the end of the day.' Woody had been gone a week, and Lindsay missed her; however, she said Craig had invited them to visit any time. - RNZ
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Probe blames operator for 'preventable' Titanic sub disaster
By Daniel Stublen , AFP OceanGate's Titan submersible launching from a platform. Photo: AFP / OceanGate Expeditions Multiple failures to follow standard safety protocol led to the deadly implosion of a private submersible visiting the Titanic wreckage in 2023, according to a final report published overnight. The US Coast Guard investigation outlined a litany of issues with operator OceanGate's conduct, as well as design flaws in its Titan submersible, that contributed to a "preventable tragedy" in which all five passengers were killed. The 335-page report said "OceanGate's failure to follow established engineering protocols for safety, testing, and maintenance of their submersible, was the primary causal factor" for the implosion. It also accused the company of "intimidation tactics ... to evade regulatory scrutiny". OceanGate had a "toxic workplace environment which used firings of senior staff members and the looming threat of being fired to dissuade employees and contractors from expressing safety concerns," the report said. OceanGate chief executive Stockton Rush was joined on the doomed expedition by British explorer Hamish Harding, French deep-sea explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet, Pakistani-British tycoon Shahzada Dawood and his son Suleman . Seats on the submersible cost $250,000 per person. Communications were lost with the SUV-sized submersible about an hour and 45 minutes into its dive on 18 June, 2023, kicking off a dramatic search that briefly captivated the world. The Titan submersible passengers (L-R, top to bottom) Hamish Harding, Stockton Rush, Paul-Henri Nargeolet, Suleman Dawood and his father Shahzada Dawood. Photo: Handout, Joël SAGET / AFP / Dirty Dozen Productions / OceanGate Expeditions / DAWOOD HERCULES CORPORATION Over two miles (about 3.2 kilometres) underwater when the hull collapsed, all occupants "were exposed to approximately 4930 pounds per square inch of water pressure", resulting in "instantaneous death", the report said. Two seconds later, the monitoring team on the support ship "heard a 'bang' emanating from the ocean's surface, which the investigation later correlated to the Titan's implosion". Debris was found a few days later on the ocean floor, about 1600 feet (500 metres) from the bow of the Titanic, and human remains were recovered when the sub was brought to the surface. In its report, the Coast Guard said that OceanGate had continued to use Titan despite "a series of incidents that compromised the integrity of the hull and other critical components of the submersible without properly assessing or inspecting the hull". It also identified design flaws with the unique carbon fibre hull "that weakened the overall structural integrity". The US Coast Guard said that the vessel was not "registered, certified, inspected, or classed" by any international flag administration or recognised organisation. Last year, the family of Nargeolet sued OceanGate for $50 million (NZ$85m), accusing the US-based company of gross negligence. Known as "Mr Titanic", he had visited the wreckage 37 previous times. Shortly after the tragedy, OceanGate halted all operations. The wreckage of the Titanic sits 400 miles (644km) off the coast of Newfoundland and has become a lure for nautical experts and underwater tourists since its discovery in 1985. The ship hit an iceberg and sank in 1912 during its maiden voyage from England to New York, with 2224 passengers and crew on board. More than 1500 people died. - AFP
