What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX).
Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI).
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here.
So, it seems like the potential worst-case scenario has been taken off the table in terms of the tax bills implications for munis. Talk to me about that.
Yep. I mean, to start the year, we definitely had a lot of headline around the muni market. I feel like we get that from time to time with the change in administration. And maybe this time we really thought there was going to be a chance that the tax exemption would be disruptive, uh, disrupted, nevertheless, uh, you know, potentially removed. So it's been great to finally feel some sense of relief come back to the market, uh, believing that that's off the table. Um, I don't think that means that munis are safe. I think that there will be, um, you know, just tangential, um, implications with respect to maybe endowment taxes, um, maybe certain sectors of the market still on the table if the administration is looking for dollars, but the tax exemption in totality, as it stands and what we all look for when we're investing in the municipal market, seems to be okay for now.
Yeah. And you mentioned that's a removal of a big headwind, but there are also still other potential policy risks on the table for munis. Why is now the right moment for investors to be looking into municipal bonds?
Yeah, um, and it's nice to actually feel that it's a great time to invest in municipal bonds. Um, we have a few really nice, you know, tailwinds here. And I think the yield environment, first and foremost, for a really long time, we were in a period where investors weren't really excited about where actual yields were. Why invest? Why not just sit in cash? Um, so to see yields in being an environment where we're actually seeing nominal yields north of 100 basis points higher than they've been over the last 10 years on average across the curve is pretty exciting. Like there is meaningful income behind that. Um, and then I would say from evaluation perspective, when you compare it to treasuries, which is a natural for most muni investors, the valuations are saying that the muni market is attractive. Like lean in, dip your toe in. And then if we look from a credit profile, um, which is, you know, a real strength that we have in the muni market, credit fundamentals remain strong, and I think that's a really important message. So you have three major boxes ticked, and it's almost like, what else are we waiting for? The time is right.
And since you mentioned it, I am curious about any sort of competition that might occur with US treasuries. We have some folks who come on and say they still see the 10-year hitting above a 5% yield this year. Does that present a headwind to muni bonds in any way? Talk to me about that.
Yeah. I mean, sure. So I think we're always looking at, um, muni's fair value versus treasuries. I think we are looking at taxable muni versus treasuries. I think that there is a preference or a belief that treasuries offer more liquidity versus munis. Uh, I think that the current market landscape is actually encouraging us to look beyond traditional fixed income in munis and treasuries and look at corporates, investment grade corporates, right? And looking at that pack of four, um, almost as close as, you know, I guess the credit profiles you can expect, and looking as to where the value and where the opportunity is across all four of them. So using treasury as the base point, um, even though it's no longer triple A, um, but using that as our baseline, where we want to get started and what we think the value is. Excuse me. Um, and what the actual portfolio composition would look like. I think there's going to be opportunity across the board and across those four sectors, um, just given the uncertainty and the volatility that's going to stay with us through the end of the year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Trump taps conservative economist EJ Antoni to serve as next labor statistics chief
President Trump on Monday announced he would nominate E.J. Antoni, a top economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he pushed out the previous leader. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I know E.J. Antoni will do an incredible job in this new role. Congratulations E.J.!' Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation and previously contributed to Project 2025's policy rubric, which outlined potential moves for the next GOP administration during the 2024 campaign. Antoni has in the past expressed skepticism about data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He recently appeared on conservative firebrand Steve Bannon's podcast to urge Trump to fire the previous commissioner, Erika McEntarfer. The position requires Senate confirmation, but Republicans hold a 53-47 GOP majority, giving Antoni a path to the job even if there are defections. Trump earlier this month ordered the firing of McEntarfer, a Biden White House appointee who was confirmed with a large bipartisan majority in the Senate in 2024. The move came after the jobs report released in early August showed lower-than-expected hiring in July and major downward revisions to the jobs reports from May and June. While Trump and his allies argued it was a move intended to improve transparency and accuracy, critics noted McEntarfer had little to do with what the numbers showed. Economists and lawmakers also expressed concern that it would erode credibility and confidence in government data, hurting businesses and consumers in the process.


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
EPA axes union contract
'The Trump administration and EPA's unlawful and authoritarian move to unilaterally strip EPA workers of their collective bargaining agreement and workplace rights is nothing short of an assault on our democracy, the rule of law, and the lives of working people in America,' said Justin Chen, president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Council 238, which represents 8,000 EPA staffers, in a written statement. He also said the union would fight the decision, saying 'AFGE Council 238 is united in our fight to defend our rights, our agency's mission, and to protect the future of our country and planet. We will see the administration in court.' An EPA spokesperson cited a March executive order that sought to limit union activity at various agencies. 'EPA is working to diligently implement President Trump's Executive Orders with respect to AFGE, including 'Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs,' in compliance with the law.' an EPA spokesperson told The Hill on Friday. A similar decision was made at the Department of Veterans Affairs this week. Both agencies' actions come after a federal court sided with the Trump administration on the issue.


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Nadler campaigns with Mamdani: ‘Trump is no friend to our city, and neither is Andrew Cuomo'
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) campaigned with New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday, slamming both President Trump and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. 'New York has always stood up to bullies and defended what's right, even when it's difficult, which is why we were so shocked to learn that Andrew Cuomo called Donald Trump for advice after the Democratic primary,' Nadler said at a press conference alongside Mamdani. 'This betrayal shows exactly what we're up against: politicians willing to legitimize our city's greatest threat for their personal benefit. The truth is, Cuomo and Trump are very similar. ' 'Both use their power to serve themselves and their wealthy donors, not the people. If it weren't clear before, it should be now. Donald Trump is no friend to our city, and neither is Andrew Cuomo. This is why the choice for New York City's next mayor is so critical,' he added. Mamdani recently heavily criticized reported moves by Trump regarding the New York City mayoral race. 'Today we learned Andrew Cuomo is directly coordinating with Donald Trump, even as this President sends masked agents to rip our neighbors off the streets and guts the social services so many New Yorkers rely on,' Mamdani said in a Wednesday post on the social platform X. 'It's disqualifying and a betrayal of our city,' he added. The New York Times reported last week that eight sources said the president talked in private about stepping into the race in an attempt to stop Mamdani from winning the November election. According to the Times, a Republican congressman and New York businessmen have been recently pressed by the president about which of Mamdani's rivals they believe could win against the Democratic nominee. Trump and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, also a candidate for New York City mayor, discussed the race in a phone call within the last few weeks, the Times also reported. During a press conference last week, Cuomo said he couldn't 'remember the last time I spoke to President Trump,' also adding that he has 'never spoken to him about the mayor's race.'