
SBS News in Easy English 30 July 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
13 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won't wait for Trump
Australia is considering recognising a Palestinian state before a major United Nations summit in September, without seeking approval from US President Donald Trump. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has faced a barrage of questions about Australia recognising Palestinian statehood after France vowed to make the move in September. The UK and Canada followed France, attaching conditions to their decisions. Sources familiar with discussions at the top of the government, not permitted to speak publicly, said the government could make an announcement this month about the position it would take at the September UN General Assembly, where Gaza and the future of a Palestinian state will be a key focus. Labor ministers, including Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, have said publicly that recognition was a matter of time, but the government has refused to set a date for the move and made it conditional on Israel's security and Hamas ceding control of Gaza. When asked on Thursday if he would clear any step to recognition with Trump before making it public, Albanese brushed off the need to act in line with the US, which is Israel and Australia's top ally, saying he led a 'sovereign government' that would make decisions in the national interest. Trump has said that Canada's move to recognise Palestine would reward Hamas and threaten the US' trade talks with its northern neighbour, but later clarified it was 'not a deal-breaker'. Israel's war cabinet is due to decide in the early hours of Friday morning (AEST) whether to escalate its campaign in Gaza by moving into the approximately 25 per cent of the battered strip still controlled by Hamas. Israel's military chief reportedly believes the step is too risky. Hamas still holds dozens of Israeli hostages, prolonging the conflict that began with its massacre of about 1200 people in Israel on October 7, 2023. After weeks of images showing starvation

The Age
13 minutes ago
- The Age
Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won't wait for Trump
Australia is considering recognising a Palestinian state before a major United Nations summit in September, without seeking approval from US President Donald Trump. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has faced a barrage of questions about Australia recognising Palestinian statehood after France vowed to make the move in September. The UK and Canada followed France, attaching conditions to their decisions. Sources familiar with discussions at the top of the government, not permitted to speak publicly, said the government could make an announcement this month about the position it would take at the September UN General Assembly, where Gaza and the future of a Palestinian state will be a key focus. Labor ministers, including Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, have said publicly that recognition was a matter of time, but the government has refused to set a date for the move and made it conditional on Israel's security and Hamas ceding control of Gaza. When asked on Thursday if he would clear any step to recognition with Trump before making it public, Albanese brushed off the need to act in line with the US, which is Israel and Australia's top ally, saying he led a 'sovereign government' that would make decisions in the national interest. Trump has said that Canada's move to recognise Palestine would reward Hamas and threaten the US' trade talks with its northern neighbour, but later clarified it was 'not a deal-breaker'. Israel's war cabinet is due to decide in the early hours of Friday morning (AEST) whether to escalate its campaign in Gaza by moving into the approximately 25 per cent of the battered strip still controlled by Hamas. Israel's military chief reportedly believes the step is too risky. Hamas still holds dozens of Israeli hostages, prolonging the conflict that began with its massacre of about 1200 people in Israel on October 7, 2023. After weeks of images showing starvation

Sydney Morning Herald
43 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The treasurer is telling us to stay calm, but this could be the time to panic
'AI may be the most transformative technology in human history,' wrote the treasurer this week. It's the rarest kind of statement: at once emphatically grand and altogether too modest. Grand, because it has AI outstripping, say, the wheel, electricity, or the internet. Modest, because it puts AI on the same continuum as all this, as though its difference is merely one of scale and speed, rather than something more fundamental. In this way, Jim Chalmers echoes the spirit of the Productivity Commission's latest interim report, also released this week, examining how AI will change our economy. It would be fair to say the report is optimistic, seduced by AI's promise of significantly increased productivity. To that end, it warns the government against overregulating AI, on the basis that this would slow down its productive march. Chalmers' version of the same idea has government regulating 'as much as necessary to protect Australians, but as little as possible to encourage innovation'. All of which presumes some kind of clear-eyed assessment of AI's risks. And it's hereabouts that all this optimism should give us pause. Not because either the government or the commission deny there are serious risks. But because they characterise these risks – much as they characterise AI – as mere extensions of previous experience. Indeed, the commission's report could hardly be clearer on this point. After running through a series of potential problems – including some serious ones such as AI making mistakes in high-risk situations like healthcare or law enforcement – it concludes there is ultimately nothing new to see here: 'AI can exacerbate existing risk of harm but does not create wholly new risks where none existed before'. Loading Meanwhile, Chalmers acknowledges the possibility of significant unemployment, but believes it will not be widespread or structural. To this end, he makes the observation that while technological developments always eliminate jobs, they create more than they destroy. 'We've seen this play out before,' he affirms. But this is more an assumption than an argument. It assumes that all technological advancement is some single, undifferentiated phenomenon, such that its history broadly repeats. But this is something the Albanese government must know not to be true. It is, after all, implementing a ban on social media platforms for children under 16, a belated response to a damaging technology we spent years assuming would be as benign as, say, television. Now we seem to be assuming similarly AI will neatly fit into a benign pattern. That assumption only holds to the extent AI is analogous with most of what has come before. And in the circumstances, we'd be wise to examine it far more rigorously before settling on it because there are good reasons to suppose it is a different species altogether, for which history is a poor guide.