Appointment of latest overseas justice to top court boosts judiciary
The departure of foreign judges from Hong Kong's top court in recent years has raised concerns about the future of a system that has served the city well. Five left last year, variously citing their age or personal or political reasons. Another resigned in April, leaving only five. The announcement that William Young, an eminent retired judge from New Zealand, has been hired to sit on the Court of Final Appeal is, therefore, most welcome. It gives the judiciary a boost and shows that even at a time of geopolitical tensions, leading legal figures are prepared to commit to Hong Kong.
Young has enjoyed a long and distinguished career. He was appointed to New Zealand's High Court in 1997, its Court of Appeal in 2004 and Supreme Court in 2010, before retiring in 2022. The jurist is also well known for chairing a royal commission of inquiry into the Christchurch terror attack of 2019. Young meets the requirement that the part-time foreign judges have experience at the highest level. He will be a valuable addition.
The appointment swiftly follows the premature resignation of Australian judge Robert French. It is encouraging that he has been replaced quickly. French expressed his respect for the integrity and independence of the Court of Final Appeal judges. But he also suggested the overseas judges had become 'increasingly anachronistic and arguably cosmetic'.
That is not the position, nor can it ever be allowed to become so. The role played by overseas judges is an integral part of the arrangements put in place for Hong Kong's return to China in 1997. It is provided for by the Basic Law.
Chief Justice Andrew Cheung Kui-nung paid tribute to the 'immense' contribution of the foreign judges in his speech at the opening of the new legal year in January.
He recognised that recruiting overseas judges with the right stature and experience had become more difficult amid the current 'geopolitical headwinds'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
22 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Safeguards can ensure legal basketball betting is the best result for all
The NBA finals, under way in the United States, are being closely followed by millions of basketball fans around the world. Many bets will be placed on the matches, including in Hong Kong. All wagers made in the city will be illegal. There is no lawful form of basketball betting, despite its soaring popularity. But that is about to change. The government has released the results of a one-month public consultation on its proposal to legalise betting on the sport. It says 94 per cent of 1,063 respondents were in favour and only 3.4 per cent against. Given that this is a sensitive social issue, with concerns about problem gambling, the level of support is surprisingly high. It is proposed that basketball betting be modelled on the one for football adopted in 2003. Lawful bets must be made with the sole authorised bookmaker, the Hong Kong Jockey Club. No credit will be given, juveniles will not be permitted to bet and there will be no gambling on matches involving local teams or staged in Hong Kong. The move is intended to combat illegal betting on basketball, which is on the rise. The Jockey Club estimates syndicates enjoyed an astonishing turnover of up to HK$90 billion last year from the city on basketball alone. Legalising gambling on the sport will also inject cash into government finances as it tackles a budget deficit of HK$87.2 billion. Betting duty will be 50 per cent of net stake receipts. In time, it is hoped the scheme will raise HK$1.5 billion a year. If people must bet on basketball, it is better they use a lawful, well-regulated platform. Conditions can be imposed and funds pumped back into the community, through taxes and the Jockey Club's charitable donations. But there are also valid concerns the move might encourage problem gambling, especially among young people. These must be taken seriously.
South China Morning Post
33 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Why red tape is a bigger challenge than US for China's military-civilian fusion plan
For decades, China's talk of letting the private sector bid for defence orders had mostly been just that: talk. Advertisement State-owned conglomerates had dominated the sector for decades, but in the middle of 2016, Beijing started to step up its military-civilian fusion strategy, publishing an official list of the sectors where private firms were being encouraged to contribute, such as swarming drone technologies. The plan is a central pillar of China's ambition to develop a modernised military by 2035 and world-class armed forces by 2049. Most details of the military-civilian fusion plan – which aims to accelerate the integration of military and civilian technology and military technology to boost civilian development – have not been made public. However, Beijing has credited it with helping develop advanced equipment for the People's Liberation Army and improving training, planning and logistics. Advertisement However, the plan also carries risks for the private sector. The strategy has become a focal point of the US-China rivalry and as a result, Washington has placed a range of sanctions on a wide range of Chinese companies accused of helping the PLA, which range from semiconductor and artificial intelligence firms to drone makers.
South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hongkongers warned not to download mobile game ‘promoting secessionist agenda'
Hong Kong police have warned residents against downloading a mobile game application advocating Hong Kong and Taiwanese independence or risk breaking national security laws. The force also said on Tuesday that action had been taken under the Beijing-imposed national security law to allow police to require the relevant electronic platforms to remove access to the game Reversed Front: Bonfire, which was developed by ESC Taiwan and released in April. Individuals who downloaded the app could be considered in possession of a seditious publication, contravening domestic security legislation, the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, police said. It added that those who provided money or financial assistance to the game's developer, including making in-app purchases, with the intent to fund it acts of secession or subversion of state power, also risk committing an offence under the national security law. 'Reversed Front: Bonfire was released under the guise of a game with the aim of promoting secessionist agendas such as 'Taiwan independence' and 'Hong Kong independence', advocating armed revolution and the overthrow of the fundamental system of the People's Republic of China [PRC] established by the constitution of the People's Republic of China,' national security police said. 'It also has an intention to provoke hatred towards the central authorities and the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.' Police added that anyone or any organisation that knowingly published the application, including sharing or recommending it online, would also risk contravening offences of inciting secession and subversion under the national security law, as well as seditious intention offences in the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance.
