logo
In-N-Out's owner is leaving California. Is the state a bad place to do business?

In-N-Out's owner is leaving California. Is the state a bad place to do business?

Last month, billionaire In-N-Out owner Lynsi Snyder announced her move from California to Tennessee, where she plans to open new restaurants and continue raising her family.
It's a dramatic shift for the leader of the beloved West Coast brand, which has become the latest company to signal its dissatisfaction with California in recent years. And she didn't mince words in explaining her decision.
'There's a lot of great things about California, but raising a family is not easy here. Doing business is not easy here,' Snyder said during a recent appearance on the 'Relatable' podcast, hosted by conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey.
In-N-Out's headquarters will remain in California, but the company is consolidating its operations in the state and opening a regional headquarters in Franklin, Tenn. Other high-profile companies have more formally exited the state.
Tesla moved its headquarters out of Palo Alto in 2021, the same year that financial services firm Charles Schwab relocated from San Francisco to north Texas. Elon Musk moved the head offices of his other companies — SpaceX and X — to Texas last year, as did Chevron, the oil giant that was started in California.
The departures have contributed to a narrative pushed by some media and politicians that the state's economy is in trouble and is unfriendly to businesses.
Conservative commentator and Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Hilton, who announced his bid for California governor this year, recently wrote on social media that the state has the 'highest rate of poverty, highest housing costs' and the 'most hostile business environment in the country.'
Experts and economists interviewed by The Times paint a more nuanced picture. Although California's steep taxes and stringent environmental regulations have pushed some firms to leave, the state remains the fourth-largest economy in the world, boasts a diverse pool of talent and is a hub of technological innovation, they said.
'The popular media narratives have characterized California as one-dimensional,' said William Riggs, a professor at the University of San Francisco School of Management. 'We continue to be a magnet for investment in tech, biotech, entertainment and green energy, as well as being an agricultural hotbed for the planet.'
The artificial intelligence boom has new companies flocking to Silicon Valley, Riggs said, leading to the highest rate of corporate office leases in San Francisco since before the COVID-19 pandemic.
The corporate departures, although generating significant media attention, represent adjustments to California's $4.1-trillion economy rather than signs of systemic decline.
'It's being overhyped,' Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics said of the purported mass exodus of companies. 'California is a big, competitive economy. We've got lots of great stuff here.'
To be sure, the state is facing some serious challenges that could threaten its competitive perch if they are not addressed.
In fact, California has been losing more companies than it's been gaining since 2014, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The net out-migration of firms from California peaked in 2022 at 741 firms, after economic disruptions and strict regulations related to the pandemic.
In 2023, the net out-migration was 533, meaning that 533 more companies left the state than entered. California has ranked among the top three states with the highest rates of firm out-migration since 2015.
One persistent complaint: Corporate executives have cited California's tax burden as a driver of their decisions to relocate. The state taxes its highest earners at 13.3% on their regular income, and unlike most states, applies the same rate to profits from the sale of investments or business assets.
Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-founder who moved his venture capital firm, 8VC, from the Bay Area to Austin, Texas, in 2020, partly framed his decision around California's high taxes.
'I could either put that money toward things that are fixing the world, or give it to the California state government,' he said.
Companies also face California's complex regulatory environment, with authorities governing matters including environmental standards and workplace safety. Many businesses must navigate multiple layers of licensing, labor and compliance requirements.
'When businesses complain about dealing with regulations in California, they're not kidding,' said Kevin Klowden, executive director of the Milken Institute. 'There are lots of overlapping authorities and a lot of businesses find it really hard to operate.'
Before fast-food chain Carl's Jr. announced it was relocating its California headquarters to Tennessee in 2016, then-Chief Executive Andrew Puzder said it takes about five times as long to open a new location in California than it would in Texas or other states.
According to Klowden, states including Florida and Texas attempt to attract businesses from California with lower tax rates, fewer regulations and other incentives. In June of this year, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott awarded hair-care brand John Paul Mitchell Systems $640,000 in grant funds to support the company's expansion into Dallas County.
'Texas is the headquarters of headquarters,' Abbott bragged at the time. In 2021, Florida topped the list of states with the highest net firm migration, followed by North Carolina, Nevada and Texas.
When firms move their headquarters out of California, it doesn't mean they're eliminating all business operations in the state, said Thornberg, a founding partner of Beacon Economics.
For example, Tesla maintains its design center in Hawthorne and engineering headquarters in Palo Alto, as well as a factory in Fremont. Defense giant Northrop Grumman, which moved from Los Angeles in 2011 and is now based in Virginia, continues development, prototyping and production operations in Palmdale.
Riggs of the University of San Francisco acknowledged that California businesses face fundamental challenges, but said that 'the opportunities California presents definitely outweigh those problems.'
Addressing housing constraints and regulatory burdens that limit business growth and workers' ability to remain in the state remain a central challenge.
California has initiated some reform efforts, including pilot programs for business license changes, but comprehensive change faces political obstacles.
Although labeled by some as bad for business, the state retains a strong reputation for innovation.
'California is viewed globally as a place that you go to try out an idea,' Klowden said. 'You're going to keep seeing businesses under pressure to move, and you'll see other ones that are desperately eager to come in.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Tesla Executives Start Automotive AI Company DensityAI
Former Tesla Executives Start Automotive AI Company DensityAI

Bloomberg

time2 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Former Tesla Executives Start Automotive AI Company DensityAI

Former leaders of Tesla Inc. 's supercomputer program have started a new artificial intelligence company focused on the automotive industry, according to people familiar with the matter. DensityAI, which is poised to come out of stealth soon, is in talks to raise hundreds of millions of dollars, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is private. The startup was founded by Ganesh Venkataramanan — the former head of Tesla's Dojo team — and ex-Tesla employees Bill Chang and Ben Floering.

RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle
RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle

Vox

time32 minutes ago

  • Vox

RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle

This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: In a blow to US pandemic preparedness, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Tuesday evening that he was slashing $500 million in federal mRNA vaccine contracts. What is HHS cutting? Twenty-two mRNA vaccine projects, intended to combat respiratory viruses like bird flu, are set to be wound down following the announcement. What is mRNA? mRNA, or messenger RNA, is the reason the US had safe, effective Covid-19 vaccines available as early as it did. A promising but still unproven technology prior to the pandemic, mRNA allowed pharmaceutical companies to develop effective vaccines far more rapidly and more adaptably than was once possible. Beyond respiratory viruses like Covid, researchers hope mRNA could even be effective in treating cancers. What's the context? Kennedy has long made false claims about mRNA vaccines, including describing the Covid-19 vaccine as 'the deadliest vaccine ever made.' On Tuesday, he falsely stated that mRNA vaccines 'don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract,' such as Covid. In fact, by one estimate, the Covid vaccines saved some 2.5 million lives. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What are the implications of the cuts? Tuesday's announcement is bad news for two distinct reasons. As far as Kennedy is concerned, this is just the latest reminder that he is who he always appeared to be, and only partially covered up while seeking to be confirmed as the secretary for the US Department of Health and Human Services: not a fair 'skeptic' but an anti-vaccine advocate who will use his power to impose unscientific beliefs on US public health infrastructure. For the country, vaccine experts say Tuesday's news is a real blow to efforts to prepare for the next pandemic, the arrival of which is a question of when and not if. mRNA vaccines have proved to be one of our best tools for saving lives, and the US will now be further behind in developing new vaccines than it otherwise would be. The consequence is likely to be measured in human lives. And with that, it's time to log off…

Nation's violent crime rate fell in 2024 to lowest in 20 years: FBI
Nation's violent crime rate fell in 2024 to lowest in 20 years: FBI

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Nation's violent crime rate fell in 2024 to lowest in 20 years: FBI

The nation's violent and property crime rates dropped to a two-decade low in 2024, following the COVID-era surge in homicides, according to new FBI data released this week. Why it matters: The numbers show crime was heading toward a 20-year record low in the last year of the Biden administration, despite President Trump's false campaign claims that President Biden was overseeing a nationwide crime spike. The big picture: The new FBI numbers released Tuesday also come as preliminary data from the country's largest cities in 2025 so far suggest violent crime is falling even more and could be heading to modern record lows. By the numbers: The U.S. had a violent crime rate of 359.1 per 100,000 residents last year, the FBI said. That surpassed the lowest violent crime rate the nation has had since 2014, when it was 372.4 per 100,000 residents, and many cities saw 30-year lows, an Axios analysis found. The rate was 370.4 in 2021, but that year the FBI collected data using two reporting systems, which makes the year not comparable. Meanwhile, the nation's property crime rate dropped to 1760.1 per 100,000 residents last year. That's also a 20-year low, according to an Axios analysis of FBI numbers. Zoom in: Overall violent crime dropped by 4.5% and all property crime decreased 8.1% from 2024 to 2023, the FBI said. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter fell 14.9% during the same period. Automobile theft went down a staggering 18.6%, FBI data showed. The intrigue: The FBI announcement made no mention of crime rates falling to 20-year lows — and didn't give out the crime rates per 100,000 residents as it does each year. The FBI also didn't say what was behind the drops. Context: Violent crime ticked up early in Biden's term, but reports show it's dropped significantly since then as law enforcement agencies responded to the pandemic surge and adopted more detailed recordkeeping. Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump repeated false claims that immigration had sparked rising crime nationwide — a reason he gave for his mass deportation plan. What they're saying:"As the pandemic receded, criminal justice experts fully expected crime to decline," Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy and partnerships at the Vera Institute of Justice, told Axios. Rahman said the crime drops occurred, even while police staffing levels have declined in the past five years by around 5% nationwide. "What's driving these unprecedented gains in community safety is the government investment in community infrastructure from the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act and the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act." Yes, but: The 2024 year-end data follows the Justice Department's April cancellation of $820 million in grants that had supported over 550 organizations focused on crime prevention research and services. What we're watching: The Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) will continue to issue quarterly preliminary violent crime data from nearly 70 large cities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store