Partnerships part of the state's plan to address future road projects
The collaborative spirit is an apparent change in attitude rooted in necessity.
Pointing to decades of under-investment in maintenance and significant bond debt taken on for construction projects through the Roads to Prosperity program, Morrisey said the West Virginia Department of Transportation will be doing more with less and operating with a renewed focus on maintenance.
As for new construction projects coveted by public and private entities across the state, they may require some local skin in the game to get built—partners, if you will.
Long story short, the state needs help.
"We have to acknowledge that one of the things that we're talking about today are partnerships with counties. We're going to be working with the counties even more aggressively than you've seen in the past. That's critical because the state doesn't have the resources to address every single need that's out there, " Morrisey said, further explaining investment from the private sector can be brought to bear for high-priority projects through public-private partnerships.
This should be music to the ears of many in Monongalia County.
The process was pioneered here nearly a decade ago.
On Sept. 1, 2016, former Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin was in town to formally open Interstate 79 exit 153. The $22-million interchange was the first major highways project in West Virginia, and possibly the country, that was born of an agreement between the county, state, Federal Highways Administration and a private developer — WestRidge.
Within two years or so of its opening, sales tax-increment financing from the surrounding economic development (TIF) district fully repaid the state's investment.
"You know, you would have thought the state would have celebrated that and set that up as a model going forward as to how we can work together collaboratively, because they put that interchange in for WestRidge, and they got their money back in two or three years, " Glenn Adrian said. "But it was like nobody really celebrated that or was really paying attention."
But Adrian, co-founder of Enrout Properties, was definitely paying attention.
Shortly after exit 153 was completed, public /private efforts for two additional projects began in earnest: the overhaul of the neighboring I-79 exit 155, again with WestRidge, and construction of a new Harmony Grove interchange providing interstate access to Enrout's Morgantown Industrial Park.
Movement on both has been slow, despite local buy-in.
On exit 155, Monongalia County Commissioner Sean Sikora pointed out that not only has $5 million in local support for the project's engineering and prep work been committed, but the county and its partners pulled down a $54.3-million federal grant for the work despite having a $66-million pledge from the state in hand.
As for Harmony Grove, Adrian said former WVDOT leadership actually signed a public-private agreement with Enrout and Monongalia County in 2020. Through that agreement, any funding generated by the Harmony Grove TIF district beyond repayment to bond holders would go directly to the state to reimburse its portion of the new interchange.
"The problem is, that had been forgotten, " Adrian said, explaining he spoke with Transportation Secretary Todd Rumbugh following Monday's announcement. "He was delighted to hear that we'd already set up a collaboration agreement to pledge tax increment to reimburse the state. He said, 'I don't think any of us knew that.'"
Sikora said it's refreshing to hear a governor "speaking our language " in terms of implementing a data-driven approach to transportation spending. Further, he said Monongalia County has proven that a collaborative approach to major projects can work.
"We're willing to think outside the box and come up with answers. We don't say, 'Hey, we have this problem, fix it.' We bring solutions to the table, " Sikora said, adding "The other counties shouldn't take this news with fear. We're looking to continue the growth here and in some of these areas so that we can help push for growth in other areas. A rising tide lifts all boats."
Adrian had similar thoughts.
"As Mon County typically is, we were ahead of the curve in recognizing the fact that we were willing to help the state get its money back for its portion of these projects, which goes hand in hand with what the governor was saying about working with the counties if they have a project they're interested in developing, " he said. "If we can get the projects we need and help reimburse the state leading to future investment here or elsewhere, that helps everyone."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
04-08-2025
- Associated Press
West Virginia lawmakers eliminated local authority to regulate data centers and similar projects
In late March, Pamela Moe was at her dining room table, skimming the local paper when something caught her eye. A legal notice, by a company she had never heard of, for a facility near the city of Thomas. Curious, Moe looked up the coordinates listed on the ad. She noticed the list of air pollutants the project would release. And then she pulled out her phone, took a photo and sent it out to a group of almost four dozen people all from or around the community, asking them what they knew. But she soon learned that no one knew anything. As news of the project spread quickly, so did the effort to learn more. The community raced to fill in details about the project. They looked to confirm their suspicions that the project was intended to power a data center. Residents reached out to their local, county and state officials. And as the news reached the broader public, worries also swirled among those who routinely visit Davis and Thomas for their scenic vistas, sprawling trails and dark skies. But by the time the community had mobilized to get answers, West Virginia lawmakers in Charleston had stripped what little power they had over such a project. Counties lost potential tax revenue. Localities lost oversight. And residents lost a say. 'All of it just dovetailed so neatly and closely, it seems suspicious,' Moe said. Morrisey and state lawmakers pitch West Virginia as data center haven In December, months earlier, lawmakers were gearing up for a last minute special session where they could have considered legislation related to a data center project in Logan County. But the session never materialized after confusion on who was allowed to vote following the November election. Then in February, during his State of the State address, Gov. Patrick Morrisey offered up his economic vision for West Virginia: Data centers, supercomputers and cryptocurrency. A measure to help aid that vision was introduced into the House of Delegates on March 18, the last day to introduce legislation into the chamber. Immediately following the day's House floor session, Morrisey held a press conference urging lawmakers to pass the bill, dubbed the Power Generation and Consumption Act, to encourage the development of small local energy grids. These developments would allow projects like data centers to operate independently instead of connecting to the larger electrical system. 'West Virginia will be the most attractive state in the country for data centers after this bill is passed,' Morrisey said. A few hours later, an air permit application for a natural gas-fired power plant in Tucker County landed in the inbox at the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's Division of Air Quality. Days later, the House Energy Committee took up the bill, approved an amended version and sent it to the floor for a vote. In the bill, lawmakers diverted all the tax revenue from such projects to the state, leaving local governments without. Lawmakers also forbid local communities from restricting noise, lighting, or land use, stripping residents of any authority. News of data center and Morrisey's bill raise questions in Tucker County As the committee was wrapping up its late March meeting in Charleston, a Tucker County postman delivered Moe her newspaper with the public notice by the Virginia-based Fundamental Data LLC. 'I didn't get to read the rest of the paper right away because that just really spurred me into action,' Moe said. Moe, who's been involved in environmental efforts for decades, had never heard of the company, but she had heard of the air pollutants. She also was familiar with the project's proposed location between the towns of Thomas and Davis. She emailed out a picture of the ad to environmentalists, business owners and other residents, asking them what they knew. Then Moe sent the full 77-page permit application, following up with a brief three-page analysis. The proximity of the project to the towns of Thomas and Davis worried Marilyn Shoenfeld, one of the email recipients. So, early the next morning, Shoenfeld, president of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, called the mayor of Davis to find out what he knew. Except, he also didn't know anything, and neither did other officials. 'From a local leadership standpoint, none of us were aware that this was even a possibility,' said Al Tomson, mayor of Davis. But, the news was quickly spreading through the community, and so were the concerns. Sheena Williams stressed about the air pollution's impact on her asthmatic daughter. Joseph Lewandowski worried how the project would harm the protected and public lands treasured by both its residents and visitors. And almost everyone was alarmed about how little information there was. They knew that the application was for a natural gas-fired power plant independent of the electric grid, but not much else. The number of combustion turbines wasn't identified. The types of air pollution control devices weren't listed. And the sources and types of fuel were missing. The company had redacted those details on its permit application, citing business confidentiality. 'That's the main gripe I think most people have with this — all the redactions and just the lack of transparency,' said Lewandowski, a Thomas native. The project's independence from the grid, along with the company's name, fed suspicions that the power plant would ultimately power a data center, despite no public confirmation. Data centers can use several million gallons of water a day for cooling, which has already caused issues in local communities where they are located. They also are a source of noise pollution and can reach concerning decibel levels. As news of the project made it through the county, so did knowledge about Morrisey's bill and the potential ways it could impact the community and projects. 'There was just so much variability in terms of what we don't know,' said Moe. Lawmakers vote to take data center regulation and benefit away from local governments At the Capitol, the bill was moving through the House. On March 31, two House Democrats tried to amend the bill and reinstate local oversight. 'My amendment doesn't have anything to do with the specifics of microgrids, whether you like microgrids or don't like microgrids,' said Del. Evan Hansen, D-Monongalia. 'My amendment is purely about local control.' The restrictions are needed because large data centers have statewide impact, said Del. Clay Riley, R-Harrison. This bill would make sure a town or county isn't 'stopping investment and stopping job creation.' 'Data centers have significantly, or can significantly, benefit the local economies through job creation, attracting investment. This bill, as it sits, could facilitate that development and boost economic growth,' Riley said. In a voice vote, the chamber rejected the amendment. As the House prepared to vote on the bill the next day, some lawmakers said they worried it would raise the cost of electric bills. Those concerns ultimately led some Republicans to join the Democrats in voting against it. Del. Marty Gearheart, R-Mercer, said he was voting no 'not because I don't want data centers here, but because in this particular instance, in my ignorance, I'm going to decide with the ratepayers in the state of West Virginia.' On April 1, the House passed the bill, 88 to 12, and sent it over to the Senate. As lawmakers in Charleston sent the bill to the other side of the Capitol, residents throughout Tucker County began mobilizing. The opposition organizes in Tucker County The community organized meetings. Residents made calls to Charleston. They emailed their delegates and senators. And news continued to spread. By then, Country Roads News, a newsletter covering the Canaan Valley, Davis and Thomas communities, broke the story about the permit application. That's also when county officials began learning about the implications of the governor's bill and how counties would lose both oversight and tax revenue, if it passed. A week later, when the Senate Economic Development Committee took up the measure on April 8, there was a steady stream of testimony from officials from several counties across the state. 'I'm concerned that this bill, as presented, will ultimately discourage local counties and municipalities from attracting data centers to their community,' Tammy Tincher, president of the County Commission of West Virginia, told the committee. Tincher, also a Greenbrier County Commissioner, said that tax revenue from developments is critical to how counties fund services and infrastructure for local communities. Eddie Gochenour, president of the Berkeley County Commission, said that officials wouldn't have worked to bring a data center to the county if they knew they would lose so much tax revenue. He called the bill 'probably one of the most overreaching pieces of legislation that I've ever seen.' 'We want to be a true and equal partner, and I don't think that's too much to ask,' Gochenour added. After more than three hours of testimony, the committee amended Morrisey's bill to allow counties to receive a fraction of the tax revenue earned off a project. That same day, state air quality engineers inspected the project site with representatives from the development and land owner companies less than a mile outside of Thomas. Over the next few days, lawmakers ironed out the details and passed the final version of the bill on April 12, the last day of the legislative session. Now, instead of all tax revenue going to the state, 30% would go to the county where the project is located while 5% would be divided up across the other 54 counties. The bill still removed local authority over data centers and microgrids. The community meets to learn more The next day, nearly 300 people packed into the Davis Volunteer Fire Hall with a lot of questions and very few answers. Tomson stood at the lectern and microphone set up in the front of the room. In a blue button down and his glasses, the mayor of Davis addressed the room. 'House Bill 2014, we'll talk about that first,' he said. 'It's a done deal. It was passed.' 'It really demonstrates, unfortunately, how much Charleston values local opinion,' Tomson added. 'They didn't want it.' For many in the community, this was the first time they learned about the legislation. In the nearly four-hour meeting, Steve Leyh, executive director of the Tucker County Development Authority, told the room that 'this project came out of the blue.' 'Usually that doesn't happen with real projects. Usually projects you start talking about months in advance,' Leyh said, adding that typically companies have conversations with the county commission, development authority and other local officials when looking to propose a project. Michael Rosenau, president of the Tucker County Commission, also told the room that he had no knowledge of the project or the bill until Tomson called him. 'Everything that we're talking about now is just guesswork,' said Rosenau. 'Once I know the facts, then I can take a stance one way or the other.' Governor Morrisey declares West Virginia 'America's energy state' Soon after the meeting, residents formed a grassroots group called Tucker United. With the bill awaiting Morrisey's signature, the group turned their efforts toward him. A few days after the town hall meeting, the group started asking the governor to veto the bill, going so far as to start an official petition. In the meantime, the community sought to find answers. Moe filed records requests. Amy Margolies continued emailing elected officials. Nikki Forrester kept spreading word. And they all, collectively, bombarded the DEP with public comments about the air permit application, asking the redacted information be released. On April 25, spurred by the influx of comments, the DEP asked for clarification on the information Fundamental Data had redacted. Five days later, in Mason County, near another location slated to host a data center, Morrisey signed the Power Generation and Consumption Act into law alongside several state lawmakers. 'West Virginia is America's energy state, and this law is going to demonstrate it to the whole country that we are ready for action,' Morrisey said. The governor had still not replied to Tomson's official requests for a meeting. On May 7, Fundamental Data replied to the DEP, saying that they believe they met the state's confidentiality standard. Days later, the DEP agreed. And a few days later, a new wave of panic surged through the community. In a May 18 article, representatives for Fundamental Data told the Wall Street Journal that their facility could be 'among the largest data center campuses in the world' and, if fully built, could span 10,000 acres across Tucker and Grant counties. It 'broadened our fears more than we could ever imagine,' said Sheena Williams, a longtime Tucker County resident. When asked in July, about whether the governor would meet with the mayor or community, spokesperson Drew Galang said that the executive branch, through the DEP, had 'already conducted significant public participation efforts.' 'As with most large‑scale economic development projects, there are multiple avenues for public participation,' he said, adding that Morrisey will always welcome feedback from communities 'so that we are bringing in business the right way and addressing citizens' concerns appropriately.' The community questions state regulators In the evening of June 30, more than 300 people filed into the Canaan Valley Resort State Park in Tucker County. Members of the DEP's Division of Air Quality sat at the front of the room, with their backs facing a wall of windows that peered over the valley. Standing at one of the two lecterns in the room, Terry Fletcher, DEP's chief communications officer, addressed the room. 'Our purpose here is to provide the information and answer questions relevant to Fundamental Data's air quality permit application,' he said. But residents wanted to talk about more than air quality. As the meeting stretched on for nearly five hours, folks cycled through a range of feelings beyond anger and frustration. Some begged and pleaded with the state regulators while others bargained, asking them to help their community. As state air quality engineers answered questions about the project's permit, they explained that the community's other concerns — water, noise, light and zoning — were outside their control. When one engineer suggested residents speak to their local officials, someone from the crowd shouted: 'They've been cut out of the process.' ___ This story was originally published by Mountain State Spotlight and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Dominion Post
10-07-2025
- Dominion Post
Three-way agreement approved for $135 million Exit 155 project
MORGANTOWN — The old proverb teaches that a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. On Wednesday, the West Virginia Division of Highways, Monongalia County Commission and developer WestRidge took the critical first step down what promises to be a long and difficult road toward a new I-79 Exit 155 interchange. In short, they sorted out the money. In a meeting attended remotely by Secretary of Transportation Todd Rumbaugh and Deputy Secretary Michael DeMers, the commission signed off on a three-way agreement that spelled out how the $135 million project budget will be covered. About half the cost – $67.2 million – will be provided by the state. Another 40%, or $54.3 million, will come through the US Department of Transportation MEGA Grant awarded in 2024, and the final 10%, totaling approximately $13.5 million, will be provided locally by WestRidge and the county. The local contribution includes design dollars already spent. As has been reported, the project will include new bridges carrying I-79 over Chaplin Hill Road, a new divergent diamond interchange, a westbound flyover at the intersection of Chaplin Hill and U.S. Route 19 to help clear heavy traffic leaving Morgantown, and a multi-modal path from the rail-trail in Star City to The Gateway. Improvements to Chaplin Hill Road up to the interstate will also be included. Exit 155 in Star City. 5-14-21 GH Ryan Lynch, representing WestRidge, noted the agreement harkens back to the three-way deal that got I-79 Exit 153 built and paid off in record time. Because of that experience, Lynch said both the county and the development team at WestRidge recognize when they have a willing partner in Charleston after years of false starts and half steps. 'With this administration and this DOH leadership, I feel very confident that we do, and that we're finally going to be able to really move this forward towards groundbreaking,' Lynch said. Lynch's comments summed up a reoccuring talking point – the renewed hope in Monongalia County brought on by new leadership and direction from the governor's office, the transportation secretary's office and DOH District 4 headquarters in Bridgeport. Specifically, the commission has lauded Gov. Patrick Morrisey's pledge to allocate funding and project support based on data, not politics. 'There's been a real change, and we've noticed it. We're now being told, and finally seen as an integral part of the state and economic development,' Commissioner Tom Bloom said, later adding, 'Where I'm excited, this is the first time that the first big project coming out of the state is in the north central area. I think that is probably a bigger surprise than anything else we've done. There's a new sheriff in town down there in transportation. I believe data-driven is key, and I believe we are now in the eyes and ears of Charleston and I can only see better things happening in the future. I appreciate that.' In a press release, Morrisey called the public-private partnership 'a model of what we can accomplish to invest in our infrastructure and grow economic development across the state.' Exit 155 and Chaplin Hill Road serve as the primary gateway to Morgantown, WVU, WVU Medicine and Mon Health Medical Center. It is the first I-79 exit south of the state line. Even so, parts of the interchange fail during peak travel times. The failure is particularly evident, and dangerous, during large sporting events and the increasingly large and frequent events hosted by Mylan Park. The state has pledged to install temporary traffic lights at the interchange's entrance and exit ramps until the reconfiguration project is complete. It was recently explained that those lights likely won't be in place until the end of the year. 'As you all have said, this is a gateway to West Virginia. It is the gateway to WVU, and it really needs to be a showcase. I think this project is going to take it to the next level and really help things out,' Rumbaugh said. While no timeline was offered during the presentation, the $54.3 million federal grant comes with a 2028 deadline, meaning those dollars will likely be spent first. Commissioner Sean Sikora said the 'big beautiful deal' is just the first step of many. 'This is the first step. We've got a lot of work to do, but we've got this memorialized, and we also have our marching orders to move forward. Our public is going to start seeing progress,' Sikora said. 'It's going to be two, three, four, five years, but we are working on it and we're phasing it so we can show progress and access those federal funds. I'm really excited to get this thing moving forward.'
Dominion Post
22-06-2025
- Dominion Post
DOGE terminates $9 million state digital equity grant
dbeard@ MORGANTOWN – A $9 million federal grant to the state Economic Development Department recently got DOGE'd. But the department and Gov. Patrick Morrisey both failed to answer questions about it. The $9,011,588 grant came from the U.S Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration to support the state's digital equity program. DOGE gives the termination date as May 9 and notes a total savings of $8,791,067.90. The $2.75 billion Digital Equity Act, passed in 2021 as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, was intended to expand internet access for certain disadvantaged populations, according to the Associated Press. 'It gave states and tribes flexibility to deliver high-speed internet access to families that could not afford it, computers to kids who did not have them, telehealth access to older adults in rural areas, and training and job skills to veterans.' But President Trump announced in late May his intention to end it, AP reported. USASpending shows that the grant began Dec. 1, 2024 and was slated to run through Nov. 30, 2029. Its stated purpose was to implement West Virginia's digital equity plan. Among its missions: launching digital skills and local digital equity planning programs; a piloting program to supply laptops; and collecting data on such things as number of covered populations served, total number served, and personal testimony of participants. The grant description said, 'The proposed projects will result in narrowing the digital divide, improved access to digital resources, and increased accessibility and impact initiatives for community development.' Morrisey and the Economic Development Department failed to respond to three inquiries sent to each on two separate days. In early January, echoing Trump, Morrisey issued an executive order eliminating DEI – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – from state government. DEI opponents generally view it as a form of reverse racism. Among the questions we asked Morrisey and the department were if the grant termination was tied to DEI opposition, what the impact of the grant termination might be, and if the state would continue the digital equity program via some other means. The general consensus is that West Virginia's broadband access challenges are tied to terrain and the state's rural nature, and we asked Morrisey and the department how those issues factor into the aims of the digital equity plan – getting no answer, of course. We also asked about the difference between the full grant amount and the listed savings – $220,520.10 – and if some of the money has been spent, what on, and if they have to return it. As it happens, on Thursday, Morrisey announced funding for broadband infrastructure deployment projects in 10 counties to facilitate the expansion of fiber-to-the-home broadband infrastructure. Morrisey said that with the installation of approximately 362 miles of fiber infrastructure, 2,897 locations will gain access to high-speed broadband. The counties are Preston, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Jackson, Lewis, Mason, Pendleton and Putnam.
