Krafton Delays ‘Subnautica 2' Game Ahead of $250 Million Payout
Subnautica 2, the second-most-wished-for upcoming game on the PC platform Steam, was originally set to offer early access to players later this year. The schedule changed last week after Krafton pushed out the leadership of its Unknown Worlds Entertainment studio, said the people, who asked to not be identified because they weren't authorized to talk to press. A representative for Krafton didn't respond to a request for comment. You may be interested in
The first Subnautica, released in 2018, was a smash indie hit, selling more than 6 million copies. Three years later, Krafton purchased Unknown Worlds at an enterprise value of $500 million and said afterwards that a sequel was in the works.
The sequel's delay to 2026 was against the wishes of the studio's former leadership, according to the people. The $250 million bonus was due to kick in if Unknown Worlds hit certain revenue targets by the end of 2025, according to the purchase agreement, which was reviewed by Bloomberg. By delaying Subnautica 2 into next year, the company is unlikely to hit those targets and therefore the employees may not be eligible for the payout, the people said.
Unknown Worlds' leadership planned to share the additional money with all of the studio's employees, which number around 100. Staff who were at the company at the time of the acquisition were told they were eligible for bonuses ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to seven figures, the people said.
Last week, Krafton announced that it had fired Unknown Worlds founders Charlie Cleveland and Max McGuire, as well as Chief Executive Officer Ted Gill. It said Striking Distance Studios CEO Steve Papoutsis would take that role, overseeing the studio's overall management and creative direction. Krafton didn't say why it made a leadership change, but said in a press release that 'we owe our players nothing less than the best possible game, as soon as possible.'
In a statement on social media several days later, Cleveland wrote that 'the events of this week have been quite a shock' and that Subnautica 2 was 'ready for early access release.'
During a company town hall this week, Papoutsis told employees that Krafton didn't believe Subnautica 2 was ready to be released this year and that the delay was to add more content to the game. When asked whether Subnautica 2 was delayed so Krafton could avoid paying the $250 million bonus, Papoutsis said he was not familiar with the specifics of the contract.
'It's a good question, and I would appreciate patience on this particular topic,' Papoutsis said, according to audio of the town hall reviewed by Bloomberg. He added that the specifics of the acquisition were 'beyond my current understanding at the moment.'
'The desire of Krafton is to have the very best version of Subnautica 2 available for its early access,' he said. 'While yes, the software that everybody worked on is in a great spot and it felt like, 'Hey we should launch this,' that wasn't where both parties aligned around.'
He added that 'it's never been told to me that we're making this change specifically to impact any earnout or anything like that.'
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
List of 10 largest banks in the world released, China dominates with top 4 positions followed by..., India is...
New Delhi: China is the second largest economy in the world. But if we look at the list of the 10 largest banks in the world in terms of assets, then China dominates it. China has four banks at the top of this list. The total assets of these four banks are around 23 trillion dollars. America and France have 2 banks each in the top 10 list, while Japan and Britain have one bank each. India's banks SBI and HDFC Bank are far behind in this list. Which are the 10 largest banks in the world by assets? Here is the list of 10 largest banks in the world by assets, top 4 are from China. According to Bloomberg, China's Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) is at the top of this list with assets of 6.7 trillion dollars. It is the largest of the 'big four' banks in China, and the largest bank in the world by total assets. The Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), also known as AgBank, is one of the 'big four' banks in China, and the second largest bank in the world by total assets of $5.9 trillion. The China Construction Bank Corporation (CCB), headquartered in Beijing, is one of the 'big four' banks in China, and is the third largest bank in the world by total assets of $5.6 trillion. The Bank of China is one of the 'big four' banks in China. It is at number four in this list with the total assets of $4.8 trillion. In this way, there are four Chinese banks at the top four positions in the list of world's banks whose total assets are around $23 trillion which is more than China's GDP ($19.23 trillion). The total assets of these four Chinese banks are around $23 trillion which is more than China's GDP, which is about $20 trillion. Which are the other countries? In this list, America's JP Morgan Chase is at number five with assets of $4 trillion. Bank of America is at number six with assets of $3.3 trillion. Britain's bank HSBC is at number seven with assets of $3 trillion. France's BNP Paribas with $2.8 trillion and Credit Agricole Group with $2.7 trillion are at number eight and nine. Japan's Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is at number ten with $2.6 trillion. Where does India rank? India's largest public sector bank SBI ($547 billion) and HDFC Bank ($494 billion) are among the top 100. India's largest public sector bank State Bank of India (SBI) has total assets of $547 billion and HDFC Bank has assets of $494 billion. Both these Indian banks have made it to the top 100.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Australian PM Touts Practical Cooperation During Shanghai Visit
(Bloomberg) -- Australia looks forward to deepening practical cooperation and promoting sustained development of bilateral relations with China, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Sunday in Shanghai. The Australian leader's comments were carried in a statement posted on the Shanghai local government's official Wechat account. Canberra hopes to further strengthen economic and trade cooperation and jointly promote green and low-carbon development, Albanese told Shanghai Communist Party Secretary Chen Jining. Shanghai welcomes Australian companies to invest in the city, China's second largest, Chen said. 'We know the one in four of Australia's jobs depends upon free and fair trade. And our biggest export partner is China,' Albanese said in a video carried on the Global Times' official Wechat account. 'Engaging with China is in our interests to build a stable and secure region.' Albanese was visiting China for the first time since being re-elected in a landslide in May. He's trying to balance an increasingly confrontational relationship between the US and China — respectively, Australia's historic security ally and its biggest trading partner. He also needs to navigate a more complicated regional security environment as China becomes more assertive in the Asia-Pacific. China in February conducted live-fire naval exercises in the Tasman Sea off Australia's east coast, which Albanese said at the time was within international law but for which he would have liked more notice. The prime minister will visit through Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu, describing the visit as a 'further demonstration of the good relations' between the nations. China's economic heft is significant given it takes a quarter of Australia's exports, from iron ore to lobsters and wine. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned on Thursday about 'the worrying pace of China's nuclear and conventional military build up,' highlighting that Beijing aims to change the balance of power in the region. A delegation of corporate executives — including from Macquarie Bank Ltd. and HSBC Holdings Plc's Australia arm, as well as Fortescue Ltd., BlueScope Steel Ltd., Rio Tinto Ltd. and BHP Group Ltd is traveling with Albanese. His visit will includes a CEO round table in Beijing on Tuesday and an international supply chain Expo that China is hosting. More stories like this are available on
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Sorry, Elon. There's Already a Third Party, and It's Called MAGA
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Elon Musk just can't seem to make up his mind. Either he has 'done enough' when it comes to political spending and will focus on his businesses or he will spend more money to start a new political party to take on the 'uniparty.' 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote on X after posting a poll on July 4. The world's richest man is right. For years, Americans have stated a desire for another party beyond red or blue. An October Gallup poll showed support for a third party at 58%. The numbers speak to an overall discontent with a lack of choice and distaste for rank partisanship. Third-party support ebbs and flows, but the desire for more choices is a constant. Nevertheless, while voters claim to want more choices, once they cast their ballots, third-party candidates haven't broken through in any meaningful way. In 2020, 1.79% voted for a third-party candidate for the White House. In 2024, 1.85% of voters backed a candidate not named Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. A group called No Labels tried and failed to identify a credible White House candidate in 2024. Typically, third party candidates have only acted as spoilers; see Ross Perot in 1992, Ralph Nader in 2000 and Jill Stein in 2016. Part of the problem is the very high structural hurdles the two existing parties have put in place to keep rival parties from forming. There is also this to consider: A third party kind of already exists. It's called the Republican Party under Trump, otherwise known as MAGA. Rather than run on a third party line, as he explored doing in 2000 with Perot's Reform Party, Trump rode populist discontent to power within an existing political party. He hijacked the GOP and remade it in his own image with ideas from both parties. He is pro-union, more isolationist than hawk, and against free trade. And he doesn't care about the debt and deficits — he agrees with Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren that the debt ceiling 'should be thrown out entirely.' As one headline from Reason Magazine put it, 'Donald Trump Sounds Like a Democrat From the 1980s.' Musk, with his billions and his influence, might be better off bankrolling candidates within the two-party system who offer a similar ideological blend. But for now, he seems set on doing what others before him have tried and failed to do. So let's take him at his word and assume that the world's richest man will show some focus and play in the 2026 midterms via a third party. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he posted. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' His strategy actually isn't a bad one and aligns with what some other groups are doing. 'Elon, I don't know what he is going to do, but I believe some of these candidates he would want to give some cash to,' said Adam Brandon, senior advisor to The Independent Center, a group that will back a handful of independent candidates in the midterms. 'If we do this in 2026, this sets up a different conversation in 2028.' The group is hosting what they are billing as the largest independent event in Washington DC later this month, and predicts that 2026 will see an independent surge. But Musk may be a tainted messenger. He once enjoyed a level of support among a wide array of people with differing political views as a kind of real life Tony Stark, but his approval ratings have dipped in recent months, as has his brand. In December, according to a YouGov poll, Musk was even among independent voters, with 42% liking and disliking him. His unfavorable rating is now 59% among that group. His numbers are also down among Democrats and Republicans. It's true that some people tend to like Musk's products, even as they dislike him. Witness the Anti-Elon Tesla Club stickers affixed to his signature product. What is missing, however, is a real reason for Musk's latest version of the disruptive third party. Musk is a political contradiction, with no consistent ideas about policy. He says the America Party is about freedom, yet it seems to be about his own personal grievances with Trump. He claims to care about ballooning deficits, yet is happy to take billions from the federal government to foot the bill for his projects. He claims to care about the environment, yet also claims that global depopulation is a bigger threat than climate change. What would the America Party platform look like and what candidates would it attract? What story would they tell about the big problems the country faces and what would the solutions be? That kind of narrative coherence is necessary, as party affiliation has become an extension of identity. In choosing to back a party, voters are telling a story about who they are, what they believe and how they think the government should operate. It's akin to joining a club. Musk has billions. But he has few resonant answers to that standard question that can be paraphrased this way when it comes to political parties: What are you and why are you here? Absent that, his third-party ambitions are likely to run aground. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A former senior political reporter for CNN and the Washington Post, she has covered politics and campaigns for almost two decades. More stories like this are available on
