logo
Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers

Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers

Reuters21 hours ago

June 16 (Reuters) - John Hamer, president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, makes store fixtures for big retailers like Ross Dress for Less and Ulta Beauty.
He sources many of the goods from China, which until recently meant he paid 70% in tariffs on metal fixtures.
"The media was saying it was 30%, but that was never true," he said, referring to the tariff rate for China announced in May as part of a truce between the Trump administration and Beijing as it negotiated a broader deal.
That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture.
When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war.
The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks.
Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law.
The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse.
'Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who've been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,' he said, 'because it's been all over the map.'
'HERE'S THE TARIFF BILL'
Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He's checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs.
"The customers pay the tariff," said Hamer. "When it comes in, we say, 'Here's the tariff bill.'"
Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump's imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration's appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months.
Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes.
Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. 'We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,' he said. 'Same with toys.'
The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a 'play table' from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking.
Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world's two largest economies.
The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.'s trading partners.
On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term.
'It sounds like that's the way he's thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products," said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington.
Ramon van Meer's business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain.
That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram.
When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff.
It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely.
'At least I can afford to pay it,' said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. "And I don't have to raise the price by that much."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled
Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled

LONDON, June 17 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump is hoping to secure American dominance in semiconductors over China. The president wants to bring production of chips back to the U.S., while courting allies. But success will take years and much more capital, while looming tariffs and unclear export rules add cost and confusion. When it comes to stimulating a key industry, the U.S. strategy is falling short. For an example of how to approach state-backed industrial planning, look to China. The People's Republic has already become a powerhouse in making solar panels and batteries for electric vehicles. A decade ago, President Xi Jinping launched his 'Made in China 2025' plan with the intention of reducing the country's reliance on foreign semiconductors from 85% to around 30%. The urgency was clear: chips had overtaken oil as China's largest import. Nearly a decade later, China has not met its goal, but local capacity is ramping up. Of the 51 wafer fabrication plants currently under construction worldwide, 23 are in China, according to an industry expert. It's a direct result of government funding: state-led investment in chips has probably exceeded $150 billion since 2014, according to, opens new tab the Economist Intelligence Unit. Little wonder that the U.S. is worrying about its dominance of advanced chips and artificial intelligence. While Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei says, opens new tab the Chinese tech giant's chips are still one generation behind U.S. rivals, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab CEO Jensen Huang has said Huawei's latest processors are approaching parity with the $3.5 trillion company's cutting-edge H200 graphics processors. These are central to training advanced AI models. Chinese players like DeepSeek are also showing signs of catching up. For the Trump administration, maintaining the U.S. lead starts with safeguarding demand for American products. That means ensuring key international customers in Europe and the Middle East don't drift toward Chinese suppliers. It's one reason Trump scrapped his predecessor Joe Biden's 'diffusion rule', which set country-specific quotas for advanced chips. The rule risked restricting previously friendly nations' access to semiconductors, pushing them into Huawei's arms. On the supply side, Trump wants to bring manufacturing back onshore. As most advanced chips are still made in Taiwan, any diversification of supply chains makes sense. The $52.7 billion Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act -- which includes, opens new tab $39 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing -- is a start, but progress is slow. The bill only releases funds as projects meet staged milestones. Trump has criticised the act, while also using it to force private companies to crank up investment stateside. Taiwanese giant TSMC ( opens new tab, for instance, committed to spending over $100 billion in the U.S. as it finalised state funding of $6.6 billion. GlobalFoundries (GFS.O), opens new tab this month pledged, opens new tab $16 billion alongside a $1.5 billion subsidy. Tariffs are another of Trump's favoured tools. He has asked the Commerce Department to investigate chip supply chains under Section 232, citing national security. But applying levies to semiconductors is fraught. For a start, the U.S. imports relatively few chips, but lots of products which contain them. Semiconductors worth less than $40 billion arrived in the country in 2024, while the U.S. imported electronic goods worth $486 billion, according to the International Trade Centre. Trying to impose tariffs on components inside devices like laptops and iPhones would be tricky. There's no easy way to tell where the chip was made once it's been packaged. Even if the Trump administration can successfully tilt the playing field towards domestic manufacturing, however, resilience still comes at a price. Proposed subsidies would make the cost of building semiconductor fabrication plants in the United States as competitive as in Asia, according to an industry analyst. But running those plants in a high-wage economy is another challenge: McKinsey & Company estimates operating costs are 35% higher in the U.S. than in Taiwan. Buyers of U.S.-made chips for cars or medical machines would have to absorb that premium or pass it on to customers. It also implies that semiconductor firms will need ongoing support in the form of tax breaks or operational subsidies as they shift supply chains. However, Trump has made hostile noises about the costs of the CHIPS Act. One key incentive, a 25% investment tax credit for every dollar chipmakers spend on capital expenditures, is set to expire unless renewed. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at possibly withholding further subsidies unless paired with broader tax legislation. The administration's stance on immigration, especially from China, is another impediment. Nvidia's Huang reckons around half of global AI researchers are Chinese. Meanwhile, nearly a third of chip companies' design engineers are in mainland China – the same proportion as in the United States, according to BCG data. The administration's policy on export controls also remains in flux. Though it has rolled back the 'diffusion rule', nothing has replaced it. Crafting bespoke export agreements with every partner like the United Arab Emirates will be time-consuming. Other potential measures, such as banning shipments of chip-making equipment made by the likes of ASML ( opens new tab to China, would require cooperation from key allies in Japan and the Netherlands. It would also require U.S. equipment makers like $114 billion Lam Research (LRCX.O), opens new tab to sacrifice revenue which could be as much as 30% of the total top line. Trump's chaotic and go-it-alone instincts on tariffs risk undermining the partnerships he will need to isolate China. China's chip campaign still falls short in several areas, including scale and efficiency. But Beijing's strategic clarity, persistence, and willingness to absorb long-term costs signal its serious intent. By contrast, Trump's U.S. chip revival is at best half-assembled. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

World's largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds
World's largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds

The Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

World's largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds

The world's largest banks boosted the amount of financing given to fossil fuel companies last year, committing $869bn to those involved in coal, oil and gas despite the worsening climate crisis and the banks' own, fraying, environmental commitments, a new report has found. The report, compiled by a coalition of eight green groups, shows that while the amount loaned by big banks to fossil fuel firms had been declining in 2021, last year saw an abrupt reversal. Two-thirds of the world's largest 65 banks increased their fossil fuel financing by $162bn from 2023 to 2024. Scientists have been clear that no new fossil fuel project can proceed if disastrous climate impacts are to be avoided, with last year the hottest ever recorded amid a slew of disasters driven by global heating. However, many banks have recently watered down or ditched their own commitments to help reduce planet-heating emissions, amid a changing political dynamic that has seen the US again being led by Donald Trump, who has famously called climate science 'a giant hoax' and 'bullshit'. In February, the US treasury withdrew from a global banking network that aims to increase green finance and reduce climate risk. Four of the five largest fossil fuel financiers last year were American companies, with JPMorgan Chase lending the most at $53.5bn. Bank of America was second, followed by Citigroup. The Japanese bank Mizuho Financial was fourth, with Wells Fargo in fifth. The largest absolute increases in fossil fuel lending last year came from the top American institutions as well as Barclays, the British bank. In the decade since the world's political leaders committed, in the landmark Paris climate agreement, to restrain dangerous global heating, the biggest banks have continued to pour lending towards drilling projects, pipelines and other fossil fuel activity. In total, banks have financed fossil fuels by $7.9tn since the Paris deal. 'By injecting a staggering $869bn into fossil fuel financing in 2024 alone, the world's largest banks fund the climate chaos that fossil fuel companies wreak on people and communities worldwide,' said David Tong, global industry campaign manager at Oil Change International and a co-author of the report. 'Governments must step in and take urgent action to hold financial institutions accountable for their role in the climate crisis.' While most of the world's top financial firms have pledged to abide by the Paris deal and help tackle the climate crisis, many of them have ignored or walked back these promises in the past year while predicting catastrophic global temperature rises. Last year, six US senators said that JPMorgan Chase may have misled investors by backtracking on its climate commitments. Then, in January, shortly before the inauguration of Trump as US president, the six largest American banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all withdrew from the net zero banking alliance. The alliance is a United Nations-sponsored initiative to spur banks to align their lending and investment portfolios with the Paris goals. It requires banks to set targets and reduce emissions associated with their investments. 'This year, banks have shown their true colors – many have walked away from climate commitments and doubled down on financing fossil fuel expansion, even as global temperatures break records,' said Lucie Pinson, director and founder at Reclaim Finance, and another report co-author. 'A few European banks may have inched forward, but for most, the lure of dirty money has proven too strong.' The Guardian contacted all of the top lenders to fossil fuels about the report, which is called Banking on Climate Chaos. A Citi spokesperson said that it supports the 'transition to a low-carbon economy and, in 2021, made a commitment to reach net-zero greenhouse gas financed emissions by 2050. 'We work with our clients as they seek to decarbonize their businesses and support clean energy solutions as part of our $1tn sustainable finance goal. Our approach reflects the need to transition while also continuing to meet global needs for energy security, particularly in this time of increasing electricity demand.' A Barclays spokesperson said: 'Barclays provides finance to meet consumer and businesses energy needs while financing the scaling of clean energy. Last year, we mobilised nearly $100bn more Sustainable and Transition Finance than in 2023 and continue to invest £500m in climate tech start-ups by 2027. These are significant interventions to support our clients to transition.' ENDS

The wobbly foundations of the stablecoin boom: podcast
The wobbly foundations of the stablecoin boom: podcast

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

The wobbly foundations of the stablecoin boom: podcast

Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. US lawmakers endorsed digital tokens backed by dollars like Tether and USDC, collectively worth $250 bln. In this episode of The Big View podcast, banks analyst and author Dan Davies explains the risks of mingling supposedly solid crypto assets with the regulated banking system. (The host is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.) Further Reading Circle IPO tethers rival to an unhinged valuation The bitcoin hoarder copycat game is just beginning Why stablecoins will entrench dollar's supremacy Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt-out of targeted advertising.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store