
World's largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds
The world's largest banks boosted the amount of financing given to fossil fuel companies last year, committing $869bn to those involved in coal, oil and gas despite the worsening climate crisis and the banks' own, fraying, environmental commitments, a new report has found.
The report, compiled by a coalition of eight green groups, shows that while the amount loaned by big banks to fossil fuel firms had been declining in 2021, last year saw an abrupt reversal. Two-thirds of the world's largest 65 banks increased their fossil fuel financing by $162bn from 2023 to 2024.
Scientists have been clear that no new fossil fuel project can proceed if disastrous climate impacts are to be avoided, with last year the hottest ever recorded amid a slew of disasters driven by global heating.
However, many banks have recently watered down or ditched their own commitments to help reduce planet-heating emissions, amid a changing political dynamic that has seen the US again being led by Donald Trump, who has famously called climate science 'a giant hoax' and 'bullshit'. In February, the US treasury withdrew from a global banking network that aims to increase green finance and reduce climate risk.
Four of the five largest fossil fuel financiers last year were American companies, with JPMorgan Chase lending the most at $53.5bn. Bank of America was second, followed by Citigroup. The Japanese bank Mizuho Financial was fourth, with Wells Fargo in fifth. The largest absolute increases in fossil fuel lending last year came from the top American institutions as well as Barclays, the British bank.
In the decade since the world's political leaders committed, in the landmark Paris climate agreement, to restrain dangerous global heating, the biggest banks have continued to pour lending towards drilling projects, pipelines and other fossil fuel activity. In total, banks have financed fossil fuels by $7.9tn since the Paris deal.
'By injecting a staggering $869bn into fossil fuel financing in 2024 alone, the world's largest banks fund the climate chaos that fossil fuel companies wreak on people and communities worldwide,' said David Tong, global industry campaign manager at Oil Change International and a co-author of the report.
'Governments must step in and take urgent action to hold financial institutions accountable for their role in the climate crisis.'
While most of the world's top financial firms have pledged to abide by the Paris deal and help tackle the climate crisis, many of them have ignored or walked back these promises in the past year while predicting catastrophic global temperature rises. Last year, six US senators said that JPMorgan Chase may have misled investors by backtracking on its climate commitments.
Then, in January, shortly before the inauguration of Trump as US president, the six largest American banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all withdrew from the net zero banking alliance.
The alliance is a United Nations-sponsored initiative to spur banks to align their lending and investment portfolios with the Paris goals. It requires banks to set targets and reduce emissions associated with their investments.
'This year, banks have shown their true colors – many have walked away from climate commitments and doubled down on financing fossil fuel expansion, even as global temperatures break records,' said Lucie Pinson, director and founder at Reclaim Finance, and another report co-author.
'A few European banks may have inched forward, but for most, the lure of dirty money has proven too strong.'
The Guardian contacted all of the top lenders to fossil fuels about the report, which is called Banking on Climate Chaos. A Citi spokesperson said that it supports the 'transition to a low-carbon economy and, in 2021, made a commitment to reach net-zero greenhouse gas financed emissions by 2050.
'We work with our clients as they seek to decarbonize their businesses and support clean energy solutions as part of our $1tn sustainable finance goal. Our approach reflects the need to transition while also continuing to meet global needs for energy security, particularly in this time of increasing electricity demand.'
A Barclays spokesperson said: 'Barclays provides finance to meet consumer and businesses energy needs while financing the scaling of clean energy. Last year, we mobilised nearly $100bn more Sustainable and Transition Finance than in 2023 and continue to invest £500m in climate tech start-ups by 2027. These are significant interventions to support our clients to transition.' ENDS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Compton man launches lawsuit against In-N-Out alleging discrimination over hairstyle
A Compton man is suing In-N-Out burger for racial discrimination, after he was allegedly pulled up multiple times, and eventually fired, over his hairstyle. Elijah Obeng, 21, who is Black, claims that he was unfairly targeted by managers at the store who singled him out over the required employee dress code – which resulted in severe emotional distress. In-N-Out requires its employees to wear company-issued hats with their hair tucked in, and male employees must be clean-shaven, according to a civil lawsuit obtained by the Los Angeles Times. The outlet reports, per the suit, that Obeng worked at the Compton In-N-Out location for just under four years. As his hair grew longer, Obeng was told by management that he should change the style so that it would remain under the company issued hat. Obeng braided his hair to comply with the request, but was later told to cut off his sideburns. He considered the sideburns important to his cultural identity, according to the lawsuit. After resisting the instructions to shave his sideburns and change his hair, Obeng alleges that he was treated differently – including being criticized more frequently and held to standards his coworkers were not. He was also denied opportunities for promotions, according to the suit. In May 2024, Obeng felt he had been 'publicly humiliated' after a supervisor told him to go home to shave his sideburns in front of other coworkers – which he did not do. According to the suit, Obeng texted his supervisor that he would return for his next shift, and a few days later he was fired. In-N-Out said the firing was due to prior write-ups, but Obeng believes that it was a retaliation for his refusal to adhere to the dress code policies, the filing states. The alleged discrimination has caused Obeng 'anxiety, humiliation, and loss of dignity,' the Times reports. In addition, the lawsuit claims that by asking Obeng to cut his hair, In-N-Out has violated the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natural Hair). The California law stops employers from discriminating on the basis of an employee's hairstyle or hair texture.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Study shows how far a $100K salary stretches in US cities
A six-figure salary was once considered the benchmark of a comfortable lifestyle, but new research suggests it depends exactly where you live. A report by GoBankingRates analyzed how far a $100,000 annual wage would stretch in America's 50 biggest cities. It found that while workers could save $40,000 a year in Memphis, Tennessee , they would be left $6,209 in debt in New York. Researchers assessed taxes and living costs in each city then worked out how much money an individual would have after these expenses. While New York came out as the most expensive city, it was followed by San Francisco where a $100,000 salary would leave workers $1,342 in debt. It was followed by San Antonio, Tulsa and Oklahoma City where the income after expenses topped $37,081, $35,696 and $35,609 respectively. The findings lay bare just how widely the cost of living varies in America as households across the board grapple with the soaring price of groceries, homeownership and utilities. Living costs have been pushed up predominantly by inflation which peaked at 9.1 percent in June 2022. Figures from December show the annual rate of inflation was hovering at 3.4 percent. In a bid to tame inflation, the Federal Reserve embarked on a campaign to hike rates to their current 44-year high of between 5.25 and 5.5 percent. In theory, higher interest rates are intended to curb consumer spending and in turn bring inflation down. But such rates have a knock-on effect on loans such as credit cards and mortgages. The average 30-year mortgage rate peaked at nearly 8 percent last year before falling to their current rate of 6.69 percent, according to data from Government-backed lender Freddie Mac. It is little wonder then that households are struggling. Earlier this month a report found the number of people falling behind on their credit card bills increased in 49 out of 50 states last year. According to analysis by WalletHub , the number of borrowers struggling to keep on track of their credit card bills has risen the fastest in Oregon. Between September 2022 and September 2023, delinquencies in the state soared by 51 percent. Generally payments are reported to the credit bureaus as delinquent once they are 30 days past due. Being delinquent on a credit card is damaging for your credit score and late payments remain on your credit report for seven years, experts warn. 'When you are delinquent on credit card debt, it is important to make a game plan to get your account current as soon as possible, as long-term delinquency can lead to severe credit score damage,' said WalletHub editor John Kiernan. 'If you're late on your payment by fewer than 30 days, paying before the 30th day will keep your delinquency from being reported to the credit bureaus.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Why soaring car prices that are crippling Americans are YOUR fault... and what you can do to stop them
Americans are paying too much for their cars — and one industry insider says consumers deserve blame. In late May, the average price for a fresh-out-of-the-factory car was $49,000. That figure saddled the average new car buyer with monthly payments over $700.